このページは自動翻訳されたものであり、翻訳の正確性は保証されていません。を参照してください。 英語版 ソーステキスト用。

A Health Belief Model Based Intervention to Increase Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) Vaccination Among College Men

2013年1月30日 更新者：Sharma Manoj、University of Cincinnati

Designing and Evaluating a Health Belief Model Based Intervention to Increase Intent of HPV Vaccination Among College Men: Use of Qualitative and Quantitative Methodologies

The purposes of this study are to (1) identify predictors of Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine acceptability among college men based on the Health Belief Model through focus groups, (2) triangulate focus group results with a prior quantitative study in developing an intervention based on the Health Belief Model to enhance HPV vaccine acceptability, and (3) test the efficacy of the above intervention based on the Health Belief Model by comparing it to a knowledge-based intervention. Approximately five focus groups with ten participants in each group with college students in the ages 18-25 years will be conducted at a large Midwestern University for the qualitative piece. Data will be analyzed for categories and triangulated with previous study to develop a theory based intervention. For the quantitative piece a randomized controlled design with 45 participants in each arm (theory based intervention and knowledge based intervention) will be implemented.

調査の概要

状態

完了

条件

介入・治療

詳細な説明

Up to this date, there was a lack of qualitative research on vaccine acceptability among men and theory-based interventions that promote HPV vaccination among men. A few studies have been conducted with parents and physicians regarding HPV vaccination with girls, and a few regarding women's awareness and acceptability. Results indicated increasing awareness of HPV, informing costs and benefits associated with the vaccine, and perceived susceptibility. Based on this information, it is crucial to obtain a further understanding of knowledge, awareness, and predictors related to HPV and its vaccination in men. Information obtained can be utilized in developing an intervention to increase intentions of taking the HPV vaccine. Refining results will lead to a standardization of an intervention that can be implemented across college campuses.

研究の種類

介入

入学 (実際)

90

段階

  • フェーズ 4

連絡先と場所

このセクションには、調査を実施する担当者の連絡先の詳細と、この調査が実施されている場所に関する情報が記載されています。

研究場所

  • アメリカ
    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati、Ohio、アメリカ、45221-0068
        • Manoj Sharma

参加基準

研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。

適格基準

就学可能な年齢

18年～25年 (大人)

健康ボランティアの受け入れ

いいえ

受講資格のある性別

男

説明

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Males
  • English speaking
  • 18-25 years
  • Undergraduate or graduate student at the University of Cincinnati

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Females
  • Under 18 years, or above 25 years
  • Non- English speaking individuals
  • Non-university attending students
  • If already received HPV vaccination

研究計画

このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。

研究はどのように設計されていますか？

デザインの詳細

  • 主な目的：防止
  • 割り当て：ランダム化
  • 介入モデル：階乗代入
  • マスキング：なし（オープンラベル）

武器と介入

参加者グループ / アーム
介入・治療
実験的：Health belief model based education
This experimental arm will provide an educational intervention designed to modify constructs of health belief model regarding HPV vaccine acceptability.
行動：HPV vaccine acceptability
One arm will receive health belief model based educational intervention and other arm will receive knowledge-based educational intervention.
アクティブコンパレータ：Knowledge-based education
This comparison arm will provide education based on knowledge regarding HPV vaccine acceptability.
行動：HPV vaccine acceptability
One arm will receive health belief model based educational intervention and other arm will receive knowledge-based educational intervention.

この研究は何を測定していますか？

主要な結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Change From Baseline to Post Intervention to Follow-up (up to 3 Months) After the Interventions the Number of Participants Who Have Taken the HPV Vaccine
時間枠：Post intervention and up to 3 months after the interventions
Before, after and one to three month following the health belief model based educational intervention and knowledge-based educational intervention the participants will be asked if they have taken the first dose of HPV vaccine and changes noted.
Post intervention and up to 3 months after the interventions
Change From Baseline to Post Intervention to Follow-up up to 3 Months After the Interventions the Number of Participants Who Intend to Take HPV Vaccine Using HPV Intent Scale (Possible Range 0-4 Likert Units)
時間枠：Post intervention and up to 3 months after the intervention

Before the interventions, post test after the interventions and follow-up 1 to 3 months after the interventions (health belief model based and knowledge based) participants will be asked about their intent to take the HPV vaccine on a scale of 0-4 Likert units and changes noted.

Posttest was conducted immediately after the intervention. Minimum score = 0 indicating no intent to take vaccine; Maximum score = 4 indicating strong intent to take vaccine. Scale was a single item scale.
Post intervention and up to 3 months after the intervention

二次結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Change From Baseline to Post Intervention to Follow-up (up to 3 Months) After the Interventions in Score of Perceived Susceptibility for HPV
時間枠：Post interventions and up to 3 months after the interventions

Before the interventions, after the interventions and up to 3 months following the interventions the health belief model construct of perceived susceptibility for HPV scores will be measured on a paper pencil self-report test and changes noted. Perceived susceptibility for HPV will be measured as a summative score on a three item Likert subscale with a range of 0 to 12 (0- not likely and 12-very likely). The subscale has acceptable validity and reliability.

Difference between posttest and pre-test was done. This value was then used to run the multiple regressions.
Post interventions and up to 3 months after the interventions
Change From Baseline to Post Test to Upto 3 Month Follow-up After the Interventions in Score for Perceived Severity for HPV
時間枠：Post interventions and up to 3 months after the intervention

Before the interventions, after the interventions and up to 3 months following the interventions the health belief model construct of perceived severity for HPV scores will be measured on a paper pencil self-report test and changes noted. Perceived severity for HPV will be measured as a summative score on a three item Likert subscale with a range of 0 to 12 to 12 (0- not likely and 12-very likely). The subscale has acceptable validity and reliability.

Difference between posttest and pre-test was done. This value was then used to run the multiple regressions.
Post interventions and up to 3 months after the intervention
Change From Baseline to Post Test After the Interventions to up to 3 Month Follow-up in Score of Perceived Benefits of HPV Vaccine
時間枠：post intervention and up to 3 months after the interventions

Before the interventions, after the interventions and one month following the interventions the health belief model construct of Perceived benefits of HPV vaccine scores will be measured on a paper pencil self-report test and changes noted. Perceived benefits of HPV vaccine will be measured as a summative score on a four item Likert subscale with a range of 0 to 16 (0-not very likely and 16- very likely). The subscale has acceptable validity and reliability.

Difference between posttest and pre-test was done. This value was then used to run the multiple regressions.
post intervention and up to 3 months after the interventions
Change From Baseline to Post Test After the Interventions to Follow-up (up to 3 Months) in the Score of Perceived Barriers to Receiving HPV Vaccine
時間枠：post interventions and up to 3 months after the intervention

Before the interventions, post test after the interventions following the interventions the health belief model construct of perceived barriers to receiving HPV vaccine scores will be measured on a paper pencil self-report test and changes noted. Perceived barriers for receiving HPV vaccine will be measured as a summative score on a three item Likert subscale with a range of 0 to 12 (0- not likely to 12- very likely). The subscale has acceptable validity and reliability.

A difference between post-test and pre-test were taken to obtain the score. This score was then used in the regression.
post interventions and up to 3 months after the intervention
Change From Baseline to After the Interventions to Follow-up up to 3 Months After the Interventions in Score of Cues to Action to Receiving HPV Vaccine
時間枠：Post interventions and up to three months after the intervention

Before the interventions, and after the interventions and up to 3 months after the interventions the health belief model construct of cues to action to receiving HPV vaccine scores will be measured on a paper pencil self-report test and changes noted. Cues to action to receiving HPV vaccine will be measured as a summative score on a four item Likert subscale with a range of 0 to 16 (0- not at all likely to 16-very likely). The subscale has acceptable validity and reliability.

Difference between post and pre-test were used to obtain a change score. This score was used for regressions.
Post interventions and up to three months after the intervention
Change From Baseline and After the Interventions to up to 3 Months Follow-up in Score of Self-efficacy for Receiving HPV Vaccine
時間枠：Post interventions and up to 3 months follow-up

Before the interventions and after the interventions the health belief model construct of self-efficacy for receiving HPV vaccine scores will be measured on a paper pencil self-report test and changes noted. Self-efficacy for receiving HPV vaccine will be measured as a summative score on a three item Likert subscale with a range of 0 to 12 (0- not likely to 12- very likely). The subscale has acceptable validity and reliability.

The difference between post and pre-test was taken to determine a change score. This score was then used for regressions.
Post interventions and up to 3 months follow-up

協力者と研究者

ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。

スポンサー

University of Cincinnati

捜査官

  • 主任研究者：Manoj Sharma, Ph.D.、University of Cincinnati
  • スタディディレクター：Rebecca Lee, Ph.D.、University of Cincinnati
  • スタディディレクター：Purvi Mehta, MS、University of Cincinnati

出版物と役立つリンク

研究に関する情報を入力する責任者は、自発的にこれらの出版物を提供します。これらは、研究に関連するあらゆるものに関するものである可能性があります。

便利なリンク

研究記録日

これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。

主要日程の研究

研究開始

2011年9月1日

一次修了 (実際)

2012年7月1日

研究の完了 (実際)

2012年8月1日

試験登録日

最初に提出

2011年9月3日

QC基準を満たした最初の提出物

2011年9月8日

最初の投稿 (見積もり)

2011年9月9日

学習記録の更新

投稿された最後の更新 (見積もり)

2013年2月4日

QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました

2013年1月30日

最終確認日

2013年1月1日

詳しくは

本研究に関する用語

キーワード

その他の研究ID番号

  • 11083108
  • 39991 (その他の識別子：Merck Pharmaceuticals)

医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書

米国FDA規制医薬品の研究

いいえ

米国FDA規制機器製品の研究

いいえ

米国で製造され、米国から輸出された製品。

いいえ

この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。

購読する