Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

A Health Belief Model Based Intervention to Increase Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) Vaccination Among College Men

30 de enero de 2013 actualizado por: Sharma Manoj, University of Cincinnati

Designing and Evaluating a Health Belief Model Based Intervention to Increase Intent of HPV Vaccination Among College Men: Use of Qualitative and Quantitative Methodologies

The purposes of this study are to (1) identify predictors of Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine acceptability among college men based on the Health Belief Model through focus groups, (2) triangulate focus group results with a prior quantitative study in developing an intervention based on the Health Belief Model to enhance HPV vaccine acceptability, and (3) test the efficacy of the above intervention based on the Health Belief Model by comparing it to a knowledge-based intervention. Approximately five focus groups with ten participants in each group with college students in the ages 18-25 years will be conducted at a large Midwestern University for the qualitative piece. Data will be analyzed for categories and triangulated with previous study to develop a theory based intervention. For the quantitative piece a randomized controlled design with 45 participants in each arm (theory based intervention and knowledge based intervention) will be implemented.

Descripción general del estudio

Estado

Terminado

Condiciones

Intervención / Tratamiento

Descripción detallada

Up to this date, there was a lack of qualitative research on vaccine acceptability among men and theory-based interventions that promote HPV vaccination among men. A few studies have been conducted with parents and physicians regarding HPV vaccination with girls, and a few regarding women's awareness and acceptability. Results indicated increasing awareness of HPV, informing costs and benefits associated with the vaccine, and perceived susceptibility. Based on this information, it is crucial to obtain a further understanding of knowledge, awareness, and predictors related to HPV and its vaccination in men. Information obtained can be utilized in developing an intervention to increase intentions of taking the HPV vaccine. Refining results will lead to a standardization of an intervention that can be implemented across college campuses.

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Actual)

90

Fase

  • Fase 4

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Ubicaciones de estudio

  • Estados Unidos
    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, Estados Unidos, 45221-0068
        • Manoj Sharma

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

18 años a 25 años (Adulto)

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Géneros elegibles para el estudio

Masculino

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Males
  • English speaking
  • 18-25 years
  • Undergraduate or graduate student at the University of Cincinnati

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Females
  • Under 18 years, or above 25 years
  • Non- English speaking individuals
  • Non-university attending students
  • If already received HPV vaccination

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Prevención
  • Asignación: Aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación factorial
  • Enmascaramiento: Ninguno (etiqueta abierta)

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Experimental: Health belief model based education
This experimental arm will provide an educational intervention designed to modify constructs of health belief model regarding HPV vaccine acceptability.
Conductual: HPV vaccine acceptability
One arm will receive health belief model based educational intervention and other arm will receive knowledge-based educational intervention.
Comparador activo: Knowledge-based education
This comparison arm will provide education based on knowledge regarding HPV vaccine acceptability.
Conductual: HPV vaccine acceptability
One arm will receive health belief model based educational intervention and other arm will receive knowledge-based educational intervention.

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Change From Baseline to Post Intervention to Follow-up (up to 3 Months) After the Interventions the Number of Participants Who Have Taken the HPV Vaccine
Periodo de tiempo: Post intervention and up to 3 months after the interventions
Before, after and one to three month following the health belief model based educational intervention and knowledge-based educational intervention the participants will be asked if they have taken the first dose of HPV vaccine and changes noted.
Post intervention and up to 3 months after the interventions
Change From Baseline to Post Intervention to Follow-up up to 3 Months After the Interventions the Number of Participants Who Intend to Take HPV Vaccine Using HPV Intent Scale (Possible Range 0-4 Likert Units)
Periodo de tiempo: Post intervention and up to 3 months after the intervention

Before the interventions, post test after the interventions and follow-up 1 to 3 months after the interventions (health belief model based and knowledge based) participants will be asked about their intent to take the HPV vaccine on a scale of 0-4 Likert units and changes noted.

Posttest was conducted immediately after the intervention. Minimum score = 0 indicating no intent to take vaccine; Maximum score = 4 indicating strong intent to take vaccine. Scale was a single item scale.
Post intervention and up to 3 months after the intervention

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Change From Baseline to Post Intervention to Follow-up (up to 3 Months) After the Interventions in Score of Perceived Susceptibility for HPV
Periodo de tiempo: Post interventions and up to 3 months after the interventions

Before the interventions, after the interventions and up to 3 months following the interventions the health belief model construct of perceived susceptibility for HPV scores will be measured on a paper pencil self-report test and changes noted. Perceived susceptibility for HPV will be measured as a summative score on a three item Likert subscale with a range of 0 to 12 (0- not likely and 12-very likely). The subscale has acceptable validity and reliability.

Difference between posttest and pre-test was done. This value was then used to run the multiple regressions.
Post interventions and up to 3 months after the interventions
Change From Baseline to Post Test to Upto 3 Month Follow-up After the Interventions in Score for Perceived Severity for HPV
Periodo de tiempo: Post interventions and up to 3 months after the intervention

Before the interventions, after the interventions and up to 3 months following the interventions the health belief model construct of perceived severity for HPV scores will be measured on a paper pencil self-report test and changes noted. Perceived severity for HPV will be measured as a summative score on a three item Likert subscale with a range of 0 to 12 to 12 (0- not likely and 12-very likely). The subscale has acceptable validity and reliability.

Difference between posttest and pre-test was done. This value was then used to run the multiple regressions.
Post interventions and up to 3 months after the intervention
Change From Baseline to Post Test After the Interventions to up to 3 Month Follow-up in Score of Perceived Benefits of HPV Vaccine
Periodo de tiempo: post intervention and up to 3 months after the interventions

Before the interventions, after the interventions and one month following the interventions the health belief model construct of Perceived benefits of HPV vaccine scores will be measured on a paper pencil self-report test and changes noted. Perceived benefits of HPV vaccine will be measured as a summative score on a four item Likert subscale with a range of 0 to 16 (0-not very likely and 16- very likely). The subscale has acceptable validity and reliability.

Difference between posttest and pre-test was done. This value was then used to run the multiple regressions.
post intervention and up to 3 months after the interventions
Change From Baseline to Post Test After the Interventions to Follow-up (up to 3 Months) in the Score of Perceived Barriers to Receiving HPV Vaccine
Periodo de tiempo: post interventions and up to 3 months after the intervention

Before the interventions, post test after the interventions following the interventions the health belief model construct of perceived barriers to receiving HPV vaccine scores will be measured on a paper pencil self-report test and changes noted. Perceived barriers for receiving HPV vaccine will be measured as a summative score on a three item Likert subscale with a range of 0 to 12 (0- not likely to 12- very likely). The subscale has acceptable validity and reliability.

A difference between post-test and pre-test were taken to obtain the score. This score was then used in the regression.
post interventions and up to 3 months after the intervention
Change From Baseline to After the Interventions to Follow-up up to 3 Months After the Interventions in Score of Cues to Action to Receiving HPV Vaccine
Periodo de tiempo: Post interventions and up to three months after the intervention

Before the interventions, and after the interventions and up to 3 months after the interventions the health belief model construct of cues to action to receiving HPV vaccine scores will be measured on a paper pencil self-report test and changes noted. Cues to action to receiving HPV vaccine will be measured as a summative score on a four item Likert subscale with a range of 0 to 16 (0- not at all likely to 16-very likely). The subscale has acceptable validity and reliability.

Difference between post and pre-test were used to obtain a change score. This score was used for regressions.
Post interventions and up to three months after the intervention
Change From Baseline and After the Interventions to up to 3 Months Follow-up in Score of Self-efficacy for Receiving HPV Vaccine
Periodo de tiempo: Post interventions and up to 3 months follow-up

Before the interventions and after the interventions the health belief model construct of self-efficacy for receiving HPV vaccine scores will be measured on a paper pencil self-report test and changes noted. Self-efficacy for receiving HPV vaccine will be measured as a summative score on a three item Likert subscale with a range of 0 to 12 (0- not likely to 12- very likely). The subscale has acceptable validity and reliability.

The difference between post and pre-test was taken to determine a change score. This score was then used for regressions.
Post interventions and up to 3 months follow-up

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Patrocinador

University of Cincinnati

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Manoj Sharma, Ph.D., University of Cincinnati
  • Director de estudio: Rebecca Lee, Ph.D., University of Cincinnati
  • Director de estudio: Purvi Mehta, MS, University of Cincinnati

Publicaciones y enlaces útiles

La persona responsable de ingresar información sobre el estudio proporciona voluntariamente estas publicaciones. Estos pueden ser sobre cualquier cosa relacionada con el estudio.

Enlaces Útiles

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio

1 de septiembre de 2011

Finalización primaria (Actual)

1 de julio de 2012

Finalización del estudio (Actual)

1 de agosto de 2012

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

3 de septiembre de 2011

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

8 de septiembre de 2011

Publicado por primera vez (Estimar)

9 de septiembre de 2011

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Estimar)

4 de febrero de 2013

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

30 de enero de 2013

Última verificación

1 de enero de 2013

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Palabras clave

Otros números de identificación del estudio

  • 11083108
  • 39991 (Otro identificador: Merck Pharmaceuticals)

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

producto fabricado y exportado desde los EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir