このページは自動翻訳されたものであり、翻訳の正確性は保証されていません。を参照してください。 英語版 ソーステキスト用。

Multi-Site Cortical Puncture for DOR (MSCPD)

Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Multiple Ovarian Cortex Punctures in Improving Ovarian Reserve and Ovarian Stimulation Outcomes in Patients With Diminished Ovarian Reserve (DOR): A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

A multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial. The target population consists of patients undergoing IVF/ICSI artificial reproduction who plan to undergo ovarian stimulation and embryo retrieval (DOR) within 4 months. A stratified block randomization method was employed to assign participants in a 1:1 ratio to the intervention group and control group. The study aims to investigate whether multiple-point ovarian cortex puncture during the initial oocyte retrieval procedure improves ovarian reserve and ovarian stimulation outcomes in DOR patients compared to conventional oocyte retrieval techniques.

調査の概要

詳細な説明

This is a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial designed to evaluate the efficacy of ovarian cortex multi-point puncture in improving ovarian reserve and ovarian stimulation outcomes in patients with delayed ovarian reserve (DOR). The target population consists of DOR patients undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) with plans for subsequent ovarian stimulation and embryo retrieval within 4 months. The primary objective is to assess whether ovarian cortex multi-point puncture during the initial oocyte retrieval procedure improves ovarian reserve and ovarian stimulation outcomes compared to conventional oocyte retrieval. The study plans to continuously recruit 214 participants across seven participating centers.

The study period for the research subjects comprises three phases: screening and baseline phase, intervention phase, and follow-up phase.

During the screening and baseline phase, patients scheduled for IVF/ICSI artificial reproduction with plans to undergo ovarian stimulation, oocyte retrieval, embryo transfer, and DOR within 4 months were invited to participate in this study. Written informed consent forms were provided to potential participants, with detailed explanations of the study protocol. Prior to implementing any specific study procedures, written informed consent from participants (or their legal representatives) was obtained. After signing the informed consent form, participants were randomly assigned to the intervention group or control group using a stratified block randomization method (with research centers as stratification factors) at a 1:1 ratio, followed by baseline data collection.

During the intervention period, on the day of oocyte retrieval after the first ovarian stimulation cycle, the control group underwent conventional anesthesia (intravenous anesthesia or sedation) followed by standard oocyte retrieval procedures according to institutional protocols. A standard 17G double-lumen oocyte retrieval needle was used with transvaginal ultrasound guidance and puncture guide frame. The intervention group completed conventional oocyte retrieval under the same anesthesia/sedation conditions and immediately underwent ovarian cortical multi-point puncture under ultrasound guidance (without needle replacement). The procedure involved selecting the ovary with relatively fewer follicles larger than 14mm and establishing two evenly distributed puncture sites in the cortical region. For patients requiring continued ovarian stimulation therapy prior to the second oocyte retrieval, the ovarian stimulation protocol remained consistent with the previous cycle. Detailed records were maintained for the stimulation regimen, medication dosages, oocyte retrieval puncture documentation, and adverse event occurrences.

During the follow-up period, study subjects undergoing IVF/ICSI treatment were monitored for pregnancy outcomes (biochemical pregnancy rate, implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate (early ≤12 weeks and mid-to-late <28 weeks), live birth rate, cumulative pregnancy rate, cumulative live birth rate), neonatal outcomes (preterm birth, stillbirth, low birth weight infants, birth defects), and adverse event-related data.

研究の種類

介入

入学 (推定)

214

段階

  • 適用できない

連絡先と場所

このセクションには、調査を実施する担当者の連絡先の詳細と、この調査が実施されている場所に関する情報が記載されています。

研究連絡先

  • 名前:Yihua Yang, Doctor
  • 電話番号:86-0771-5356126
  • メールworkyyh@163.com

研究場所

    • Fujian
      • Xiamen、Fujian、中国
        • The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University
        • コンタクト:
    • Guangxi
      • Guigang、Guangxi、中国
        • Guigang City People's Hospital
        • コンタクト:
      • Liuzhou、Guangxi、中国
        • Liuzhou people's Hospital
        • コンタクト:
      • Nanning、Guangxi、中国
        • The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University
        • コンタクト:
      • Nanning、Guangxi、中国
        • The Second Nanning People's Hospital
        • コンタクト:
      • Nanning、Guangxi、中国、530011
        • Nanning Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital
        • コンタクト:
      • Qinzhou、Guangxi、中国
        • Qinzhou Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital
        • コンタクト:

参加基準

研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。

適格基準

就学可能な年齢

  • 大人

健康ボランティアの受け入れ

いいえ

説明

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age 20-45 years;
  2. Infertile women meeting the diagnostic criteria for diminished ovarian reserve (DOR); The following two criteria must be met simultaneously: ① Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) ≤0.5 ng/ml, ② Bilateral ovarian antral follicles (AFC) ≤5 (3-9 mm).
  3. Patients scheduled for IVF (in vitro fertilization)/ICSI (intracytoplasmic sperm injection) treatment;
  4. Patients who plan for whole embryo cryopreservation and intend to undergo another ovulation induction cycle within 4 natural months starting from the first cycle, with the goal of embryo retrieval and embryo banking;
  5. Bilateral follicles were observed during AFC examination;
  6. The planned ovarian stimulation protocol is one of PPOS, antagonist, or microstimulation protocols;
  7. The first ovulation induction protocol is planned to be consistent with the second ovulation induction protocol;
  8. Voluntary participation in the study and signing of the informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with the following reproductive and gynecological comorbidities: history of salpingectomy, ovarian cysts (e.g., chocolate cysts), ovarian tumors, or simple cysts ≥10 mm (not eligible for enrollment in the current cycle; may be enrolled after regression), history of ovarian surgery, endometriosis or adenomyosis, or acute pelvic inflammatory disease;
  2. Patients with abnormal ovarian position who are expected to experience difficulties during oocyte retrieval puncture;
  3. Patients with concomitant systemic severe diseases (history of severe chronic diseases such as heart failure, myocardial infarction, stroke, end-stage renal disease; advanced cancer or other terminal illnesses with an estimated survival period of less than 6 months; coagulation disorders; uncontrolled sepsis; autoimmune diseases; poor general condition rendering anesthesia and surgery intolerable);
  4. Patients with contraindications to hormone replacement therapy;
  5. Currently undergoing treatment with cytotoxic drugs, glucocorticoids or other immunosuppressants, radiotherapy or chemotherapy, or having previously received radiotherapy or chemotherapy;
  6. One spouse has chromosomal abnormalities;
  7. Patients with a history of uncontrolled epilepsy, central nervous system disorders, or psychiatric disorders, where the investigator determines that clinical severity affects compliance with the clinical study;
  8. Patients who have undergone oocyte retrieval or ovarian puncture within the past year;
  9. Participating in other clinical trials.

研究計画

このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。

研究はどのように設計されていますか?

デザインの詳細

  • 主な目的:処理
  • 割り当て:ランダム化
  • 介入モデル:並列代入
  • マスキング:ダブル

武器と介入

参加者グループ / アーム
介入・治療
実験的:intervention group (multiple ovarian cortex puncture)
The intervention group underwent combined ovarian cortex multi-point puncture in addition to conventional oocyte retrieval procedures (identical to the control group). Specifically, after completing standard oocyte retrieval under the same anesthesia/sedation conditions, multi-point ovarian cortex puncture was performed without needle replacement. The procedure was guided by real-time ultrasound to ensure operational accuracy and visualization. On ultrasound imaging, three puncture sites were selected from the ovarian cortex region (avoiding residual follicles, corpus luteum, and medullary vascular areas) for uniform distribution: the first puncture point was aligned with the oocyte retrieval puncture line, followed by the second and third puncture points located approximately 5 mm to either side of the first point after exiting the ovarian surface.
During the intervention period, on the day of oocyte retrieval after the first ovarian stimulation cycle, the control group underwent conventional anesthesia (intravenous anesthesia or sedation) followed by standard oocyte retrieval procedures according to institutional protocols. A standard 17G double-lumen oocyte retrieval needle was used with transvaginal ultrasound guidance and puncture guide frame. The intervention group completed conventional oocyte retrieval under the same anesthesia/sedation conditions and immediately underwent ovarian cortical multi-point puncture under ultrasound guidance (without needle replacement).
他の:control group (conventional oocyte retrieval procedure)
Control measures (routine oocyte retrieval procedure):The procedure was performed according to the standard oocyte retrieval protocols of each center, with ovarian follicle aspiration completed under transvaginal ultrasound guidance. All target follicles were confirmed to have undergone complete aspiration of follicular fluid.
Equipment preparation:Oocyte retrieval puncture needle(Standard 17G double-lumen oocyte retrieval needle),Transvaginal ultrasound probe and puncture guidance frame, Sterile gloves, disinfectant solution, sterile gauze; Patient Preparation:Verify patient identity,Routine pre-oocyte retrieval preparations (bladder emptying, vulvar disinfection, etc.),Anesthesia method: According to the standard practice of each center (intravenous anesthesia or sedation); Oocyte retrieval procedure (identical in both groups):The procedure was performed according to the standard oocyte retrieval protocols of each center, with ovarian follicle aspiration completed under transvaginal ultrasound guidance. All target follicles were confirmed to have undergone complete aspiration of follicular fluid.

この研究は何を測定していますか?

主要な結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Number of oocytes retrieved during the second ovarian stimulation cycle
時間枠:The assessment period lasts up to 4 months, from the date of randomization to the completion of the second ovarian stimulation and oocyte retrieval.
Number of oocytes retrieved during the second ovarian stimulation cycle in DOR patients (recorded separately by investigators unaware of group assignments for left and right ovaries).
The assessment period lasts up to 4 months, from the date of randomization to the completion of the second ovarian stimulation and oocyte retrieval.

二次結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Key reproductive-related indicators for the second ovarian stimulation and oocyte retrieval cycle
時間枠:From the date of randomization to the third month after the second ovulation induction and oocyte retrieval surgery, the assessment period can last up to 7 months.
Antral follicle count (AFC), anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), number of follicles ≥14mm on HCG day, number of MII-stage follicles, number of fertilizations, number of 2pn embryos, number of embryos, and number of high-quality embryos;
From the date of randomization to the third month after the second ovulation induction and oocyte retrieval surgery, the assessment period can last up to 7 months.
Rate of biochemical pregnancy
時間枠:From the date of randomization to the occurrence of biochemical pregnancy after this embryo transfer, the assessment period can last up to 24 months.
A blood pregnancy test is performed 14 days after embryo transfer. A positive result is defined as biochemical pregnancy. The rate of biochemical pregnancy is calculated using the following formula: (Number of cycles with positive blood hCG / Number of transfer cycles) × 100%.
From the date of randomization to the occurrence of biochemical pregnancy after this embryo transfer, the assessment period can last up to 24 months.
Clinical pregnancy rate
時間枠:From the date of randomization to clinical pregnancy after this embryo transfer, the assessment period can last up to 24 months.
Transvaginal ultrasound examination performed 4-5 weeks after embryo transfer is conducted. If intrauterine gestational sac, ectopic pregnancy, or combined intrauterine and extrauterine pregnancy is detected, it is classified as clinical pregnancy. The clinical pregnancy rate is calculated using the following formula: (Number of cycles with clinical pregnancy / Total number of embryo transfer cycles) × 100%.
From the date of randomization to clinical pregnancy after this embryo transfer, the assessment period can last up to 24 months.
Implantation rate
時間枠:From the date of randomization to implantation at the 5th week after embryo transfer, the assessment period can last up to 24 months.
Transvaginal ultrasound examination performed 4-5 weeks after embryo transfer. If intrauterine or ectopic gestational sacs are detected, implantation is confirmed. (Number of gestational sacs / Number of transferred embryos) × 100%
From the date of randomization to implantation at the 5th week after embryo transfer, the assessment period can last up to 24 months.
Abortion rate
時間枠:From the date of randomization to miscarriage after this embryo transfer, the assessment period can last up to 30 months.
Early abortion rate (number of cycles with miscarriage occurring before 12 weeks / total clinical pregnancy cycles) × 100%; Mid-to-late abortion rate (number of cycles with miscarriage occurring between 12 weeks and 28 weeks / total clinical pregnancy cycles) × 100%.
From the date of randomization to miscarriage after this embryo transfer, the assessment period can last up to 30 months.
Live birth rate
時間枠:From the date of randomization to the birth of a full-term live fetus following this embryo transfer, the assessment period lasts up to 36 months.
(Number of transplant cycles achieving at least one full-term live birth at 28 weeks / Total number of transplant cycles) × 100%
From the date of randomization to the birth of a full-term live fetus following this embryo transfer, the assessment period lasts up to 36 months.
Cumulative pregnancy rate
時間枠:From the date of randomization to clinical pregnancy after exhaustion of transplantable embryos, the assessment period lasts up to 100 months.
The proportion of patients who ultimately achieve clinical pregnancy, calculated until all transplantable embryos obtained from two consecutive IVF/ICSI cycles are exhausted.
From the date of randomization to clinical pregnancy after exhaustion of transplantable embryos, the assessment period lasts up to 100 months.
Cumulative live birth rate
時間枠:From the date of randomization to the birth of a full-term live fetus after exhaustion of transplantable embryos, the assessment period lasts up to 100 months.
The proportion of patients who ultimately achieved live births (gestation ≥28 weeks) using transplantable embryos obtained from two consecutive IVF/ICSI cycles until all embryos were exhausted.
From the date of randomization to the birth of a full-term live fetus after exhaustion of transplantable embryos, the assessment period lasts up to 100 months.
Adverse neonatal outcomes
時間枠:From the date of randomization to one year after the birth of the newborn, the assessment period can last up to 100 months.
primarily including preterm birth, stillbirth, low birth weight infants, and birth defects;
From the date of randomization to one year after the birth of the newborn, the assessment period can last up to 100 months.
Incidence of adverse events
時間枠:From the date of randomization to the date of adverse event occurrence, the assessment period lasts up to 100 months.
Adverse events and serious adverse events, with a focus on evaluating the incidence of puncture-related adverse events (e.g., bleeding, injury, infection).
From the date of randomization to the date of adverse event occurrence, the assessment period lasts up to 100 months.

協力者と研究者

ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。

研究記録日

これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。

主要日程の研究

研究開始 (推定)

2026年4月30日

一次修了 (推定)

2028年3月30日

研究の完了 (推定)

2030年12月30日

試験登録日

最初に提出

2026年4月12日

QC基準を満たした最初の提出物

2026年4月28日

最初の投稿 (実際)

2026年5月6日

学習記録の更新

投稿された最後の更新 (実際)

2026年5月6日

QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました

2026年4月28日

最終確認日

2026年3月1日

詳しくは

本研究に関する用語

その他の研究ID番号

  • YYZS2021001002
  • YYZS2021001 (その他の助成金/資金番号:The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University)

個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画

個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?

未定

医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書

米国FDA規制医薬品の研究

いいえ

米国FDA規制機器製品の研究

いいえ

この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。

購読する