このページは自動翻訳されたものであり、翻訳の正確性は保証されていません。を参照してください。 英語版 ソーステキスト用。

Face-to-Face Versus Distance Learning of Basic Suturing Skills

2022年3月4日 更新者:Dr. Ahmad Zaghal、American University of Beirut Medical Center

Traditional Face-to-Face Versus Distance Learning of Basic Suturing Skills in Novice Learners

The main objective of this study is to determine the acceptability and effectiveness of Distance Learning (DL) of basic suturing skills in novice learners.

A prospective randomized controlled trial involving 118 pre-medical and medical students with no previous experience in suturing was conducted. Participants were randomized into two groups for learning simple interrupted suturing: F-F and DL groups (59 students in each group) . Evaluation was conducted by two independent assessors. Agreement between the assessors was calculated, and performance scores of the participants were compared between the two groups.

All the participants demonstrated their ability to place three interrupted sutures, with no significant difference in the performance between the two groups. All the respondents positively rated the teaching sessions, found them useful and enjoyable.

Distance learning of basic suturing is as effective as the face-to-face approach in novice learners

調査の概要

状態

完了

詳細な説明

At our hospital, during the initial lock-down period in March and April 2020, all medical students' clinical clerkships were temporarily cancelled, and their educational activities switched to web-based remote learning, utilizing teleconferencing and commercially available web-based interactive clinical modules. Teaching surgical technical skills, such as basic suturing, presented itself as a more challenging component of the clinical education under these unusual circumstances as compared to teaching cognitive skills and knowledge, which raised questions and concerns around the effectiveness and acceptability of distance learning of basic surgical skills.

In this study, the investigators aimed to compare the effectiveness and retention of distance learning to the traditional face-to-face learning of basic (simple interrupted) suturing in novice learners. This study entails a prospective randomized trial involving two arms (traditional face-to-face versus distance learning of basic simple interrupted suturing) in pre-medical students as well as first and second year medical students at the American University of Beirut (AUB). Immediately after the teaching session as part of research, two independent surgeons assessed the students' simple interrupted suturing performance using a validated checklist and OSATS global rating.

The difference in performance was used to determine the effectiveness of distance learning of basic suturing as compared to the traditional instructional method. In addition, the students in both groups were asked to complete a questionnaire (immediately after the teaching session) to investigate their satisfaction and confidence.

研究の種類

観察的

入学 (実際)

118

連絡先と場所

このセクションには、調査を実施する担当者の連絡先の詳細と、この調査が実施されている場所に関する情報が記載されています。

研究場所

      • Beirut、レバノン、1104
        • American University of Beirut Medical Center

参加基準

研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。

適格基準

就学可能な年齢

18年~25年 (大人)

健康ボランティアの受け入れ

はい

受講資格のある性別

全て

サンプリング方法

確率サンプル

調査対象母集団

Pre-medical, first, and second-year medical students from a four-year Doctor of Medicine graduate-entry programme. Premedical students include senior biology, medical laboratory, and nutrition students. All participants had no previous experience with suturing. Basic suturing is one of the educational activities of the third-year medical students, before which students are not normally exposed to basic suturing skills teaching sessions. The participants were recruited via an email sent to all the potential candidates for participation in this study.

説明

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Pre-medical, first, and second-year medical students with no previous experience in suturing.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous experience in suturing.Refusal of enrolment.

研究計画

このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。

研究はどのように設計されていますか?

デザインの詳細

コホートと介入

グループ/コホート
介入・治療
Control group: Face-to-Face learning of simple interrupted suturing
  • The students watched a video demonstrating simple interrupted suturing, with the instructor commenting on the steps.
  • The students then watched the video again.
  • The instructor then demonstrated the procedure for the students.
  • The students then practiced suturing with immediate and specific feedback provided by the instructor until he and the students were satisfied with the performance.
Study group: Distance learning (tele simulation) of simple interrupted suturing
  • The instructor ran the interactive tele simulation sessions utilising web-based video-conferencing technology (WebEx platform). The students used their personal smartphones or laptops with audio-video capabilities. The instructor ran the session through his smartphone.
  • The instructor shared a video demonstrating simple interrupted suturing while commenting on the steps (the same video used in the control group).
  • The instructor then ran the video again for the students.
  • The instructor then demonstrated the skill for the students by turning on his camera.
  • The students then practiced suturing, and periodically turned on their cameras to receive live and specific feedback from the instructor on their performance, until the instructor and the students were satisfied.
  • No face-to-face interactions between the students and the instructor.
Interactive tele simulation sessions utilising web-based video-conferencing technology (WebEx platform).

この研究は何を測定していますか?

主要な結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Assessment of suturing skills in medical students via checklist
時間枠:immediately after the intervention(suturing session)

The adopted ten-item checklist for assessing suturing skills in medical studentS differentiated between novice and expert performances and showed a narrow variation in the scores provided by three independent expert assessors.

Overall performance scores were calculated based on the formula used by the same authors: "cutoff time (seconds) - completion time (seconds) - (10 x sum of errors)" with higher scores indicating better performance

immediately after the intervention(suturing session)

二次結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Assessment of suturing skills in medical students via OSATS
時間枠:immediately after the intervention(suturing session)
OSATS is a validated observational assessment tool also used in medical students. It comprises of seven performance domains whereby learners are scored on a 5-point Likert scale on proper tissue handling, efficiency and economy of movements, instrument handling, suture handling, flow of the procedure, knowledge of the steps of the procedure, overall appearance of the suture, in addition to an overall assessment of the performance; higher scores indicate better performance
immediately after the intervention(suturing session)

その他の成果指標

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Questionnaire that assesses confidence and satisfaction
時間枠:immediately after the intervention( suturing session)
The students were asked, on voluntary basis, to electronically fill a brief anonymous questionnaire after the completion of their respective sessions to evaluate their satisfaction (acceptability), confidence levels, and attitudes towards the instructional method they experienced (Figure 4). We followed the AMEE's guide No.87 (Artino et-al, 2014) recommendations for the survey items development, making sure to use clear self-explanatory language, avoid using negative-worded sentences, and include verbal labels for all the Likert-scale responses of the closed-ended items. We have also included three open-ended questions to gain a more detailed grasp of the students' perceptions of their learning experience.
immediately after the intervention( suturing session)

協力者と研究者

ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。

捜査官

  • 主任研究者:Ahmad Zaghal, MD, MSc, FACS, FEBPS、American University of Beirut Medical Center ; Department of Surgery

研究記録日

これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。

主要日程の研究

研究開始 (実際)

2021年1月4日

一次修了 (実際)

2021年5月19日

研究の完了 (実際)

2021年5月19日

試験登録日

最初に提出

2022年2月24日

QC基準を満たした最初の提出物

2022年3月4日

最初の投稿 (実際)

2022年3月11日

学習記録の更新

投稿された最後の更新 (実際)

2022年3月11日

QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました

2022年3月4日

最終確認日

2022年3月1日

詳しくは

本研究に関する用語

その他の研究ID番号

  • SBS-2020-0378

個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画

個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?

いいえ

IPD プランの説明

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available due to the Institutional Review Board requirements but are available from the corresponding author upon a reasonable request.

医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書

米国FDA規制医薬品の研究

いいえ

米国FDA規制機器製品の研究

いいえ

この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。

購読する