Achilles Allograft With or Without InternalBrace for ACL Revision Surgery (ACL-AlloRev)
Achilles Tendon Allografts With and Without InternalBrace Augmentation for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Revision Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial
This study evaluated outcomes after revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using Achilles tendon allografts with a calcaneal bone block, with or without additional InternalBrace augmentation. Revision ACL reconstruction is often more complex than primary ACL reconstruction because previous surgery may leave widened bone tunnels or bone defects. Achilles tendon allografts with attached bone blocks may help address these defects and allow reconstruction in a single surgical procedure.
Participants with MRI-confirmed ACL graft re-tear and clinical knee instability were randomized to undergo revision ACL reconstruction either with InternalBrace augmentation or without InternalBrace augmentation. Clinical outcomes, patient-reported knee function, health-related quality of life, and MRI findings were assessed during 13 months of follow-up. The study was designed as a prospective randomized controlled pilot trial to compare whether additional InternalBrace augmentation improved functional, radiographic, or quality-of-life outcomes after revision ACL surgery.
調査の概要
状態
詳細な説明
Anterior cruciate ligament revision surgery remains challenging and may have less predictable outcomes than primary ACL reconstruction. In revision cases, prior bone tunnels and bone defects can complicate graft fixation. Achilles tendon allografts with calcaneal bone blocks provide a reliable graft configuration and may help fill pre-existing bone defects during a one-stage revision procedure. InternalBrace augmentation is intended to provide additional support to the reconstructed ligament during the healing period, but clinical evidence for its use with allograft ACL revision surgery is limited.
This prospective, randomized controlled pilot study enrolled patients from February 2017 to September 2020 at the Medical University of Graz. Eligible participants had MRI-confirmed re-tear of the ACL graft and clinical and patient-reported knee instability. Patients with advanced associated lesions requiring reconstruction or prolonged restricted weight bearing, signs of infection, advanced osteoarthritis, or neuromuscular disease were excluded. For all included participants, the procedure was the first revision surgery on the affected knee. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Medical University of Graz, and written informed consent was obtained before participation.
All participants underwent revision ACL reconstruction using an Achilles tendon allograft with a calcaneal bone block. Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either additional InternalBrace augmentation or no InternalBrace augmentation. The InternalBrace group received a non-resorbable polyethylene FiberTape fixed separately and independently from the ACL graft. Apart from the additional InternalBrace fixation in one group, the surgical technique and postoperative rehabilitation protocol were the same for all participants.
Clinical and patient-reported outcomes were assessed preoperatively and at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, and 13 months after surgery. Outcome measures included the International Knee Documentation Committee score, Lysholm Knee Questionnaire, Tegner Activity Scale, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, and Short Form-36. MRI scans were performed before surgery and 13 months after surgery to assess graft appearance, graft tightness, graft signal, ligament signs at the femoral and tibial tunnel insertions, and tunnel size.
The final analyzed study population included 30 participants, with 16 participants in the InternalBrace group and 14 participants in the non-InternalBrace group. Overall, clinical and patient-reported outcomes improved during follow-up. At the final 13-month follow-up, there were no clinically relevant differences between the InternalBrace and non-InternalBrace groups. Postoperative MRI showed elongated or insufficient ACL allografts in 15 of 30 participants, without significant differences between groups. The study concluded that ACL revision surgery using Achilles tendon allografts with bone blocks resulted in improved clinical outcomes at 13 months, but additional InternalBrace augmentation did not improve objective or subjective outcomes in this pilot trial.
研究の種類
入学 (実際)
段階
- 適用できない
連絡先と場所
研究場所
-
-
Styria
-
Graz、Styria、オーストリア、8036
- Medical University of Graz
-
-
参加基準
適格基準
就学可能な年齢
- 大人
健康ボランティアの受け入れ
説明
Inclusion Criteria:
- MRI-confirmed re-tear of the anterior cruciate ligament.
- Clinical knee instability.
- Patient-reported knee instability.
- Planned first revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction of the affected knee.
- Ability to undergo the standardized postoperative rehabilitation protocol.
- Written informed consent for study participation and use of study data.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Advanced associated knee lesions, such as pronounced meniscal tears or cartilage defects, requiring reconstruction or prolonged reduced weight bearing.
- Signs of infection.
- Advanced-stage osteoarthritis.
- Neuromuscular disease.
- Previous revision surgery on the affected knee.
研究計画
研究はどのように設計されていますか?
デザインの詳細
- 主な目的:処理
- 割り当て:ランダム化
- 介入モデル:並列代入
- マスキング:独身
武器と介入
参加者グループ / アーム |
介入・治療 |
|---|---|
|
実験的:InternalBrace Augmentation
Participants underwent revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using an Achilles tendon allograft with calcaneal bone block and additional InternalBrace augmentation.
The InternalBrace consisted of non-resorbable polyethylene FiberTape fixed separately and independently from the ACL allograft.
|
Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction was performed using an Achilles tendon allograft with calcaneal bone block.
In this group, a non-resorbable polyethylene FiberTape InternalBrace was additionally fixed separately and independently from the ACL allograft to support the graft during healing.
他の名前:
|
|
アクティブコンパレータ:No InternalBrace Augmentation
Participants underwent revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using an Achilles tendon allograft with calcaneal bone block without additional InternalBrace augmentation.
Apart from the InternalBrace augmentation, the surgical technique and postoperative rehabilitation protocol were the same as in the InternalBrace group.
|
Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction was performed using an Achilles tendon allograft with calcaneal bone block.
No additional InternalBrace or suture tape augmentation was used.
Apart from the absence of InternalBrace augmentation, the surgical technique and postoperative rehabilitation protocol were the same as in the InternalBrace augmentation group.
他の名前:
|
この研究は何を測定していますか?
主要な結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
International Knee Documentation Committee Score
時間枠:Preoperative baseline to 13 months after surgery
|
The International Knee Documentation Committee score was used to assess patient-reported knee symptoms, function, and sports activity after revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better knee function.
|
Preoperative baseline to 13 months after surgery
|
二次結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Lysholm Knee Questionnaire Score
時間枠:Preoperative baseline to 13 months after surgery
|
The Lysholm Knee Questionnaire was used to assess knee symptoms and functional limitations after revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better knee function.
|
Preoperative baseline to 13 months after surgery
|
|
Tegner Activity Scale Score
時間枠:Preoperative baseline to 13 months after surgery
|
The Tegner Activity Scale was used to assess participant activity level after revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
Scores range from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating a higher activity level.
|
Preoperative baseline to 13 months after surgery
|
|
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score
時間枠:Preoperative baseline to 13 months after surgery
|
The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score was used to assess knee-related pain, symptoms, activities of daily living, sport and recreation function, and knee-related quality of life.
Subscale scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better outcomes.
|
Preoperative baseline to 13 months after surgery
|
|
MRI Assessment of ACL Allograft Tightness
時間枠:13 months after surgery
|
Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging was used to assess anterior cruciate ligament allograft tightness.
Grafts were categorized as tight, elongated, or insufficient.
|
13 months after surgery
|
|
MRI Assessment of Femoral and Tibial Tunnel Size
時間枠:13 months after surgery
|
Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging was used to measure femoral and tibial tunnel size after revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
Tunnel size was measured in millimeters.
|
13 months after surgery
|
|
Short Form-36 Physical Component Summary Score
時間枠:Preoperative baseline to 13 months after surgery
|
The Short Form-36 Physical Component Summary score was used to assess physical health-related quality of life after revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better physical health-related quality of life.
|
Preoperative baseline to 13 months after surgery
|
|
Short Form-36 Mental Component Summary Score
時間枠:Preoperative baseline to 13 months after surgery
|
The Short Form-36 Mental Component Summary score was used to assess mental health-related quality of life after revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better mental health-related quality of life.
|
Preoperative baseline to 13 months after surgery
|
協力者と研究者
捜査官
- 主任研究者:Paul Ruckenstuhl, MD、Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Medical University of Graz
研究記録日
主要日程の研究
研究開始 (実際)
一次修了 (実際)
研究の完了 (実際)
試験登録日
最初に提出
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
最初の投稿 (実際)
学習記録の更新
投稿された最後の更新 (実際)
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
最終確認日
詳しくは
本研究に関する用語
キーワード
その他の研究ID番号
- 29-201 ex 16/17
個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画
個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?
IPD プランの説明
IPD 共有時間枠
IPD 共有アクセス基準
医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書
米国FDA規制医薬品の研究
米国FDA規制機器製品の研究
この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。