- ICH GCP
- Registro de ensayos clínicos de EE. UU.
- Ensayo clínico NCT01325714
Preventing Aggression in Veterans With Dementia (PAVeD)
Descripción general del estudio
Estado
Intervención / Tratamiento
Descripción detallada
Tipo de estudio
Inscripción (Actual)
Fase
- Fase 3
Contactos y Ubicaciones
Ubicaciones de estudio
-
-
Texas
-
Houston, Texas, Estados Unidos, 77030
- Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX
-
-
Criterios de participación
Criterio de elegibilidad
Edades elegibles para estudiar
Acepta Voluntarios Saludables
Géneros elegibles para el estudio
Descripción
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients will be eligible to participate in the study if they meet the following criteria:
- have a documented diagnosis of dementia
- receive primary care from the VA
- reside outside a long-term care facility
- live within 45 minutes of the MEDVAMC
- have mild-to-moderate dementia
- have no history of aggression in the past year
- have no evidence of aggression on the CMAI at baseline (i.e., do not score 2 or higher on both frequency and disruptiveness for any of 13 behaviors listed).
have a caregiver who is directly involved with the patient:
- at least 8 hours per week
- sees the patient at least twice a week
- and speaks English
- report clinically significant pain (either directly or through the caregiver as a proxy)
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients will be excluded if they have had history of aggression in the past year
- The investigators will administer the aggression subscale of the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI)
Aggression will be considered present if any of the following items are endorsed as having occurred over the prior year:
- spitting
- cursing/verbal aggression
- hitting
- kicking
- grabbing
- pushing
- throwing
- biting
- scratching
- hurting self/others
- tearing things/destroying property
- making inappropriate verbal sexual advances
- or making inappropriate physical sexual advances
Participants that scored 2 or higher for both frequency and disruptiveness on any of the 13 behaviors listed on the CMAI at baseline were considered aggressive and were excluded from the study.
Plan de estudios
¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?
Detalles de diseño
- Propósito principal: Investigación de servicios de salud
- Asignación: Aleatorizado
- Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
- Enmascaramiento: Único
Armas e Intervenciones
Grupo de participantes/brazo |
Intervención / Tratamiento |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Arm 1: PAVeD Intervention
In the experimental arm, the caregiver will receive six to eight 45-minute visits to teach caregiver about pain and memory problems.
The person with dementia will also be able to learn from these visits.
These visits will take place over three months.
|
In the PAVeD Intervention, the caregiver will receive six to eight 45-minute visits to teach caregiver about pain and memory problems.
The person with dementia will also be able to learn from these visits.
These visits will take place over three months.
|
|
Comparador activo: Arm 2: Enhanced Usual Care
In the comparison arm, the caregiver will receive information in the mail about memory problems and pain; and the caregiver will receive eight short telephone calls to check on how the person with dementia is doing.
|
In Enhanced Usual Care, the caregiver will receive information in the mail about memory problems and pain; and the caregiver will receive eight short telephone calls to check on how the person with dementia is doing. Primary Care providers will be notified through electronic medical records about any significant behavioral problems or pain. |
¿Qué mide el estudio?
Medidas de resultado primarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Aggression as Determined by the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (Aggression Subscale)
Periodo de tiempo: Three Months, Six Months, Twelve Months Post Intervention
|
The CMAI lists 13 behaviors (2 verbal and 11 nonverbal) and for each behavior the participant indicates how frequently the behavior occurs (1-5, higher values = greater frequency) and how disruptive the behavior is (1-5, higher values = greater disruptiveness). For any given behavior, if a participant scored a 2 or higher on BOTH frequency (i.e., it occurred "less than once a week" or more often) and disruptiveness (i.e., it was "a little" disruptive or more), he/she was considered aggressive. Overall aggression takes into account all 13 behaviors, whereas verbal aggression only pertains to two behaviors and non-verbal aggression pertains to 11 behaviors. One is considered verbally aggressive if he/she responds with a 2 or higher on both frequency and disruptiveness for either of the two verbal behaviors. One is considered non-verbally aggressive if he/she responds with a 2 or higher on both frequency and disruptiveness for any of the 11 non-verbal behaviors. |
Three Months, Six Months, Twelve Months Post Intervention
|
Medidas de resultado secundarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Caregiver-Reported Worst Pain
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months
|
This is one item on the Philadelphia Pain Intensity Scale. One item with scores from 0 to 5, where 0 = no pain, 1 = little pain, 2 = moderate pain, 3 = quite bad pain, 4 = very bad pain, 5 = the pain is almost unbearable. Higher scores = greater pain severity |
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months
|
|
Patient-reported Worst Pain.
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months
|
This is one item on the Philadelphia Pain Intensity Scale. One item on a 0-5 scale, where 0 = no pain, 1 = little pain, 2= moderate pain, 3 = quite bad pain, 4 = very bad pain, 5 = the pain is almost unbearable. Higher scores = greater pain severity. |
Baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months
|
|
Caregiver Reported Overall Pain Over the Last Several Weeks
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months.
|
This is one item on the Philadelphia Pain Intensity Scale. One item on a 0-5 scale, where 0 = no pain, 1 = little pain, 2= moderate pain, 3 = quite bad pain, 4 = very bad pain, 5 = the pain is almost unbearable. Higher scores = greater pain severity. |
Baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months.
|
|
Patient-reported Overall Pain Over the Last Several Weeks
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months
|
This is one item on the Philadelphia Pain Intensity Scale. One item on a 0-5 scale, where 0 = no pain, 1 = little pain, 2= moderate pain, 3 = quite bad pain, 4 = very bad pain, 5 = the pain is almost unbearable. Higher scores = greater pain severity. |
Baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months
|
|
Depression
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months
|
Geriatric Depression Scale. 30 item scale with response options of yes = 1 and no = 0 to each item. Total GDS scores range from 0 to 30, with greater scores indicating greater depression. |
Baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months
|
|
Pleasant Events - Short Form - Alzheimer's Disease
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline, 0, 3, 6, 12 months
|
The frequency of engagement in pleasant events, according to the Pleasant Events Schedule - Alzheimer's Disease. For each of 20 events, participants answered the frequency (0 = not at all, 1 = 1-6 times, 2 = 7+ times) they engaged in the event and whether they enjoyed the event (1 = yes, 0 = no). For each item, frequency x enjoyment were multiplied. Then scores for each of the 20 items were added together. The possible range of scores on the PES frequency of engagement in pleasant events is from 0 - 40, with higher scores indicating more frequent engagement in pleasant events. |
Baseline, 0, 3, 6, 12 months
|
|
Caregiver Burden
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline, 3, 6, 12 months
|
Caregiver-reported burden, according to the Burden Inventory. 22 items are responded to on a 0-4 scale where 0 = never, 1 = rarely, 2 = sometimes, 3 = quite frequently, and 4 = nearly always. Scores are then summed so that the total range is from 0 to 88. Higher scores indicate greater caregiver burden. |
Baseline, 3, 6, 12 months
|
|
Caregiver-perceived Mutuality
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline, 3, 6, 12 months
|
Caregiver-Perceived Total Mutuality (with patient), based on the Mutuality Scale. Fifteen items about the caregivers' relationship with the patient with dementia were responded to on a 0-4 scale, where 0 = not at all, 1 = a little, 2 = some, 3 = quite a bit, and 4 = a great deal. responses to all 15 items were averaged, so total scores range from 0-4, with higher values indicating greater mutuality. |
Baseline, 3, 6, 12 months
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Patrocinador
Investigadores
- Investigador principal: Mark E. Kunik, MD MPH, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX
Publicaciones y enlaces útiles
Publicaciones Generales
- Fowler JH, Dannecker K, Stanley M, Wilson N, Snow AL, Kunik ME. Preventing aggression and other secondary features of dementia in elderly persons: Three case studies. Bull Menninger Clin. 2015 Spring;79(2):95-115. doi: 10.1521/bumc.2015.79.2.95.
- Bradford A, Shrestha S, Snow AL, Stanley MA, Wilson N, Hersch G, Kunik ME. Managing pain to prevent aggression in people with dementia: a nonpharmacologic intervention. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2012 Feb;27(1):41-7. doi: 10.1177/1533317512439795.
- Breland JY, Barrera TL, Snow AL, Sansgiry S, Stanley MA, Wilson N, Amspoker AB, Kunik ME. Correlates of pain intensity in community-dwelling individuals with mild to moderate dementia. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2015 May;30(3):320-5. doi: 10.1177/1533317514545827. Epub 2014 Aug 7.
- Li J, Snow AL, Wilson N, Stanley MA, Morgan RO, Sansgiry S, Kunik ME. The Quality of Pain Treatment in Community-Dwelling Persons with Dementia. Dement Geriatr Cogn Dis Extra. 2015 Dec 5;5(3):459-70. doi: 10.1159/000441717. eCollection 2015 Sep-Dec.
- Amspoker AB, Snow AL, Renn BN, Block P, Pickens S, Morgan RO, Kunik ME. Patient Versus Informal Caregiver Proxy Reports of Pain Interference in Persons With Dementia. J Appl Gerontol. 2021 Apr;40(4):414-422. doi: 10.1177/0733464820902632. Epub 2020 Feb 6.
Fechas de registro del estudio
Fechas importantes del estudio
Inicio del estudio
Finalización primaria (Actual)
Finalización del estudio (Actual)
Fechas de registro del estudio
Enviado por primera vez
Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
Publicado por primera vez (Estimar)
Actualizaciones de registros de estudio
Última actualización publicada (Estimar)
Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
Última verificación
Más información
Términos relacionados con este estudio
Términos MeSH relevantes adicionales
Otros números de identificación del estudio
- IIR 09-351
Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)
¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?
Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .