Comparing Postoperative Functional Recovery and Analgesic Efficacy of a Single Shot Sciatic Nerve Block Versus Posterior Capsule/Fat Pad Infiltration of Local Anesthetic for Total Knee Arthroplasty
A Prospective, Unicenter, Randomized, Placebo Controlled, Clinical Interventional Trial, Comparing the Postoperative Functional Recovery as Well as Analgesic Efficacy of a Single Shot Sciatic Nerve Block Versus Posterior Capsule/Fat Pad Infiltration of Local Anesthetic for Total Knee Arthroplasty.
調査の概要
状態
詳細な説明
The objectives of this study are:
- Evaluate the role of sciatic nerve block in total knee replacement. There is conflicting data as to whether sciatic nerve block would provide significant analgesic benefit in addition to femoral nerve block and the usual multimodal and preemptive analgesic regimen for TKA.
- Investigate the efficacy of single-shot sciatic nerve block on early rehabilitation, functional recovery and patient satisfaction.
- Evaluate the previously described technique of local anesthetic infiltration into the posterior capsule/fat pad of the knee as an alternative technique to sciatic nerve block in providing analgesia to the posterior aspect of the knee in this select group of patients.
- Investigate the efficacy of local anesthetic infiltration into the posterior capsule/fat pad of the knee on early rehabilitation, functional recovery and patient satisfaction.
Study Design:
All patients will have a femoral nerve block (FNB) and spinal anesthesia.
Patients will be randomized into one of the 3 possible groups:
Group 1: Femoral nerve block + Sciatic nerve block + Spinal anesthesia + Infiltration of normal saline at the end of surgery
Group 2: Femoral nerve block + Sham Sciatic nerve block + Spinal anesthesia + Infiltration of local anesthetic at the end of surgery.
Group 3: Femoral nerve block + Sham Sciatic nerve block + Spinal anesthesia. + Infiltration of normal saline at the end of surgery.
In summary, this study will help further define the role of sciatic nerve block as well as the alternative technique of local anesthetic infiltration in the perioperative analgesic regimen of total knee arthroplasty surgery, in an effort to develop a standardized perioperative protocol for this patient population. The advent of this protocol should allow reduced risk, improved analgesia, and potentially earlier discharged from hospital with better function.
研究の種類
入学 (実際)
段階
- 適用できない
連絡先と場所
研究場所
-
-
Ontario
-
Toronto、Ontario、カナダ、M2N-3Y7
- Holland Orthopedic and Arthritic Centre
-
-
参加基準
適格基準
就学可能な年齢
健康ボランティアの受け入れ
受講資格のある性別
説明
Inclusion Criteria:
- American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I and III
- Scheduled for total knee arthroplasty
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients not providing informed consent.
- Refusal of treatment plan.
- Preexisting medical/neurological/hematologic conditions contraindicated for spinal anesthesia or peripheral nerve blocks.
- Revision total knee arthroplasty.
- Known allergy to any of the medications being used.
- History of drug or alcohol abuse.
- Patients with chronic pain on slow-release preparations of opioid in excess of 30mg of morphine equivalence per day.
- Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis.
- Patients with psychiatric disorders.
- Patients unable or unwilling to use Patient Controlled Analgesia.
- Diabetic patients or those with impaired renal function (Creatinine >106).
- Obese patients (i.e. BMI >45).
- Postoperatively, patients will be excluded if they have had additional operative procedures requiring a change in the usual rehabilitation protocol of care.
研究計画
研究はどのように設計されていますか?
デザインの詳細
- 主な目的:処理
- 割り当て:ランダム化
- 介入モデル:並列代入
- マスキング:トリプル
武器と介入
参加者グループ / アーム |
介入・治療 |
|---|---|
|
実験的:1
|
Patients randomized to Group 1 will receive a single sciatic nerve block using the infragluteal parabiceps approach, using 20 ml of 0.5 % Ropivacaine.
A sham injection of the posterior capsule and fat pad using 50 cc of normal saline will be conducted at the conclusion of the surgery.
|
|
実験的:2
|
Patients randomized to Group 2 will receive a Sham sciatic nerve block using 20cc of normal saline as described above as well as extensive local anesthetic infiltration of the posterior capsule and fat pad with a solution of 50 ml of 0.2% ropivicaine.
|
|
偽コンパレータ:3
|
Patients randomized to group 3 will only receive a continuous femoral nerve catheter, A sham sciatic nerve block with 20cc of normal saline as well as a sham injection of the posterior capsule and fat pad will be performed with 50cc of normal saline.
|
この研究は何を測定していますか?
主要な結果の測定
結果測定 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|
|
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain will be used (0=no pain, 100mm = terrible pain) as our primary outcome, for 72 hours post-operatively (at rest and during mobilization).
時間枠:On arrival to PACU and every 4 hours thereafter.
|
On arrival to PACU and every 4 hours thereafter.
|
二次結果の測定
結果測定 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|
|
The TUG (Timed up and go test) and Range of motion.
時間枠:Performed on day 2 and 3.
|
Performed on day 2 and 3.
|
協力者と研究者
捜査官
- 主任研究者:Ben Safa, MD, FRCPC、Staff Anesthesiologist, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre.
研究記録日
主要日程の研究
研究開始
一次修了 (実際)
研究の完了 (実際)
試験登録日
最初に提出
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
最初の投稿 (見積もり)
学習記録の更新
投稿された最後の更新 (見積もり)
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
最終確認日
詳しくは
この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。