Evaluation of State-Level Sexual and Gender Minority Laws for the Primary Prevention of Sexual and Intimate Partner Violence Among Sexual and Gender Minority Youth in the U.S. (YAP)
The goal of this observational study is to learn how state-level laws related to sexual and gender minority (SGM) youth affect the risk of sexual violence (SV) and intimate partner violence (IPV) among sexual minority (SM) youth in the United States. The study looks at both supportive laws (such as bans on conversion therapy and anti-bullying protections) and restrictive laws (such as limits on gender-affirming care) passed between 2017 and 2025. The main questions it aims to answer are:
Part 1:
- Do supportive SGM laws lower the risk of SV/IPV among SM youth?
- Do restrictive SGM laws raise the risk of SV/IPV among SM youth?
- Does the social climate in a state (such as levels of stigma toward SGM people) change how these laws affect SM youth?
Part 2:
-How do SGM youth themselves describe the ways that laws and social climates affect their safety and wellbeing?
Part 1 - Quantitative analysis: Researchers will use existing, publicly available survey data from the Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System (YRBSS) to compare changes in SV/IPV risk among SM youth across states that adopted different types of SGM laws over the period of 2017-2025. No participants are enrolled for this part.
Part 2 - Qualitative interviews: Researchers will conduct one-on-one interviews with approximately 30 SGM youth ages 13-18 living across U.S. states with varying levels of adoption of supportive SGM laws. Each youth will take part in one 60-minute interview. Youth will be asked about their views on how laws and social climates affect safety, stigma, and access to resources. Youth will not be asked to share personal experiences of violence.
研究概览
地位
条件
详细说明
Quantitative Component (Aims 1-2):
SM youth are identified using the YRBSS sexual identity item, which asks respondents "Which of the following best describes you?" Respondents indicating gay, lesbian, bisexual, describing their sexual identity some other way, or questioning are categorized as SM. Respondents indicating heterosexual (straight) are categorized as non-SM.
Primary outcomes are three individual-level YRBSS items measuring past 12-month sexual violence (SV) victimization and past 12-month intimate partner violence (IPV) victimization (physical and sexual).
Policy exposures are constructed as state-level binary indicators (present versus absent) for three types of SGM laws: gender-affirming care laws, conversion therapy bans, and enumerated identity-based anti-bullying laws. Exposure data are drawn from legal epidemiology datasets available through LawAtlas.org for years 2016, 2018, 2020, 2022, and 2024 with a one-year lag between exposure measurement and outcome assessment to ensure policies are implemented before outcome measurement. Outcome data are drawn from YRBSS survey including 29 states for the years 2017, 2019, 2021, 2023, 2025 representing 98 state-years with a total sample of approximately 357,040 youth.
Aim 1 employs a difference-in-differences (DiD) approach in a quasi-experimental framework using mixed effects DiD Poisson models to estimate the effect of SGM law adoption on SV/IPV risk among SM youth. Separate models are estimated for each law type and each outcome. Time-varying state-level covariates include population size, percentage below poverty line, and state-level demographic composition of race/ethnicity and age. Sensitivity analyses include Goodman-Bacon decomposition, doubly robust estimators, and imputation-based estimators to address potential treatment effect heterogeneity across adoption timing. Parallel pre-trends are assessed using lag and lead models with bounds adjusted for any non-parallel pre-trends. Exploratory analyses examine effects among specific racial/ethnic SM youth subgroups (Black, Hispanic/Latino, Native American/Alaska Native, and mixed race SM youth), reporting point estimates with 95 percent confidence intervals without formal hypothesis testing to provide directional evidence.
Aim 2 builds on the Aim 1 models by adding an interaction term between state-level SGM law adoption and social climate to test whether policy effects on SV/IPV risk differ based on state-level stigma toward SGM populations. Social climate is measured using publicly available survey data from the Public Religion Research Institute (PRRI) American Values Atlas collected from a nationally representative sample of approximately 22,000 adults annually from all 50 states 2016-2024. Respondents are asked the degree to which they favor allowing same-sex couples to marry legally, with responses dichotomized as favorable or unfavorable and summarized as the proportion with favorable attitudes at the state level (continuous). State-level estimates are derived using a multilevel regression and poststratification (MRP) approach with maximum likelihood modeling and poststratification based on demographics and state characteristics from the American Community Survey. Using model output, relative risks are calculated for meaningful cut-offs in SM social climate (for example, quartiles) using average marginal effects.
Qualitative Component (Aim 3):
Aim 3 participants are purposively sampled from states representing three strata of SGM-affirming policy adoption: high, medium, and low, with up to 10 youth per stratum. Within each stratum, constructed sampling quotas aim to include approximately 4 cisgender boys, 4 cisgender girls, and 2 transgender or nonbinary youth, and to ensure that at least half of participants identify as a racial or ethnic minority. This approach supports exploration of intersectional mechanisms and addresses known limitations of surveillance data in capturing diverse SGM youth experiences. Qualitative data are analyzed using thematic analysis to identify mechanisms through which state-level policies and social climates may affect SV/IPV risk among SGM youth. These findings contextualize and interpret the population-level quantitative results from Aims 1 and 2.
研究类型
注册 (估计的)
联系人和位置
学习联系方式
- 姓名：Sabrina C Boyce, PhD
- 电话号码：916-709-1123
- 邮箱：boyce.sabrina@berkeley.edu
研究联系人备份
- 姓名：Ricardo B Vera Monroy, MS
- 电话号码：619-277-8303
- 邮箱：rveramonroy@berkeley.edu
学习地点
-
-
California
-
Berkeley、California、美国、94710-1754
- University of California, Berkeley
-
接触：
- Sabrina C Boyce, PhD
- 电话号码：916-709-1123
- 邮箱：boyce.sabrina@berkeley.edu
-
接触：
- Ricardo B Vera Monroy, MS
- 电话号码：619-277-8303
- 邮箱：rveramonroy@berkeley.edu
-
首席研究员：
- Sabrina C Boyce, PhD
-
-
参与标准
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
- 孩子
- 成人
接受健康志愿者
取样方法
研究人群
描述
Inclusion Criteria:
- Ages 13-18 years
- Resides in a U.S. state selected for the study
- Self-identifies as a sexual and/or gender minority (for example, lesbian, gay, bisexual, pansexual, queer, questioning, asexual, nonbinary, transgender, or another non-heterosexual or non-cisgender identity)
- Able to complete the interview in English
- Sufficient literacy to review age-appropriate assent materials
Exclusion Criteria: No additional exclusion criteria beyond not meeting inclusion criteria
学习计划
研究是如何设计的？
设计细节
队列和干预
团体/队列 |
干预/治疗 |
|---|---|
|
YRBSS state-representative cohort 2017
First year of primary analytic population for quantitative analyses examining the effect of state-level SGM law adoption on SV/IPV risk (Aims 1-2).
|
The interventions in this study are being studied as a natural experiment and are not assigned or implemented by the study. In any given cohort year, some states are exposed to the legislation of interest and others are not, as assessed using data from LawAtlas.org and categorized by the research team. Enumerated anti-bullying state legislation is state-level legislation that prohibits bullying in educational settings and that explicitly includes sexual orientation and gender identity as protected classes. The interventions in this study are being studied as a natural experiment and are not assigned or implemented by the study. In any given cohort year, some states are exposed to the legislation of interest and others are not, as assessed using data from LawAtlas.org and categorized by the research team. Conversion therapy state legislation is state-level legislation that prohibits the practice of conversion therapy, a practice that attempts to change a person/client's sexual orientation or gender identity to conform to prevailing cisgender and/or heterosexual norms. The interventions in this study are being studied as a natural experiment and are not assigned or implemented by the study. In any given cohort year, some states are exposed to the legislation of interest and others are not, as assessed using data from LawAtlas.org and categorized by the research team. Gender-affirming care state legislation is state-level legislation regarding the use of healthcare tailored to support the patient's gender identity (may prohibit or protect the right to use this type of healthcare) |
|
YRBSS state-representative cohort 2019
Second year of primary analytic population for quantitative analyses examining the effect of state-level SGM law adoption on SV/IPV risk (Aims 1-2).
|
The interventions in this study are being studied as a natural experiment and are not assigned or implemented by the study. In any given cohort year, some states are exposed to the legislation of interest and others are not, as assessed using data from LawAtlas.org and categorized by the research team. Enumerated anti-bullying state legislation is state-level legislation that prohibits bullying in educational settings and that explicitly includes sexual orientation and gender identity as protected classes. The interventions in this study are being studied as a natural experiment and are not assigned or implemented by the study. In any given cohort year, some states are exposed to the legislation of interest and others are not, as assessed using data from LawAtlas.org and categorized by the research team. Conversion therapy state legislation is state-level legislation that prohibits the practice of conversion therapy, a practice that attempts to change a person/client's sexual orientation or gender identity to conform to prevailing cisgender and/or heterosexual norms. The interventions in this study are being studied as a natural experiment and are not assigned or implemented by the study. In any given cohort year, some states are exposed to the legislation of interest and others are not, as assessed using data from LawAtlas.org and categorized by the research team. Gender-affirming care state legislation is state-level legislation regarding the use of healthcare tailored to support the patient's gender identity (may prohibit or protect the right to use this type of healthcare) |
|
SGM Youth Interview Participants
Sexual and gender minority youth ages 13-18 enrolled for one-on-one qualitative interviews exploring perceptions of how state-level policies and social climates affect safety, stigma, and access to resources (Aim 3).
|
The interventions in this study are being studied as a natural experiment and are not assigned or implemented by the study. In any given cohort year, some states are exposed to the legislation of interest and others are not, as assessed using data from LawAtlas.org and categorized by the research team. Enumerated anti-bullying state legislation is state-level legislation that prohibits bullying in educational settings and that explicitly includes sexual orientation and gender identity as protected classes. The interventions in this study are being studied as a natural experiment and are not assigned or implemented by the study. In any given cohort year, some states are exposed to the legislation of interest and others are not, as assessed using data from LawAtlas.org and categorized by the research team. Conversion therapy state legislation is state-level legislation that prohibits the practice of conversion therapy, a practice that attempts to change a person/client's sexual orientation or gender identity to conform to prevailing cisgender and/or heterosexual norms. The interventions in this study are being studied as a natural experiment and are not assigned or implemented by the study. In any given cohort year, some states are exposed to the legislation of interest and others are not, as assessed using data from LawAtlas.org and categorized by the research team. Gender-affirming care state legislation is state-level legislation regarding the use of healthcare tailored to support the patient's gender identity (may prohibit or protect the right to use this type of healthcare) |
|
YRBSS state-representative cohort 2021
Third year of primary analytic population for quantitative analyses examining the effect of state-level SGM law adoption on SV/IPV risk (Aims 1-2).
|
The interventions in this study are being studied as a natural experiment and are not assigned or implemented by the study. In any given cohort year, some states are exposed to the legislation of interest and others are not, as assessed using data from LawAtlas.org and categorized by the research team. Enumerated anti-bullying state legislation is state-level legislation that prohibits bullying in educational settings and that explicitly includes sexual orientation and gender identity as protected classes. The interventions in this study are being studied as a natural experiment and are not assigned or implemented by the study. In any given cohort year, some states are exposed to the legislation of interest and others are not, as assessed using data from LawAtlas.org and categorized by the research team. Conversion therapy state legislation is state-level legislation that prohibits the practice of conversion therapy, a practice that attempts to change a person/client's sexual orientation or gender identity to conform to prevailing cisgender and/or heterosexual norms. The interventions in this study are being studied as a natural experiment and are not assigned or implemented by the study. In any given cohort year, some states are exposed to the legislation of interest and others are not, as assessed using data from LawAtlas.org and categorized by the research team. Gender-affirming care state legislation is state-level legislation regarding the use of healthcare tailored to support the patient's gender identity (may prohibit or protect the right to use this type of healthcare) |
|
YRBSS state-representative cohort 2023
Fourth year of primary analytic population for quantitative analyses examining the effect of state-level SGM law adoption on SV/IPV risk (Aims 1-2).
|
The interventions in this study are being studied as a natural experiment and are not assigned or implemented by the study. In any given cohort year, some states are exposed to the legislation of interest and others are not, as assessed using data from LawAtlas.org and categorized by the research team. Enumerated anti-bullying state legislation is state-level legislation that prohibits bullying in educational settings and that explicitly includes sexual orientation and gender identity as protected classes. The interventions in this study are being studied as a natural experiment and are not assigned or implemented by the study. In any given cohort year, some states are exposed to the legislation of interest and others are not, as assessed using data from LawAtlas.org and categorized by the research team. Conversion therapy state legislation is state-level legislation that prohibits the practice of conversion therapy, a practice that attempts to change a person/client's sexual orientation or gender identity to conform to prevailing cisgender and/or heterosexual norms. The interventions in this study are being studied as a natural experiment and are not assigned or implemented by the study. In any given cohort year, some states are exposed to the legislation of interest and others are not, as assessed using data from LawAtlas.org and categorized by the research team. Gender-affirming care state legislation is state-level legislation regarding the use of healthcare tailored to support the patient's gender identity (may prohibit or protect the right to use this type of healthcare) |
|
YRBSS state-representative cohort 2025
Fifth year of primary analytic population for quantitative analyses examining the effect of state-level SGM law adoption on SV/IPV risk (Aims 1-2).
|
The interventions in this study are being studied as a natural experiment and are not assigned or implemented by the study. In any given cohort year, some states are exposed to the legislation of interest and others are not, as assessed using data from LawAtlas.org and categorized by the research team. Enumerated anti-bullying state legislation is state-level legislation that prohibits bullying in educational settings and that explicitly includes sexual orientation and gender identity as protected classes. The interventions in this study are being studied as a natural experiment and are not assigned or implemented by the study. In any given cohort year, some states are exposed to the legislation of interest and others are not, as assessed using data from LawAtlas.org and categorized by the research team. Conversion therapy state legislation is state-level legislation that prohibits the practice of conversion therapy, a practice that attempts to change a person/client's sexual orientation or gender identity to conform to prevailing cisgender and/or heterosexual norms. The interventions in this study are being studied as a natural experiment and are not assigned or implemented by the study. In any given cohort year, some states are exposed to the legislation of interest and others are not, as assessed using data from LawAtlas.org and categorized by the research team. Gender-affirming care state legislation is state-level legislation regarding the use of healthcare tailored to support the patient's gender identity (may prohibit or protect the right to use this type of healthcare) |
研究衡量的是什么？
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Past 12-Month Sexual Violence Victimization
大体时间：Past 12 months at each biennial YRBSS survey administration (repeated cross-sectional assessments from 2017 to 2025)
|
Binary self-reported YRBSS item indicating sexual violence victimization in the past 12 months.
Risk ratios estimated comparing states with and without specific SGM laws.
|
Past 12 months at each biennial YRBSS survey administration (repeated cross-sectional assessments from 2017 to 2025)
|
|
Past 12-Month Intimate Partner Violence Victimization
大体时间：Past 12 months at each biennial YRBSS survey administration (repeated cross-sectional assessments from 2017 to 2025)
|
Binary composite of two self-reported YRBSS items indicating physical dating violence or sexual dating violence in the past 12 months, coded as victimization if either item is endorsed.
Risk ratios estimated comparing states with and without specific SGM laws.
|
Past 12 months at each biennial YRBSS survey administration (repeated cross-sectional assessments from 2017 to 2025)
|
次要结果测量
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Past 12-months Suicidality
大体时间：Past 12 months at each biennial YRBSS survey administration (repeated cross-sectional assessments from 2017 to 2025)
|
Binary composite of three self-reported YRBSS items indicating suicidality in the past 12 months (serious consideration of attempting suicide, planning, and attempts).
Risk ratios estimated comparing states with and without specific SGM laws.
|
Past 12 months at each biennial YRBSS survey administration (repeated cross-sectional assessments from 2017 to 2025)
|
|
Past 12-month Bullying
大体时间：Past 12 months at each biennial YRBSS survey administration (repeated cross-sectional assessments from 2017 to 2025)
|
Binary composite of two self-reported YRBSS items indicating in-person or electronic bullying victimization in the past 12 months.
Risk ratios estimated comparing states with and without specific SGM laws.
|
Past 12 months at each biennial YRBSS survey administration (repeated cross-sectional assessments from 2017 to 2025)
|
其他结果措施
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Past 12-Month SV/IPV Victimization Among Racial/Ethnic Minority SM Youth Subgroups
大体时间：Past 12 months at each biennial YRBSS survey administration (repeated cross-sectional assessments from 2017 to 2025)
|
Exploratory analyses estimating risk ratios for effects of SGM law adoption on past 12-month SV and IPV among specific racial/ethnic SM youth subgroups (Black, Hispanic/Latino, Native American/Alaska Native, and mixed race).
Point estimates reported with 95 percent confidence intervals without formal hypothesis testing to provide directional evidence
|
Past 12 months at each biennial YRBSS survey administration (repeated cross-sectional assessments from 2017 to 2025)
|
|
Youth-Reported Perceptions of How State-Level Sexual and Gender Minority (SGM) Policies and Social Climates Affect Safety, Stigma, and Access to Resources
大体时间：During a single 60-minute interview session at enrollment
|
Memos and qualitative themes identified through thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews with SGM youth exploring how state-level policies and social climates shape perceived safety, experiences of stigma, and access to supportive resources
|
During a single 60-minute interview session at enrollment
|
合作者和调查者
调查人员
- 首席研究员：Sabrina C Boyce, PhD、University of California, Berkeley
研究记录日期
研究主要日期
学习开始 (估计的)
初级完成 (估计的)
研究完成 (估计的)
研究注册日期
首次提交
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
首次发布 (实际的)
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (实际的)
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
最后验证
更多信息
与本研究相关的术语
关键字
其他研究编号
- 2026-01-19304
- U01CE003753 (美国 NIH 拨款/合同)
计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)
计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)？
IPD 计划说明
药物和器械信息、研究文件
研究美国 FDA 监管的药品
研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索，没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求，请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改，我们的网站上也会自动更新.