このページは自動翻訳されたものであり、翻訳の正確性は保証されていません。を参照してください。 英語版 ソーステキスト用。

Type 2 Diabetes: Risk Perceptions and Self-management Behaviour

2019年2月12日 更新者:University of Oxford

This pilot randomised controlled trial (RCT) aims to assess the feasibility of using a new type of risk communication intervention for people with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in primary care and to evaluate its potential impact on risk perceptions and self-management behaviour.

The study comprises 40 participants with T2DM randomly allocated to usual care supported by the risk communication intervention or usual care only.

調査の概要

詳細な説明

Diabetes self-management, which includes self-care behaviours such as healthy eating and physical exercise, has become the cornerstone for treating type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, although self-management education (SME) is necessary to equip patients with the knowledge, skills and attitudes required to manage their diabetes care, the most effective method to do so is still unclear.

Recent studies have shown that people with T2DM underestimated their risks of developing complications. Although behavioural processes are complex, wrong risk perceptions are a major impediment to the adoption of self-care behaviours and, as a result, an additional risk for the occurrence of adverse outcomes.

Existing risk communication interventions have shown mixed results, with many participants barely understanding the explanations of health professionals about risks and having poor recall of risk information. In this context, there is a need for better risk communication interventions.

Based on the results of recent studies investigating the risk perceptions and risk attitudes of people with T2DM, we have developed a new, tailored risk communication intervention. The objectives of this intervention are:

  • To increase the awareness of risks for complications associated with type 2 diabetes.
  • To encourage the adoption of recommended self-care behaviours.

The intervention has been developed in collaboration with both health professionals and patients. We have designed a pilot study to assess the feasibility of using the intervention in primary care and to evaluate its potential impact on patients' risk perceptions and self-management behaviour, in order to inform the design of a largest study (RCT to be conducted in the future)

The intervention lasts 5 minutes on average, conducted by the general practitioner (GP) during patients' routine primary care consultation. The study involves 40 participants with T2DM randomly allocated to usual care supported by the risk communication intervention or usual care only.

The research is supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care Oxford at Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust.

研究の種類

介入

入学 (実際)

40

段階

  • 適用できない

連絡先と場所

このセクションには、調査を実施する担当者の連絡先の詳細と、この調査が実施されている場所に関する情報が記載されています。

研究場所

    • Oxfordshire
      • Oxford、Oxfordshire、イギリス、OX1 2NR
        • 27 Beaumont Street Surgery Practice

参加基準

研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。

適格基準

就学可能な年齢

30年~75年 (大人、高齢者)

健康ボランティアの受け入れ

いいえ

受講資格のある性別

全て

説明

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study.
  • Diagnosed with type-2 diabetes.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to provide informed consent.
  • Non-English speaker.
  • Not suitable for the study according to GP.

研究計画

このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。

研究はどのように設計されていますか?

デザインの詳細

  • 主な目的:他の
  • 割り当て:ランダム化
  • 介入モデル:並列代入
  • マスキング:独身

武器と介入

参加者グループ / アーム
介入・治療
実験的:Intervention and usual care
Risk communication intervention and usual care including personalized lifestyle advice
The risk communication intervention consists of communicating the impact of being poorly controlled on two types of outcome: (1) absolute 10-year risk of experiencing a cardiovascular event, i.e. heart attack or stroke (10-year CV risk); (2) life expectancy. These personalized risk estimates are calculated based on the UKPDS outcomes model (version 2), which is a prognostic model of reference in the area of Type 2 diabetes.
介入なし:Usual care only
Usual care including personalized lifestyle advice

この研究は何を測定していますか?

主要な結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Feasibility of implementing the intervention in primary care: Binary outcome (feasible / not feasible), as judged by the investigators
時間枠:3 months
Binary outcome (feasible / not feasible), as judged by the investigators following analysis of study pre-specified outcome measures.
3 months

二次結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Recall of personalised risk information
時間枠:3 months

Recall of personalised risk information is measured immediately and 3 months after the intervention.

Type of question used: "The doctor has recently calculated your personalised risk information on his computer. Do you remember these numbers?

Binary outcome: information recalled or information not recalled. Recall of information represents a better outcome. Rates of information recall (%) are compared between the two groups.

3 months
Intentions to make lifestyle changes
時間枠:3 months
Intentions to make lifestyle changes are measured immediately before and after the intervention using the validated Determinants of Lifestyle Behaviour Questionnaire (DLBQ). The DLBQ consists of three parts: intentions to eat healthier, to increase physical activity, and to reduce smoking consumption. Intentions are assessed by a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Each dimension score is assessed individually. Higher scores represent a better outcome.
3 months
Change in self-management behaviour
時間枠:3 months
Change in self-management behaviour from baseline to 3 months is measured using the validated Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities (SDSCA) questionnaire. This instrument explores six dimensions of self-management (healthy eating, physical activity, medication adherence, self-monitoring of blood glucose, foot checks and smoking behaviour), using the self-reported frequency of completing recommended activities during the past seven days as an outcome (SDSCA score ranging from 0 to 7 for each dimension). Each dimension score is assessed individually. Higher scores represent a better outcome.
3 months

その他の成果指標

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Consent rate
時間枠:3 months
Rate of eligible subjects consenting to participate in the study (%)
3 months
Acceptability of the intervention
時間枠:Immediately after the intervention
Participants' acceptability of the intervention is measured using adapted questions from the COMRADE (Combined Outcome Measure for Risk communication And treatment Decision-making Effectiveness) scale, which was validated for use in the UK. This scale consists of 10 questions on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree) and is used immediately after the intervention. The scores of each question are combined to compute an average score. Higher average scores represent a better outcome.
Immediately after the intervention
Anxiety due to the intervention
時間枠:Immediately after the inervention
Following Welschen et al. (2012), a question adapted from Claassen et al. (2010) is used to assess how anxious participants are about their personalised risk information (7-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not anxious at all) to 7 (very much anxious). Higher scores represent a worse outcome.
Immediately after the inervention
Worry due to the intervention
時間枠:Immediately after the intervention
Following Welschen et al. (2012), a question adapted from Claassen et al. (2010) is used to assess how worried participants are about their personalised risk information (7-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not worried at all) to 7 (very much worried). Higher scores represent a worse outcome.
Immediately after the intervention
Retention rate
時間枠:3 months
Rate of participants who stay enrolled in the study until it ends (%)
3 months
Rate of missing data
時間枠:3 months
Rate of missing data in participants' self-reported questionnaires (%)
3 months

協力者と研究者

ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。

研究記録日

これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。

主要日程の研究

研究開始 (実際)

2017年9月15日

一次修了 (実際)

2018年2月9日

研究の完了 (実際)

2018年2月9日

試験登録日

最初に提出

2019年1月18日

QC基準を満たした最初の提出物

2019年2月12日

最初の投稿 (実際)

2019年2月15日

学習記録の更新

投稿された最後の更新 (実際)

2019年2月15日

QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました

2019年2月12日

最終確認日

2019年1月1日

詳しくは

本研究に関する用語

キーワード

その他の研究ID番号

  • 17/NW/0267

個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画

個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?

いいえ

医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書

米国FDA規制医薬品の研究

いいえ

米国FDA規制機器製品の研究

いいえ

この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。

購読する