Effectiveness of a Nurse-Led Transitional Care Model Based on the Fundamentals of Care Framework (NURSE-LEDFOC)
This study aims to find out whether nurse-led transitional care can help older adults with chronic health conditions recover safely after leaving the hospital. It also examines whether this approach can lower the risk of returning to the hospital within 30 days.
The study includes 652 adults aged 60 years or older with at least one long-term health condition. All participants were receiving care in medical wards at an Italian university hospital and were preparing to return home.
Participants were randomly assigned to one of two groups:
Nurse-led transitional care: Participants received additional care in a nurse-led unit before returning home. Nurses assessed their health and daily needs, provided personalized care and education, and helped plan a safe return home. This approach followed the Fundamentals of Care Framework, which focuses on meeting people's physical, emotional, and social care needs.
Usual care: Participants received standard hospital care and returned directly home after discharge, without the additional nurse-led transitional care program.
Researchers assessed participants' ability to perform daily activities, memory and thinking skills, risk of falls, and risk of developing pressure injuries (skin damage caused by prolonged pressure). They also checked whether participants returned to the hospital unexpectedly within 30 days.
By comparing the two groups, the study aims to understand whether additional nurse-led care can support recovery, improve independence, and help older adults remain safely at home after hospitalization.
研究概览
研究类型
注册 (实际的)
阶段
- 不适用
联系人和位置
学习地点
-
-
-
Rome、意大利、00133
- Nursing Department
-
-
参与标准
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
- 孩子
- 成人
- 年长者
接受健康志愿者
有资格学习的性别
描述
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adults aged 60 years or older.
- Diagnosis of at least one chronic condition (e.g., chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, heart disease, heart failure, musculoskeletal disorders, or hypertension).
- Ability to understand the study information and provide informed consent.
- Planned discharge from an acute medical ward to their own home.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Participants requiring daily assistance from a family member or informal caregiver to perform activities of daily living.
- Inability to understand the study information or provide informed consent.
- Planned discharge to other healthcare or residential care settings, such as nursing homes or rehabilitation centers.
学习计划
研究是如何设计的?
设计细节
- 主要用途:卫生服务研究
- 分配:随机化
- 介入模型:并行分配
- 屏蔽:单身的
武器和干预
参与者组/臂 |
干预/治疗 |
|---|---|
|
实验性的:Community Hospital
Participants assigned to this group received nurse-led transitional care in a Community Hospital before returning home. The intervention was based on the Fundamentals of Care Framework and included comprehensive nursing assessment, individualized care planning, daily clinical monitoring, patient education, and coordinated discharge planning. Nurses supported participants' physical, emotional, and social care needs, promoted self-care skills, and coordinated care with community health services. The maximum length of stay was 14 days, followed by a 30-day follow-up after discharge. |
The intervention was based on the Fundamentals of Care Framework and included comprehensive nursing assessment, individualized care planning, daily clinical monitoring, patient education, and coordinated discharge planning. Nurses supported participants' physical, emotional, and social care needs, promoted self-care skills, and coordinated care with community health services. The maximum length of stay was 14 days, followed by a 30-day follow-up after discharge. |
|
有源比较器:Usual Care - Direct Discharge Home
Participants assigned to this group received usual care in acute medical wards and were discharged directly home after clinical stabilization. They received standard discharge instructions and routine care, without transfer to a Community Hospital or participation in the structured nurse-led transitional care program. Community health services were provided when indicated according to usual clinical practice. Participants were followed up 30 days after discharge. |
Participants received standard hospital care and returned directly home after discharge, without the additional nurse-led transitional care program. |
研究衡量的是什么?
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Unplanned Hospital Readmission Within 30 Days
大体时间:Within 30 days after final hospital discharge
|
The proportion of participants experiencing at least one unplanned hospital readmission within 30 days after final hospital discharge. Readmissions to any hospital in the Lazio region were identified using regional administrative hospital databases. The outcome was compared between the nurse-led transitional care group and the usual care group. |
Within 30 days after final hospital discharge
|
次要结果测量
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Functional Independence Assessed by the Barthel Index
大体时间:Baseline and 30 days after final hospital discharge.
|
Functional independence was assessed using the Barthel Index, which measures the ability to perform 10 basic activities of daily living, including feeding, bathing, dressing, mobility, and personal hygiene. Total scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater independence. Changes from baseline were compared between the two study groups. |
Baseline and 30 days after final hospital discharge.
|
|
Change in Pressure Injury Risk Assessed by the Braden Scale
大体时间:Baseline and 30 days after final hospital discharge.
|
The risk of developing pressure injuries was assessed using the Braden Scale, which evaluates six areas: sensory perception, skin moisture, physical activity, mobility, nutrition, and friction or shear. Total scores range from 6 to 23, with lower scores indicating a higher risk of pressure injuries. Changes from baseline were compared between the two study groups. |
Baseline and 30 days after final hospital discharge.
|
|
Change in Cognitive Status Assessed by the Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire
大体时间:Baseline and 30 days after final hospital discharge.
|
Cognitive status was assessed using the Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire (SPMSQ), a 10-item instrument evaluating orientation, memory, and basic cognitive functioning. According to the scoring system used in this study, total scores range from 0 to 11, with higher scores indicating better cognitive functioning. Changes from baseline were compared between the two study groups. |
Baseline and 30 days after final hospital discharge.
|
|
Change in Fall Risk Assessed by the Modified Morse Fall Scale
大体时间:Baseline and 30 days after final hospital discharge.
|
Fall risk was assessed using a modified version of the Morse Fall Scale consisting of six dichotomous items. Total scores range from 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating greater fall risk. Scores of 0-2 indicate low risk, 3-4 moderate risk, and 5-6 high risk. Changes from baseline were compared between the two study groups. |
Baseline and 30 days after final hospital discharge.
|
合作者和调查者
出版物和有用的链接
一般刊物
- Saari H, Lonnroos E, Kautiainen H, Kokko S, Ryynanen OP, Mantyselka P. Incidence of short-term community hospital stays and clinical profiles of patients: the Finnish Community Hospital Cohort Study. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2024 Mar;42(1):82-90. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2023.2291671. Epub 2024 Feb 7.
- Sun M, Qian Y, Liu L, Wang J, Zhuansun M, Xu T, Rosa RD. Transition of care from hospital to home for older people with chronic diseases: a qualitative study of older patients' and health care providers' perspectives. Front Public Health. 2023 Apr 27;11:1128885. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1128885. eCollection 2023.
- Recio-Saucedo A, Dall'Ora C, Maruotti A, Ball J, Briggs J, Meredith P, Redfern OC, Kovacs C, Prytherch D, Smith GB, Griffiths P. What impact does nursing care left undone have on patient outcomes? Review of the literature. J Clin Nurs. 2018 Jun;27(11-12):2248-2259. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14058. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
研究记录日期
研究主要日期
学习开始 (实际的)
初级完成 (实际的)
研究完成 (实际的)
研究注册日期
首次提交
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
首次发布 (实际的)
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (实际的)
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
最后验证
更多信息
与本研究相关的术语
其他相关的 MeSH 术语
其他研究编号
- 669
- 2.26.3 (其他赠款/资助编号:Center of Excellence for Culture and Research Nursing of the Professions Order Nursing of Rome)
计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)
计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)?
IPD 计划说明
De-identified individual participant data underlying the results reported in this study may be made available to qualified researchers upon reasonable request to the corresponding author. Data sharing will be subject to approval of the research team and compliance with applicable ethical and data protection requirements. No directly identifiable participant information will be shared.
IPD 共享时间框架
Beginning 6 months after publication of the study results and ending 5 years after publication
IPD 共享访问标准
De-identified individual participant data and supporting study documents may be made available to qualified researchers who submit a reasonable request to the corresponding author. Requests must include a research proposal describing the scientific objectives, planned analyses, and intended use of the data. Access will be subject to approval by the research team and compliance with applicable ethical and data protection requirements. Approved researchers will receive access to the data necessary for their proposed analyses through a secure data-sharing process. Data will not be made publicly available.
IPD 共享支持信息类型
- 研究方案
药物和器械信息、研究文件
研究美国 FDA 监管的药品
研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.