このページは自動翻訳されたものであり、翻訳の正確性は保証されていません。を参照してください。 英語版 ソーステキスト用。

Preventing Aggression in Veterans With Dementia (PAVeD)

2016年5月19日 更新者:VA Office of Research and Development
This study tests whether education about memory and pain might help to prevent aggression in persons with dementia who have pain. The overall goal of this intervention is to reduce the risk of aggressive behavior by improving several areas of patient life that are known causes of aggression: pain, depression, lack of pleasurable activities, caregiver stress and difficulty in caregiver-patient communication.

調査の概要

詳細な説明

Dementia is known primarily for its effects on memory, however, eighty percent of persons with dementia also have behavioral disturbances. This is often not addressed, leading to increased use of nursing homes, higher incidence of injury (both patient and caregiver) and the use of tranquilizing medications. Pain is one of the strongest predictors of aggression. The prevalence of pain in persons with dementia is known to be about 50%. Untreated pain is associated with significant negative outcomes, including increased health care use, inactivity and isolation. The investigators aim to determine whether outcome differences exist between active intervention and control conditions in relation to the occurrence of aggressive behavior, pain and depression, and its impact on pleasant activities, caregiver burden, quality of caregiver-patient relationship, antipsychotic use, health-service use, injuries to patient and caregiver, and nursing home placement. The active intervention, Preventing Aggression in Veterans with Dementia (PAVeD), is a family caregiver-focused, home-based intervention that uses psychoeducational and behavioral approaches to help reduce the risk of aggressive behavior in persons with dementia. The objective of PAVeD is to improve several areas of patient life that are known causes of aggression: pain and distress (including mood problems), lack of pleasurable activities, and difficulty in patient-caregiver communication that may negatively affect relationship quality and caregivers' recognition of pain.

研究の種類

介入

入学 (実際)

203

段階

  • フェーズ 3

連絡先と場所

このセクションには、調査を実施する担当者の連絡先の詳細と、この調査が実施されている場所に関する情報が記載されています。

研究場所

    • Texas
      • Houston、Texas、アメリカ、77030
        • Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX

参加基準

研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。

適格基準

就学可能な年齢

60年歳以上 (大人、高齢者)

健康ボランティアの受け入れ

はい

受講資格のある性別

全て

説明

Inclusion Criteria:

Patients will be eligible to participate in the study if they meet the following criteria:

  • have a documented diagnosis of dementia
  • receive primary care from the VA
  • reside outside a long-term care facility
  • live within 45 minutes of the MEDVAMC
  • have mild-to-moderate dementia
  • have no history of aggression in the past year
  • have no evidence of aggression on the CMAI at baseline (i.e., do not score 2 or higher on both frequency and disruptiveness for any of 13 behaviors listed).
  • have a caregiver who is directly involved with the patient:

    • at least 8 hours per week
    • sees the patient at least twice a week
    • and speaks English
  • report clinically significant pain (either directly or through the caregiver as a proxy)

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients will be excluded if they have had history of aggression in the past year

  • The investigators will administer the aggression subscale of the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI)
  • Aggression will be considered present if any of the following items are endorsed as having occurred over the prior year:

    • spitting
    • cursing/verbal aggression
    • hitting
    • kicking
    • grabbing
    • pushing
    • throwing
    • biting
    • scratching
    • hurting self/others
    • tearing things/destroying property
    • making inappropriate verbal sexual advances
    • or making inappropriate physical sexual advances

Participants that scored 2 or higher for both frequency and disruptiveness on any of the 13 behaviors listed on the CMAI at baseline were considered aggressive and were excluded from the study.

研究計画

このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。

研究はどのように設計されていますか?

デザインの詳細

  • 主な目的:ヘルスサービス研究
  • 割り当て:ランダム化
  • 介入モデル:並列代入
  • マスキング:独身

武器と介入

参加者グループ / アーム
介入・治療
実験的:Arm 1: PAVeD Intervention
In the experimental arm, the caregiver will receive six to eight 45-minute visits to teach caregiver about pain and memory problems. The person with dementia will also be able to learn from these visits. These visits will take place over three months.
In the PAVeD Intervention, the caregiver will receive six to eight 45-minute visits to teach caregiver about pain and memory problems. The person with dementia will also be able to learn from these visits. These visits will take place over three months.
アクティブコンパレータ:Arm 2: Enhanced Usual Care
In the comparison arm, the caregiver will receive information in the mail about memory problems and pain; and the caregiver will receive eight short telephone calls to check on how the person with dementia is doing.

In Enhanced Usual Care, the caregiver will receive information in the mail about memory problems and pain; and the caregiver will receive eight short telephone calls to check on how the person with dementia is doing.

Primary Care providers will be notified through electronic medical records about any significant behavioral problems or pain.

この研究は何を測定していますか?

主要な結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Number of Participants With Aggression as Determined by the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (Aggression Subscale)
時間枠:Three Months, Six Months, Twelve Months Post Intervention

The CMAI lists 13 behaviors (2 verbal and 11 nonverbal) and for each behavior the participant indicates how frequently the behavior occurs (1-5, higher values = greater frequency) and how disruptive the behavior is (1-5, higher values = greater disruptiveness). For any given behavior, if a participant scored a 2 or higher on BOTH frequency (i.e., it occurred "less than once a week" or more often) and disruptiveness (i.e., it was "a little" disruptive or more), he/she was considered aggressive.

Overall aggression takes into account all 13 behaviors, whereas verbal aggression only pertains to two behaviors and non-verbal aggression pertains to 11 behaviors.

One is considered verbally aggressive if he/she responds with a 2 or higher on both frequency and disruptiveness for either of the two verbal behaviors.

One is considered non-verbally aggressive if he/she responds with a 2 or higher on both frequency and disruptiveness for any of the 11 non-verbal behaviors.

Three Months, Six Months, Twelve Months Post Intervention

二次結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Caregiver-Reported Worst Pain
時間枠:Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months

This is one item on the Philadelphia Pain Intensity Scale. One item with scores from 0 to 5, where 0 = no pain, 1 = little pain, 2 = moderate pain, 3 = quite bad pain, 4 = very bad pain, 5 = the pain is almost unbearable.

Higher scores = greater pain severity

Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months
Patient-reported Worst Pain.
時間枠:Baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months

This is one item on the Philadelphia Pain Intensity Scale. One item on a 0-5 scale, where 0 = no pain, 1 = little pain, 2= moderate pain, 3 = quite bad pain, 4 = very bad pain, 5 = the pain is almost unbearable.

Higher scores = greater pain severity.

Baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months
Caregiver Reported Overall Pain Over the Last Several Weeks
時間枠:Baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months.

This is one item on the Philadelphia Pain Intensity Scale. One item on a 0-5 scale, where 0 = no pain, 1 = little pain, 2= moderate pain, 3 = quite bad pain, 4 = very bad pain, 5 = the pain is almost unbearable.

Higher scores = greater pain severity.

Baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months.
Patient-reported Overall Pain Over the Last Several Weeks
時間枠:Baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months

This is one item on the Philadelphia Pain Intensity Scale. One item on a 0-5 scale, where 0 = no pain, 1 = little pain, 2= moderate pain, 3 = quite bad pain, 4 = very bad pain, 5 = the pain is almost unbearable.

Higher scores = greater pain severity.

Baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months
Depression
時間枠:Baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months

Geriatric Depression Scale. 30 item scale with response options of yes = 1 and no = 0 to each item.

Total GDS scores range from 0 to 30, with greater scores indicating greater depression.

Baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months
Pleasant Events - Short Form - Alzheimer's Disease
時間枠:Baseline, 0, 3, 6, 12 months

The frequency of engagement in pleasant events, according to the Pleasant Events Schedule - Alzheimer's Disease.

For each of 20 events, participants answered the frequency (0 = not at all, 1 = 1-6 times, 2 = 7+ times) they engaged in the event and whether they enjoyed the event (1 = yes, 0 = no).

For each item, frequency x enjoyment were multiplied. Then scores for each of the 20 items were added together.

The possible range of scores on the PES frequency of engagement in pleasant events is from 0 - 40, with higher scores indicating more frequent engagement in pleasant events.

Baseline, 0, 3, 6, 12 months
Caregiver Burden
時間枠:Baseline, 3, 6, 12 months

Caregiver-reported burden, according to the Burden Inventory. 22 items are responded to on a 0-4 scale where 0 = never, 1 = rarely, 2 = sometimes, 3 = quite frequently, and 4 = nearly always.

Scores are then summed so that the total range is from 0 to 88. Higher scores indicate greater caregiver burden.

Baseline, 3, 6, 12 months
Caregiver-perceived Mutuality
時間枠:Baseline, 3, 6, 12 months

Caregiver-Perceived Total Mutuality (with patient), based on the Mutuality Scale.

Fifteen items about the caregivers' relationship with the patient with dementia were responded to on a 0-4 scale, where 0 = not at all, 1 = a little, 2 = some, 3 = quite a bit, and 4 = a great deal.

responses to all 15 items were averaged, so total scores range from 0-4, with higher values indicating greater mutuality.

Baseline, 3, 6, 12 months

協力者と研究者

ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。

捜査官

  • 主任研究者:Mark E. Kunik, MD MPH、Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX

出版物と役立つリンク

研究に関する情報を入力する責任者は、自発的にこれらの出版物を提供します。これらは、研究に関連するあらゆるものに関するものである可能性があります。

研究記録日

これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。

主要日程の研究

研究開始

2011年5月1日

一次修了 (実際)

2015年2月1日

研究の完了 (実際)

2015年9月1日

試験登録日

最初に提出

2011年3月28日

QC基準を満たした最初の提出物

2011年3月29日

最初の投稿 (見積もり)

2011年3月30日

学習記録の更新

投稿された最後の更新 (見積もり)

2016年6月24日

QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました

2016年5月19日

最終確認日

2016年5月1日

詳しくは

本研究に関する用語

その他の研究ID番号

  • IIR 09-351

個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画

個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?

いいえ

この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。

購読する