이 페이지는 자동 번역되었으며 번역의 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다. 참조하십시오 영문판 원본 텍스트의 경우.

Multi-Site Cortical Puncture for DOR (MSCPD)

Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Multiple Ovarian Cortex Punctures in Improving Ovarian Reserve and Ovarian Stimulation Outcomes in Patients With Diminished Ovarian Reserve (DOR): A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

A multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial. The target population consists of patients undergoing IVF/ICSI artificial reproduction who plan to undergo ovarian stimulation and embryo retrieval (DOR) within 4 months. A stratified block randomization method was employed to assign participants in a 1:1 ratio to the intervention group and control group. The study aims to investigate whether multiple-point ovarian cortex puncture during the initial oocyte retrieval procedure improves ovarian reserve and ovarian stimulation outcomes in DOR patients compared to conventional oocyte retrieval techniques.

연구 개요

상세 설명

This is a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial designed to evaluate the efficacy of ovarian cortex multi-point puncture in improving ovarian reserve and ovarian stimulation outcomes in patients with delayed ovarian reserve (DOR). The target population consists of DOR patients undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) with plans for subsequent ovarian stimulation and embryo retrieval within 4 months. The primary objective is to assess whether ovarian cortex multi-point puncture during the initial oocyte retrieval procedure improves ovarian reserve and ovarian stimulation outcomes compared to conventional oocyte retrieval. The study plans to continuously recruit 214 participants across seven participating centers.

The study period for the research subjects comprises three phases: screening and baseline phase, intervention phase, and follow-up phase.

During the screening and baseline phase, patients scheduled for IVF/ICSI artificial reproduction with plans to undergo ovarian stimulation, oocyte retrieval, embryo transfer, and DOR within 4 months were invited to participate in this study. Written informed consent forms were provided to potential participants, with detailed explanations of the study protocol. Prior to implementing any specific study procedures, written informed consent from participants (or their legal representatives) was obtained. After signing the informed consent form, participants were randomly assigned to the intervention group or control group using a stratified block randomization method (with research centers as stratification factors) at a 1:1 ratio, followed by baseline data collection.

During the intervention period, on the day of oocyte retrieval after the first ovarian stimulation cycle, the control group underwent conventional anesthesia (intravenous anesthesia or sedation) followed by standard oocyte retrieval procedures according to institutional protocols. A standard 17G double-lumen oocyte retrieval needle was used with transvaginal ultrasound guidance and puncture guide frame. The intervention group completed conventional oocyte retrieval under the same anesthesia/sedation conditions and immediately underwent ovarian cortical multi-point puncture under ultrasound guidance (without needle replacement). The procedure involved selecting the ovary with relatively fewer follicles larger than 14mm and establishing two evenly distributed puncture sites in the cortical region. For patients requiring continued ovarian stimulation therapy prior to the second oocyte retrieval, the ovarian stimulation protocol remained consistent with the previous cycle. Detailed records were maintained for the stimulation regimen, medication dosages, oocyte retrieval puncture documentation, and adverse event occurrences.

During the follow-up period, study subjects undergoing IVF/ICSI treatment were monitored for pregnancy outcomes (biochemical pregnancy rate, implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate (early ≤12 weeks and mid-to-late <28 weeks), live birth rate, cumulative pregnancy rate, cumulative live birth rate), neonatal outcomes (preterm birth, stillbirth, low birth weight infants, birth defects), and adverse event-related data.

연구 유형

중재적

등록 (추정된)

214

단계

  • 해당 없음

연락처 및 위치

이 섹션에서는 연구를 수행하는 사람들의 연락처 정보와 이 연구가 수행되는 장소에 대한 정보를 제공합니다.

연구 연락처

  • 이름: Yihua Yang, Doctor
  • 전화번호: 86-0771-5356126
  • 이메일: workyyh@163.com

연구 장소

    • Fujian
      • Xiamen, Fujian, 중국
        • The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University
        • 연락하다:
    • Guangxi
      • Guigang, Guangxi, 중국
        • Guigang City People's Hospital
        • 연락하다:
      • Liuzhou, Guangxi, 중국
        • Liuzhou People's Hospital
        • 연락하다:
      • Nanning, Guangxi, 중국
        • The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University
        • 연락하다:
      • Nanning, Guangxi, 중국
        • The Second Nanning People's Hospital
        • 연락하다:
      • Nanning, Guangxi, 중국, 530011
        • Nanning Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital
        • 연락하다:
      • Qinzhou, Guangxi, 중국
        • Qinzhou Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital
        • 연락하다:

참여기준

연구원은 적격성 기준이라는 특정 설명에 맞는 사람을 찾습니다. 이러한 기준의 몇 가지 예는 개인의 일반적인 건강 상태 또는 이전 치료입니다.

자격 기준

공부할 수 있는 나이

  • 성인

건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다

아니

설명

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age 20-45 years;
  2. Infertile women meeting the diagnostic criteria for diminished ovarian reserve (DOR); The following two criteria must be met simultaneously: ① Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) ≤0.5 ng/ml, ② Bilateral ovarian antral follicles (AFC) ≤5 (3-9 mm).
  3. Patients scheduled for IVF (in vitro fertilization)/ICSI (intracytoplasmic sperm injection) treatment;
  4. Patients who plan for whole embryo cryopreservation and intend to undergo another ovulation induction cycle within 4 natural months starting from the first cycle, with the goal of embryo retrieval and embryo banking;
  5. Bilateral follicles were observed during AFC examination;
  6. The planned ovarian stimulation protocol is one of PPOS, antagonist, or microstimulation protocols;
  7. The first ovulation induction protocol is planned to be consistent with the second ovulation induction protocol;
  8. Voluntary participation in the study and signing of the informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with the following reproductive and gynecological comorbidities: history of salpingectomy, ovarian cysts (e.g., chocolate cysts), ovarian tumors, or simple cysts ≥10 mm (not eligible for enrollment in the current cycle; may be enrolled after regression), history of ovarian surgery, endometriosis or adenomyosis, or acute pelvic inflammatory disease;
  2. Patients with abnormal ovarian position who are expected to experience difficulties during oocyte retrieval puncture;
  3. Patients with concomitant systemic severe diseases (history of severe chronic diseases such as heart failure, myocardial infarction, stroke, end-stage renal disease; advanced cancer or other terminal illnesses with an estimated survival period of less than 6 months; coagulation disorders; uncontrolled sepsis; autoimmune diseases; poor general condition rendering anesthesia and surgery intolerable);
  4. Patients with contraindications to hormone replacement therapy;
  5. Currently undergoing treatment with cytotoxic drugs, glucocorticoids or other immunosuppressants, radiotherapy or chemotherapy, or having previously received radiotherapy or chemotherapy;
  6. One spouse has chromosomal abnormalities;
  7. Patients with a history of uncontrolled epilepsy, central nervous system disorders, or psychiatric disorders, where the investigator determines that clinical severity affects compliance with the clinical study;
  8. Patients who have undergone oocyte retrieval or ovarian puncture within the past year;
  9. Participating in other clinical trials.

공부 계획

이 섹션에서는 연구 설계 방법과 연구가 측정하는 내용을 포함하여 연구 계획에 대한 세부 정보를 제공합니다.

연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?

디자인 세부사항

  • 주 목적: 치료
  • 할당: 무작위
  • 중재 모델: 병렬 할당
  • 마스킹: 더블

무기와 개입

참가자 그룹 / 팔
개입 / 치료
실험적: intervention group (multiple ovarian cortex puncture)
The intervention group underwent combined ovarian cortex multi-point puncture in addition to conventional oocyte retrieval procedures (identical to the control group). Specifically, after completing standard oocyte retrieval under the same anesthesia/sedation conditions, multi-point ovarian cortex puncture was performed without needle replacement. The procedure was guided by real-time ultrasound to ensure operational accuracy and visualization. On ultrasound imaging, three puncture sites were selected from the ovarian cortex region (avoiding residual follicles, corpus luteum, and medullary vascular areas) for uniform distribution: the first puncture point was aligned with the oocyte retrieval puncture line, followed by the second and third puncture points located approximately 5 mm to either side of the first point after exiting the ovarian surface.
During the intervention period, on the day of oocyte retrieval after the first ovarian stimulation cycle, the control group underwent conventional anesthesia (intravenous anesthesia or sedation) followed by standard oocyte retrieval procedures according to institutional protocols. A standard 17G double-lumen oocyte retrieval needle was used with transvaginal ultrasound guidance and puncture guide frame. The intervention group completed conventional oocyte retrieval under the same anesthesia/sedation conditions and immediately underwent ovarian cortical multi-point puncture under ultrasound guidance (without needle replacement).
다른: control group (conventional oocyte retrieval procedure)
Control measures (routine oocyte retrieval procedure):The procedure was performed according to the standard oocyte retrieval protocols of each center, with ovarian follicle aspiration completed under transvaginal ultrasound guidance. All target follicles were confirmed to have undergone complete aspiration of follicular fluid.
Equipment preparation:Oocyte retrieval puncture needle(Standard 17G double-lumen oocyte retrieval needle),Transvaginal ultrasound probe and puncture guidance frame, Sterile gloves, disinfectant solution, sterile gauze; Patient Preparation:Verify patient identity,Routine pre-oocyte retrieval preparations (bladder emptying, vulvar disinfection, etc.),Anesthesia method: According to the standard practice of each center (intravenous anesthesia or sedation); Oocyte retrieval procedure (identical in both groups):The procedure was performed according to the standard oocyte retrieval protocols of each center, with ovarian follicle aspiration completed under transvaginal ultrasound guidance. All target follicles were confirmed to have undergone complete aspiration of follicular fluid.

연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?

주요 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Number of oocytes retrieved during the second ovarian stimulation cycle
기간: The assessment period lasts up to 4 months, from the date of randomization to the completion of the second ovarian stimulation and oocyte retrieval.
Number of oocytes retrieved during the second ovarian stimulation cycle in DOR patients (recorded separately by investigators unaware of group assignments for left and right ovaries).
The assessment period lasts up to 4 months, from the date of randomization to the completion of the second ovarian stimulation and oocyte retrieval.

2차 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Key reproductive-related indicators for the second ovarian stimulation and oocyte retrieval cycle
기간: From the date of randomization to the third month after the second ovulation induction and oocyte retrieval surgery, the assessment period can last up to 7 months.
Antral follicle count (AFC), anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), number of follicles ≥14mm on HCG day, number of MII-stage follicles, number of fertilizations, number of 2pn embryos, number of embryos, and number of high-quality embryos;
From the date of randomization to the third month after the second ovulation induction and oocyte retrieval surgery, the assessment period can last up to 7 months.
Rate of biochemical pregnancy
기간: From the date of randomization to the occurrence of biochemical pregnancy after this embryo transfer, the assessment period can last up to 24 months.
A blood pregnancy test is performed 14 days after embryo transfer. A positive result is defined as biochemical pregnancy. The rate of biochemical pregnancy is calculated using the following formula: (Number of cycles with positive blood hCG / Number of transfer cycles) × 100%.
From the date of randomization to the occurrence of biochemical pregnancy after this embryo transfer, the assessment period can last up to 24 months.
Clinical pregnancy rate
기간: From the date of randomization to clinical pregnancy after this embryo transfer, the assessment period can last up to 24 months.
Transvaginal ultrasound examination performed 4-5 weeks after embryo transfer is conducted. If intrauterine gestational sac, ectopic pregnancy, or combined intrauterine and extrauterine pregnancy is detected, it is classified as clinical pregnancy. The clinical pregnancy rate is calculated using the following formula: (Number of cycles with clinical pregnancy / Total number of embryo transfer cycles) × 100%.
From the date of randomization to clinical pregnancy after this embryo transfer, the assessment period can last up to 24 months.
Implantation rate
기간: From the date of randomization to implantation at the 5th week after embryo transfer, the assessment period can last up to 24 months.
Transvaginal ultrasound examination performed 4-5 weeks after embryo transfer. If intrauterine or ectopic gestational sacs are detected, implantation is confirmed. (Number of gestational sacs / Number of transferred embryos) × 100%
From the date of randomization to implantation at the 5th week after embryo transfer, the assessment period can last up to 24 months.
Abortion rate
기간: From the date of randomization to miscarriage after this embryo transfer, the assessment period can last up to 30 months.
Early abortion rate (number of cycles with miscarriage occurring before 12 weeks / total clinical pregnancy cycles) × 100%; Mid-to-late abortion rate (number of cycles with miscarriage occurring between 12 weeks and 28 weeks / total clinical pregnancy cycles) × 100%.
From the date of randomization to miscarriage after this embryo transfer, the assessment period can last up to 30 months.
Live birth rate
기간: From the date of randomization to the birth of a full-term live fetus following this embryo transfer, the assessment period lasts up to 36 months.
(Number of transplant cycles achieving at least one full-term live birth at 28 weeks / Total number of transplant cycles) × 100%
From the date of randomization to the birth of a full-term live fetus following this embryo transfer, the assessment period lasts up to 36 months.
Cumulative pregnancy rate
기간: From the date of randomization to clinical pregnancy after exhaustion of transplantable embryos, the assessment period lasts up to 100 months.
The proportion of patients who ultimately achieve clinical pregnancy, calculated until all transplantable embryos obtained from two consecutive IVF/ICSI cycles are exhausted.
From the date of randomization to clinical pregnancy after exhaustion of transplantable embryos, the assessment period lasts up to 100 months.
Cumulative live birth rate
기간: From the date of randomization to the birth of a full-term live fetus after exhaustion of transplantable embryos, the assessment period lasts up to 100 months.
The proportion of patients who ultimately achieved live births (gestation ≥28 weeks) using transplantable embryos obtained from two consecutive IVF/ICSI cycles until all embryos were exhausted.
From the date of randomization to the birth of a full-term live fetus after exhaustion of transplantable embryos, the assessment period lasts up to 100 months.
Adverse neonatal outcomes
기간: From the date of randomization to one year after the birth of the newborn, the assessment period can last up to 100 months.
primarily including preterm birth, stillbirth, low birth weight infants, and birth defects;
From the date of randomization to one year after the birth of the newborn, the assessment period can last up to 100 months.
Incidence of adverse events
기간: From the date of randomization to the date of adverse event occurrence, the assessment period lasts up to 100 months.
Adverse events and serious adverse events, with a focus on evaluating the incidence of puncture-related adverse events (e.g., bleeding, injury, infection).
From the date of randomization to the date of adverse event occurrence, the assessment period lasts up to 100 months.

공동 작업자 및 조사자

여기에서 이 연구와 관련된 사람과 조직을 찾을 수 있습니다.

연구 기록 날짜

이 날짜는 ClinicalTrials.gov에 대한 연구 기록 및 요약 결과 제출의 진행 상황을 추적합니다. 연구 기록 및 보고된 결과는 공개 웹사이트에 게시되기 전에 특정 품질 관리 기준을 충족하는지 확인하기 위해 국립 의학 도서관(NLM)에서 검토합니다.

연구 주요 날짜

연구 시작 (추정된)

2026년 4월 30일

기본 완료 (추정된)

2028년 3월 30일

연구 완료 (추정된)

2030년 12월 30일

연구 등록 날짜

최초 제출

2026년 4월 12일

QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출

2026년 4월 28일

처음 게시됨 (실제)

2026년 5월 6일

연구 기록 업데이트

마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)

2026년 5월 6일

QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출

2026년 4월 28일

마지막으로 확인됨

2026년 3월 1일

추가 정보

이 연구와 관련된 용어

기타 연구 ID 번호

  • YYZS2021001002
  • YYZS2021001 (기타 보조금/기금 번호: The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University)

개별 참가자 데이터(IPD) 계획

개별 참가자 데이터(IPD)를 공유할 계획입니까?

미정

약물 및 장치 정보, 연구 문서

미국 FDA 규제 의약품 연구

아니

미국 FDA 규제 기기 제품 연구

아니

이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .

구독하다