このページは自動翻訳されたものであり、翻訳の正確性は保証されていません。を参照してください。 英語版 ソーステキスト用。

Examining Migration, Social Bonds, Transnationalism, and HIV Prevention Pathways Among African Immigrants. (MiST-Pathways)

2026年6月24日 更新者:Gloria Aidoo-Frimpong、State University of New York at Buffalo

Migration, Social Bonds, Transnationalism, and HIV Prevention Pathways Among African Immigrants (MiST-Pathways)

The goal of this mixed-methods pilot study is to learn whether migration experiences, social bonds, and transnational ties shape HIV prevention decision-making, including HIV testing, HIV self-testing (HIVST), and pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) uptake, among first-generation African immigrants aged 18 to 50 residing in New York and Massachusetts. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • What relationship typologies and migration-related relational mechanisms influence HIV testing, HIVST, and PrEP decision-making among African immigrants?
  • Can a relationship-tailored HIV prevention intervention component, co-developed with the community, demonstrate feasibility and acceptability among African immigrants?
  • Does exposure to the prioritized intervention component show directional increases in HIV testing intention, willingness to use HIVST, interest in PrEP, and readiness for relationship-based prevention communication? There is no comparison group. All Aim 3 participants receive the same co-developed intervention component.

Participants will:

  • Complete a qualitative interview (60-90 minutes) and/or a structured electronic survey (15-20 minutes) about their relationship experiences, migration history, and HIV prevention behaviors.
  • Take part in a 3-4 hour structured group deliberation session called a Palava Hut Conversation to co-develop and prioritize HIV prevention intervention ideas.
  • Complete a baseline survey, receive the prioritized intervention component in a structured Zoom session, and complete a follow-up survey with an optional 60-90 minute cognitive interview for a subset of participants.

調査の概要

詳細な説明

African immigrants in the United States account for a disproportionate share of new HIV diagnoses relative to their population size, yet this community remains underrepresented in HIV prevention research. Existing prevention strategies rarely address the relational and structural contexts that shape prevention engagement in this population. Relationships, including intimate partnerships, family systems, and co-ethnic social networks, function as key mechanisms through which HIV risk perception, disclosure, and prevention decisions are negotiated. Migration reorganizes these relational structures by altering trust dynamics, communication norms, household decision-making authority, and transnational obligations in ways that are not well understood. The proposed study addresses this gap by generating foundational, mechanism-focused evidence on how migration-shaped relational contexts influence engagement with HIV testing, HIV self-testing, and PrEP among African immigrants in the United States.

The study is guided by a relational-socioecological framework that positions relationships as central mechanisms linking individual, interpersonal, and structural determinants of HIV prevention behavior. Within this framework, migration is not treated as a direct risk factor but as a structural force that reshapes the relational contexts through which prevention decisions occur. Processes such as separation, reunification, and transnational living alter intimacy, trust, and communication, while cross-border financial obligations and dense co-ethnic networks reinforce norms of discretion and respectability that may suppress prevention engagement. This framework builds on prior qualitative and community-engaged research by the principal investigator, including PCORI-supported African immigrant-led agenda-setting work that identified relationships, trust, and communication as central yet under-addressed drivers of HIV prevention in this community.

The study uses a three-phase sequential design in which each phase builds directly on the findings of the prior one. AIM 1, where relationship typologies and relational mechanisms must first be empirically identified before intervention components can be meaningfully co-developed, and community deliberation must occur in AIM 2. The final step in AIM 3 will be a proof-of-concept assessment that can be conducted with a typology-matched sample.

This sequencing ensures that the intervention component tested in Aim 3 is grounded in both empirical evidence and community priorities rather than researcher-imposed assumptions.

Palava Hut Conversations (PHC) is an African-centered deliberative method adapted from traditional West African communal dialogue practices. It structures collective reasoning through facilitated discussion, negotiated agreement, and consensus-building. PHC was selected for Aim 2 because it centers community knowledge and cultural authority in the co-development process, moves beyond nominal input to genuine co-creation, and generates actionable, community-validated outputs through structured prioritization. This approach ensures that intervention components reflect the lived experiences, cultural values, and practical constraints of the target population.

Aim 1 qualitative data will undergo thematic analysis to identify relationship typologies and relational mechanisms. Survey data will be analyzed descriptively to contextualize typology distribution and prevention awareness across the sample.

Aim 2 deliberation outputs, including facilitator notes, decision logs, and prioritization matrices, will be synthesized using rapid qualitative methods to produce a ranked list of intervention components.

Aim 3 pre- and post-exposure survey data will be summarized using descriptive statistics to assess the direction and consistency of change across prevention intention outcomes. Cognitive interview data will undergo rapid thematic analysis focused on implementation-relevant constructs including acceptability, feasibility, perceived fit, usability, and evidence of mechanism activation.

研究の種類

介入

入学 (推定)

144

段階

  • 適用できない

連絡先と場所

このセクションには、調査を実施する担当者の連絡先の詳細と、この調査が実施されている場所に関する情報が記載されています。

研究連絡先

  • 名前:Gloria A. Aidoo-Frimpong, PhD, MPH, MA
  • 電話番号:716-829-5721
  • メール:gloriaai@buffalo.edu

研究場所

    • New York
      • Buffalo、New York、アメリカ、14214
        • State University of New York at Buffalo
        • コンタクト:

参加基準

研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。

適格基準

就学可能な年齢

  • 大人

健康ボランティアの受け入れ

はい

説明

Inclusion Criteria: Individuals must meet ALL of the following criteria:

  • Age 18 to 50 years at the time of enrollment
  • Self-identify as a first-generation African immigrant (born in an African country and currently residing in the United States)
  • Currently reside in New York or Massachusetts
  • Able to communicate in English at approximately a 3rd-grade reading level
  • Have access to a smartphone or computer with internet capability sufficient to participate in Zoom and/or WhatsApp-based study activities
  • Willing and able to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Are under 18 years of age
  • Do not self-identify as a first-generation African immigrant
  • Do not reside in New York or Massachusetts
  • Are unable to provide informed consent
  • Do not have access to the technology required for virtual participation (Zoom and/or WhatsApp)

研究計画

このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。

研究はどのように設計されていますか?

デザインの詳細

  • 主な目的:防止
  • 割り当て:なし
  • 介入モデル:単一グループの割り当て
  • マスキング:なし(オープンラベル)

武器と介入

参加者グループ / アーム
介入・治療
実験的:Proof of Concept Assessment
Participants matching the relationship typology prioritized through community deliberation in Aim 2 are assigned to receive a single co-developed behavioral intervention component. The intervention is delivered via Zoom in a standardized facilitation structure and focuses on relationship-based HIV prevention communication and decision-making within migration-shaped relationship contexts. Participants complete a baseline survey (T0) before the intervention and a post-intervention survey (T1) immediately after. A subset of participants completes an optional cognitive interview to assess feasibility, acceptability, perceived fit, and evidence of mechanism activation.
A structured, culturally grounded, relationship-tailored behavioral intervention component co-developed and prioritized through Palava Hut Conversations in Aim 2. The intervention is delivered via Zoom in a standardized facilitation structure and may include guided reflection prompts, scenario-based discussions, structured relational messaging, or communication skill-building exercises designed to address migration-shaped relational dynamics influencing HIV testing, HIVST, and PrEP decision-making. The intervention does not involve drugs, devices, or clinical procedures. Session duration: approximately 60-75 minutes.

この研究は何を測定していますか?

主要な結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Acceptability of Intervention - AIM Score and 75% Acceptability Threshold
時間枠:Immediately post-intervention (T1), within the same session as intervention exposure

Acceptability measured using the validated 4-item Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM), rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = completely disagree to 5 = completely agree). Scores range from 1 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree). Results will be reported as mean and standard deviation. Higher scores indicate greater acceptability (better outcome). In addition, the intervention will be considered acceptable if: (1) at least 75% of participants rate it as acceptable or very acceptable, and (2) at least 75% rate it as culturally relevant.

Unit of Measure: Mean AIM score (1-5 scale)

Immediately post-intervention (T1), within the same session as intervention exposure
Feasibility of Intervention - FIM Score
時間枠:Immediately post-intervention (T1), within the same session as intervention exposure

Feasibility of the intervention will be measured using the Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM), a validated 4-item scale with 5-point Likert responses. Scores range from 1 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree). Results will be reported as mean and standard deviation. Higher scores indicate greater feasibility (better outcome).

Unit of Measure: Mean FIM score (1-5 scale)

Immediately post-intervention (T1), within the same session as intervention exposure
Appropriateness of Intervention - IAM Score
時間枠:Immediately post-intervention (T1), within the same session as intervention exposure

Appropriateness of the intervention will be measured using the Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM), a validated 4-item scale with 5-point Likert responses. Scores range from 1 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree). Results will be reported as mean and standard deviation. Higher scores indicate greater perceived appropriateness (better outcome).

Unit of Measure: Mean IAM score (1-5 scale)

Immediately post-intervention (T1), within the same session as intervention exposure

二次結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Change in Mean Score of HIV Testing Intention
時間枠:Pre-intervention (T0) and immediately post-intervention (T1), within the same session

Intention to test for HIV will be measured on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = Very unlikely to 5 = Very likely). Change from baseline (T0) to post-intervention (T1) will be reported as mean change score. Higher scores indicate greater intention to test (better outcome).

Unit of Measure: Mean change in score (1-5 scale)

Pre-intervention (T0) and immediately post-intervention (T1), within the same session
Change in HIV Self-Testing Willingness
時間枠:Pre-intervention (T0) and immediately post-intervention (T1), within the same session

Willingness to use HIV self-testing will be measured on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = Very unlikely to 5 = Very likely) with a higher score indicating willingness to conduct HIV Self Testing. Change from T0 to T1 will be reported as mean change score.

Unit of Measure: Mean change in score (1-5 scale)

Pre-intervention (T0) and immediately post-intervention (T1), within the same session
Change in Communication Readiness
時間枠:Pre-intervention (T0) and immediately post-intervention (T1), within the same session

Readiness to discuss HIV prevention within intimate relationships will be measured using 3 items on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree). Change from T0 to T1 will be reported as mean change score. Higher scores indicate greater communication readiness (better outcome).

Unit of Measure: Mean change in score (1-5 scale)

Pre-intervention (T0) and immediately post-intervention (T1), within the same session
Change in PrEP Awareness and Interest
時間枠:Baseline (T0) and immediately post-intervention (T1), within the same session

Awareness and interest in PrEP will each be measured on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = not interested to 5 = extremely interested). The change from T0 to T1 will be reported as the mean change score. Higher scores indicate greater willingness and interest (better outcome).

Unit of Measure: Mean change in score (1-5 scale)

Baseline (T0) and immediately post-intervention (T1), within the same session

その他の成果指標

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Relationship Typologies
時間枠:During and after Aim 1 data collection, approximately Months 1-3

Categories of relationship structures among first-generation African immigrants derived from thematic analysis of Aim 1 qualitative interviews. Reported narratively as distinct typologies with descriptive characteristics.

Unit of Measure: Number of typologies identified

During and after Aim 1 data collection, approximately Months 1-3
HIV Prevention Awareness and Behaviors
時間枠:At Aim 1 survey completion, approximately Months 1-3

Self-reported HIV testing history, HIV self-testing awareness, and PrEP awareness from Aim 1 structured survey. Reported as frequencies and proportions.

Unit of Measure: Percentage of participants (%)

At Aim 1 survey completion, approximately Months 1-3

協力者と研究者

ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。

協力者

捜査官

  • 主任研究者:Gloria A. Aidoo-Frimpong, PhD, MPH, MA、State University of New York at Buffalo

出版物と役立つリンク

研究に関する情報を入力する責任者は、自発的にこれらの出版物を提供します。これらは、研究に関連するあらゆるものに関するものである可能性があります。

研究記録日

これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。

主要日程の研究

研究開始 (推定)

2026年8月4日

一次修了 (推定)

2027年8月1日

研究の完了 (推定)

2027年9月1日

試験登録日

最初に提出

2026年4月27日

QC基準を満たした最初の提出物

2026年4月27日

最初の投稿 (実際)

2026年5月4日

学習記録の更新

投稿された最後の更新 (実際)

2026年6月29日

QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました

2026年6月24日

最終確認日

2026年6月1日

詳しくは

本研究に関する用語

個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画

個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?

いいえ

IPD プランの説明

Due to the sensitive nature of data related to HIV status, HIV prevention intentions, immigration experiences, and relationship dynamics, and the use of a small, community-based sample in which re-identification is possible, individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared publicly to protect participant confidentiality and community trust.

医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書

米国FDA規制医薬品の研究

いいえ

米国FDA規制機器製品の研究

いいえ

この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。

購読する