Effects of Functional Training vs Dual-Task Training in School-Going Children
2026年8月10日 更新者：Riphah International University
Effects of Progressive Functional Training Versus Dual-Task Performance in School-Going Children
This study aims to compare the effects of Progressive Functional Training and Dual-Task Training on motor skills in school-going children.
It focuses on improving balance, coordination, strength, and motor-cognitive integration.
A randomized clinical trial will be conducted on children aged 6-12 years divided into two groups receiving different interventions for 4 weeks.
研究概览
详细说明
Motor skill development during childhood plays a vital role in physical fitness, academic participation, and overall functional independence.
School-going children require adequate motor competence to perform daily activities, participate in sports, and adapt to increasingly complex physical and cognitive demands.
Traditional physical education programs often focus on isolated physical skills, which may not fully address real-life multitasking requirements.
Progressive functional training (PFT) emphasizes task-oriented, developmentally appropriate movements that mimic daily activities and progressively increase in difficulty.
This approach helps improve fundamental motor skills, balance, coordination, and strength.
In contrast, dual-task training (DTT) involves the simultaneous performance of motor and cognitive tasks, thereby enhancing motor performance under divided attention and improving motor-cognitive integration.
Although both training methods have shown positive effects on motor skills, limited evidence exists comparing their effectiveness in school-going children.
Therefore, this study aims to compare the effects of progressive functional training versus dual-task training on motor skills in school-going children.
This study will adopt a randomized clinical design.
A total of 66 school-going children aged 6-12 years will be selected based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Participants will be randomly allocated into two groups: Group A (Progressive Functional Training) and Group B (Dual-Task Training).
Baseline assessments of motor skills will be conducted using standardized tools such Bruin inks- as the Ossietzky Test of Motor Proficiency (BOT-2), Pediatric Balance Scale, and Dual-Task Timed Up and Go Test.
Group A will undergo progressive functional training focusing on balance, coordination, strength, and functional movement patterns.
Group B will receive dual-task training involving motor activities combined with cognitive tasks.
Both groups will receive training for 4 weeks, with sessions conducted 3 times per week.
Post-intervention assessments will be performed using the same outcome measures.
The collected data will be statistically analyzed to compare pre- and post test outcomes within and between groups.
研究类型
介入性
注册 (实际的)
66
阶段
- 不适用
联系人和位置
本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息，以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。
学习地点
-
-
Punjab Province
-
Lahore、Punjab Province、巴基斯坦、54660
- Riphah International University
-
-
参与标准
研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人，称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
- 孩子
接受健康志愿者
是的
描述
Inclusion Criteria:
- School going children aged 6-12 years ,
- Both gender ,Ability to understand and follow simple verbal instruction ,
- Typically developing children
Exclusion Criteria:
- Visual or hearing issue ,
- Recent injury or surgeries
学习计划
本节提供研究计划的详细信息，包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。
研究是如何设计的？
设计细节
- 主要用途：治疗
- 分配：随机化
- 介入模型：并行分配
- 屏蔽：无（打开标签）
武器和干预
参与者组/臂 |
干预/治疗 |
|---|---|
|
实验性的：Progressive Functional Training Group
This program involves task-oriented exercises such as sit-to-stand, step-ups, reaching, jumping, and obstacle walking, with progressive increases in difficulty, speed, and resistance.
It is performed for 30-40 minutes per session, three times per week for six weeks, including a 5-7 minute warm-up, 30 minutes of functional training, and a 5-8 minute cool-down.
Training progresses from low-intensity activities in weeks 1-2 (e.g., sit-to-stand, walking, low step-ups, ball activities, and static balance) to moderate intensity in weeks 3-4 (e.g., squats with reach, tandem and obstacle walking, ball tasks, and dynamic balance), and high intensity in weeks 5-6 (e.g., lunges, jumping, agility drills, direction changes, and advanced balance tasks).
|
This program involves task-oriented exercises such as sit-to-stand, step-ups, reaching, jumping, and obstacle walking, with progressive increases in difficulty, speed, and resistance.
It is performed for 30-40 minutes per session, three times per week for six weeks, including a 5-7 minute warm-up, 30 minutes of functional training, and a 5-8 minute cool-down.
Training progresses from low-intensity activities in weeks 1-2 (e.g., sit-to-stand, walking, low step-ups, ball activities, and static balance) to moderate intensity in weeks 3-4 (e.g., squats with reach, tandem and obstacle walking, ball tasks, and dynamic balance), and high intensity in weeks 5-6 (e.g., lunges, jumping, agility drills, direction changes, and advanced balance tasks).
|
|
有源比较器：Dual Task Performance Group
This program combines motor and cognitive tasks, such as walking while counting, balance with memory recall, and ball activities with verbal tasks, with gradually increasing cognitive complexity.
It is performed for 30-40 minutes per session, three times per week for six weeks, to improve dual-task performance, attention, and executive function.
Each session includes a 5-7 minute warm-up, followed by 30 minutes of dual-task training progressing from simple tasks (e.g., walking while counting forward, naming animals during balance) to moderate (e.g., counting backward, obstacle walking with naming tasks) and then complex activities (e.g., direction-change walking while counting by threes, hopping with verbal tasks, TUG with cognitive tasks).
Sessions end with a 5-8 minute cool-down of relaxed walking, stretching, and breathing exercises.
|
This program combines motor and cognitive tasks, such as walking while counting, balance with memory recall, and ball activities with verbal tasks, with gradually increasing cognitive complexity.
It is performed for 30-40 minutes per session, three times per week for six weeks, to improve dual-task performance, attention, and executive function.
Each session includes a 5-7 minute warm-up, followed by 30 minutes of dual-task training progressing from simple tasks (e.g., walking while counting forward, naming animals during balance) to moderate (e.g., counting backward, obstacle walking with naming tasks) and then complex activities (e.g., direction-change walking while counting by threes, hopping with verbal tasks, TUG with cognitive tasks).
Sessions end with a 5-8 minute cool-down of relaxed walking, stretching, and breathing exercises.
|
研究衡量的是什么？
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency
大体时间：The BOT-2 Short Form was administered at baseline and after the 6-week intervention. Each assessment required approximately 15-20 minutes to complete.
|
Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency Used for composites and overall proficiency, ranging from a scale of 20 to 80 .
Assesses gross and fine motor skills Subtests include: Balance, running, speed and agility, Bilateral coordination, Strength Suitable for children aged 4-21 years, widely used, reliable, and valid for school aged children
|
The BOT-2 Short Form was administered at baseline and after the 6-week intervention. Each assessment required approximately 15-20 minutes to complete.
|
|
digit span test
大体时间：Time Frame: Assessed at baseline (Week 1) and after 6 weeks of intervention (Week 6).
|
This framework assesses fundamental motor skills in children aged 3-10, including locomotor skills (running, jumping, hopping) and object control skills (throwing, catching, kicking), commonly used in school-based interventions.
Cognitive dual-task performance is measured using the Digit Span Test (forward and backward) to assess attention and working memory during concurrent motor tasks, and the Verbal Fluency Test (animal naming) to evaluate executive function and cognitive flexibility, with outcomes based on correct recall sequences and number of words generated in 60 seconds.
|
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline (Week 1) and after 6 weeks of intervention (Week 6).
|
合作者和调查者
在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。
调查人员
- 首席研究员：Hafsa Aslam, MS-PT、Riphah International University
出版物和有用的链接
负责输入研究信息的人员自愿提供这些出版物。这些可能与研究有关。
研究记录日期
这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查，以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。
研究主要日期
学习开始 (实际的)
2026年4月16日
初级完成 (实际的)
2026年7月5日
研究完成 (实际的)
2026年7月10日
研究注册日期
首次提交
2026年5月5日
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
2026年8月10日
首次发布 (实际的)
2026年8月14日
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (实际的)
2026年8月14日
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
2026年8月10日
最后验证
2026年8月1日
更多信息
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索，没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求，请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改，我们的网站上也会自动更新.