Updated Abdominal Compartment Society Consensus Definitions (WSACS)
Expert Consensus On Definitions And Management Of Intra-Abdominal Hypertension And Abdominal Compartment Syndrome
An international team of experts is working on a project called updated WSACS consensus definitions. The goals of this study are to:
- To generate expert consensus on the definitions and classification of IAH and ACS.
- To generate expert consensus on definitions regarding the pathophysiology of IAH and ACS.
- To generate consensus on definitions regarding the methods of measurement of intra-abdominal pressure (IAP).
調査の概要
詳細な説明
Intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) and abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) are frequently encountered in critically ill or injured patients and remain associated with significant morbidity and mortality. IAH is defined as a sustained increase in intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) equal to or above 12 mmHg. It is diagnosed in approximately one-third of mixed medical and surgical intensive care unit (ICU) patients at admission and develops in about half during the first week of ICU stay. IAH has consistently been shown to be an independent predictor of adverse outcomes, including multi-organ dysfunction and death.
Following the original consensus definitions and subsequent guideline updates by the Abdominal Compartment Society (WSACS), the understanding and management of IAH and ACS have evolved substantially. While surgical etiologies such as trauma and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm were historically predominant, more recent data highlight that IAH and ACS frequently occur in medical ICU populations as well. Contributing factors include excessive fluid resuscitation, massive transfusion, venous congestion, and capillary leak, which can lead to secondary IAH and subsequent organ failure even in the absence of direct abdominal pathology.
Despite the availability of consensus guidelines and an improved understanding of the pathophysiology, it remains unclear whether prevention or active treatment of IAH directly improves patient outcomes. Furthermore, there is growing recognition of the need to refine the definitions, measurement techniques, and classification systems for IAH and ACS to reflect current clinical knowledge and practice across diverse healthcare settings.
The WSACS - The Abdominal Compartment Society - previously published comprehensive consensus definitions and recommendations in 2013. Since then, new research has provided additional insights into epidemiology, measurement technologies, classification systems, and the broader clinical implications of IAH and ACS. A recent global survey among healthcare professionals identified emerging areas of uncertainty and priority topics for definition updates.
In response, this study will conduct an international modified Delphi process to achieve expert consensus on updated definitions and clinical practice statements for IAH and ACS. The Delphi method will systematically collect and refine expert opinions over several iterative rounds, with the goal of reaching agreement on revised definitions, measurement approaches, pathophysiological frameworks, and classification criteria.
The outcome of this Delphi process will be a set of updated, evidence-informed, and globally endorsed definitions and recommendations for IAH, ACS, and the open abdomen. These consensus statements aim to harmonize terminology, support clinical decision-making, guide future research, and ultimately improve patient care. The target audience includes physicians, surgeons, intensivists, anesthesiologists, nurses, and policymakers involved in the management of critically ill or injured patients across both high- and low-to-middle-income countries.
研究の種類
入学 (推定)
連絡先と場所
研究場所
-
-
-
Lublin、ポーランド、20090
- Medical University of Lublin
-
-
参加基準
適格基準
就学可能な年齢
- 大人
- 高齢者
健康ボランティアの受け入れ
サンプリング方法
調査対象母集団
説明
Inclusion Criteria: Panellists will be identified based on either of the following criteria At least 5 years of clinical experience as a staff member in Anesthesiology, Surgery or Intensive Care Medicine with involvement in care of patients with postoperative complications Author of at least one publication (observational studies or randomised controlled trials) on intra-abdominal hypertension or abdominal compartment syndrome. For patients and public involvement Individuals who have either personally experienced IAH or ACS following surgery or ICU within the last 5 years or, primary caregivers of such patients will be recruited as patient care representatives. Proficiency in English is required. To mitigate potential bias, patient care representatives mustn't maintain a professional or advisory relationship with the steering committee or panellists. Co-authors from previous WSACS survey published in 2024, former or current WSACS ambassadors, representative from WSES, ESAIC, ESICM.
Exclusion Criteria:
- None
研究計画
研究はどのように設計されていますか?
デザインの詳細
コホートと介入
グループ/コホート |
介入・治療 |
|---|---|
|
Panelist
|
structured interview via online survey
|
この研究は何を測定していますか?
主要な結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Level of consensus on definitions of intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) and abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS)
時間枠:3-6 months
|
Proportion of predefined definition statements for IAH and ACS reaching consensus among expert panellists, measured using a structured Delphi process. Consensus is defined a priori as ≥80% agreement on a 5-point Likert scale (ratings of 4-5 indicating agreement). Outcomes will include: Number and percentage of statements reaching consensus Median and interquartile range (IQR) of Likert scores per statement Stability of responses across Delphi rounds |
3-6 months
|
二次結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Level of consensus on pathophysiological concepts of IAH and ACS
時間枠:3-6 months
|
Proportion of predefined pathophysiological statements related to IAH and ACS reaching consensus among expert panellists using a Delphi process. Consensus is defined as ≥80% agreement on a 5-point Likert scale. Outcomes will include: Number and percentage of statements reaching consensus Median and IQR of Likert scores per statement Changes in agreement across Delphi rounds |
3-6 months
|
|
Level of consensus on measurement methods for intra-abdominal pressure (IAP)
時間枠:3-6 months
|
Proportion of predefined statements regarding IAP measurement techniques reaching consensus among expert panellists using a Delphi process. Consensus is defined as ≥80% agreement on a 5-point Likert scale. Outcomes will include: Number and percentage of statements reaching consensus Median and IQR of Likert scores per statement Agreement trends across Delphi rounds |
3-6 months
|
協力者と研究者
捜査官
- 主任研究者:Prashant Nasa, MD、The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust Wolverhampton, UK
出版物と役立つリンク
一般刊行物
- Nasa P, Jain R, Juneja D. Delphi methodology in healthcare research: How to decide its appropriateness. World J Methodol. 2021 Jul 20;11(4):116-129. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v11.i4.116. eCollection 2021 Jul 20.
- Miller RS, Morris JA Jr, Diaz JJ Jr, Herring MB, May AK. Complications after 344 damage-control open celiotomies. J Trauma. 2005 Dec;59(6):1365-71; discussion 1371-4. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000196004.49422.af.
- Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, Shamseer L, Tetzlaff JM, Akl EA, Brennan SE, Chou R, Glanville J, Grimshaw JM, Hrobjartsson A, Lalu MM, Li T, Loder EW, Mayo-Wilson E, McDonald S, McGuinness LA, Stewart LA, Thomas J, Tricco AC, Welch VA, Whiting P, Moher D. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
- Alhazzani W, Lewis K, Jaeschke R, Rochwerg B, Møller MH, Evans L, et al. Conflicts of interest disclosure forms and management in critical care clinical practice guidelines. Intensive Care Med. 2018;44(10):1691-8.
- Traversy G, Barnieh L, Akl EA, Allan GM, Brouwers M, Ganache I, et al. Managing conflicts of interest in the development of health guidelines. CMAJ. 2021;193(2):E49-E54.
- Schünemann HJ, Al-Ansary LA, Forland F, Kersten S, Komulainen J, Kopp IB, et al. Guidelines International Network: Principles for Disclosure of Interests and Management of Conflicts in Guidelines. Ann Intern Med. 2015;163(7):548-53.
- Gattrell WT, Logullo P, van Zuuren EJ, Price A, Hughes EL, Blazey P, et al. ACCORD (ACcurate COnsensus Reporting Document): A reporting guideline for consensus methods in biomedicine developed via a modified Delphi. PLoS Med. 2024;21(1):e1004326.
- Nasa P, Azoulay E, Khanna AK, Jain R, Gupta S, Javeri Y, et al. Expert consensus statements for the management of COVID-19-related acute respiratory failure using a Delphi method. Crit Care. 2021;25(1):106.
- Nasa P, Wise RD, Smit M, Acosta S, D'Amours S, Beaubien-Souligny W, et al. International cross-sectional survey on current and updated definitions of intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome. World J Emerg Surg. 2024;19(1):39.
- Roberts DJ, Zygun DA, Kirkpatrick AW, Ball CG, Faris PD, Bobrovitz N, et al. A protocol for a scoping and qualitative study to identify and evaluate indications for damage control surgery and damage control interventions in civilian trauma patients. BMJ Open. 2014;4(7):e005634.
- Higa G, Friese R, O'Keeffe T, Wynne J, Bowlby P, Ziemba M, et al. Damage control laparotomy: a vital tool once overused. J Trauma. 2010;69(1):53-9.
- van Brunschot S, Schut AJ, Bouwense SA, Besselink MG, Bakker OJ, van Goor H, et al. Abdominal compartment syndrome in acute pancreatitis: a systematic review. Pancreas. 2014;43(5):665-74.
- Strang SG, Van Lieshout EM, Breederveld RS, Van Waes OJ. A systematic review on intra-abdominal pressure in severely burned patients. Burns. 2014 Feb;40(1):9-16. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2013.07.001. Epub 2013 Sep 17.
- Karkos CD, Menexes GC, Patelis N, Kalogirou TE, Giagtzidis IT, Harkin DW. A systematic review and meta-analysis of abdominal compartment syndrome after endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2014 Mar;59(3):829-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.11.085. Epub 2014 Jan 16.
- Malbrain ML, Chiumello D, Cesana BM, Reintam Blaser A, Starkopf J, Sugrue M, et al. A systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis on intra-abdominal hypertension in critically ill patients: the wake-up project. World initiative on Abdominal Hypertension Epidemiology, a Unifying Project (WAKE-Up!). Minerva Anestesiol. 2014;80(3):293-306.
- Moll V, Khanna AK, Kurz A, Huang J, Smit M, Swaminathan M, et al. Optimization of kidney function in cardiac surgery patients with intra-abdominal hypertension: expert opinion. Perioper Med (Lond). 2024;13(1):72.
- Reintam Blaser A, Regli A, De Keulenaer B, Kimball EJ, Starkopf L, Davis WA, et al. Incidence, Risk Factors, and Outcomes of Intra-Abdominal Hypertension in Critically Ill Patients-A Prospective Multicenter Study (IROI Study). Crit Care Med. 2019;47(4):535-42.
- Regli A, Reintam Blaser A, De Keulenaer B, Starkopf J, Kimball E, Malbrain M, et al. Intra-abdominal hypertension and hypoxic respiratory failure together predict adverse outcome - A sub-analysis of a prospective cohort. J Crit Care. 2021;64:165-72.
- Strang SG, Van Lieshout EM, Van Waes OJ, Verhofstad MH. Prevalence and mortality of abdominal compartment syndrome in severely injured patients: A systematic review. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016 Sep;81(3):585-92. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001133.
- Kirkpatrick AW, Roberts DJ, De Waele J, Jaeschke R, Malbrain ML, De Keulenaer B, et al. Intra-abdominal hypertension and the abdominal compartment syndrome: updated consensus definitions and clinical practice guidelines from the World Society of the Abdominal Compartment Syndrome. Intensive Care Med. 2013;39(7):1190-206.
- De Waele JJ, Cheatham ML, Malbrain MLNG, Kirkpatrick A, Sugrue M, Balogh Z, et al. Recommendations for research from the International Conference of Experts on Intra-abdominal Hypertension and Abdominal Compartment Syndrome. Acta Clin Belg. 2009;64(3):203-9.
- Cheatham ML. Nonoperative management of intraabdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome. World J Surg. 2009 Jun;33(6):1116-22. doi: 10.1007/s00268-009-0003-9.
- Cheatham ML, Malbrain ML, Kirkpatrick A, Sugrue M, Parr M, De Waele J, et al. Results from the International Conference of Experts on Intra-abdominal Hypertension and Abdominal Compartment Syndrome. II. Recommendations. Intensive Care Med. 2007;33(6):951-62.
- Malbrain ML, De laet I, Cheatham M. Consensus conference definitions and recommendations on intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) and the abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS)--the long road to the final publications, how did we get there? Acta Clin Belg Suppl. 2007;62(1):44-59.
- Malbrain ML, Cheatham ML, Kirkpatrick A, Sugrue M, Parr M, De Waele J, et al. Results from the International Conference of Experts on Intra-abdominal Hypertension and Abdominal Compartment Syndrome. I. Definitions. Intensive Care Med. 2006;32(11):1722-32.
- Murphy PB, Parry NG, Sela N, Leslie K, Vogt K, Ball I. Intra-Abdominal Hypertension Is More Common Than Previously Thought: A Prospective Study in a Mixed Medical-Surgical ICU. Crit Care Med. 2018;46(6):958-64.
- Blaser AR, Sarapuu S, Tamme K, Starkopf J. Expanded measurements of intra-abdominal pressure do not increase the detection rate of intra-abdominal hypertension: a single-center observational study. Crit Care Med. 2014;42(2):378-86.
便利なリンク
研究記録日
主要日程の研究
研究開始 (実際)
一次修了 (推定)
研究の完了 (推定)
試験登録日
最初に提出
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
最初の投稿 (実際)
学習記録の更新
投稿された最後の更新 (実際)
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
最終確認日
詳しくは
本研究に関する用語
その他の研究ID番号
- MUL2025WSACS001
- PROSPERO CRD420251167137 (その他の識別子:MULublin)
個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画
個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?
IPD プランの説明
医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書
米国FDA規制医薬品の研究
米国FDA規制機器製品の研究
この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。