此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Effective Communication in Perinatal Care (ComPARE)

2026年11月2日 更新者:Candiani Massimo、IRCCS San Raffaele

ComPARE: Effective COMmunication in Perinatal cARE Cross-sectional Study

ComPARE is a cross-sectional observational study investigating the effectiveness of communication during prenatal consultations concerning vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC). It involves 50 pregnant people considering VBAC and 12 healthcare professionals from IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele: 6 OB-GYNs and 6 midwives with expertise in VBAC. The main objective is to identify and analyse misunderstandings in doctor/midwife-patient communication, using the TouCAN Codebook, and to examine whether these misunderstandings are associated with patients' perceptions of communication quality. The study does not introduce any treatment or medical device: it analyses routine clinical consultations. The study period is 5 years, with 2 years of enrolment.

研究概览

地位

招聘中

条件

详细说明

ComPARE (effective COMmunication in Perinatal cARE) is a cross-sectional observational study investigating the clarity, accessibility, and effectiveness of communication between healthcare professionals and pregnant individuals during prenatal consultations concerning vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC).

Doctor-patient communication is an integral component of clinical care and is essential for establishing trust, supporting patient autonomy and shared decision-making, and promoting patient safety and quality of care. In clinical communication, misunderstandings may arise not only from the explicit content of what is said, but also from implicit assumptions, contextual cues, presuppositions, and non-literal meanings. The TouCAN Codebook (Textual misUnderstanding Codebook ANalysis) provides a structured linguistic framework for identifying markers of potentially problematic communication that may hinder mutual understanding. The present study applies this approach to perinatal care, with a specific focus on consultations concerning VBAC.

The study addresses the need for research specifically examining communication practices in VBAC counselling. These consultations involve the communication of complex and risk-sensitive information concerning pregnancy and birth and require information to be conveyed in a clear and accessible manner to support informed and autonomous decision-making.

The study population consists of 50 pregnant individuals considering VBAC and 12 healthcare professionals from IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, including 6 obstetricians and gynaecologists (OB-GYNs) and 6 midwives with expertise in VBAC. Eligible pregnant participants are Italian-speaking individuals aged 18-44 years with a singleton pregnancy between 33 and 37 weeks of gestation, a history of caesarean section in a previous pregnancy, and a scheduled VBAC counselling consultation at IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele. Participants must provide written informed consent and plan to deliver at San Raffaele Hospital.

The study is non-interventional and does not involve medicinal products, medical devices, diagnostic procedures, or therapeutic interventions outside routine clinical practice. The clinical consultation is conducted according to standard care, and participation in the study does not influence the healthcare professional's clinical decisions or the diagnostic or therapeutic pathway.

The study procedures include three main components. First, the participant attends the scheduled outpatient prenatal consultation with an OB-GYN or midwife experienced in VBAC. The consultation is audio-recorded to allow subsequent linguistic analysis. Second, following the consultation, the participant takes part in the SSI-CLAR semi-structured interview, lasting approximately 30 minutes, which assesses the participant's perceived clarity of communication, tone, accessibility of language, and subjective understanding of the information received. The interview is also audio-recorded and subsequently analysed using thematic analysis. Third, after delivery, information is collected concerning the method of delivery, specifically whether the participant underwent VBAC or caesarean section and, in the case of caesarean section, the clinical indication.

The primary objective is to evaluate the clarity and effectiveness of communication between healthcare professionals (OB-GYNs and midwives) and pregnant individuals during prenatal consultations concerning VBAC. The primary endpoint is the level of misunderstanding in clinician-patient conversations, measured through systematic analysis of consultation transcripts using the TouCAN Codebook. Coded misunderstandings will be quantified as counts and, where appropriate, as rates per consultation. Inter-rater reliability will also be assessed.

A secondary objective is to assess whether there is a match or mismatch between patterns of misunderstanding identified in clinical conversations and patients' own perceptions of communication as reported in the post-consultation interviews. The secondary endpoint is the degree of convergence or divergence between the level and types of misunderstandings identified through TouCAN Codebook coding and patients' perceived clarity and understanding as assessed through the semi-structured interviews.

The study will also explore the association between communication characteristics, perceived clarity, and the participant's subsequent decision regarding VBAC or a new caesarean section. Quantitative analyses will include descriptive statistics and exploratory Spearman correlations. A linear mixed-effects model will be used to explore the relationship between communication characteristics and perceived clarity, accounting for clustering at the clinician level. A logistic regression model will explore the association between communication characteristics and delivery outcomes. These quantitative analyses are exploratory and hypothesis-generating and are not intended to establish causal or predictive relationships.

The qualitative analysis of consultation transcripts will focus on identifying and characterising linguistic markers of misunderstanding using the TouCAN Codebook. Interview data will be analysed through thematic analysis, following a six-phase approach involving independent coding and collaborative synthesis. The combination of linguistic analysis and participants' subjective accounts is intended to capture both observable features of communication and patients' own perceptions of clarity, understanding, and communication quality.

All study data are collected in connection with the routine prenatal consultation and the subsequent assessment of communication and understanding. Participant involvement lasts approximately two hours. No additional clinical risk or therapeutic intervention is introduced by the study.

The study has a total duration of five years, with participant enrolment lasting two years. The study is sponsored by IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele and co-sponsored by Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele. The Principal Investigator is Prof. Massimo Candiani.

研究类型

观察性的

注册 (估计的)

50

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习地点

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

18年 至 44年 (成人)

接受健康志愿者

不

有资格学习的性别

女性

取样方法

非概率样本

研究人群

The study population will consist of approximately 50 pregnant participants with a history of previous caesarean delivery who are considering vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC). Participants will be recruited among patients attending prenatal counselling consultations at IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy. Eligible participants will be between 18 and 44 years of age, have a singleton pregnancy between 33 and 37 weeks of gestation, and be planning delivery at the study hospital. The study will examine communicative misunderstandings during prenatal counselling and patients' perceptions of the information exchanged.

描述

Inclusion Criteria

  1. Singleton pregnancy.
  2. Gestational age between 33 and 37 weeks at the time of the prenatal consultation.
  3. Maternal age between 18 and 44 years, inclusive.
  4. Ability to communicate in Italian and understand the study procedures.
  5. History of at least one previous caesarean delivery.
  6. Planned delivery at IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele.
  7. Provision of written informed consent for study participation and audio recording of the consultation.

Exclusion Criteria

  1. Multiple pregnancy.
  2. Obstetric emergencies or urgent clinical conditions requiring immediate medical intervention that would prevent the planned prenatal counselling consultation.
  3. Inability to provide valid informed consent.
  4. Refusal of audio recording of the consultation.
  5. Clinical or logistical circumstances preventing participation in the interview following the consultation.

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

  • 观测模型:COHORT
  • 时间观点:CROSS_SECTIONAL

队列和干预

团体/队列
Pregnant people considering VBAC

Pregnant individuals aged 18 to 44 years with a singleton pregnancy between 33 and 37 weeks of gestation, a history of caesarean section in a previous pregnancy, and a scheduled VBAC counselling consultation at IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele. Participants must be Italian speakers, provide written informed consent, and plan to deliver at San Raffaele Hospital. The study is observational and involves no experimental intervention. Participants undergo their scheduled routine VBAC consultation, which is audio recorded for linguistic analysis, followed by a semi structured interview assessing their perceived understanding and clarity of the information received. Information on the subsequent mode of delivery is also collected after delivery. A total of 50 pregnant participants are planned.

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Level of misunderstanding in clinician-patient conversations
大体时间:During the prenatal consultation (Day 1)

he primary endpoint is the level of misunderstanding in clinician-patient conversations, measured through systematic analysis of consultation transcripts using the TouCAN Codebook.

During the prenatal consultation (Day 1)

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Convergence or divergence between consultation based misunderstanding and patients' perceived communication
大体时间:On the day of the prenatal consultation (Day 1)

The degree of convergence or divergence between (a) the level and types of misunderstandings identified through TouCAN Codebook coding of consultations and (b) patients' perceived clarity and understanding as assessed via semi structured interviews.

On the day of the prenatal consultation (Day 1)

其他结果措施

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Descriptive mapping of the types of communicative misunderstandings observed across consultations
大体时间:During the prenatal consultation (Day 1)

Descriptive mapping of the types of communicative misunderstandings observed across consultations.

During the prenatal consultation (Day 1)
Convergence or divergence between misunderstandings, perceived clarity and delivery decision
大体时间:During the prenatal consultation (Day 1)

The degree of convergence or divergence between (a) the level and types of misunderstandings identified through TouCAN Codebook coding of consultations, (b) patients' perceived clarity and understanding as assessed via semi structured interviews and (c) the decision of the pregnant person to undergo a VBAC or a CS.

During the prenatal consultation (Day 1)

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (实际的)

2026年9月16日

初级完成 (估计的)

2029年9月16日

研究完成 (估计的)

2031年9月16日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2026年9月16日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2026年11月2日

首次发布 (实际的)

2026年11月5日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2026年11月5日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2026年11月2日

最后验证

2026年11月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

其他研究编号

  • ComPARE - CET 209-2026

计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)

计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)?

不

药物和器械信息、研究文件

研究美国 FDA 监管的药品

不

研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品

不

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅