A Clinical Study of a Fully Implanted, Wireless and Functional BCI for Upper-Limb Functional Replacement in Tetraplegia Due to Spinal Cord Injury: Efficacy and Safety ("Triple-F" BCI)
2026年7月17日 更新者:NeuroXess Technology (shanghai) Co.,Ltd.
A Prospective, Multicenter, Single-Arm Target Value Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Implantable Brain-Computer Interface Hand Motor Function Compensation System for Upper-Limb Functional Replacement in Tetraplegic Patients With Spinal Cord Injury
This prospective, multicenter, single-arm clinical trial will enroll subjects with tetraplegia secondary to spinal cord injury.
An implantable brain-computer interface system for compensatory hand motor function will be used to reconstruct upper-limb function, so as to evaluate the safety and clinical efficacy of this device in achieving upper-limb functional replacement.
研究概览
详细说明
This trial adopts a prospective, multicenter, single-arm target value study design.
All enrolled subjects will receive implantation of an implantable brain-computer interface system for compensatory hand motor function, followed by standardized brain-computer training (including brain-controlled pneumatic gloves). Follow-up assessments will be conducted at 1, 2, 3 and 6 months after implantation to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the investigational medical device for upper-limb functional replacement in patients with tetraplegia caused by spinal cord injury.
研究类型
介入性
注册 (估计的)
32
阶段
- 不适用
联系人和位置
本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。
学习联系方式
- 姓名:Ying Mao, MD
- 电话号码:+86 021 5288 8045
- 邮箱:maoying@fudan.edu.cn
研究联系人备份
- 姓名:Liang Chen, MD
- 邮箱:hschenliang@fudan.edu.cn
学习地点
-
-
Shanghai Municipality
-
Shanghai、Shanghai Municipality、中国、200040
- 招聘中
- Huashan Hospital
-
-
参与标准
研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
- 成人
- 年长者
接受健康志愿者
不
描述
Inclusion Criteria:
- 18 years ≤ age ≤ 65 years, male or female;
- Cervical spinal cord injury (injury level C2-C6), with ASIA Impairment Scale grade A, B, or C;
- Severe impairment of hand function on the target upper extremity: finger flexor muscle strength < grade 3 as assessed by the ISNCSCI scale;
- ARAT score ≥ 2 for "hand to mouth"; score ≥ 1 for both "hand to top of head" and "hand to back of head"; and scores ≤ 1 for each of the grasp, grip, and pinch tasks;
- Neurological assessment confirms normal motor-related cortical function of the brain, with no acute cerebral functional changes;
- At least 12 months have elapsed since the cervical spinal cord injury resulting in tetraplegia, and the condition has been stable for at least 6 months following standardized treatment (with documentation of rehabilitation therapy records available);
- Good cognitive function: Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score ≥ 22 and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score ≥ 26 ;
- Possess the basic visual, auditory, and language comprehension abilities required for interaction, and be able to cooperate with training;
- The subject voluntarily participates and is willing to comply with the relevant examinations and follow-up visits.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Neurodegenerative diseases / secondary injury due to tumors, or severe autonomic dysreflexia;
- Presence of intracranial lesions or contraindications to intracranial implantation: active epilepsy or definite epileptogenic tendency; severe cerebrovascular disease; brain tumor; moderate-to-severe sequelae of traumatic brain injury; space-occupying lesions or structural abnormalities at the electrode implantation target area; already implanted with active implantable electronic devices such as cardiac pacemakers/defibrillators, cochlear implants, deep brain stimulators, or drug infusion pumps, or presence of local metal foreign bodies/implants in the area to be implanted; or other contraindications to intracranial implantation as assessed by the investigator;
- Malignancies in other organ systems;
- Cardiovascular system diseases: severe cardiac insufficiency, severe arrhythmias, or uncontrolled hypertension;
- Other ongoing medical interventions that may affect the benefit from BCI intervention (e.g., dependence on ventilator support, tracheostomy, nasogastric tube feeding, etc.);
- Presence of psychiatric or psychological disorders that may interfere with the subject's participation in BCI training, such as depression (HAMD ≥ 18 points) or anxiety disorder (HAMA ≥ 14 points) ;
- Presence of active infection; severe coagulation abnormalities (activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) or prothrombin time (PT) > 2.5 × upper limit of normal); or other severe systemic diseases that, as assessed by the investigator, may significantly increase surgical risk or interfere with neurological function assessment or system use;
- Contraindications to surgery or anesthesia, or deemed unsuitable for implantation surgery by anesthesiology/surgical assessment;
- Fever, or vital signs and/or intracranial status not yet stabilized;
- Upper-limb motor dysfunction due to other etiologies, such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, syringomyelia, spinal vascular diseases, muscular dystrophy, hypokalemic periodic paralysis, spondylitis, arthritis, osteomyelitis, peripheral nerve injury, tendon rupture, etc.;
- Planned MRI examination during the device implantation period;
- Life expectancy < 6 months (e.g., severe end-stage diseases);
- Participation in other drug or medical device clinical trials within the past 1 month;
- Pregnant or breastfeeding women;
- Other conditions that, in the investigator's judgment, make the subject unsuitable for participation in this clinical trial.
学习计划
本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。
研究是如何设计的?
设计细节
- 主要用途:其他
- 分配:不适用
- 介入模型:单组作业
- 屏蔽:无(打开标签)
武器和干预
参与者组/臂 |
干预/治疗 |
|---|---|
|
实验性的:"Triple-F" BCI
Experimental: Implantation of the "Triple-F" BCI
|
Subjects will undergo implantation of the "Triple-F" BCI and receive standardized brain-computer interface training postoperatively, including training with brain-controlled pneumatic gloves.
Follow-up visits will be scheduled at 1, 2, 3 and 6 months after implantation.
其他名称:
|
研究衡量的是什么?
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
BCI-assisted ARAT response rate (at 3 months postoperatively)
大体时间:3 months post-operation
|
The proportion of subjects whose BCI-assisted ARAT score at 3 months postoperatively minus the baseline unassisted ARAT score at screening is ≥ the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID).
|
3 months post-operation
|
次要结果测量
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
The ARAT score assessed with BCI assistance
大体时间:2, 3, and 6 months post-operation
|
The subject, wearing the pneumatic glove paired with the BCI system, performs the four ARAT subscales (grasp, grip, pinch, and gross motor) sequentially per standard procedures, with each subscale score and the total ARAT score recorded.The unabridged scoring sheet is titled the "Action Research Arm Test Scoring Sheet" .
It yields a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 57 per arm (19 items scored 0-3 each), with higher scores indicating better outcomes, that is, better arm motor status.
|
2, 3, and 6 months post-operation
|
|
ARAT score assessed without BCI assistance
大体时间:baseline, 3 and 6 months post-operation
|
The subject completes the assessment in accordance with the standard ARAT operating procedures without using the BCI-actuated pneumatic glove.The unabridged scoring sheet is titled the "Action Research Arm Test Scoring Sheet" .
It yields a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 57 per arm (19 items scored 0-3 each), with higher scores indicating better outcomes, that is, better arm motor status.
|
baseline, 3 and 6 months post-operation
|
|
Task completion rate of five common hand-movement brain-control tasks
大体时间:baseline,2,3 and 6 months post-operation
|
baseline,2,3 and 6 months post-operation
|
|
|
Success rate for six-direction target selection under brain control
大体时间:3 and 6 months post-operation
|
3 and 6 months post-operation
|
|
|
Change from baseline in Activities of Daily Living (ADL) score as measured by the Barthel Index
大体时间:baseline,2, 3 and 6 months post-operation
|
The Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Scale, commonly known as the Barthel Index, is scored using its original, unabridged form titled the "Barthel Index" , which comprises 10 items covering basic self-care and mobility, yielding a minimum total score of 0 (complete dependence) and a maximum of 100, with higher scores indicating better outcomes-that is, greater independence in activities of daily living.
|
baseline,2, 3 and 6 months post-operation
|
|
Change from baseline in the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) score
大体时间:baseline, 2,3 and 6 months post-operation
|
ISNCSCI are recorded on its standard worksheet titled the "International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury" (ASIA/ISNCSCI worksheet), in which sensory function is scored separately for light touch and pin prick (each ranging from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 112 across 28 dermatomes bilaterally) and motor function is scored across 10 key muscle groups per side (yielding a total motor score from 0 to 100, with upper- and lower-extremity subscores of 0-50 each), with higher scores indicating better outcomes-that is, less neurological impairment after spinal cord injury.
|
baseline, 2,3 and 6 months post-operation
|
|
Reliability of the device
大体时间:day of implantation,1,2,3 and6 months post-operation
|
Under standardized conditions (with the subject at rest and room temperature ), the number of well-functioning channels of the implanted device is evaluated and recorded, together with the mean, median, minimum, and maximum impedance of the well-functioning channels and their trends over time.
Impedance trends over time are presented as line graphs.
Channels with an impedance not exceeding 1 MΩ are classified as well-functioning.
|
day of implantation,1,2,3 and6 months post-operation
|
|
Investigator-evaluated device operability performance
大体时间:3 and 6 months post-operation
|
At the scheduled visits, the operating investigator rates the following performance items of the BCI compensation system using a pre-designed device performance evaluation form, graded on a four-level scale (excellent/good/fair/poor): signal acquisition stability, defined as the reliability and consistency of electrode signal recording; decoding response speed, defined as the latency from the generation of motor intention to the initiation of pneumatic glove movement; pneumatic glove output accuracy, defined as the degree of concordance between the movements actually performed by the glove and the decoded intentions; overall system stability, defined as the failure rate and system reliability during long-term use; wearing comfort and convenience, defined as the ease of donning the pneumatic glove and the subject's comfort while wearing it; and overall operational convenience, defined as the complexity of routine system operation and its user-friendliness.
|
3 and 6 months post-operation
|
|
Subject-reported evaluation of device use
大体时间:3 and 6 months post-operation
|
Assessment method: A subject device-use satisfaction questionnaire is administered; at the scheduled visits, the investigator reads each questionnaire item aloud to the subject, the subject responds verbally, and the investigator records the answers verbatim .
The investigator must not guide or suggest the subject's answers in any way, and upon completion must confirm with the subject that the recorded responses are consistent with his or her own opinions.
The questionnaire covers the following dimensions, each scored on a 5-point Likert scale with the following criteria: 5 = very satisfied / very easy, 4 = satisfied / relatively easy, 3 = neutral / neutral, 2 = dissatisfied / relatively difficult, 1 = very dissatisfied / very difficult.
The dimensions include: wearing comfort, defined as the comfort of wearing the pneumatic glove in daily use; donning and doffing convenience, defined as the ease of putting on and taking off the pneumatic glove independent.
|
3 and 6 months post-operation
|
|
Average time of device use per month
大体时间:3 and 6 months post-operation
|
3 and 6 months post-operation
|
合作者和调查者
在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。
研究记录日期
这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。
研究主要日期
学习开始 (实际的)
2026年7月7日
初级完成 (估计的)
2027年1月30日
研究完成 (估计的)
2027年4月30日
研究注册日期
首次提交
2026年7月7日
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
2026年7月17日
首次发布 (实际的)
2026年7月22日
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (实际的)
2026年7月22日
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
2026年7月17日
最后验证
2026年7月1日
更多信息
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.