이 페이지는 자동 번역되었으며 번역의 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다. 참조하십시오 영문판 원본 텍스트의 경우.

Type 2 Diabetes: Risk Perceptions and Self-management Behaviour

2019년 2월 12일 업데이트: University of Oxford

This pilot randomised controlled trial (RCT) aims to assess the feasibility of using a new type of risk communication intervention for people with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in primary care and to evaluate its potential impact on risk perceptions and self-management behaviour.

The study comprises 40 participants with T2DM randomly allocated to usual care supported by the risk communication intervention or usual care only.

연구 개요

상세 설명

Diabetes self-management, which includes self-care behaviours such as healthy eating and physical exercise, has become the cornerstone for treating type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, although self-management education (SME) is necessary to equip patients with the knowledge, skills and attitudes required to manage their diabetes care, the most effective method to do so is still unclear.

Recent studies have shown that people with T2DM underestimated their risks of developing complications. Although behavioural processes are complex, wrong risk perceptions are a major impediment to the adoption of self-care behaviours and, as a result, an additional risk for the occurrence of adverse outcomes.

Existing risk communication interventions have shown mixed results, with many participants barely understanding the explanations of health professionals about risks and having poor recall of risk information. In this context, there is a need for better risk communication interventions.

Based on the results of recent studies investigating the risk perceptions and risk attitudes of people with T2DM, we have developed a new, tailored risk communication intervention. The objectives of this intervention are:

  • To increase the awareness of risks for complications associated with type 2 diabetes.
  • To encourage the adoption of recommended self-care behaviours.

The intervention has been developed in collaboration with both health professionals and patients. We have designed a pilot study to assess the feasibility of using the intervention in primary care and to evaluate its potential impact on patients' risk perceptions and self-management behaviour, in order to inform the design of a largest study (RCT to be conducted in the future)

The intervention lasts 5 minutes on average, conducted by the general practitioner (GP) during patients' routine primary care consultation. The study involves 40 participants with T2DM randomly allocated to usual care supported by the risk communication intervention or usual care only.

The research is supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care Oxford at Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust.

연구 유형

중재적

등록 (실제)

40

단계

  • 해당 없음

연락처 및 위치

이 섹션에서는 연구를 수행하는 사람들의 연락처 정보와 이 연구가 수행되는 장소에 대한 정보를 제공합니다.

연구 장소

    • Oxfordshire
      • Oxford, Oxfordshire, 영국, OX1 2NR
        • 27 Beaumont Street Surgery Practice

참여기준

연구원은 적격성 기준이라는 특정 설명에 맞는 사람을 찾습니다. 이러한 기준의 몇 가지 예는 개인의 일반적인 건강 상태 또는 이전 치료입니다.

자격 기준

공부할 수 있는 나이

30년 (성인, 고령자)

건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다

아니

연구 대상 성별

모두

설명

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study.
  • Diagnosed with type-2 diabetes.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to provide informed consent.
  • Non-English speaker.
  • Not suitable for the study according to GP.

공부 계획

이 섹션에서는 연구 설계 방법과 연구가 측정하는 내용을 포함하여 연구 계획에 대한 세부 정보를 제공합니다.

연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?

디자인 세부사항

  • 주 목적: 다른
  • 할당: 무작위
  • 중재 모델: 병렬 할당
  • 마스킹: 하나의

무기와 개입

참가자 그룹 / 팔
개입 / 치료
실험적: Intervention and usual care
Risk communication intervention and usual care including personalized lifestyle advice
The risk communication intervention consists of communicating the impact of being poorly controlled on two types of outcome: (1) absolute 10-year risk of experiencing a cardiovascular event, i.e. heart attack or stroke (10-year CV risk); (2) life expectancy. These personalized risk estimates are calculated based on the UKPDS outcomes model (version 2), which is a prognostic model of reference in the area of Type 2 diabetes.
간섭 없음: Usual care only
Usual care including personalized lifestyle advice

연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?

주요 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Feasibility of implementing the intervention in primary care: Binary outcome (feasible / not feasible), as judged by the investigators
기간: 3 months
Binary outcome (feasible / not feasible), as judged by the investigators following analysis of study pre-specified outcome measures.
3 months

2차 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Recall of personalised risk information
기간: 3 months

Recall of personalised risk information is measured immediately and 3 months after the intervention.

Type of question used: "The doctor has recently calculated your personalised risk information on his computer. Do you remember these numbers?

Binary outcome: information recalled or information not recalled. Recall of information represents a better outcome. Rates of information recall (%) are compared between the two groups.

3 months
Intentions to make lifestyle changes
기간: 3 months
Intentions to make lifestyle changes are measured immediately before and after the intervention using the validated Determinants of Lifestyle Behaviour Questionnaire (DLBQ). The DLBQ consists of three parts: intentions to eat healthier, to increase physical activity, and to reduce smoking consumption. Intentions are assessed by a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Each dimension score is assessed individually. Higher scores represent a better outcome.
3 months
Change in self-management behaviour
기간: 3 months
Change in self-management behaviour from baseline to 3 months is measured using the validated Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities (SDSCA) questionnaire. This instrument explores six dimensions of self-management (healthy eating, physical activity, medication adherence, self-monitoring of blood glucose, foot checks and smoking behaviour), using the self-reported frequency of completing recommended activities during the past seven days as an outcome (SDSCA score ranging from 0 to 7 for each dimension). Each dimension score is assessed individually. Higher scores represent a better outcome.
3 months

기타 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Consent rate
기간: 3 months
Rate of eligible subjects consenting to participate in the study (%)
3 months
Acceptability of the intervention
기간: Immediately after the intervention
Participants' acceptability of the intervention is measured using adapted questions from the COMRADE (Combined Outcome Measure for Risk communication And treatment Decision-making Effectiveness) scale, which was validated for use in the UK. This scale consists of 10 questions on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree) and is used immediately after the intervention. The scores of each question are combined to compute an average score. Higher average scores represent a better outcome.
Immediately after the intervention
Anxiety due to the intervention
기간: Immediately after the inervention
Following Welschen et al. (2012), a question adapted from Claassen et al. (2010) is used to assess how anxious participants are about their personalised risk information (7-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not anxious at all) to 7 (very much anxious). Higher scores represent a worse outcome.
Immediately after the inervention
Worry due to the intervention
기간: Immediately after the intervention
Following Welschen et al. (2012), a question adapted from Claassen et al. (2010) is used to assess how worried participants are about their personalised risk information (7-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not worried at all) to 7 (very much worried). Higher scores represent a worse outcome.
Immediately after the intervention
Retention rate
기간: 3 months
Rate of participants who stay enrolled in the study until it ends (%)
3 months
Rate of missing data
기간: 3 months
Rate of missing data in participants' self-reported questionnaires (%)
3 months

공동 작업자 및 조사자

여기에서 이 연구와 관련된 사람과 조직을 찾을 수 있습니다.

연구 기록 날짜

이 날짜는 ClinicalTrials.gov에 대한 연구 기록 및 요약 결과 제출의 진행 상황을 추적합니다. 연구 기록 및 보고된 결과는 공개 웹사이트에 게시되기 전에 특정 품질 관리 기준을 충족하는지 확인하기 위해 국립 의학 도서관(NLM)에서 검토합니다.

연구 주요 날짜

연구 시작 (실제)

2017년 9월 15일

기본 완료 (실제)

2018년 2월 9일

연구 완료 (실제)

2018년 2월 9일

연구 등록 날짜

최초 제출

2019년 1월 18일

QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출

2019년 2월 12일

처음 게시됨 (실제)

2019년 2월 15일

연구 기록 업데이트

마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)

2019년 2월 15일

QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출

2019년 2월 12일

마지막으로 확인됨

2019년 1월 1일

추가 정보

이 연구와 관련된 용어

키워드

기타 연구 ID 번호

  • 17/NW/0267

개별 참가자 데이터(IPD) 계획

개별 참가자 데이터(IPD)를 공유할 계획입니까?

아니요

약물 및 장치 정보, 연구 문서

미국 FDA 규제 의약품 연구

아니

미국 FDA 규제 기기 제품 연구

아니

이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .

제2형 당뇨병에 대한 임상 시험

  • Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and...
    완전한
    Type 2 HRS에서 Terlipressin과 Noradrenaline의 안전성과 효능 및 예측반응인자
    인도
3
구독하다