Denne side blev automatisk oversat, og nøjagtigheden af ​​oversættelsen er ikke garanteret. Der henvises til engelsk version for en kildetekst.

Achilles Allograft With or Without InternalBrace for ACL Revision Surgery (ACL-AlloRev)

4. maj 2026 opdateret af: Medical University of Graz

Achilles Tendon Allografts With and Without InternalBrace Augmentation for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Revision Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial

This study evaluated outcomes after revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using Achilles tendon allografts with a calcaneal bone block, with or without additional InternalBrace augmentation. Revision ACL reconstruction is often more complex than primary ACL reconstruction because previous surgery may leave widened bone tunnels or bone defects. Achilles tendon allografts with attached bone blocks may help address these defects and allow reconstruction in a single surgical procedure.

Participants with MRI-confirmed ACL graft re-tear and clinical knee instability were randomized to undergo revision ACL reconstruction either with InternalBrace augmentation or without InternalBrace augmentation. Clinical outcomes, patient-reported knee function, health-related quality of life, and MRI findings were assessed during 13 months of follow-up. The study was designed as a prospective randomized controlled pilot trial to compare whether additional InternalBrace augmentation improved functional, radiographic, or quality-of-life outcomes after revision ACL surgery.

Studieoversigt

Detaljeret beskrivelse

Anterior cruciate ligament revision surgery remains challenging and may have less predictable outcomes than primary ACL reconstruction. In revision cases, prior bone tunnels and bone defects can complicate graft fixation. Achilles tendon allografts with calcaneal bone blocks provide a reliable graft configuration and may help fill pre-existing bone defects during a one-stage revision procedure. InternalBrace augmentation is intended to provide additional support to the reconstructed ligament during the healing period, but clinical evidence for its use with allograft ACL revision surgery is limited.

This prospective, randomized controlled pilot study enrolled patients from February 2017 to September 2020 at the Medical University of Graz. Eligible participants had MRI-confirmed re-tear of the ACL graft and clinical and patient-reported knee instability. Patients with advanced associated lesions requiring reconstruction or prolonged restricted weight bearing, signs of infection, advanced osteoarthritis, or neuromuscular disease were excluded. For all included participants, the procedure was the first revision surgery on the affected knee. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Medical University of Graz, and written informed consent was obtained before participation.

All participants underwent revision ACL reconstruction using an Achilles tendon allograft with a calcaneal bone block. Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either additional InternalBrace augmentation or no InternalBrace augmentation. The InternalBrace group received a non-resorbable polyethylene FiberTape fixed separately and independently from the ACL graft. Apart from the additional InternalBrace fixation in one group, the surgical technique and postoperative rehabilitation protocol were the same for all participants.

Clinical and patient-reported outcomes were assessed preoperatively and at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, and 13 months after surgery. Outcome measures included the International Knee Documentation Committee score, Lysholm Knee Questionnaire, Tegner Activity Scale, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, and Short Form-36. MRI scans were performed before surgery and 13 months after surgery to assess graft appearance, graft tightness, graft signal, ligament signs at the femoral and tibial tunnel insertions, and tunnel size.

The final analyzed study population included 30 participants, with 16 participants in the InternalBrace group and 14 participants in the non-InternalBrace group. Overall, clinical and patient-reported outcomes improved during follow-up. At the final 13-month follow-up, there were no clinically relevant differences between the InternalBrace and non-InternalBrace groups. Postoperative MRI showed elongated or insufficient ACL allografts in 15 of 30 participants, without significant differences between groups. The study concluded that ACL revision surgery using Achilles tendon allografts with bone blocks resulted in improved clinical outcomes at 13 months, but additional InternalBrace augmentation did not improve objective or subjective outcomes in this pilot trial.

Undersøgelsestype

Interventionel

Tilmelding (Faktiske)

32

Fase

  • Ikke anvendelig

Kontakter og lokationer

Dette afsnit indeholder kontaktoplysninger for dem, der udfører undersøgelsen, og oplysninger om, hvor denne undersøgelse udføres.

Studiesteder

    • Styria
      • Graz, Styria, Østrig, 8036
        • Medical University of Graz

Deltagelseskriterier

Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Berettigelseskriterier

Aldre berettiget til at studere

  • Voksen

Tager imod sunde frivillige

Ingen

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • MRI-confirmed re-tear of the anterior cruciate ligament.
  • Clinical knee instability.
  • Patient-reported knee instability.
  • Planned first revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction of the affected knee.
  • Ability to undergo the standardized postoperative rehabilitation protocol.
  • Written informed consent for study participation and use of study data.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Advanced associated knee lesions, such as pronounced meniscal tears or cartilage defects, requiring reconstruction or prolonged reduced weight bearing.
  • Signs of infection.
  • Advanced-stage osteoarthritis.
  • Neuromuscular disease.
  • Previous revision surgery on the affected knee.

Studieplan

Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.

Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?

Design detaljer

  • Primært formål: Behandling
  • Tildeling: Randomiseret
  • Interventionel model: Parallel tildeling
  • Maskning: Enkelt

Våben og indgreb

Deltagergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandling
Eksperimentel: InternalBrace Augmentation
Participants underwent revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using an Achilles tendon allograft with calcaneal bone block and additional InternalBrace augmentation. The InternalBrace consisted of non-resorbable polyethylene FiberTape fixed separately and independently from the ACL allograft.
Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction was performed using an Achilles tendon allograft with calcaneal bone block. In this group, a non-resorbable polyethylene FiberTape InternalBrace was additionally fixed separately and independently from the ACL allograft to support the graft during healing.
Andre navne:
  • Revision ACL Reconstruction With InternalBrace
  • ACL Revision Surgery With InternalBrace Augmentation
  • Achilles Tendon Allograft ACL Revision With Suture Tape Augmentation
Aktiv komparator: No InternalBrace Augmentation
Participants underwent revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using an Achilles tendon allograft with calcaneal bone block without additional InternalBrace augmentation. Apart from the InternalBrace augmentation, the surgical technique and postoperative rehabilitation protocol were the same as in the InternalBrace group.
Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction was performed using an Achilles tendon allograft with calcaneal bone block. No additional InternalBrace or suture tape augmentation was used. Apart from the absence of InternalBrace augmentation, the surgical technique and postoperative rehabilitation protocol were the same as in the InternalBrace augmentation group.
Andre navne:
  • Revision ACL Reconstruction Without InternalBrace
  • ACL Revision Surgery Without InternalBrace Augmentation
  • Achilles Tendon Allograft ACL Revision Without Suture Tape Augmentation

Hvad måler undersøgelsen?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
International Knee Documentation Committee Score
Tidsramme: Preoperative baseline to 13 months after surgery
The International Knee Documentation Committee score was used to assess patient-reported knee symptoms, function, and sports activity after revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better knee function.
Preoperative baseline to 13 months after surgery

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Lysholm Knee Questionnaire Score
Tidsramme: Preoperative baseline to 13 months after surgery
The Lysholm Knee Questionnaire was used to assess knee symptoms and functional limitations after revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better knee function.
Preoperative baseline to 13 months after surgery
Tegner Activity Scale Score
Tidsramme: Preoperative baseline to 13 months after surgery
The Tegner Activity Scale was used to assess participant activity level after revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Scores range from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating a higher activity level.
Preoperative baseline to 13 months after surgery
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score
Tidsramme: Preoperative baseline to 13 months after surgery
The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score was used to assess knee-related pain, symptoms, activities of daily living, sport and recreation function, and knee-related quality of life. Subscale scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better outcomes.
Preoperative baseline to 13 months after surgery
MRI Assessment of ACL Allograft Tightness
Tidsramme: 13 months after surgery
Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging was used to assess anterior cruciate ligament allograft tightness. Grafts were categorized as tight, elongated, or insufficient.
13 months after surgery
MRI Assessment of Femoral and Tibial Tunnel Size
Tidsramme: 13 months after surgery
Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging was used to measure femoral and tibial tunnel size after revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Tunnel size was measured in millimeters.
13 months after surgery
Short Form-36 Physical Component Summary Score
Tidsramme: Preoperative baseline to 13 months after surgery
The Short Form-36 Physical Component Summary score was used to assess physical health-related quality of life after revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better physical health-related quality of life.
Preoperative baseline to 13 months after surgery
Short Form-36 Mental Component Summary Score
Tidsramme: Preoperative baseline to 13 months after surgery
The Short Form-36 Mental Component Summary score was used to assess mental health-related quality of life after revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better mental health-related quality of life.
Preoperative baseline to 13 months after surgery

Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere

Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.

Efterforskere

  • Ledende efterforsker: Paul Ruckenstuhl, MD, Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Medical University of Graz

Datoer for undersøgelser

Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.

Studer store datoer

Studiestart (Faktiske)

1. februar 2017

Primær færdiggørelse (Faktiske)

30. september 2021

Studieafslutning (Faktiske)

30. september 2021

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først indsendt

27. april 2026

Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier

27. april 2026

Først opslået (Faktiske)

4. maj 2026

Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler

Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)

8. maj 2026

Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier

4. maj 2026

Sidst verificeret

1. maj 2026

Mere information

Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse

Plan for individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)

Planlægger du at dele individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)?

JA

IPD-planbeskrivelse

De-identified individual participant data underlying the results reported in the publication will be shared upon reasonable request. Shared data may include baseline characteristics, group allocation, clinical outcome scores, patient-reported outcome measures, health-related quality-of-life scores, and MRI assessment data.

IPD-delingstidsramme

Data will be available upon reasonable request after publication, with no predetermined end date.

IPD-delingsadgangskriterier

Qualified researchers may request access by contacting the corresponding author. Requests will be reviewed based on scientific purpose, ethical approval where applicable, and compliance with applicable data protection requirements. Only de-identified data relevant to the approved request will be shared.

Lægemiddel- og udstyrsoplysninger, undersøgelsesdokumenter

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret lægemiddelprodukt

Ingen

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret enhedsprodukt

Ingen

Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .

Kliniske forsøg med Forreste korsbåndsruptur

Abonner