Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

A Randomized Non-Inferiority Study of Mepi™ Press 2 vs UrgoK2® for Compression Therapy in Venous Leg Ulcers

13. Mai 2026 aktualisiert von: Molnlycke Health Care AB

A Comparative, Adaptive, Randomized, Non-Inferiority Clinical Investigation of Two-Layer Compression Bandages Mepi™ Press 2 Versus UrgoK2® in the Treatment of Venous Leg Ulcers

Venous leg ulcers (VLUs) account for approximately 70% of all lower limb ulcers and affect an estimated 0.032% to 1% of the population in Western countries, corresponding to approximately 265,000 to 650,000 individuals in France. Effective management of VLUs is essential to reduce patient burden and associated healthcare costs. Compression therapy is the cornerstone of VLU treatment , as it improves venous return, reduces oedema, and promotes wound healing. Multilayer compression bandage systems, including two-layer systems, are considered the gold standard, and in France, they are recommended as first-line treatment for VLUs.

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate whether the Mepi™ Press 2 compression system is non-inferior to UrgoK2® in the treatment of venous leg ulcers in adult patients.

The main question it aims to answer is:

-Is Mepi™ Press 2 non-inferior to UrgoK2® in terms of the proportion of completely healed VLUs within 12 weeks?

Researchers will compare Mepi™ Press 2 with UrgoK2® to determine whether similar clinical efficacy, performance, and safety can be achieved.

Participants are adult patients with venous leg ulcers of less than 24 months duration requiring treatment with a two-layer compression bandage system. The study is multicenter, involving approximately 25 sites in France, and plans to enroll 386 participants.

Participants will:

  • Receive compression therapy with either Mepi™ Press 2 or UrgoK2® in accordance with standard of care
  • Receive an appropriate primary wound dressing prior to compression
  • Attend up to five study visits over a period of up to 12 weeks (or until wound healing, whichever occurs first)
  • Be assessed for wound healing, safety, and device performance throughout the study

Studienübersicht

Status

Noch keine Rekrutierung

Bedingungen

Intervention / Behandlung

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Geschätzt)

386

Phase

  • Unzutreffend

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienkontakt

Studienorte

  • Frankreich
      • Castelnau-le-Lez, Frankreich
        • Clinique du Parc-Montpellier
        • Kontakt:
      • Grenoble, Frankreich
        • CHU Michallon Grenoble
        • Kontakt:
      • Lyon, Frankreich
      • Lyon, Frankreich
      • Nantes, Frankreich
      • Poitiers, Frankreich
        • Poitiers Polyclinique
        • Kontakt:
      • Toulouse, Frankreich
      • Toulouse, Frankreich

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

  • Erwachsene
  • Älterer Erwachsener

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Nein

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients ≥ 18 years.
  • Stage C6 venous leg ulcer diagnosed less than 24 months ago.
  • 2cm² ≤ VLU surface area ≤ 40cm².
  • ABPI equal or higher than 0.8 and equal or lower than 1.3.
  • Able to read, understand and speak French for their medical care.
  • Agreeing to follow the procedures described in the CIP.
  • Benefiting from a social insurance coverage.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any contraindication to investigational or comparator medical devices mentioned in their respective IFUs.
  • Planned endovenous treatment or surgical venous stripping / exeresis within 8 weeks before planned inclusion date, or before end of participation to the study.
  • Treatment with chemotherapy or antineoplastic agent within the last 6 months.
  • Active wound infection or wound infection treatment within the past 4 weeks before inclusion or current use of silver dressings.
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women.
  • Persons deprived from their liberty.
  • Persons protected under guardianship or curatorship.
  • Any person who, as per investigator's decision, is not suitable to participate in the investigation for any other reason.-

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Behandlung
  • Zuteilung: Zufällig
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
  • Maskierung: Keine (Offenes Etikett)

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Experimental: Mepi™ Press 2- two-layer compression bandage
Participants will receive compression therapy using Mepi™ Press 2 in accordance with standard of care for venous leg ulcer (VLU) management. Mepi™ Press 2 is a two-layer, short-stretch compression system consisting of a padded bandage and a cohesive compression bandage with visual application indicator. An appropriate primary wound dressing will be applied prior to compression. Bandages are worn continuously and changed as clinically indicated, typically up to once weekly. The system is intended to provide high working pressure and low resting pressure to support venous return and reduce edema. Single-use, non-sterile device.
Gerät: Compression bandage system (Mepi™ Press 2)
A two-layer compression system consisting of a padded bandage and a cohesive short-stretch bandage with visual indicator. Provides therapeutic compression to support venous leg ulcer management. Applied with an appropriate primary wound dressing and changed as clinically indicated.
Gerät: Wound Dressing Material
Appropriate primary wound dressing applied prior to compression therapy according to standard of care.
Aktiver Komparator: UrgoK2® - multicomponent, compression system
Participants will receive compression therapy using UrgoK2® in accordance with standard of care for venous leg ulcer (VLU) management. UrgoK2® is a two-layer compression system consisting of a white short-stretch bandage (K-TECH) and a pink/beige cohesive long-stretch bandage (Kpress) with visual indicators to support correct application and achieve therapeutic compression (approximately 40 mmHg). An appropriate primary wound dressing will be applied prior to compression. Bandages are worn continuously and changed as clinically indicated, typically up to once weekly. The system is non-sterile, intended for single use, available in different sizes based on ankle circumference.
Gerät: Wound Dressing Material
Appropriate primary wound dressing applied prior to compression therapy according to standard of care.
Gerät: Compression bandage system (UrgoK2®)
A two-layer compression system composed of a short-stretch bandage and a cohesive long-stretch bandage designed to achieve therapeutic compression (~40 mmHg). Used for venous leg ulcer management with an appropriate primary wound dressing.

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Percentage of patients with complete healing of their VLU
Zeitfenster: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks, Visit 1(Day 0 + 2 weeks ± 1 day), Visit 2 (D0 + 4 weeks ± 3 days), Visit 3 (D0+ 8 weeks ± 4 days), Visit 4 (D0 + 12 weeks ± 4 day)s
Healing assessment is performed by the site investigator through clinical examination of the wound at the investigational site, during each of the follow-up visits.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks, Visit 1(Day 0 + 2 weeks ± 1 day), Visit 2 (D0 + 4 weeks ± 3 days), Visit 3 (D0+ 8 weeks ± 4 days), Visit 4 (D0 + 12 weeks ± 4 day)s

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Compare reduction of VLU wound area (absolute and relative).
Zeitfenster: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks, Visit 1(Day 0 + 2 weeks ± 1 day), Visit 2 (D0 + 4 weeks ± 3 days), Visit 3 (D0+ 8 weeks ± 4 days), Visit 4 (D0 + 12 weeks ± 4 day)s
Absolute and percentage VLU wound surface area reduction compared to baseline at all follow-up visits .
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks, Visit 1(Day 0 + 2 weeks ± 1 day), Visit 2 (D0 + 4 weeks ± 3 days), Visit 3 (D0+ 8 weeks ± 4 days), Visit 4 (D0 + 12 weeks ± 4 day)s
Compare proportions of participants reaching 40% wound area reduction at 4 weeks
Zeitfenster: From enrollment to the follow-up visit at 4 weeks, Visit 1(Day 0 + 2 weeks ± 1 day), Visit 2 (D0 + 4 weeks ± 3 days)
Proportion of participants reaching ≥40% relative wound area reduction (RWAR) at 4 weeks
From enrollment to the follow-up visit at 4 weeks, Visit 1(Day 0 + 2 weeks ± 1 day), Visit 2 (D0 + 4 weeks ± 3 days)
Compare time to complete wound healing
Zeitfenster: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks, Visit 1(Day 0 + 2 weeks ± 1 day), Visit 2 (D0 + 4 weeks ± 3 days), Visit 3 (D0+ 8 weeks ± 4 days), Visit 4 (D0 + 12 weeks ± 4 day)s
Time to wound healed in each cohort, for patients with healed wound at termination.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks, Visit 1(Day 0 + 2 weeks ± 1 day), Visit 2 (D0 + 4 weeks ± 3 days), Visit 3 (D0+ 8 weeks ± 4 days), Visit 4 (D0 + 12 weeks ± 4 day)s
Compare quality-of-life during treatment and up to 12 weeks.
Zeitfenster: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks, Visit 0 (D0) , Visit 1 (D0 + 2 weeks ± 1 day) ,Visit 2 (D0 + 4 weeks ± 3 days), Visit 3 (D0 + 8 weeks ± 4 days), Visit 4 (D0 + 12 weeks ± 4 day)s
Quality of Life assessed with Wound-QoL-17 tool at each visit and change compared to baseline.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks, Visit 0 (D0) , Visit 1 (D0 + 2 weeks ± 1 day) ,Visit 2 (D0 + 4 weeks ± 3 days), Visit 3 (D0 + 8 weeks ± 4 days), Visit 4 (D0 + 12 weeks ± 4 day)s
Compare comfort and usability as rated by the participant
Zeitfenster: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks, Visit 1 (D0 + 2 weeks ± 1 day), Visit 2 (D0 + 4 weeks ± 3 days), Visit 3 (D0 + 8 weeks ± 4 days), Visit 4 (D0 + 12 weeks ± 4 day)s
At each follow-up visit, participants will complete a usability questionnaire including Likert scale assessments.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks, Visit 1 (D0 + 2 weeks ± 1 day), Visit 2 (D0 + 4 weeks ± 3 days), Visit 3 (D0 + 8 weeks ± 4 days), Visit 4 (D0 + 12 weeks ± 4 day)s
Compare usability as rated by the healthcare professional.
Zeitfenster: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks, Visit 0 (D0), Visit 1 (D0 + 2 weeks ± 1 day), Visit 2 (D0 + 4 weeks ± 3 days), Visit 3 (D0 + 8 weeks ± 4 days), Visit 4 (D0 + 12 weeks ± 4 day)s
At each visit, the treating investigator will complete a usability questionnaire including Likert scale assessments; at baseline, only a limited set of questions will be collected.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks, Visit 0 (D0), Visit 1 (D0 + 2 weeks ± 1 day), Visit 2 (D0 + 4 weeks ± 3 days), Visit 3 (D0 + 8 weeks ± 4 days), Visit 4 (D0 + 12 weeks ± 4 day)s
Compare device use including frequency of change
Zeitfenster: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks, Visit 0 (D0), Visit 1 (D0 + 2 weeks ± 1 day), Visit 2 (D0 + 4 weeks ± 3 days), Visit 3 (D0 + 8 weeks ± 4 days),Visit 4 (D0 + 12 weeks ± 4 day)s
A summary and comparison of the compression use, including frequency of dressing/compression changes and primary dressing used, and type and size of compression used in relation to ankle size
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks, Visit 0 (D0), Visit 1 (D0 + 2 weeks ± 1 day), Visit 2 (D0 + 4 weeks ± 3 days), Visit 3 (D0 + 8 weeks ± 4 days),Visit 4 (D0 + 12 weeks ± 4 day)s
Compare safety profiles of both bandages.
Zeitfenster: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks,Visit 1 (D0 + 2 weeks ± 1 day), Visit 2 (D0 + 4 weeks ± 3 days), Visit 3 (D0 + 8 weeks ± 4 days), Visit 4 (D0 + 12 weeks ± 4 day)s
A(D)E and SA(D)E and DD rates.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks,Visit 1 (D0 + 2 weeks ± 1 day), Visit 2 (D0 + 4 weeks ± 3 days), Visit 3 (D0 + 8 weeks ± 4 days), Visit 4 (D0 + 12 weeks ± 4 day)s

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Sponsor

Molnlycke Health Care AB

Mitarbeiter

Euraxi Pharma

Ermittler

  • Studienleiter: Arne Böhling, Mölnlycke Health Care AB

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn (Geschätzt)

1. Mai 2026

Primärer Abschluss (Geschätzt)

1. Mai 2028

Studienabschluss (Geschätzt)

1. Mai 2028

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

30. April 2026

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

13. Mai 2026

Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)

20. Mai 2026

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

20. Mai 2026

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

13. Mai 2026

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. Mai 2026

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Zusätzliche relevante MeSH-Bedingungen

Andere Studien-ID-Nummern

  • The Boa Clinical Investigation

Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt

Nein

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt

Nein

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Klinische Studien zur Compression bandage system (Mepi™ Press 2)

Suchen Sie nach ähnlichen Studien

Sponsoren und Mitarbeiter

Krankheiten

Drogeninterventionen

CROs by country

CROs in Belarus

Bedingungen

Seltene Krankheiten

Drogeninterventionen

Nahrungsergänzungsmittel

Sponsor / Mitarbeiter

Standorte

Abonnieren