A Novel Multimodal Approach to Promote Motor Recovery and Plasticity After Stroke
Upper extremity (UE) paresis or weakness is one of the most frequent impairments after stroke. Despite intense rehabilitation, motor and functional recovery of patients with severe hand impairments is poor. Hence, there is a need for more effective treatments to enhance motor function in patients with severe hand impairments after stroke. Adaptive functional electrical stimulation (FES) appears to be a promising treatment and has the potential to facilitate active movement in individuals with severe impairments post-stroke. In addition, transcranial random noise stimulation (trns) is a widely studied, non-invasive and safe method to enhance the corticomotor excitability in individuals with chronic stroke. However, the effect of combining trns and adaptive FES in patients with severe hand impairments has not been investigated. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to investigate whether combining trns with FES will enhance hand function in individuals with chronic stroke than FES alone. The investigators predict that combining trns with FES will significantly enhance hand function than FES alone.
研究概览
地位
条件
详细说明
The primary purpose of this study was to investigate whether combining transcranial random noise stimulation with functional electrical stimulation-facilitated task practice will enhance hand function in individuals with severe paresis post-stroke than functional electrical stimulation alone.
The study is an experimental randomized study comparing the effects of transcranial random noise stimulation with functional electrical stimulation to functional electrical stimulation alone on recovery of function in the more-affected hand in individuals with chronic stroke.
Participants were randomized to receive transcranial random noise stimulation and functional electrical stimulation-facilitated task practice or sham-transcranial random noise stimulation and functional electrical stimulation-facilitated task practice.
Participants received 18 treatment sessions over 6 weeks (3 times/week for 6-8 weeks).
研究类型
注册 (估计的)
阶段
- 不适用
联系人和位置
学习地点
-
-
Utah
-
Salt Lake City、Utah、美国、84112
- 尚未招聘
- University of Utah
-
Salt Lake City、Utah、美国、84108
- 招聘中
- University of Utah
-
接触：
- Amit Sethi
- 电话号码：8016467882
- 邮箱：amit.sethi@utah.edu
-
-
参与标准
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
接受健康志愿者
有资格学习的性别
描述
Inclusion Criteria:
Female and male subjects are eligible for inclusion only if all of the following criteria are met:
- Age between 40-85 years
- Diagnosis of first-ever subcortical stroke (single cerebrovascular accident)
- Stroke onset of at least six months prior to the time of participation
- Limited functional wrist and finger flexion and extension, as indicated between 5º-20º active movement
- Cognitive skills to actively participate, as indicated by scores of ≥ 24 on the Mini-Mental Status Examina-tion
- English speaking
Exclusion Criteria:
A subject is not eligible for inclusion if any of the following criteria apply:
- Presence of severe aphasia preventing the ability to follow 1-step directions at least 80% of the time
- Excessive spasticity of the wrist and finger muscles, defined as a Modified Ashworth Score >2
- Diagnosis of neurological disorders other than stroke
- History of recent seizure or epilepsy while taking anticonvulsants
- Orthopedic/musculoskeletal conditions (e.g., arthritis) affecting the upper extremity
- Presence of metallic implants in the head or neck
- Currently or planning to become pregnant
- Difficulty maintaining alertness or remaining still
- Ferromagnetic metallic implants, pacemakers, other implanted devices, or ventilators (for MRI)
- Bodyweight > 300 lbs due to MRI scanner dimensions (for subjects also undergoing MRI)
- Psychiatric diagnosis according to the criteria of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorder, Fifth Edition (DSM-V), or who are on psychotropic medication
- Participation in concurrent occupational therapy
学习计划
研究是如何设计的？
设计细节
- 主要用途：治疗
- 分配：随机化
- 介入模型：并行分配
- 屏蔽：四人间
武器和干预
参与者组/臂 |
干预/治疗 |
|---|---|
|
假比较器：sham-tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice
Participants will receive the intervention 3x/week for 6-8 weeks for a total of 18 intervention sessions. Participants will receive sham-tRNS during the FES-assisted task-specific practice. |
The FES-assisted task-specific practice will focus on restituting the movement components composing functional tasks. We will use the principles of motor learning with FES-assisted task-specific practice. Based on motor learning principles, our intervention will include 1) movement practice as close to normative as possible, 2) a high number of repetitions, 3) attention to the motor task, and 4) training specificity. Individuals in this group will receive sham-tRNS via the same electrode configuration as the tRNS. The stimulation will gradually ramp up for 30 seconds and then fade away for the rest of the intervention session. |
|
实验性的：tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice
Participants will receive the intervention 3x/week for 6-8 weeks for a total of 18 intervention sessions. Participants will receive tRNS during the FES-assisted task-specific practice. |
The FES-assisted task-specific practice will focus on restituting the movement components composing functional tasks. We will use the principles of motor learning with FES-assisted task-specific practice. Based on motor learning principles, our intervention will include 1) movement practice as close to normative as possible, 2) a high number of repetitions, 3) attention to the motor task, and 4) training specificity. Individuals in this group will receive tRNS at 2 mA intensity between 101-640 Hz. The current will be gradually ramped up for and down for the first and last 30 seconds of the stimulation. |
研究衡量的是什么？
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer Scale
大体时间：6-9 weeks post-intervention
|
Changes in Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer between the experimental (tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) and control (sham-tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) conditions. This scale measures voluntary motor control of the paretic upper extremity (UE) using a 3-point ordinal scale where 0=cannot perform, 1=performs partially, and 2=performs fully. The total possible score ranges from 0-66 with higher scores indicating a better voluntary motor control of the paretic UE. |
6-9 weeks post-intervention
|
|
Stroke Impact Scale - Hand Function Score
大体时间：6-9 weeks post-intervention
|
Changes in Stroke Impact Scale - Hand Function Score between the experimental (tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) and control (sham-tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) conditions. Participants report paretic upper extremity (UE) use in five commonly performed daily tasks (e.g., carry a bag of groceries) using a 5-point ordinal scale, which ranges from 0-5, where 0=cannot use paretic and 5=not difficult at all to use paretic UE. The total score ranges from 0-25 with higher scores indicating better UE function. |
6-9 weeks post-intervention
|
|
Transcranial Magnetic stimulation-induced motor evoked potential
大体时间：6-9 weeks post-intervention
|
Changes in cortical motor evoked potentials (MEPs) between the experimental (tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) and control (sham-tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) conditions. MEPs will be obtained by placing a transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) coil over the hand knob of the ipsilesional primary motor cortex. TMS-induced MEP amplitude will be obtained by averaging peak to peak amplitudes of 20 MEPs from the flexor carpii radials and/or extensor digitorum communis muscles. Higher values of MEP indicate greater corticospinal excitability. |
6-9 weeks post-intervention
|
次要结果测量
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer Scale
大体时间：12-14 weeks post intervention
|
Changes in Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer between the experimental (tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) and control (sham-tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) conditions. This scale measures voluntary motor control of the paretic upper extremity (UE) using a 3-point ordinal scale where 0=cannot perform, 1=performs partially, and 2=performs fully. The total possible score ranges from 0-66 with higher scores indicating a better voluntary motor control of the paretic UE. |
12-14 weeks post intervention
|
|
Stroke Impact Scale - Hand Function Score
大体时间：12-14 weeks post intervention
|
Changes in Stroke Impact Scale - Hand Function Score between the experimental (tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) and control (sham-tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) conditions. Participants report paretic upper extremity (UE) use in five commonly performed daily tasks (e.g., carry a bag of groceries) using a 5-point ordinal scale, which ranges from 0-5, where 0=cannot use paretic and 5=not difficult at all to use paretic UE. The total score ranges from 0-25 with higher scores indicating better UE function. |
12-14 weeks post intervention
|
|
Transcranial Magnetic stimulation-induced motor evoked potential
大体时间：12-14 weeks post intervention
|
Changes in cortical motor evoked potentials (MEPs) between the experimental (tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) and control (sham-tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) conditions. MEPs will be obtained by placing a transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) coil over the hand knob of the ipsilesional primary motor cortex. TMS-induced MEP amplitude will be obtained by averaging peak to peak amplitudes of 20 MEPs from the flexor carpii radials and/or extensor digitorum communis muscles. Higher values of MEP indicate greater corticospinal excitability. |
12-14 weeks post intervention
|
其他结果措施
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Grip Strength of the paretic hand
大体时间：6-9 weeks Post-intervention
|
Changes in Grip Strength between the experimental (tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) and control (sham-tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) conditions. Average grip strength of the of three trials will be reported in kilograms. Higher values indicate better grip strength. |
6-9 weeks Post-intervention
|
|
Grip Strength of the paretic hand
大体时间：12 -14 weeks Post-intervention
|
Changes in Grip Strength between the experimental (tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) and control (sham-tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) conditions. Average grip strength of the of three trials will be reported in kilograms. Higher values indicate better grip strength. |
12 -14 weeks Post-intervention
|
|
Upper extremity muscle synergy
大体时间：6-9 weeks Post-intervention
|
Changes in upper extremity muscle synergy between the experimental (tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) and control (sham-tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) conditions. Transcranial magnetic stimulation induced motor evoked potentials of different proximal and distal upper extremity muscles are coupled using the synergy weights and activation profiles obtained with a novel Principal component-based motor evoked potential analyses. Higher values suggest better muscle synergy. |
6-9 weeks Post-intervention
|
|
Upper extremity muscle synergy
大体时间：12-14 weeks Post-intervention
|
Changes in upper extremity muscle synergy between the experimental (tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) and control (sham-tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) conditions. Transcranial magnetic stimulation induced motor evoked potentials of different proximal and distal upper extremity muscles are coupled using the synergy weights and activation profiles obtained with a novel Principal component-based motor evoked potential analyses. Higher values suggest better muscle synergy. |
12-14 weeks Post-intervention
|
|
Upper Extremity range of motion via kinematics
大体时间：6-9 weeks Post-intervention
|
Changes in Upper Extremity kinematics between the experimental (tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) and control (sham-tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) conditions. 3D biomechanical data will be collected using a motion capture system. We will evaluate maximum finger excursions. Higher values indicate greater finger excursion. |
6-9 weeks Post-intervention
|
|
Upper Extremity range of motion via kinematics
大体时间：12-14 weeks Post-intervention
|
Changes in Upper Extremity kinematics between the experimental (tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) and control (sham-tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) conditions. 3D biomechanical data will be collected using a motion capture system. We will evaluate maximum finger excursions. Higher values indicate greater finger excursion. |
12-14 weeks Post-intervention
|
|
Muscle strength and activation
大体时间：6-9 weeks Post-intervention
|
Changes in muscle strength and activation between the experimental (tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) and control (sham-tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) conditions. Muscle strength and activation testing will be performed using the triple interpolated twitch technique for the paretic wrist and hand muscles. We will test muscle strength and activation using a customized set-up with load cells for the wrist and hand. Normalized peak force/torque will be used to calculate strength and activation. Higher values indicate greater muscle strength and activation. |
6-9 weeks Post-intervention
|
|
Muscle strength and activation
大体时间：12-14 weeks Post-intervention
|
Changes in muscle strength and activation between the experimental (tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) and control (sham-tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) conditions. Muscle strength and activation testing will be performed using the triple interpolated twitch technique for the paretic wrist and hand muscles. We will test muscle strength and activation using a customized set-up with load cells for the wrist and hand. Normalized peak force/torque will be used to calculate strength and activation. Higher values indicate greater muscle strength and activation. |
12-14 weeks Post-intervention
|
|
Action Research Arm Test
大体时间：6-9 weeks Post-intervention
|
Changes in Action Research Arm Test between the experimental (tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) and control (sham-tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) conditions. Action Research Arm Test evaluates upper extremity (UE) functional performance using a 4-point ordinal scale on 19-items, which are divided into 4 sub-tests (grasp, grip, pinch, and gross arm movement). The total possible score ranges from 0-57 with higher scores indicating higher UE function. |
6-9 weeks Post-intervention
|
|
Action Research Arm Test
大体时间：12-14 weeks Post-intervention
|
Changes in Action Research Arm Test between the experimental (tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) and control (sham-tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) conditions. Action Research Arm Test evaluates upper extremity (UE) functional performance using a 4-point ordinal scale on 19-items, which are divided into 4 sub-tests (grasp, grip, pinch, and gross arm movement). The total possible score ranges from 0-57 with higher scores indicating higher UE function. |
12-14 weeks Post-intervention
|
|
Social role sub-scale of Assessment of Life Habits
大体时间：6-9 weeks Post-intervention
|
Changes in Social role sub-scale of Assessment of Life Habits between the experimental (tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) and control (sham-tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) conditions. The Social-LIFE-H assess the quality of social participation by estimating the perceived difficulty an in-dividual faces in performing a life habit and the type of assistance required to perform it. Using 40 items, the sub-scale assesses restrictions in social responsibilities, interpersonal relationships, community life, education, employment, and leisure. Each item is scored using a 10-point ordinal scale, which ranges from 0-9, where 0 = not able to perform and 9 = able to perform without difficulty with higher scores indicating better social participation. The total possible score will be reported, which is obtained by summing the scores on each item and then dividing by the number of items. |
6-9 weeks Post-intervention
|
|
Social role sub-scale of Assessment of Life Habits
大体时间：12-14 weeks Post-intervention
|
Changes in Social role sub-scale of Assessment of Life Habits between the experimental (tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) and control (sham-tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) conditions. The Social-LIFE-H assess the quality of social participation by estimating the perceived difficulty an in-dividual faces in performing a life habit and the type of assistance required to perform it. Using 40 items, the sub-scale assesses restrictions in social responsibilities, interpersonal relationships, community life, education, employment, and leisure. Each item is scored using a 10-point ordinal scale, which ranges from 0-9, where 0 = not able to perform and 9 = able to perform without difficulty with higher scores indicating better social participation. The total possible score will be reported, which is obtained by summing the scores on each item and then dividing by the number of items. |
12-14 weeks Post-intervention
|
|
Transcranial magnetic stimulation induced cervicomedullary motor evoked potential
大体时间：6-9 weeks Post-intervention
|
Changes in transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) induced cervicomedullary motor evoked potential (CMEP) between the experimental (tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) and control (sham-tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) conditions. An average peak to peak amplitudes of 20 CMEPs will be reported from the flexor carpii radials and/or extensor digitorum communis muscles. Higher values of CMEP indicate greater spinal excitability. |
6-9 weeks Post-intervention
|
|
Transcranial magnetic stimulation induced cervicomedullary motor evoked potential
大体时间：12-14 weeks Post-intervention
|
Changes in transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) induced cervicomedullary motor evoked potential (CMEP) between the experimental (tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) and control (sham-tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) conditions. An average peak to peak amplitudes of 20 CMEPs will be reported from the flexor carpii radials and/or extensor digitorum communis muscles. Higher values of CMEP indicate greater spinal excitability. |
12-14 weeks Post-intervention
|
|
H-reflex excitability
大体时间：6-8 weeks Post-intervention
|
Changes in H-reflex excitability (measured by H-max/M-max ratio) between the experimental (tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) and control (sham-tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) conditions. H- and M- recruitment curves will be mapped for the paretic flexor carpii radials muscle. Higher values indicate greater spinal excitability. |
6-8 weeks Post-intervention
|
|
H-reflex excitability
大体时间：12 -14 weeks Post-intervention
|
Changes in H-reflex excitability (measured by H-max/M-max ratio) between the experimental (tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) and control (sham-tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) conditions. H- and M- recruitment curves will be mapped for the paretic flexor carpii radials muscle. Higher values indicate greater spinal excitability. |
12 -14 weeks Post-intervention
|
合作者和调查者
研究记录日期
研究主要日期
学习开始 (估计的)
初级完成 (估计的)
研究完成 (估计的)
研究注册日期
首次提交
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
首次发布 (实际的)
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (实际的)
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
最后验证
更多信息
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索，没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求，请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改，我们的网站上也会自动更新.