This Multicentre Study Compares aCUP-E With Standard Electrodes During aEEG Monitoring in NICU Newborns at Risk of Encephalopathy, Assessing Recording Quality, Reliability, Ease of Use and Safety. (aCUP HUSJR/J23)
Anàlisis Comparatiu Del Registre aEEG Realitzat Amb Elèctrodes Comercials i Amb l'Elèctrode aCUP-E (Advanced Cup Electrode) en Nounats Amb Risc de Patir Una Encefalopatia
This multicentre, observational, prospective and comparative study aims to validate the use of the new aCUP-E electrode for aEEG monitoring in newborns admitted to the NICU, comparing it with conventional electrodes currently used at two hospitals: Salut Sant Joan de Reus - Baix Camp and Hospital Universitari de Tarragona Joan XXIII.
A total of 35 newborns at risk of encephalopathy will be recruited.
During aEEG monitoring, one type of electrode will be placed on each cerebral hemisphere: on one hemisphere, the standard electrode normally used according to each hospital's protocol, and on the other, the new aCUP-E electrode. This design allows direct comparison under similar conditions to assess recording quality, reliability and ease of use. The multicentre methodology also facilitates a more representative and diverse sample, increasing the robustness and generalisability of the results.
This study seeks to determine whether aCUP-E can replace conventional electrodes, offering a safe and effective alternative that improves the quality of neonatal neurological monitoring and adapts to different clinical contexts.
研究概览
地位
条件
研究类型
注册 (估计的)
联系人和位置
学习联系方式
- 姓名：Vicenç Pascual, Clinical Neurophisyiologist
- 电话号码：53160 34977 31 03 00
- 邮箱：vicenc.pascual@salutsantjoan.cat
参与标准
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
接受健康志愿者
有资格学习的性别
取样方法
研究人群
Overall, the three cohorts together involve the inclusion of a maximum of 35 neonates, a number considered adequate to achieve the technical, functional and clinical objectives of the study, while maintaining a balance between methodological robustness, recruitment feasibility and minimisation of the care burden on an especially vulnerable population.
描述
Inclusion Criteria:
- Preterm or term newborns admitted to the NICU who are at risk of encephalopathy due to conditions arising from the clinical context. For example, maternal infection (e.g. maternal infections such as fever during labour, urinary tract infection, etc.), maternal history of gestational diabetes, gestational hypertension or preeclampsia, history of delivery complications such as placental displacement or abnormal placentation.
- Informed consent obtained from the parents or legal guardians of the newborns.
- Availability of aEEG monitoring equipment and aCUP-E electrodes during the study period.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Newborns with signs or symptoms of encephalopathy or any other evident neurological abnormality.
- Newborns with critical or unstable medical conditions that interfere with monitoring, such as the need for continuous mechanical ventilation or significant haemodynamic instability.
- Newborns receiving medication that may alter brain activity and interfere with aEEG results.
- Newborns with cranial or skin malformations that prevent proper electrode placement.
- Situations requiring urgent interventions that may interrupt monitoring or affect the quality of the data collected.
- Lack of informed consent from the parents or legal guardians of the newborns to participate in the study.
学习计划
研究是如何设计的？
设计细节
- 观测模型：COHORT
- 时间观点：PROSPECTIVE
队列和干预
团体/队列 |
|---|
|
Cohort 1. Comparison between aCUP-E and liquid-gel electrodes
The first cohort will include 10 neonates, in whom an intra-individual comparison between aCUP-E and conventional liquid-gel electrodes will be performed. The main objective of this cohort is to externally validate the results obtained in the previous study authorised by the Spanish Agency of Medicines and Medical Devices (AEMPS), file 918/21/EC-R, the results of which were subsequently published by Fabregat-Sanjuan et al. (Frontiers in Pediatrics, 2024). Therefore, the results obtained in these ten new patients will be compared with the results previously obtained in the initial study, with the aim of verifying the reproducibility of aCUP-E performance at a second hospital and confirming that its performance does not depend on the participating centre or the staff responsible for electrode placement. |
|
Cohort 2. Comparison between aCUP-E and needle electrodes
The second cohort will include 15 neonates, all recruited at Hospital Universitari de Tarragona Joan XXIII (HUJ23). In this cohort, a simultaneous comparison between aCUP-E and the needle electrodes routinely used in clinical practice will be performed. This is the first specific clinical evaluation between the two recording systems. In a paired intra-individual design, a cohort of approximately 10 neonates would allow an initial assessment of comparative performance to detect large intra-individual differences. |
|
Cohort 3. Monitoring exclusively using aCUP-E
The third cohort will include 10 neonates monitored exclusively using aCUP-E electrodes. This cohort is expected to be distributed evenly between the two participating centres, including approximately 5 neonates at Hospital Universitari de Tarragona Joan XXIII (HUJ23) and 5 neonates at Hospital Universitari Sant Joan de Reus (HUSJR), provided that the recruitment rate allows it. The main objective of this cohort is not to compare different types of electrodes, but to evaluate the technical feasibility, functional stability and safety of exclusive use of aCUP-E during complete monitoring sessions. |
研究衡量的是什么？
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
1. To compare the overall recording quality of aCUP-E with that of commercial electrodes.
大体时间：Through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
This analysis will be performed in preterm and term newborns at risk of encephalopathy, selecting segments with low impedance and absence of artefacts to determine recording quality. The outcome will be a % of time of the recording with good quality |
Through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
次要结果测量
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
2. To evaluate the clinical feasibility of aCUP-E
大体时间：Through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
This outcome will evaluate the clinical feasibility in relation with standard practice. The outcome will be the results of a survey from clinicians. |
Through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
|
3. To evaluate the safety of aCUP-E
大体时间：Through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
This outcome will evaluate the safety of the electrode. The outcome will be the results of a survey from clinicians. |
Through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
|
4. To evaluate the reliability of aCUP-E recordings
大体时间：Through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
This outcome will evaluate the differences between recordings. The outcome will be the % of differences between recordings. |
Through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
|
5. To evaluate electrode survival and durability
大体时间：Through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
This outcome will evaluate the time to use in good conditions the electrode. The outcome will be the number of hours as a function of the % of survival. |
Through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
合作者和调查者
研究记录日期
研究主要日期
学习开始 (估计的)
初级完成 (估计的)
研究完成 (估计的)
研究注册日期
首次提交
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
首次发布 (实际的)
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (实际的)
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
最后验证
更多信息
与本研究相关的术语
计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)
计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)？
药物和器械信息、研究文件
研究美国 FDA 监管的药品
研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索，没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求，请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改，我们的网站上也会自动更新.