このページは自動翻訳されたものであり、翻訳の正確性は保証されていません。を参照してください。 英語版 ソーステキスト用。

"Where-there-is-no-psychiatrist Integrated Personal Therapy" Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults

2021年6月8日 更新者:Shefaly Shorey、National University, Singapore

"Where-there-is-no-psychiatrist Integrated Personal Therapy" Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults: Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial

The World Health Organization (WHO) reported that approximately 15% of adults aged 60 and above suffer from some form of mental disorder, with one of the most common neuropsychiatric disorders being depression. Similar trends are seen in Singapore where 11.4% of the older adults aged 65 and above had depressive symptoms. Another population survey conducted among elderly in Singapore showed that elderly with subsyndromal depression (SSD) were similar to or worse than elderly with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). However being a multi-ethnic Asia society the mental conditions such as depression and anxiety are seen as taboo topics to be discussed more so to seek help or treatment for these conditions in Singapore. Additionally scarcity of trained psychiatrists and work load of these trained professionals in the acute care settings make it difficult to reach these needy older adults. Hence, it is imperative to support the needs of this group of community dwelling older adults to ensure that their emotional wellbeing, and their condition do not progress to MDD. As such, this is the first of its kind study that will evaluate the effectiveness of solution focused brief therapy delivered by the lay mindfulness practitioner and the nurses.

If the pilot intervention is found to be feasible and effective, the large scale community trial will be planned to reach to more elderly in Singapore to help them age in a dignified way. In addition, other countries that do not involve lay mindfulness practitioners and nurses to provide integrated personal therapy in the community may benefit from this study as well.

調査の概要

研究の種類

介入

入学 (実際)

21

段階

  • 適用できない

連絡先と場所

このセクションには、調査を実施する担当者の連絡先の詳細と、この調査が実施されている場所に関する情報が記載されています。

研究場所

      • Singapore、シンガポール、117597
        • National University of Singapore

参加基準

研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。

適格基準

就学可能な年齢

60年~95年 (大人、高齢者)

健康ボランティアの受け入れ

いいえ

受講資格のある性別

全て

説明

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Community-dwelling older adults aged between 60-95 years old
  • Able to understand and speak either English and/or Mandarin
  • Able to attend at least 80% (five out of seven sessions) of the intervention sessions
  • Have subsyndromal depression (obtained a score between one and five on the Geriatric Depression Scale) and/or subsyndromal anxiety (obtained a score between three and 10 on the Geriatric Anxiety Scale)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Older adults aged between 60-95 years old without subsyndromal depression and/or subsyndromal anxiety
  • Older adults aged between 60-95 years old who could not understand or speak either English and/or Mandarin.
  • Older adults aged between 60-95 years old who were unable to attend at least 80% (five out of seven sessions) of the intervention sessions.

研究計画

このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。

研究はどのように設計されていますか?

デザインの詳細

  • 主な目的:処理
  • 割り当て:ランダム化
  • 介入モデル:並列代入
  • マスキング:独身

武器と介入

参加者グループ / アーム
介入・治療
介入なし:コントロール
介入なし
実験的:Where-there-is-no-psychiatrist Integrated Personal Therapy (WIPT)
Solution-focused brief therapy (SFBT) involving psychoeducation and structured life review therapy, as well as mindfulness-based training
The WIPT include weekly face-to-face group sessions including mindfulness-based training and solution focused brief therapy (SFBT) involving psychoeducation and structured life review therapy catered to the personal needs of the participants.

この研究は何を測定していますか?

主要な結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Symptoms of depression
時間枠:Prior to start of intervention
Measured using Geriatric Depression Scale. 15-item scale where participants select either "Yes" or "No" in response to 15 statements. The maximum score that could be obtained was 15 points; a high score on the scale indicates severe depressive symptoms.
Prior to start of intervention
Symptoms of depression
時間枠:3 months post-recruitment
Measured using Geriatric Depression Scale. 15-item scale where participants select either "Yes" or "No" in response to 15 statements. The maximum score that could be obtained was 15 points; a high score on the scale indicates severe depressive symptoms.
3 months post-recruitment
Symptoms of depression
時間枠:6 months post-recruitment
Measured using Geriatric Depression Scale. 15-item scale where participants select either "Yes" or "No" in response to 15 statements. The maximum score that could be obtained was 15 points; a high score on the scale indicates severe depressive symptoms.
6 months post-recruitment
Symptoms of anxiety
時間枠:Prior to start of intervention
Measured using Geriatric Anxiety Inventory. 20-item scale where participants select either "Agree" or "Disagree" to assess the anxiety symptoms in older adults. The maximum score that could be obtained was 20 points; a high score indicates more anxiety symptoms.
Prior to start of intervention
Symptoms of anxiety
時間枠:3 months post-recruitment
Measured using Geriatric Anxiety Inventory. 20-item scale where participants select either "Agree" or "Disagree" to assess the anxiety symptoms in older adults. The maximum score that could be obtained was 20 points; a high score indicates more anxiety symptoms.
3 months post-recruitment
Symptoms of anxiety
時間枠:6 months post-recruitment
Measured using Geriatric Anxiety Inventory. 20-item scale where participants select either "Agree" or "Disagree" to assess the anxiety symptoms in older adults. The maximum score that could be obtained was 20 points; a high score indicates more anxiety symptoms.
6 months post-recruitment

二次結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Life satisfaction
時間枠:Prior to start of intervention
Measured using Satisfaction with Life Scale. 5-item scale that included a 7-point Likert scale (1 = "Strongly Disagree"; 7 = "Strongly Agree"). The maximum score that could be obtained was 35 points; a high score indicates high level of satisfaction with life.
Prior to start of intervention
Life satisfaction
時間枠:3 months post-recruitment
Measured using Satisfaction with Life Scale. 5-item scale that included a 7-point Likert scale (1 = "Strongly Disagree"; 7 = "Strongly Agree"). The maximum score that could be obtained was 35 points; a high score indicates high level of satisfaction with life.
3 months post-recruitment
Life satisfaction
時間枠:6 months post-recruitment
Measured using Satisfaction with Life Scale. 5-item scale that included a 7-point Likert scale (1 = "Strongly Disagree"; 7 = "Strongly Agree"). The maximum score that could be obtained was 35 points; a high score indicates high level of satisfaction with life.
6 months post-recruitment
Social connectedness in terms of friendship
時間枠:Prior to start of intervention
Measured using Friendship Scale. 6-item where participants had to select an answer out of the five options (1 = "Not at All"; 5 = "Almost Always"). The maximum score that could be obtained was 30 points; a high score indicates high level of social connectedness.
Prior to start of intervention
Social connectedness in terms of friendship
時間枠:3 months post-recruitment
Measured using Friendship Scale. 6-item where participants had to select an answer out of the five options (1 = "Not at All"; 5 = "Almost Always"). The maximum score that could be obtained was 30 points; a high score indicates high level of social connectedness.
3 months post-recruitment
Social connectedness in terms of friendship
時間枠:6 months post-recruitment
Measured using Friendship Scale. 6-item where participants had to select an answer out of the five options (1 = "Not at All"; 5 = "Almost Always"). The maximum score that could be obtained was 30 points; a high score indicates high level of social connectedness.
6 months post-recruitment
Quality of life
時間枠:Prior to start of intervention
Measured using World Health Organization Quality of Life-Older Adults module. 13-item scale where participants had to select an answer based on a 5-point rating scale (1 = "Not at All"; 5 = "Very Satisfied"). The maximum score was 65 points, and a high score indicates high quality of life.
Prior to start of intervention
Quality of life
時間枠:3 months post-recruitment
Measured using World Health Organization Quality of Life-Older Adults module. 13-item scale where participants had to select an answer based on a 5-point rating scale (1 = "Not at All"; 5 = "Very Satisfied"). The maximum score was 65 points, and a high score indicates high quality of life.
3 months post-recruitment
Quality of life
時間枠:6 months post-recruitment
Measured using World Health Organization Quality of Life-Older Adults module. 13-item scale where participants had to select an answer based on a 5-point rating scale (1 = "Not at All"; 5 = "Very Satisfied"). The maximum score was 65 points, and a high score indicates high quality of life.
6 months post-recruitment

その他の成果指標

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Cortisol in ng/ml
時間枠:Prior to start of intervention
Stress- and anxiety- related inflammatory outcomes. Collected in lithium heparin tubes
Prior to start of intervention
Cortisol in ng/ml
時間枠:6 months post-recruitment
Stress- and anxiety- related inflammatory outcomes. Collected in lithium heparin tubes
6 months post-recruitment
Annexin-A1 in ng/ml
時間枠:Prior to start of intervention
Stress- and anxiety- related inflammatory outcomes. Collected in lithium heparin tubes
Prior to start of intervention
Annexin-A1 in ng/ml
時間枠:6 months post-recruitment
Stress- and anxiety- related inflammatory outcomes. Collected in lithium heparin tubes
6 months post-recruitment
Interleukin-1-beta in pg/ml
時間枠:Prior to start of intervention
Stress- and anxiety- related inflammatory outcomes. Collected in lithium heparin tubes
Prior to start of intervention
Interleukin-1-beta in pg/ml
時間枠:6 months post-recruitment
Stress- and anxiety- related inflammatory outcomes. Collected in lithium heparin tubes
6 months post-recruitment

協力者と研究者

ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。

研究記録日

これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。

主要日程の研究

研究開始 (実際)

2019年9月1日

一次修了 (実際)

2020年1月31日

研究の完了 (実際)

2020年3月31日

試験登録日

最初に提出

2021年6月1日

QC基準を満たした最初の提出物

2021年6月8日

最初の投稿 (実際)

2021年6月15日

学習記録の更新

投稿された最後の更新 (実際)

2021年6月15日

QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました

2021年6月8日

最終確認日

2021年6月1日

詳しくは

本研究に関する用語

その他の研究ID番号

  • A17-2003-B

個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画

個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?

いいえ

医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書

米国FDA規制医薬品の研究

いいえ

米国FDA規制機器製品の研究

いいえ

この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。

購読する