Parenting-STAIR Modular for Military Fathers and OCONUS Families

PSTAIR-M is a culturally adapted, 12-16-session modular intervention which combines elements of two existing EBTs: Skills Training in Affective and Interpersonal Regulation (STAIR), targeting maternal trauma and emotion dysregulation, and dyadic Parent-Child Care (PC-CARE), targeting parenting.

12-16 PSTAIR-M treatment sessions (approximately 12-16 weeks).

Treatment as usual (TAU) is defined as an established EBT that is already being delivered at the study sites on an ongoing basis. Possible EBTs include prolonged exposure, cognitive processing therapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, and emotion-focused therapy. Clinicians treating participants randomly assigned to TAU will determine the most appropriate course of treatment based on established clinic protocols for treatment assignment.

Weekly treatment sessions of an established EBT. The total number of sessions/weeks will be determined by the EBT and clinic protocols.

The PCL-5 will be used to assess severity and change in PTSD symptoms. The PCL-5 is a 20-item self-report measure with strong evidence of reliability and convergent validity. Participants indicate the degree to which they have been bothered by problems related to a traumatic experience in the past month (e.g., "repeated, disturbing dreams of the stressful experience"; "feeling very upset when something reminded you of the stressful experience") on a 5-point Likert scale (0=not at all; 1=a little bit; 2=moderately; 3=quite a bit; 4=extremely). Summed responses yield a continuous score ranging from 0 to 80; higher scores indicate greater symptom severity.

The PHQ-9 will be used to assess severity and change in depressive symptoms. The PHQ-9 is a 9-item self-report measure with strong evidence of reliability and predictive and convergent validity. Participants indicate how often they have been bothered by particular problems within the past two weeks (e.g., "feeling down, depressed, or hopeless"; "poor appetite or overeating") on a 4-point Likert scale (0=not at all; 1=several days; 2=more than half the days; 3=nearly every day). Summed responses yield a continuous score ranging from 0 to 27; higher scores indicate greater symptom severity.

The AAPI-2 will be used to measure child-maltreatment risk. The AAPI-2 is a 40-item self-report measure with strong psychometric properties and predictive validity. Participants indicate how much they agree or disagree with statements about parenting and raising children (e.g., "Time-out is an effective way to discipline children") on a 5-point Likert scale (SD=Strongly disagree, D=Disagree, U=Uncertain, A=Agree, SA=Strongly agree). AAPI-2 is scored using a stencil to assign each answer a number; summed numbers for five parenting categories are converted into standard scores that are plotted on a profile chart to show risk for abusive or neglectful parenting behavior.

The SDQ will be used to assess child behaviors. The SDQ is a 25-item parent-report measure with good reliability, cross-informant correlation, and retest stability. Participant mothers indicate how true or untrue various statements about child behavior are relative to their participating child (e.g., "Shares readily with other children, for example toys, treats, pencils", "Often fights with other children or bullies them") on a 3-point Likert scale (0=not true; 1=somewhat true; 2=certainly true). Summed responses yield a continuous score ranging from 0 to 40; higher scores indicate greater behavioral difficulty.

The PSOC will be used to assess parental functioning as reflected by parenting self-efficacy. The PSOC is a 17-item self-report measure with strong evidence of reliability and validity. Participants indicate how much they agree or disagree with statements related to parenting (e.g., "Being a parent is manageable, and any problems are easily solved"; "My mother/father was better prepared than I am to be a good parent") on a 6-point Likert scale (1=strongly disagree; 2=disagree; 3=somewhat disagree; 4=somewhat agree; 5=agree; 6=strongly agree). Summed responses yield a continuous score ranging from 17 to 102; higher scores indicate greater parenting competency.

DERS, which measures emotion regulation, will be evaluated as a potential mediator. DERS is a 36-item self-report measure with adequate reliability and construct and predictive validity. Participants indicate how true or untrue various statements about emotions are for them (e.g., "I have no idea how I am feeling"; "I know exactly how I am feeling") on a 5-point Likert scale (1=almost never; 2=sometimes; 3=about half the time; 4=most of the time; 5=almost always). Summed responses yield a continuous score ranging from 36 to 180; higher scores indicate greater emotion regulation difficulty.

Brief Cope, which measures coping, will be evaluated as a potential mediator. Brief Cope is a 28-item self-report measure with adequate reliability and convergent and discriminant validity. Participants indicate how much or how often they have used various coping strategies (e.g., "I used alcohol or other drugs to make myself feel better"; "I took action to try to make the situation better") on a 4-point Likert scale (0=I didn't do this at all; 1=I did this a little bit; 2=I did this a medium amount; 3=I did this a lot). Summed responses within each of 14 subscales (e.g., substance use; active coping) yields a continuous score ranging from 0 to 6; higher scores indicate greater use of a particular coping strategy.

Parent interaction will be videotaped and coded by independent assessors. 10% of recordings will also be coded at UC Davis Parent-Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT) Training Center by expert coders unaware of treatment condition. Positive scores include the number of observed praises, reflections, and behavioral descriptions used during the play session, and negative scores include the number of observed questions, commands, and negative talk. DPICS is administered for 15-minutes in total with three 5-minute sessions focusing on child-directed play (CDI), parent-directed play (PDI), and clean-up.

TAE is a 5-item measure developed by study co-investigator Dr. Marylene Cloitre, will be used to assess acceptability and feasibility of the intervention. Participants are asked to appraise the intervention (e.g., "How logical does this type of treatment seem to you?"; "How successful do you think this treatment will be in reducing your trauma symptoms?") on an 8-point Likert scale (0=not at all; 2=very little; 4=somewhat; 6=moderate; 8=extremely). Summed responses yield a continuous score ranging from 0 to 40; higher scores indicate greater acceptability.

The Military Stress of Life Survey, a 14-item self-report measure adapted from the Department of Defense (DoD) Navy and Marine Stress of Life Survey, has been adapted for this study to assess lifetime and recent burden of military-related stressors. Participants indicate (0=no; 1=yes) whether they and their families have ever experienced various stressful situations associated with military life (e.g., "A combat-related injury"; "Difficulty balancing the demands of family life and military duties"), and if so, whether the experience occurred within the last 12 months. For every "yes" response, participants rate how stressful the particular experience was on a 4-point Likert scale (0=not stressful at all; 1=slightly stressful; 2=moderately stressful; 3=very stressful). Summed responses yield a continuous score ranging from 0 to 42; higher scores indicate a greater burden of military-related stressors.