이 페이지는 자동 번역되었으며 번역의 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다. 참조하십시오 영문판 원본 텍스트의 경우.

Face-to-Face Versus Distance Learning of Basic Suturing Skills

2022년 3월 4일 업데이트: Dr. Ahmad Zaghal, American University of Beirut Medical Center

Traditional Face-to-Face Versus Distance Learning of Basic Suturing Skills in Novice Learners

The main objective of this study is to determine the acceptability and effectiveness of Distance Learning (DL) of basic suturing skills in novice learners.

A prospective randomized controlled trial involving 118 pre-medical and medical students with no previous experience in suturing was conducted. Participants were randomized into two groups for learning simple interrupted suturing: F-F and DL groups (59 students in each group) . Evaluation was conducted by two independent assessors. Agreement between the assessors was calculated, and performance scores of the participants were compared between the two groups.

All the participants demonstrated their ability to place three interrupted sutures, with no significant difference in the performance between the two groups. All the respondents positively rated the teaching sessions, found them useful and enjoyable.

Distance learning of basic suturing is as effective as the face-to-face approach in novice learners

연구 개요

상태

완전한

정황

개입 / 치료

상세 설명

At our hospital, during the initial lock-down period in March and April 2020, all medical students' clinical clerkships were temporarily cancelled, and their educational activities switched to web-based remote learning, utilizing teleconferencing and commercially available web-based interactive clinical modules. Teaching surgical technical skills, such as basic suturing, presented itself as a more challenging component of the clinical education under these unusual circumstances as compared to teaching cognitive skills and knowledge, which raised questions and concerns around the effectiveness and acceptability of distance learning of basic surgical skills.

In this study, the investigators aimed to compare the effectiveness and retention of distance learning to the traditional face-to-face learning of basic (simple interrupted) suturing in novice learners. This study entails a prospective randomized trial involving two arms (traditional face-to-face versus distance learning of basic simple interrupted suturing) in pre-medical students as well as first and second year medical students at the American University of Beirut (AUB). Immediately after the teaching session as part of research, two independent surgeons assessed the students' simple interrupted suturing performance using a validated checklist and OSATS global rating.

The difference in performance was used to determine the effectiveness of distance learning of basic suturing as compared to the traditional instructional method. In addition, the students in both groups were asked to complete a questionnaire (immediately after the teaching session) to investigate their satisfaction and confidence.

연구 유형

관찰

등록 (실제)

118

연락처 및 위치

이 섹션에서는 연구를 수행하는 사람들의 연락처 정보와 이 연구가 수행되는 장소에 대한 정보를 제공합니다.

연구 장소

  • 레바논
      • Beirut, 레바논, 1104
        • American University of Beirut Medical Center

참여기준

연구원은 적격성 기준이라는 특정 설명에 맞는 사람을 찾습니다. 이러한 기준의 몇 가지 예는 개인의 일반적인 건강 상태 또는 이전 치료입니다.

자격 기준

공부할 수 있는 나이

18년 (성인)

건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다

예

연구 대상 성별

모두

샘플링 방법

확률 샘플

연구 인구

Pre-medical, first, and second-year medical students from a four-year Doctor of Medicine graduate-entry programme. Premedical students include senior biology, medical laboratory, and nutrition students. All participants had no previous experience with suturing. Basic suturing is one of the educational activities of the third-year medical students, before which students are not normally exposed to basic suturing skills teaching sessions. The participants were recruited via an email sent to all the potential candidates for participation in this study.

설명

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Pre-medical, first, and second-year medical students with no previous experience in suturing.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous experience in suturing.Refusal of enrolment.

공부 계획

이 섹션에서는 연구 설계 방법과 연구가 측정하는 내용을 포함하여 연구 계획에 대한 세부 정보를 제공합니다.

연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?

디자인 세부사항

코호트 및 개입

그룹/코호트
개입 / 치료
Control group: Face-to-Face learning of simple interrupted suturing
  • The students watched a video demonstrating simple interrupted suturing, with the instructor commenting on the steps.
  • The students then watched the video again.
  • The instructor then demonstrated the procedure for the students.
  • The students then practiced suturing with immediate and specific feedback provided by the instructor until he and the students were satisfied with the performance.
Study group: Distance learning (tele simulation) of simple interrupted suturing
  • The instructor ran the interactive tele simulation sessions utilising web-based video-conferencing technology (WebEx platform). The students used their personal smartphones or laptops with audio-video capabilities. The instructor ran the session through his smartphone.
  • The instructor shared a video demonstrating simple interrupted suturing while commenting on the steps (the same video used in the control group).
  • The instructor then ran the video again for the students.
  • The instructor then demonstrated the skill for the students by turning on his camera.
  • The students then practiced suturing, and periodically turned on their cameras to receive live and specific feedback from the instructor on their performance, until the instructor and the students were satisfied.
  • No face-to-face interactions between the students and the instructor.
다른: Tele simulation
Interactive tele simulation sessions utilising web-based video-conferencing technology (WebEx platform).

연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?

주요 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Assessment of suturing skills in medical students via checklist
기간: immediately after the intervention(suturing session)

The adopted ten-item checklist for assessing suturing skills in medical studentS differentiated between novice and expert performances and showed a narrow variation in the scores provided by three independent expert assessors.

Overall performance scores were calculated based on the formula used by the same authors: "cutoff time (seconds) - completion time (seconds) - (10 x sum of errors)" with higher scores indicating better performance
immediately after the intervention(suturing session)

2차 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Assessment of suturing skills in medical students via OSATS
기간: immediately after the intervention(suturing session)
OSATS is a validated observational assessment tool also used in medical students. It comprises of seven performance domains whereby learners are scored on a 5-point Likert scale on proper tissue handling, efficiency and economy of movements, instrument handling, suture handling, flow of the procedure, knowledge of the steps of the procedure, overall appearance of the suture, in addition to an overall assessment of the performance; higher scores indicate better performance
immediately after the intervention(suturing session)

기타 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Questionnaire that assesses confidence and satisfaction
기간: immediately after the intervention( suturing session)
The students were asked, on voluntary basis, to electronically fill a brief anonymous questionnaire after the completion of their respective sessions to evaluate their satisfaction (acceptability), confidence levels, and attitudes towards the instructional method they experienced (Figure 4). We followed the AMEE's guide No.87 (Artino et-al, 2014) recommendations for the survey items development, making sure to use clear self-explanatory language, avoid using negative-worded sentences, and include verbal labels for all the Likert-scale responses of the closed-ended items. We have also included three open-ended questions to gain a more detailed grasp of the students' perceptions of their learning experience.
immediately after the intervention( suturing session)

공동 작업자 및 조사자

여기에서 이 연구와 관련된 사람과 조직을 찾을 수 있습니다.

스폰서

American University of Beirut Medical Center

수사관

  • 수석 연구원: Ahmad Zaghal, MD, MSc, FACS, FEBPS, American University of Beirut Medical Center ; Department of Surgery

연구 기록 날짜

이 날짜는 ClinicalTrials.gov에 대한 연구 기록 및 요약 결과 제출의 진행 상황을 추적합니다. 연구 기록 및 보고된 결과는 공개 웹사이트에 게시되기 전에 특정 품질 관리 기준을 충족하는지 확인하기 위해 국립 의학 도서관(NLM)에서 검토합니다.

연구 주요 날짜

연구 시작 (실제)

2021년 1월 4일

기본 완료 (실제)

2021년 5월 19일

연구 완료 (실제)

2021년 5월 19일

연구 등록 날짜

최초 제출

2022년 2월 24일

QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출

2022년 3월 4일

처음 게시됨 (실제)

2022년 3월 11일

연구 기록 업데이트

마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)

2022년 3월 11일

QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출

2022년 3월 4일

마지막으로 확인됨

2022년 3월 1일

추가 정보

이 연구와 관련된 용어

키워드

기타 연구 ID 번호

  • SBS-2020-0378

개별 참가자 데이터(IPD) 계획

개별 참가자 데이터(IPD)를 공유할 계획입니까?

아니요

IPD 계획 설명

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available due to the Institutional Review Board requirements but are available from the corresponding author upon a reasonable request.

약물 및 장치 정보, 연구 문서

미국 FDA 규제 의약품 연구

아니

미국 FDA 규제 기기 제품 연구

아니

이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .

구독하다