このページは自動翻訳されたものであり、翻訳の正確性は保証されていません。を参照してください。 英語版 ソーステキスト用。

A Randomized Non-Inferiority Study of Mepi™ Press 2 vs UrgoK2® for Compression Therapy in Venous Leg Ulcers

2026年5月13日 更新者:Molnlycke Health Care AB

A Comparative, Adaptive, Randomized, Non-Inferiority Clinical Investigation of Two-Layer Compression Bandages Mepi™ Press 2 Versus UrgoK2® in the Treatment of Venous Leg Ulcers

Venous leg ulcers (VLUs) account for approximately 70% of all lower limb ulcers and affect an estimated 0.032% to 1% of the population in Western countries, corresponding to approximately 265,000 to 650,000 individuals in France. Effective management of VLUs is essential to reduce patient burden and associated healthcare costs. Compression therapy is the cornerstone of VLU treatment , as it improves venous return, reduces oedema, and promotes wound healing. Multilayer compression bandage systems, including two-layer systems, are considered the gold standard, and in France, they are recommended as first-line treatment for VLUs.

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate whether the Mepi™ Press 2 compression system is non-inferior to UrgoK2® in the treatment of venous leg ulcers in adult patients.

The main question it aims to answer is:

-Is Mepi™ Press 2 non-inferior to UrgoK2® in terms of the proportion of completely healed VLUs within 12 weeks?

Researchers will compare Mepi™ Press 2 with UrgoK2® to determine whether similar clinical efficacy, performance, and safety can be achieved.

Participants are adult patients with venous leg ulcers of less than 24 months duration requiring treatment with a two-layer compression bandage system. The study is multicenter, involving approximately 25 sites in France, and plans to enroll 386 participants.

Participants will:

  • Receive compression therapy with either Mepi™ Press 2 or UrgoK2® in accordance with standard of care
  • Receive an appropriate primary wound dressing prior to compression
  • Attend up to five study visits over a period of up to 12 weeks (or until wound healing, whichever occurs first)
  • Be assessed for wound healing, safety, and device performance throughout the study

調査の概要

研究の種類

介入

入学 (推定)

386

段階

  • 適用できない

連絡先と場所

このセクションには、調査を実施する担当者の連絡先の詳細と、この調査が実施されている場所に関する情報が記載されています。

研究連絡先

研究場所

      • Castelnau-le-Lez、フランス
        • Clinique du Parc-Montpellier
        • コンタクト:
      • Grenoble、フランス
        • CHU Michallon Grenoble
        • コンタクト:
      • Lyon、フランス
      • Lyon、フランス
        • Hopital Edouard Herriot_HCL
        • コンタクト:
      • Nantes、フランス
      • Poitiers、フランス
        • Poitiers Polyclinique
        • コンタクト:
      • Toulouse、フランス
      • Toulouse、フランス
        • Clinique Pasteur-Toulouse
        • コンタクト:

参加基準

研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。

適格基準

就学可能な年齢

  • 大人
  • 高齢者

健康ボランティアの受け入れ

いいえ

説明

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients ≥ 18 years.
  • Stage C6 venous leg ulcer diagnosed less than 24 months ago.
  • 2cm² ≤ VLU surface area ≤ 40cm².
  • ABPI equal or higher than 0.8 and equal or lower than 1.3.
  • Able to read, understand and speak French for their medical care.
  • Agreeing to follow the procedures described in the CIP.
  • Benefiting from a social insurance coverage.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any contraindication to investigational or comparator medical devices mentioned in their respective IFUs.
  • Planned endovenous treatment or surgical venous stripping / exeresis within 8 weeks before planned inclusion date, or before end of participation to the study.
  • Treatment with chemotherapy or antineoplastic agent within the last 6 months.
  • Active wound infection or wound infection treatment within the past 4 weeks before inclusion or current use of silver dressings.
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women.
  • Persons deprived from their liberty.
  • Persons protected under guardianship or curatorship.
  • Any person who, as per investigator's decision, is not suitable to participate in the investigation for any other reason.-

研究計画

このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。

研究はどのように設計されていますか?

デザインの詳細

  • 主な目的:処理
  • 割り当て:ランダム化
  • 介入モデル:並列代入
  • マスキング:なし(オープンラベル)

武器と介入

参加者グループ / アーム
介入・治療
実験的:Mepi™ Press 2- two-layer compression bandage
Participants will receive compression therapy using Mepi™ Press 2 in accordance with standard of care for venous leg ulcer (VLU) management. Mepi™ Press 2 is a two-layer, short-stretch compression system consisting of a padded bandage and a cohesive compression bandage with visual application indicator. An appropriate primary wound dressing will be applied prior to compression. Bandages are worn continuously and changed as clinically indicated, typically up to once weekly. The system is intended to provide high working pressure and low resting pressure to support venous return and reduce edema. Single-use, non-sterile device.
A two-layer compression system consisting of a padded bandage and a cohesive short-stretch bandage with visual indicator. Provides therapeutic compression to support venous leg ulcer management. Applied with an appropriate primary wound dressing and changed as clinically indicated.
Appropriate primary wound dressing applied prior to compression therapy according to standard of care.
アクティブコンパレータ:UrgoK2® - multicomponent, compression system
Participants will receive compression therapy using UrgoK2® in accordance with standard of care for venous leg ulcer (VLU) management. UrgoK2® is a two-layer compression system consisting of a white short-stretch bandage (K-TECH) and a pink/beige cohesive long-stretch bandage (Kpress) with visual indicators to support correct application and achieve therapeutic compression (approximately 40 mmHg). An appropriate primary wound dressing will be applied prior to compression. Bandages are worn continuously and changed as clinically indicated, typically up to once weekly. The system is non-sterile, intended for single use, available in different sizes based on ankle circumference.
Appropriate primary wound dressing applied prior to compression therapy according to standard of care.
A two-layer compression system composed of a short-stretch bandage and a cohesive long-stretch bandage designed to achieve therapeutic compression (~40 mmHg). Used for venous leg ulcer management with an appropriate primary wound dressing.

この研究は何を測定していますか?

主要な結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Percentage of patients with complete healing of their VLU
時間枠:From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks, Visit 1(Day 0 + 2 weeks ± 1 day), Visit 2 (D0 + 4 weeks ± 3 days), Visit 3 (D0+ 8 weeks ± 4 days), Visit 4 (D0 + 12 weeks ± 4 day)s
Healing assessment is performed by the site investigator through clinical examination of the wound at the investigational site, during each of the follow-up visits.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks, Visit 1(Day 0 + 2 weeks ± 1 day), Visit 2 (D0 + 4 weeks ± 3 days), Visit 3 (D0+ 8 weeks ± 4 days), Visit 4 (D0 + 12 weeks ± 4 day)s

二次結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Compare reduction of VLU wound area (absolute and relative).
時間枠:From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks, Visit 1(Day 0 + 2 weeks ± 1 day), Visit 2 (D0 + 4 weeks ± 3 days), Visit 3 (D0+ 8 weeks ± 4 days), Visit 4 (D0 + 12 weeks ± 4 day)s
Absolute and percentage VLU wound surface area reduction compared to baseline at all follow-up visits .
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks, Visit 1(Day 0 + 2 weeks ± 1 day), Visit 2 (D0 + 4 weeks ± 3 days), Visit 3 (D0+ 8 weeks ± 4 days), Visit 4 (D0 + 12 weeks ± 4 day)s
Compare proportions of participants reaching 40% wound area reduction at 4 weeks
時間枠:From enrollment to the follow-up visit at 4 weeks, Visit 1(Day 0 + 2 weeks ± 1 day), Visit 2 (D0 + 4 weeks ± 3 days)
Proportion of participants reaching ≥40% relative wound area reduction (RWAR) at 4 weeks
From enrollment to the follow-up visit at 4 weeks, Visit 1(Day 0 + 2 weeks ± 1 day), Visit 2 (D0 + 4 weeks ± 3 days)
Compare time to complete wound healing
時間枠:From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks, Visit 1(Day 0 + 2 weeks ± 1 day), Visit 2 (D0 + 4 weeks ± 3 days), Visit 3 (D0+ 8 weeks ± 4 days), Visit 4 (D0 + 12 weeks ± 4 day)s
Time to wound healed in each cohort, for patients with healed wound at termination.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks, Visit 1(Day 0 + 2 weeks ± 1 day), Visit 2 (D0 + 4 weeks ± 3 days), Visit 3 (D0+ 8 weeks ± 4 days), Visit 4 (D0 + 12 weeks ± 4 day)s
Compare quality-of-life during treatment and up to 12 weeks.
時間枠:From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks, Visit 0 (D0) , Visit 1 (D0 + 2 weeks ± 1 day) ,Visit 2 (D0 + 4 weeks ± 3 days), Visit 3 (D0 + 8 weeks ± 4 days), Visit 4 (D0 + 12 weeks ± 4 day)s
Quality of Life assessed with Wound-QoL-17 tool at each visit and change compared to baseline.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks, Visit 0 (D0) , Visit 1 (D0 + 2 weeks ± 1 day) ,Visit 2 (D0 + 4 weeks ± 3 days), Visit 3 (D0 + 8 weeks ± 4 days), Visit 4 (D0 + 12 weeks ± 4 day)s
Compare comfort and usability as rated by the participant
時間枠:From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks, Visit 1 (D0 + 2 weeks ± 1 day), Visit 2 (D0 + 4 weeks ± 3 days), Visit 3 (D0 + 8 weeks ± 4 days), Visit 4 (D0 + 12 weeks ± 4 day)s
At each follow-up visit, participants will complete a usability questionnaire including Likert scale assessments.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks, Visit 1 (D0 + 2 weeks ± 1 day), Visit 2 (D0 + 4 weeks ± 3 days), Visit 3 (D0 + 8 weeks ± 4 days), Visit 4 (D0 + 12 weeks ± 4 day)s
Compare usability as rated by the healthcare professional.
時間枠:From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks, Visit 0 (D0), Visit 1 (D0 + 2 weeks ± 1 day), Visit 2 (D0 + 4 weeks ± 3 days), Visit 3 (D0 + 8 weeks ± 4 days), Visit 4 (D0 + 12 weeks ± 4 day)s
At each visit, the treating investigator will complete a usability questionnaire including Likert scale assessments; at baseline, only a limited set of questions will be collected.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks, Visit 0 (D0), Visit 1 (D0 + 2 weeks ± 1 day), Visit 2 (D0 + 4 weeks ± 3 days), Visit 3 (D0 + 8 weeks ± 4 days), Visit 4 (D0 + 12 weeks ± 4 day)s
Compare device use including frequency of change
時間枠:From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks, Visit 0 (D0), Visit 1 (D0 + 2 weeks ± 1 day), Visit 2 (D0 + 4 weeks ± 3 days), Visit 3 (D0 + 8 weeks ± 4 days),Visit 4 (D0 + 12 weeks ± 4 day)s
A summary and comparison of the compression use, including frequency of dressing/compression changes and primary dressing used, and type and size of compression used in relation to ankle size
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks, Visit 0 (D0), Visit 1 (D0 + 2 weeks ± 1 day), Visit 2 (D0 + 4 weeks ± 3 days), Visit 3 (D0 + 8 weeks ± 4 days),Visit 4 (D0 + 12 weeks ± 4 day)s
Compare safety profiles of both bandages.
時間枠:From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks,Visit 1 (D0 + 2 weeks ± 1 day), Visit 2 (D0 + 4 weeks ± 3 days), Visit 3 (D0 + 8 weeks ± 4 days), Visit 4 (D0 + 12 weeks ± 4 day)s
A(D)E and SA(D)E and DD rates.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks,Visit 1 (D0 + 2 weeks ± 1 day), Visit 2 (D0 + 4 weeks ± 3 days), Visit 3 (D0 + 8 weeks ± 4 days), Visit 4 (D0 + 12 weeks ± 4 day)s

協力者と研究者

ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。

スポンサー

協力者

捜査官

  • スタディディレクター:Arne Böhling、Mölnlycke Health Care AB

研究記録日

これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。

主要日程の研究

研究開始 (推定)

2026年5月1日

一次修了 (推定)

2028年5月1日

研究の完了 (推定)

2028年5月1日

試験登録日

最初に提出

2026年4月30日

QC基準を満たした最初の提出物

2026年5月13日

最初の投稿 (実際)

2026年5月20日

学習記録の更新

投稿された最後の更新 (実際)

2026年5月20日

QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました

2026年5月13日

最終確認日

2026年5月1日

詳しくは

本研究に関する用語

医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書

米国FDA規制医薬品の研究

いいえ

米国FDA規制機器製品の研究

いいえ

この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。

Compression bandage system (Mepi™ Press 2)の臨床試験

購読する