"Where-there-is-no-psychiatrist Integrated Personal Therapy" Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults
2021년 6월 8일 업데이트: Shefaly Shorey, National University, Singapore
"Where-there-is-no-psychiatrist Integrated Personal Therapy" Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults: Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial
The World Health Organization (WHO) reported that approximately 15% of adults aged 60 and above suffer from some form of mental disorder, with one of the most common neuropsychiatric disorders being depression. Similar trends are seen in Singapore where 11.4% of the older adults aged 65 and above had depressive symptoms. Another population survey conducted among elderly in Singapore showed that elderly with subsyndromal depression (SSD) were similar to or worse than elderly with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). However being a multi-ethnic Asia society the mental conditions such as depression and anxiety are seen as taboo topics to be discussed more so to seek help or treatment for these conditions in Singapore. Additionally scarcity of trained psychiatrists and work load of these trained professionals in the acute care settings make it difficult to reach these needy older adults. Hence, it is imperative to support the needs of this group of community dwelling older adults to ensure that their emotional wellbeing, and their condition do not progress to MDD. As such, this is the first of its kind study that will evaluate the effectiveness of solution focused brief therapy delivered by the lay mindfulness practitioner and the nurses.
If the pilot intervention is found to be feasible and effective, the large scale community trial will be planned to reach to more elderly in Singapore to help them age in a dignified way. In addition, other countries that do not involve lay mindfulness practitioners and nurses to provide integrated personal therapy in the community may benefit from this study as well.
연구 개요
상태
완전한
연구 유형
중재적
등록 (실제)
21
단계
- 해당 없음
연락처 및 위치
이 섹션에서는 연구를 수행하는 사람들의 연락처 정보와 이 연구가 수행되는 장소에 대한 정보를 제공합니다.
연구 장소
-
-
-
Singapore, 싱가포르, 117597
- National University of Singapore
-
-
참여기준
연구원은 적격성 기준이라는 특정 설명에 맞는 사람을 찾습니다. 이러한 기준의 몇 가지 예는 개인의 일반적인 건강 상태 또는 이전 치료입니다.
자격 기준
공부할 수 있는 나이
60년 (성인, 고령자)
건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다
아니
연구 대상 성별
모두
설명
Inclusion Criteria:
- Community-dwelling older adults aged between 60-95 years old
- Able to understand and speak either English and/or Mandarin
- Able to attend at least 80% (five out of seven sessions) of the intervention sessions
- Have subsyndromal depression (obtained a score between one and five on the Geriatric Depression Scale) and/or subsyndromal anxiety (obtained a score between three and 10 on the Geriatric Anxiety Scale)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Older adults aged between 60-95 years old without subsyndromal depression and/or subsyndromal anxiety
- Older adults aged between 60-95 years old who could not understand or speak either English and/or Mandarin.
- Older adults aged between 60-95 years old who were unable to attend at least 80% (five out of seven sessions) of the intervention sessions.
공부 계획
이 섹션에서는 연구 설계 방법과 연구가 측정하는 내용을 포함하여 연구 계획에 대한 세부 정보를 제공합니다.
연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?
디자인 세부사항
- 주 목적: 치료
- 할당: 무작위
- 중재 모델: 병렬 할당
- 마스킹: 하나의
무기와 개입
참가자 그룹 / 팔 |
개입 / 치료 |
|---|---|
|
간섭 없음: 제어
개입 없음
|
|
|
실험적: Where-there-is-no-psychiatrist Integrated Personal Therapy (WIPT)
Solution-focused brief therapy (SFBT) involving psychoeducation and structured life review therapy, as well as mindfulness-based training
|
The WIPT include weekly face-to-face group sessions including mindfulness-based training and solution focused brief therapy (SFBT) involving psychoeducation and structured life review therapy catered to the personal needs of the participants.
|
연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?
주요 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
Symptoms of depression
기간: Prior to start of intervention
|
Measured using Geriatric Depression Scale.
15-item scale where participants select either "Yes" or "No" in response to 15 statements.
The maximum score that could be obtained was 15 points; a high score on the scale indicates severe depressive symptoms.
|
Prior to start of intervention
|
|
Symptoms of depression
기간: 3 months post-recruitment
|
Measured using Geriatric Depression Scale.
15-item scale where participants select either "Yes" or "No" in response to 15 statements.
The maximum score that could be obtained was 15 points; a high score on the scale indicates severe depressive symptoms.
|
3 months post-recruitment
|
|
Symptoms of depression
기간: 6 months post-recruitment
|
Measured using Geriatric Depression Scale.
15-item scale where participants select either "Yes" or "No" in response to 15 statements.
The maximum score that could be obtained was 15 points; a high score on the scale indicates severe depressive symptoms.
|
6 months post-recruitment
|
|
Symptoms of anxiety
기간: Prior to start of intervention
|
Measured using Geriatric Anxiety Inventory.
20-item scale where participants select either "Agree" or "Disagree" to assess the anxiety symptoms in older adults.
The maximum score that could be obtained was 20 points; a high score indicates more anxiety symptoms.
|
Prior to start of intervention
|
|
Symptoms of anxiety
기간: 3 months post-recruitment
|
Measured using Geriatric Anxiety Inventory.
20-item scale where participants select either "Agree" or "Disagree" to assess the anxiety symptoms in older adults.
The maximum score that could be obtained was 20 points; a high score indicates more anxiety symptoms.
|
3 months post-recruitment
|
|
Symptoms of anxiety
기간: 6 months post-recruitment
|
Measured using Geriatric Anxiety Inventory.
20-item scale where participants select either "Agree" or "Disagree" to assess the anxiety symptoms in older adults.
The maximum score that could be obtained was 20 points; a high score indicates more anxiety symptoms.
|
6 months post-recruitment
|
2차 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
Life satisfaction
기간: Prior to start of intervention
|
Measured using Satisfaction with Life Scale.
5-item scale that included a 7-point Likert scale (1 = "Strongly Disagree"; 7 = "Strongly Agree").
The maximum score that could be obtained was 35 points; a high score indicates high level of satisfaction with life.
|
Prior to start of intervention
|
|
Life satisfaction
기간: 3 months post-recruitment
|
Measured using Satisfaction with Life Scale.
5-item scale that included a 7-point Likert scale (1 = "Strongly Disagree"; 7 = "Strongly Agree").
The maximum score that could be obtained was 35 points; a high score indicates high level of satisfaction with life.
|
3 months post-recruitment
|
|
Life satisfaction
기간: 6 months post-recruitment
|
Measured using Satisfaction with Life Scale.
5-item scale that included a 7-point Likert scale (1 = "Strongly Disagree"; 7 = "Strongly Agree").
The maximum score that could be obtained was 35 points; a high score indicates high level of satisfaction with life.
|
6 months post-recruitment
|
|
Social connectedness in terms of friendship
기간: Prior to start of intervention
|
Measured using Friendship Scale.
6-item where participants had to select an answer out of the five options (1 = "Not at All"; 5 = "Almost Always").
The maximum score that could be obtained was 30 points; a high score indicates high level of social connectedness.
|
Prior to start of intervention
|
|
Social connectedness in terms of friendship
기간: 3 months post-recruitment
|
Measured using Friendship Scale.
6-item where participants had to select an answer out of the five options (1 = "Not at All"; 5 = "Almost Always").
The maximum score that could be obtained was 30 points; a high score indicates high level of social connectedness.
|
3 months post-recruitment
|
|
Social connectedness in terms of friendship
기간: 6 months post-recruitment
|
Measured using Friendship Scale.
6-item where participants had to select an answer out of the five options (1 = "Not at All"; 5 = "Almost Always").
The maximum score that could be obtained was 30 points; a high score indicates high level of social connectedness.
|
6 months post-recruitment
|
|
Quality of life
기간: Prior to start of intervention
|
Measured using World Health Organization Quality of Life-Older Adults module.
13-item scale where participants had to select an answer based on a 5-point rating scale (1 = "Not at All"; 5 = "Very Satisfied").
The maximum score was 65 points, and a high score indicates high quality of life.
|
Prior to start of intervention
|
|
Quality of life
기간: 3 months post-recruitment
|
Measured using World Health Organization Quality of Life-Older Adults module.
13-item scale where participants had to select an answer based on a 5-point rating scale (1 = "Not at All"; 5 = "Very Satisfied").
The maximum score was 65 points, and a high score indicates high quality of life.
|
3 months post-recruitment
|
|
Quality of life
기간: 6 months post-recruitment
|
Measured using World Health Organization Quality of Life-Older Adults module.
13-item scale where participants had to select an answer based on a 5-point rating scale (1 = "Not at All"; 5 = "Very Satisfied").
The maximum score was 65 points, and a high score indicates high quality of life.
|
6 months post-recruitment
|
기타 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
Cortisol in ng/ml
기간: Prior to start of intervention
|
Stress- and anxiety- related inflammatory outcomes.
Collected in lithium heparin tubes
|
Prior to start of intervention
|
|
Cortisol in ng/ml
기간: 6 months post-recruitment
|
Stress- and anxiety- related inflammatory outcomes.
Collected in lithium heparin tubes
|
6 months post-recruitment
|
|
Annexin-A1 in ng/ml
기간: Prior to start of intervention
|
Stress- and anxiety- related inflammatory outcomes.
Collected in lithium heparin tubes
|
Prior to start of intervention
|
|
Annexin-A1 in ng/ml
기간: 6 months post-recruitment
|
Stress- and anxiety- related inflammatory outcomes.
Collected in lithium heparin tubes
|
6 months post-recruitment
|
|
Interleukin-1-beta in pg/ml
기간: Prior to start of intervention
|
Stress- and anxiety- related inflammatory outcomes.
Collected in lithium heparin tubes
|
Prior to start of intervention
|
|
Interleukin-1-beta in pg/ml
기간: 6 months post-recruitment
|
Stress- and anxiety- related inflammatory outcomes.
Collected in lithium heparin tubes
|
6 months post-recruitment
|
공동 작업자 및 조사자
여기에서 이 연구와 관련된 사람과 조직을 찾을 수 있습니다.
연구 기록 날짜
이 날짜는 ClinicalTrials.gov에 대한 연구 기록 및 요약 결과 제출의 진행 상황을 추적합니다. 연구 기록 및 보고된 결과는 공개 웹사이트에 게시되기 전에 특정 품질 관리 기준을 충족하는지 확인하기 위해 국립 의학 도서관(NLM)에서 검토합니다.
연구 주요 날짜
연구 시작 (실제)
2019년 9월 1일
기본 완료 (실제)
2020년 1월 31일
연구 완료 (실제)
2020년 3월 31일
연구 등록 날짜
최초 제출
2021년 6월 1일
QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출
2021년 6월 8일
처음 게시됨 (실제)
2021년 6월 15일
연구 기록 업데이트
마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)
2021년 6월 15일
QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출
2021년 6월 8일
마지막으로 확인됨
2021년 6월 1일
추가 정보
이 연구와 관련된 용어
기타 연구 ID 번호
- A17-2003-B
개별 참가자 데이터(IPD) 계획
개별 참가자 데이터(IPD)를 공유할 계획입니까?
아니
약물 및 장치 정보, 연구 문서
미국 FDA 규제 의약품 연구
아니
미국 FDA 규제 기기 제품 연구
아니
이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .