Comparison of NMTCuff and Standard TOF in Gynecologic Oncology Surgery (NMTCUFF-TOF)

Following approval from the institutional non-interventional clinical research ethics committee and obtaining written and verbal informed consent from all participating patients, this prospective study will be conducted on patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic gynecologic oncology surgery. Patients aged 18-75 years with an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status of I-III will be included. Exclusion criteria consist of a known history of neuromuscular disease, severe hepatic or renal insufficiency, a Body Mass Index (BMI) greater than 35 kg/m2, and patient refusal to participate.

Upon arrival in the operating room, standard monitoring will be applied to all patients, including electrocardiography (ECG), peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2), and non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP). Anesthesia induction will follow a standardized routine institutional protocol: propofol 2-3 mg/kg, remifentanil 0.5-1 mcg/kg, and rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg to facilitate endotracheal intubation and induce neuromuscular blockade.

Simultaneously, two different neuromuscular monitoring methods will be applied to each patient as follows:

Group 1 - NMTCuff (Vision Duo): Measurements will be performed using a specialized NMT cuff belonging to the Vision Duo monitor. This cuff is placed around the patient's non-dominant upper arm, and neuromuscular transmission is assessed via pressure-sensitive sensors during muscle contraction.

Group 2 - AMG (Standard TOF): Measurements will be performed using a standard acceleromyography (AMG) Train-of-Four (TOF) sensor attached to the contralateral wrist along the ulnar nerve pathway.

At the end of the surgical procedure, routine reversal of the neuromuscular blockade will be performed using Sugammadex at a dose of 2 mg/kg. The recovery times-specifically the duration from the exact moment of Sugammadex administration until the TOF ratio reaches 90% and 100% (matching the Vision Duo Auto-Pilot specification)-will be recorded separately for both devices using a digital stopwatch. Clinical assessment parameters at the time of extubation, including tidal volume and the 5-second head lift test, will also be documented.

This study is purely prospective and observational regarding clinical anesthesia management. The alternative monitoring methods will not intervene in or alter the routine anesthesia care, muscle relaxant dosages, reversal strategies, or extubation decisions. The attending clinician will manage the patient according to the standard operating room practices, and data from both devices will only be recorded simultaneously and matched for subsequent statistical analysis.