Examining Migration, Social Bonds, Transnationalism, and HIV Prevention Pathways Among African Immigrants. (MiST-Pathways)
Migration, Social Bonds, Transnationalism, and HIV Prevention Pathways Among African Immigrants (MiST-Pathways)
The goal of this mixed-methods pilot study is to learn whether migration experiences, social bonds, and transnational ties shape HIV prevention decision-making, including HIV testing, HIV self-testing (HIVST), and pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) uptake, among first-generation African immigrants aged 18 to 50 residing in New York and Massachusetts. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- What relationship typologies and migration-related relational mechanisms influence HIV testing, HIVST, and PrEP decision-making among African immigrants?
- Can a relationship-tailored HIV prevention intervention component, co-developed with the community, demonstrate feasibility and acceptability among African immigrants?
- Does exposure to the prioritized intervention component show directional increases in HIV testing intention, willingness to use HIVST, interest in PrEP, and readiness for relationship-based prevention communication? There is no comparison group. All Aim 3 participants receive the same co-developed intervention component.
Participants will:
- Complete a qualitative interview (60-90 minutes) and/or a structured electronic survey (15-20 minutes) about their relationship experiences, migration history, and HIV prevention behaviors.
- Take part in a 3-4 hour structured group deliberation session called a Palava Hut Conversation to co-develop and prioritize HIV prevention intervention ideas.
- Complete a baseline survey, receive the prioritized intervention component in a structured Zoom session, and complete a follow-up survey with an optional 60-90 minute cognitive interview for a subset of participants.
研究概览
地位
详细说明
African immigrants in the United States account for a disproportionate share of new HIV diagnoses relative to their population size, yet this community remains underrepresented in HIV prevention research. Existing prevention strategies rarely address the relational and structural contexts that shape prevention engagement in this population. Relationships, including intimate partnerships, family systems, and co-ethnic social networks, function as key mechanisms through which HIV risk perception, disclosure, and prevention decisions are negotiated. Migration reorganizes these relational structures by altering trust dynamics, communication norms, household decision-making authority, and transnational obligations in ways that are not well understood. The proposed study addresses this gap by generating foundational, mechanism-focused evidence on how migration-shaped relational contexts influence engagement with HIV testing, HIV self-testing, and PrEP among African immigrants in the United States.
The study is guided by a relational-socioecological framework that positions relationships as central mechanisms linking individual, interpersonal, and structural determinants of HIV prevention behavior. Within this framework, migration is not treated as a direct risk factor but as a structural force that reshapes the relational contexts through which prevention decisions occur. Processes such as separation, reunification, and transnational living alter intimacy, trust, and communication, while cross-border financial obligations and dense co-ethnic networks reinforce norms of discretion and respectability that may suppress prevention engagement. This framework builds on prior qualitative and community-engaged research by the principal investigator, including PCORI-supported African immigrant-led agenda-setting work that identified relationships, trust, and communication as central yet under-addressed drivers of HIV prevention in this community.
The study uses a three-phase sequential design in which each phase builds directly on the findings of the prior one. AIM 1, where relationship typologies and relational mechanisms must first be empirically identified before intervention components can be meaningfully co-developed, and community deliberation must occur in AIM 2. The final step in AIM 3 will be a proof-of-concept assessment that can be conducted with a typology-matched sample.
This sequencing ensures that the intervention component tested in Aim 3 is grounded in both empirical evidence and community priorities rather than researcher-imposed assumptions.
Palava Hut Conversations (PHC) is an African-centered deliberative method adapted from traditional West African communal dialogue practices. It structures collective reasoning through facilitated discussion, negotiated agreement, and consensus-building. PHC was selected for Aim 2 because it centers community knowledge and cultural authority in the co-development process, moves beyond nominal input to genuine co-creation, and generates actionable, community-validated outputs through structured prioritization. This approach ensures that intervention components reflect the lived experiences, cultural values, and practical constraints of the target population.
Aim 1 qualitative data will undergo thematic analysis to identify relationship typologies and relational mechanisms. Survey data will be analyzed descriptively to contextualize typology distribution and prevention awareness across the sample.
Aim 2 deliberation outputs, including facilitator notes, decision logs, and prioritization matrices, will be synthesized using rapid qualitative methods to produce a ranked list of intervention components.
Aim 3 pre- and post-exposure survey data will be summarized using descriptive statistics to assess the direction and consistency of change across prevention intention outcomes. Cognitive interview data will undergo rapid thematic analysis focused on implementation-relevant constructs including acceptability, feasibility, perceived fit, usability, and evidence of mechanism activation.
研究类型
注册 (估计的)
阶段
- 不适用
联系人和位置
学习联系方式
- 姓名:Gloria A. Aidoo-Frimpong, PhD, MPH, MA
- 电话号码:716-829-5721
- 邮箱:gloriaai@buffalo.edu
学习地点
-
-
New York
-
Buffalo、New York、美国、14214
- State University of New York at Buffalo
-
接触:
- Gloria A. Frimpong, PhD, MPH, MA
- 电话号码:716-829-5721
- 邮箱:gloriaai@buffalo.edu
-
-
参与标准
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
- 成人
接受健康志愿者
描述
Inclusion Criteria: Individuals must meet ALL of the following criteria:
- Age 18 to 50 years at the time of enrollment
- Self-identify as a first-generation African immigrant (born in an African country and currently residing in the United States)
- Currently reside in New York or Massachusetts
- Able to communicate in English at approximately a 3rd-grade reading level
- Have access to a smartphone or computer with internet capability sufficient to participate in Zoom and/or WhatsApp-based study activities
- Willing and able to provide informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Are under 18 years of age
- Do not self-identify as a first-generation African immigrant
- Do not reside in New York or Massachusetts
- Are unable to provide informed consent
- Do not have access to the technology required for virtual participation (Zoom and/or WhatsApp)
学习计划
研究是如何设计的?
设计细节
- 主要用途:预防
- 分配:不适用
- 介入模型:单组作业
- 屏蔽:无(打开标签)
武器和干预
参与者组/臂 |
干预/治疗 |
|---|---|
|
实验性的:Proof of Concept Assessment
Participants matching the relationship typology prioritized through community deliberation in Aim 2 are assigned to receive a single co-developed behavioral intervention component.
The intervention is delivered via Zoom in a standardized facilitation structure and focuses on relationship-based HIV prevention communication and decision-making within migration-shaped relationship contexts.
Participants complete a baseline survey (T0) before the intervention and a post-intervention survey (T1) immediately after.
A subset of participants completes an optional cognitive interview to assess feasibility, acceptability, perceived fit, and evidence of mechanism activation.
|
A structured, culturally grounded, relationship-tailored behavioral intervention component co-developed and prioritized through Palava Hut Conversations in Aim 2. The intervention is delivered via Zoom in a standardized facilitation structure and may include guided reflection prompts, scenario-based discussions, structured relational messaging, or communication skill-building exercises designed to address migration-shaped relational dynamics influencing HIV testing, HIVST, and PrEP decision-making.
The intervention does not involve drugs, devices, or clinical procedures.
Session duration: approximately 60-75 minutes.
|
研究衡量的是什么?
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Acceptability of Intervention - AIM Score and 75% Acceptability Threshold
大体时间:Immediately post-intervention (T1), within the same session as intervention exposure
|
Acceptability measured using the validated 4-item Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM), rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = completely disagree to 5 = completely agree). Scores range from 1 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree). Results will be reported as mean and standard deviation. Higher scores indicate greater acceptability (better outcome). In addition, the intervention will be considered acceptable if: (1) at least 75% of participants rate it as acceptable or very acceptable, and (2) at least 75% rate it as culturally relevant. Unit of Measure: Mean AIM score (1-5 scale) |
Immediately post-intervention (T1), within the same session as intervention exposure
|
|
Feasibility of Intervention - FIM Score
大体时间:Immediately post-intervention (T1), within the same session as intervention exposure
|
Feasibility of the intervention will be measured using the Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM), a validated 4-item scale with 5-point Likert responses. Scores range from 1 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree). Results will be reported as mean and standard deviation. Higher scores indicate greater feasibility (better outcome). Unit of Measure: Mean FIM score (1-5 scale) |
Immediately post-intervention (T1), within the same session as intervention exposure
|
|
Appropriateness of Intervention - IAM Score
大体时间:Immediately post-intervention (T1), within the same session as intervention exposure
|
Appropriateness of the intervention will be measured using the Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM), a validated 4-item scale with 5-point Likert responses. Scores range from 1 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree). Results will be reported as mean and standard deviation. Higher scores indicate greater perceived appropriateness (better outcome). Unit of Measure: Mean IAM score (1-5 scale) |
Immediately post-intervention (T1), within the same session as intervention exposure
|
次要结果测量
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Mean Score of HIV Testing Intention
大体时间:Pre-intervention (T0) and immediately post-intervention (T1), within the same session
|
Intention to test for HIV will be measured on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = Very unlikely to 5 = Very likely). Change from baseline (T0) to post-intervention (T1) will be reported as mean change score. Higher scores indicate greater intention to test (better outcome). Unit of Measure: Mean change in score (1-5 scale) |
Pre-intervention (T0) and immediately post-intervention (T1), within the same session
|
|
Change in HIV Self-Testing Willingness
大体时间:Pre-intervention (T0) and immediately post-intervention (T1), within the same session
|
Willingness to use HIV self-testing will be measured on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = Very unlikely to 5 = Very likely) with a higher score indicating willingness to conduct HIV Self Testing. Change from T0 to T1 will be reported as mean change score. Unit of Measure: Mean change in score (1-5 scale) |
Pre-intervention (T0) and immediately post-intervention (T1), within the same session
|
|
Change in Communication Readiness
大体时间:Pre-intervention (T0) and immediately post-intervention (T1), within the same session
|
Readiness to discuss HIV prevention within intimate relationships will be measured using 3 items on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree). Change from T0 to T1 will be reported as mean change score. Higher scores indicate greater communication readiness (better outcome). Unit of Measure: Mean change in score (1-5 scale) |
Pre-intervention (T0) and immediately post-intervention (T1), within the same session
|
|
Change in PrEP Awareness and Interest
大体时间:Baseline (T0) and immediately post-intervention (T1), within the same session
|
Awareness and interest in PrEP will each be measured on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = not interested to 5 = extremely interested). The change from T0 to T1 will be reported as the mean change score. Higher scores indicate greater willingness and interest (better outcome). Unit of Measure: Mean change in score (1-5 scale) |
Baseline (T0) and immediately post-intervention (T1), within the same session
|
其他结果措施
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Relationship Typologies
大体时间:During and after Aim 1 data collection, approximately Months 1-3
|
Categories of relationship structures among first-generation African immigrants derived from thematic analysis of Aim 1 qualitative interviews. Reported narratively as distinct typologies with descriptive characteristics. Unit of Measure: Number of typologies identified |
During and after Aim 1 data collection, approximately Months 1-3
|
|
HIV Prevention Awareness and Behaviors
大体时间:At Aim 1 survey completion, approximately Months 1-3
|
Self-reported HIV testing history, HIV self-testing awareness, and PrEP awareness from Aim 1 structured survey. Reported as frequencies and proportions. Unit of Measure: Percentage of participants (%) |
At Aim 1 survey completion, approximately Months 1-3
|
合作者和调查者
合作者
调查人员
- 首席研究员:Gloria A. Aidoo-Frimpong, PhD, MPH, MA、State University of New York at Buffalo
出版物和有用的链接
研究记录日期
研究主要日期
学习开始 (估计的)
初级完成 (估计的)
研究完成 (估计的)
研究注册日期
首次提交
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
首次发布 (实际的)
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (实际的)
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
最后验证
更多信息
与本研究相关的术语
关键字
其他研究编号
- STUDY00010347
计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)
计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)?
IPD 计划说明
药物和器械信息、研究文件
研究美国 FDA 监管的药品
研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.