此页面是自动翻译的，不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Breakthrough Platform Trial for PCAS (BPT-PCAS)

2026年8月12日 更新者：Yasuhiro Kuroda、Kagawa University

Breakthrough Platform Trial for Post Cardiac Arrest Syndrome

The goal of this platform clinical trial is to evaluate whether specific post-cardiac arrest care strategies can improve neurological recovery and survival in adult patients who remain comatose after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) following cardiac arrest and require intensive care management.

This multicenter cluster-randomized crossover platform trial (BPT-PCAS) evaluates post-cardiac arrest care strategies within a shared master protocol structure. Participating hospitals are randomized at the institutional level to predefined treatment strategies for fixed study periods and subsequently cross over to alternative strategies according to a predefined allocation schedule.

The platform is designed to accommodate multiple independent intervention domains, each evaluating a different post-cardiac arrest care strategy under shared eligibility criteria, infrastructure, data management systems, and follow-up procedures. Participants may be enrolled in one or more active intervention domains according to platform availability and eligibility.

Participants will receive the post-cardiac arrest care strategy assigned to their participating hospital during the study period while otherwise undergoing standard intensive care management according to local practice and study protocols.

Participants will be followed for neurological outcomes including modified Rankin Scale (mRS), mortality, and safety outcomes at hospital discharge, 30 days, and 90 days after hospital admission.

研究概览

地位

尚未招聘

条件

干预/治疗

详细说明

BPT-PCAS (Breakthrough Platform Trial for Post-Cardiac Arrest Syndrome) is a multicenter platform trial designed to evaluate whether early post-cardiac arrest care strategies can improve neurological recovery and survival in adult patients who remain comatose after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) following cardiac arrest and require intensive care management.

Despite advances in resuscitation and intensive care medicine, prognosis after post-cardiac arrest syndrome (PCAS) remains poor, particularly because of hypoxic-ischemic brain injury and systemic circulatory dysfunction. Many aspects of post-resuscitation intensive care management, including positioning strategies and targeted temperature management, are widely used in clinical practice but remain supported by limited high-quality randomized evidence, particularly during the ultra-early post-ROSC period.

BPT-PCAS is designed as a pragmatic multicenter cluster-randomized crossover platform trial conducted in Japan. Participating hospitals are randomized at the institutional level to predefined treatment strategies for fixed study periods. Hospitals subsequently cross over to alternative treatment strategies every 6 months according to a predefined allocation schedule. Randomization occurs at the hospital level rather than the individual patient level in order to facilitate immediate implementation of time-sensitive post-cardiac arrest interventions during emergency care.

The platform uses a master protocol structure with shared eligibility criteria, infrastructure, data management systems, and follow-up procedures across multiple intervention domains. Adult patients with persistent coma after ROSC who require intensive care are screened for eligibility under the master protocol. Individual domains may apply additional domain-specific inclusion and exclusion criteria.

The current platform includes multiple intervention domains evaluating different post-cardiac arrest care strategies.

One domain evaluates early head positioning strategies during intensive care management. This domain compares head elevation positioning (30°-45°) with near-supine positioning (0°-10°) initiated early after ICU admission in order to determine whether head positioning influences neurological recovery, mortality, and complications associated with cerebral perfusion, intracranial pressure, or respiratory management.

Another domain evaluates early targeted temperature management strategies in patients with non-shockable cardiac arrest rhythms. This domain compares early hypothermia (33-34°C) with normothermia (36-37.5°C) initiated as early as possible after ROSC in order to evaluate whether early temperature control improves neurological outcomes and survival.

Participants may simultaneously participate in more than one intervention domain when eligibility criteria are met. Aside from the assigned study interventions, all other intensive care management is performed according to local institutional practice and study protocols.

The primary and secondary outcomes differ according to each intervention domain and include neurological outcomes assessed using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS), mortality, and predefined safety outcomes. Follow-up assessments are performed during hospitalization and at 30 and 90 days after hospital admission.

Because eligible patients are critically ill and frequently incapable of providing prospective informed consent at the time of enrollment, this study permits deferred consent procedures in accordance with Japanese ethical guidelines for emergency research. Consent from legally acceptable representatives or patients themselves is obtained as soon as feasible after hospital admission whenever possible.

The study also includes predefined interim analyses and centralized data management using REDCap-based electronic data capture systems. Statistical analyses are performed using intention-to-treat principles with methods appropriate for cluster-randomized crossover trial designs.

研究类型

介入性

注册 (估计的)

630

阶段

  • 不适用

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息，以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习联系方式

学习地点

  • 日本
    • Chiba
      • Chiba、Chiba、日本、2610012
        • Chiba Kaihin Municipal Hospital
        • 接触：
    • Fukuoka
      • Iizuka、Fukuoka、日本、8208505
    • Hiroshima
      • Hiroshima、Hiroshima、日本、7348551
    • Hyōgo
      • Kobe、Hyōgo、日本、651-0073
        • Hyogo Emergency Medical Center
        • 接触：
    • Kagawa-ken
      • Kita-gun、Kagawa-ken、日本、761-0701
    • Kyoto
      • Kyoto、Kyoto、日本、6158256
        • Kyoto Katsura Hospital
        • 接触：
    • Miyagi
      • Sendai、Miyagi、日本、9838520
        • National Hospital Organization Sendai Medical Center
        • 接触：
    • Okayama-ken
      • Okayama、Okayama-ken、日本、7008558
    • Saitama
      • Asaka、Saitama、日本、3510023
    • Tokyo
      • Bunkyō-Ku、Tokyo、日本、113-8603
        • Nippon Medical School Hospital
        • 接触：
      • Musashino、Tokyo、日本、1800023
      • Sumida-ku、Tokyo、日本、1308575
        • Tokyo Metropolitan Bokutoh Hospital
        • 接触：

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人，称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

  • 成人
  • 年长者

接受健康志愿者

不

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

Master Platform Eligibility:

  • Adult patients aged 18 years or older
  • Return of spontaneous circulation after cardiac arrest
  • Persistent coma after return of spontaneous circulation (GCS motor score <6)
  • Requirement for intensive care management

Head Positioning Domain Eligibility:

  • Non-traumatic out-of-hospital or in-hospital cardiac arrest
  • Systolic blood pressure ≥80 mmHg or mean arterial pressure ≥65 mmHg (fluid resuscitation and vasopressor use permitted; transient hypotension recoverable within 20-30 minutes is acceptable)

Temperature Control Domain Eligibility:

  • Initial non-shockable cardiac arrest rhythm
  • Systolic blood pressure ≥80 mmHg or mean arterial pressure ≥65 mmHg (fluid resuscitation and vasopressor use permitted; transient hypotension recoverable within 20-30 minutes is acceptable)
  • Ability to initiate temperature control therapy within 240 minutes after return of spontaneous circulation

Exclusion Criteria:

Master Platform Exclusion:

  • Refusal of intensive care management
  • Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR)
  • Pregnancy or possible pregnancy
  • Cardiac arrest due to intracranial hemorrhage, subarachnoid hemorrhage, cerebral infarction, acute aortic dissection, or terminal cancer (including suspected cases)
  • Severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease requiring home oxygen therapy
  • Poor pre-arrest neurological function (CPC 3-4) or poor overall functional status (OPC 3-4)
  • Pre-existing do-not-attempt-resuscitation (DNAR) order
  • Expected early death
  • Inability to obtain consent from a legally acceptable representative or the participant
  • Enrollment judged inappropriate by the investigator

Head Positioning Domain Exclusion:

  • Body temperature <30°C on hospital arrival
  • Refusal of consent for participation in the head positioning domain
  • Enrollment judged inappropriate by the investigator
  • Patients using Impella® (a percutaneous mechanical circulatory support catheter) at the time of ICU admission
  • Patients using an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) at the time of ICU admission
  • Patients for whom feedback-controlled device-based temperature management or fever prevention is not being performed and is not planned at the time of ICU admission

Temperature Control Domain Exclusion:

  • rCAST <4.5
  • rCAST ≥17.0
  • Traumatic cardiac arrest
  • Body temperature <30°C on hospital arrival
  • Refusal of consent for participation in the temperature control domain
  • Enrollment judged inappropriate by the investigator

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息，包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的？

设计细节

  • 主要用途：治疗
  • 分配：随机化
  • 介入模型：交叉作业
  • 屏蔽：无（打开标签）

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
实验性的：Head Positioning Strategy (near-supine vs head elevation)
Participants receive institutionally assigned post-cardiac arrest head positioning strategies according to the cluster-randomized crossover platform protocol, including head elevation (30°-45°) or near-supine positioning (0°-10°).
程序：Head Positioning
Institution-level assignment to predefined head positioning strategies during post-cardiac arrest intensive care management, including head elevation (30°-45°) or near-supine positioning (0°-10°).
实验性的：Temperature Control Strategy (hypothermia vs normothermia)
Participants receive institutionally assigned post-cardiac arrest temperature control strategies according to the cluster-randomized crossover platform protocol, including targeted hypothermia (33-34°C) or normothermia/fever prevention strategies (36-37.5°C).
其他：Temperature Control
Institution-level assignment to predefined temperature control strategies during post-cardiac arrest intensive care management, including targeted hypothermia (33-34°C) or normothermia/fever prevention strategies (36-37.5°C).

研究衡量的是什么？

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Favorable neurological outcome (modified Rankin Scale ≤3) on Day 90 in the head positioning domain
大体时间：90 days after hospital admission
Comparison of Favorable neurological outcome (modified Rankin Scale ≤3) on Day 90 between institutionally assigned head positioning strategies in adult patients with post-cardiac arrest syndrome.
90 days after hospital admission
Favorable neurological outcome (modified Rankin Scale ≤3) on Day 90 in the temperature control domain
大体时间：90 days after hospital admission
Comparison of neurological outcomes between institutionally assigned temperature control strategies in adult patients with post-cardiac arrest syndrome and non-shockable initial rhythms.
90 days after hospital admission

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
mRS ≤3 on Day 30
大体时间：30 days after hospital admission
Comparison of neurological outcome (mRS ≤3) on Day 30 between institutionally assigned head positioning strategies in adult patients with post-cardiac arrest syndrome.
30 days after hospital admission
mRS ≤3 on Day 30
大体时间：30 days after hospital admission
Comparison of neurological outcome (mRS ≤3) on Day 30 between institutionally assigned temperature control strategies in adult patients with post-cardiac arrest syndrome and non-shockable initial rhythms.
30 days after hospital admission
All-cause mortality on Day 30 and Day 90
大体时间：30 days and 90 days after hospital admission
Comparison of all-cause mortality on Day 30 and Day 90 between institutionally assigned head positioning strategies in adult patients with post-cardiac arrest syndrome.
30 days and 90 days after hospital admission
All-cause mortality on Day 30 and Day 90
大体时间：30 days and 90 days after hospital admission
Comparison of all-cause mortality on Day 30 and Day 90 between institutionally assigned temperature control strategies in adult patients with post-cardiac arrest syndrome and non-shockable initial rhythms.
30 days and 90 days after hospital admission

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

赞助

Kagawa University

合作者

Becton, Dickinson and Company

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查，以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (估计的)

2026年9月1日

初级完成 (估计的)

2031年3月31日

研究完成 (估计的)

2031年6月30日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2026年8月12日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2026年8月12日

首次发布 (实际的)

2026年8月17日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2026年8月17日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2026年8月12日

最后验证

2026年8月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

关键字

其他相关的 MeSH 术语

其他研究编号

  • bpt-pcas

计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)

计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)？

未定

药物和器械信息、研究文件

研究美国 FDA 监管的药品

不

研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品

不

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索，没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求，请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改，我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅