The Effect of Loving-Kindness Meditation on Mood and Anxiety Symptoms, Interpersonal Relationships, and Emotions: An Initial Randomized Controlled Trial With a Non-Clinical Sample of Undergraduate Women
2026年5月20日 更新者：Luis Flores
The Effect of Loving-Kindness Meditation on Anhedonic Depressivity, Interpersonal Relationships, and Emotions.
The goal of this clinical trial was to examine the effects of Loving-Kindness Meditation (LKM) on anhedonic depressivity, interpersonal relationships (other inclusive self-concept, willingness to sacrifice, interaction quality) and emotions (positive affect, negative affect).
The second aim was to conduct exploratory analyses investigating potential mediators that help explain changes in anhedonic depressivity over the course of short-term targeted LKM.
Participants were randomly assigned to receive one week of ~5-minute daily audio recordings of Loving-Kindness Meditation or a visualization meditation, both of which were focused on a same-gender close friend. Participants completed baseline and follow-up questionnaires measuring psychological, social, and emotional variables; participants also completed daily questionnaires.
調査の概要
詳細な説明
Undergraduate women were recruited via the Queen's University psychology department's subject pool (n = 222) and online advertisements (i.e., Facebook; n = 18) in 2021; written informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to any data collection.
We randomly assigned participants-via Microsoft Excel random number generation-to engage in one-week of either a targeted form of Loving-Kindness Meditation or a visualization meditation. Participants identified a specific close friend at the beginning of the study to be the target of their meditation practice. They completed baseline and one-week follow-up measures.
Audio instructions for the LKM and visualization meditation conditions were developed for this study based on those used by Seppala et al. (2014). Recordings were delivered via email. Descriptions of the conditions can be found in the Arms and Interventions sections.
研究の種類
介入
入学 (実際)
240
段階
- 適用できない
連絡先と場所
このセクションには、調査を実施する担当者の連絡先の詳細と、この調査が実施されている場所に関する情報が記載されています。
研究場所
-
-
Ontario
-
Kingston、Ontario、カナダ
- Queen's University
-
-
参加基準
研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。
適格基準
就学可能な年齢
- 大人
- 高齢者
健康ボランティアの受け入れ
はい
説明
Inclusion Criteria:
- Participants must be enrolled as an undergraduate student
- Each Participant had to self-identify as a woman.
- Participants had to be age 18 or older.
- Participants had to have at least one close female platonic friend.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Participants did not complete at least three of seven daily meditations.
研究計画
このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。
研究はどのように設計されていますか？
デザインの詳細
- 主な目的：基礎科学
- 割り当て：ランダム化
- 介入モデル：並列代入
- マスキング：ダブル
武器と介入
参加者グループ / アーム |
介入・治療 |
|---|---|
|
実験的：Loving-Kindness Meditation
Participants randomly assigned (via Microsoft Excel) to receive the Loving-Kindness Meditation intervention.
|
Participants received a ~5 minute audio recording of Loving-Kindness Meditation Instructions everday for one week.
Recordings were delivered via email.
Meditators in both conditions were instructed to find a comfortable position, either sitting or lying down, and were then guided through some initial deep breathing.
Once relaxed, meditators in the LKM condition were asked to imagine receiving love and wishes of well-being from a close other; they were then asked to direct feelings of love and wishes of wellness to their target close friend.
After approximately 5 minutes, meditators were guided back to relaxation.
|
|
アクティブコンパレータ：Visualization Meditation
Participants randomly assigned (via Microsoft Excel) to receive the Visualization Meditation active comparator condition.
|
Participants received a ~5 minute audio recording of visualization Instructions everday for one week.
Recordings were delivered via email.
Meditators in both conditions were instructed to find a comfortable position, either sitting or lying down, and were then guided through some initial deep breathing.
Meditators in the visualization condition were asked to visualize specific details of their target close friend's appearance.
After approximately 5 minutes, meditators were guided back to relaxation.
|
この研究は何を測定していますか？
主要な結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Anhedonic Depressivity
時間枠：Assessed once at baseline (Day 0) and once at follow-up after the intervention (follow up sent on Day 8).
|
The anhedonic depression scale of the Mood and Anxiety Symptom Questionnaire (MASQ; Clark & Watson, 1991) was used to measure anhedonic depressivity.
Participants rated items of the MASQ (Clark & Watson, 1991) on a scale from 1-5 (1 = Not at All; 5 = Extremely) based on how they felt over the past week.
The anhedonic depression subscale includes 22 items (e.g., "Felt like there wasn't anything interesting or fun to do").
A mean score was calculated, with higher scores indicating more anhedonic depressivity.
|
Assessed once at baseline (Day 0) and once at follow-up after the intervention (follow up sent on Day 8).
|
二次結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Positive Affect
時間枠：Assessed once at baseline (Day 0) and once at follow-up after the intervention (follow up sent on Day 8).
|
The Positive Affect Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS; Watson et al., 1988) was used to measure positive affect.
The PANAS consists of 20 emotion words divided into two subscales (10 positive words and 10 negative words).
Participants rate each emotion word on a scale from 1-5 (1 = Very Slightly or Not at All; 5 = Extremely) corresponding to how they have been feeling over the past week.
The positive affect subscale contains emotion words such as: "Interested," "Excited," and "Inspired."
A mean score was calculated for use in data analyses, with higher scores indicating greater positive affect.
|
Assessed once at baseline (Day 0) and once at follow-up after the intervention (follow up sent on Day 8).
|
|
Willingness to Sacrifice
時間枠：Assessed once at baseline (Day 0) and once at follow-up after the intervention (follow up sent on Day 8).
|
The willingness to sacrifice scale is a two-item measure adapted from the Marburg Attitude Inventory for Styles of Loving (Bierhoff et al., 1993).
Participants are asked to respond to the following questions on a scale from 1-10 (1 = Not at all; 10 = Entirely): "To what extent would you be willing to sacrifice your own desires for your close friend's desires?"; and "To what extent would you leave everything else aside for your close friend?".
At baseline and follow-up, participants responded to these questions based on the previous week.
For each administration, a mean score was calculated for use in data analyses.
|
Assessed once at baseline (Day 0) and once at follow-up after the intervention (follow up sent on Day 8).
|
|
Other-Inclusive Self Concept
時間枠：Assessed once at baseline (Day 0) and once at follow-up after the intervention (follow up sent on Day 8).
|
The Inclusion of the Other in the Self Scale (IOS; Aron et al., 1992) is a one item measure composed of seven images of two increasingly overlapping circles labeled "self" and "other".
Other-inclusive self-concept was measured with a modified IOS by asking participants to think about their relationship with their chosen close friend over the past week and to indicate the diagram that best matched their perceived connection.
The IOS has convergent validity (Aron et al., 1992; Gächter et al., 2015) and discriminant validity (Aron et al., 1992) in relation to other established interpersonal closeness measures.
|
Assessed once at baseline (Day 0) and once at follow-up after the intervention (follow up sent on Day 8).
|
|
Interaction Quality
時間枠：Assessed once at baseline (Day 0) and once at follow-up after the intervention (follow up sent on Day 8).
|
A modified version of the Rochester Interaction Record (M-RIR; based on Wheeler & Reis, 1991) was used to measure interaction quality.
The M-RIR asks participants to rate, from 1-7, the degree to which their interactions with their close other: 1) were intimate (1 = superficial; 7 = meaningful); 2) included self/other disclosure (1 = very little; 7 = a great deal); 3) were satisfying (1 = very unsatisfying; 7 = very satisfying); 4) were loving (1 = not at all loving; 7 = very loving); 5) were supportive (1 = not at all supportive; 7 = very supportive); and 6) were stressful (1 = not at all stressful; 7 = very stressful; reverse coded).
At baseline and follow-up, participants completed the M-RIR for the past week.
A mean score was calculated for use in data analyses, with higher scores indicating greater interaction quality.
|
Assessed once at baseline (Day 0) and once at follow-up after the intervention (follow up sent on Day 8).
|
|
Anxious Arousal
時間枠：Assessed once at baseline (Day 0) and once at follow-up after the intervention (follow up sent on Day 8).
|
The anxious arousal subscale of the Mood and Anxiety Symptom Questionnaire (MASQ; Clark & Watson, 1991) was used to measure anxious arousal. Participants rated items of the MASQ (Clark & Watson, 1991) on a scale from 1-5 (1 = Not at All; 5 = Extremely) based on how they felt over the past week. The anxious arousal subscale includes 17 items (e.g., "Was trembling or shaking"). For each subscale, a mean score was calculated, with higher scores indicating more anxious arousal. |
Assessed once at baseline (Day 0) and once at follow-up after the intervention (follow up sent on Day 8).
|
|
Negative Affect
時間枠：Assessed once at baseline (Day 0) and once at follow-up after the intervention (follow up sent on Day 8).
|
The Positive Affect Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS; Watson et al., 1988) was used to measure negative affect.
The PANAS consists of 20 emotion words divided into two subscales (10 positive words and 10 negative words).
Participants rate each emotion word on a scale from 1-5 (1 = Very Slightly or Not at All; 5 = Extremely) corresponding to how they have been feeling over the past week.
The negative affect subscale contains emotion words such as "Hostile", "Irritable", and "Ashamed'".
A mean score was calculated for use in data analyses, with higher scores indicating greater negative affect.
|
Assessed once at baseline (Day 0) and once at follow-up after the intervention (follow up sent on Day 8).
|
|
Emotional Closeness
時間枠：Assessed once at baseline (Day 0) and once at follow-up after the intervention (follow up sent on Day 8).
|
Emotional closeness was measured using a modified 10-item version of the Emotional Closeness Questionnaire (ECQ; Flores & Berenbaum, 2012, 2014).
The ECQ presents participants with 10 statements that reflect aspects of emotional closeness (e.g., "my friend gave me emotional support", "I shared my personal thoughts or feelings with my friend").
Respondents rate the degree each of these statements happened over the past week on a scale of 1 (not at all) to 5 (extremely).
Scores from each question are averaged to create an overall score with higher scores indicating higher levels of emotional closeness (Flores & Berenbaum, 2012, 2014).
This questionnaire was modified to ask respondents to specifically consider the close other they chose at the beginning of the study.
|
Assessed once at baseline (Day 0) and once at follow-up after the intervention (follow up sent on Day 8).
|
|
Desired Emotional Closeness
時間枠：Assessed once at baseline (Day 0) and once at follow-up after the intervention (follow up sent on Day 8).
|
Desired emotional closeness was measured using a modified 10-item version of the Emotional Closeness Questionnaire (ECQ; Flores & Berenbaum, 2012, 2014).
The D-ECQ presents participants with 5 statements that reflect aspects of emotional closeness (e.g., "my friend gives me emotional support", "I share my personal thoughts or feelings with my friend").
Respondents rate the degree to which they would have liked each of these statements to have happened over the past week on a scale of 1 (not at all) to 5 (extremely).
Scores from each question are averaged to create an overall score with higher scores indicating a higher desire for emotional closeness (Flores & Berenbaum, 2012, 2014).
This questionnaire was modified to ask respondents to specifically consider the close other they chose at the beginning of the study.
|
Assessed once at baseline (Day 0) and once at follow-up after the intervention (follow up sent on Day 8).
|
|
Worry
時間枠：Assessed once at baseline (Day 0) and once at follow-up after the intervention (follow up sent on Day 8).
|
The Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ; Meyer et al., 1990) was used to measure worry.
The PSWQ asks participants to rate the degree to which 16 statements related to worry are typical or characteristic of them (e.g., "My worries overwhelm me", "Once I start worrying, I can't stop").
Respondents rate each item on a scale from 1 (not at all typical) to 5 (very typical; Meyer et al., 1990).
A mean score was generated for each participant with higher scores indicating higher levels of worry.
|
Assessed once at baseline (Day 0) and once at follow-up after the intervention (follow up sent on Day 8).
|
その他の成果指標
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Daily Engagement with the Meditation
時間枠：Questionnaires with an embedded meditation were sent each day (Day 1 - Day 7). Engagement was measured after listening to the audio recording.
|
After completing the meditation, participants were asked: "On a scale from one to ten, how engaged did you feel with the meditation today?" (higher numbers indicating more engagement in the meditation).
|
Questionnaires with an embedded meditation were sent each day (Day 1 - Day 7). Engagement was measured after listening to the audio recording.
|
|
Daily Negative Affect
時間枠：Questionnaires with an embedded meditation were sent each day (Day 1 - Day 7). Negative affect was measured before and after listening to the audio recording.
|
Prior to the meditation, participants were asked to rate on a scale from 1-10: "how much negative emotion are you feeling right now?" (higher numbers indicating more negative emotion).
After completing the meditation, this question was repeated.
|
Questionnaires with an embedded meditation were sent each day (Day 1 - Day 7). Negative affect was measured before and after listening to the audio recording.
|
|
Daily Positive Affect
時間枠：Questionnaires with an embedded meditation were sent each day (Day 1 - Day 7). Positive affect was measured before and after listening to the audio recording.
|
Prior to the meditation, participants were asked to rate on a scale from 1-10 "how much positive emotion are you feeling right now?" (higher numbers indicating more positive emotion).
After completing the meditation, this question was repeated.
|
Questionnaires with an embedded meditation were sent each day (Day 1 - Day 7). Positive affect was measured before and after listening to the audio recording.
|
|
Daily Social Connection
時間枠：Questionnaires with an embedded meditation were sent each day (Day 1 - Day 7). Social connection was measured before and after listening to the audio recording.
|
Prior to the meditation, participants were asked to rate on a scale from 1-10 "how socially connected to your friend are you feeling right now?" (higher numbers indicating more feelings of social connection).
After completing the meditation, this question was repeated.
|
Questionnaires with an embedded meditation were sent each day (Day 1 - Day 7). Social connection was measured before and after listening to the audio recording.
|
協力者と研究者
ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。
スポンサー
捜査官
- 主任研究者：Luis Flores, Ph.D.、Queen's University and Rutgers University
出版物と役立つリンク
研究に関する情報を入力する責任者は、自発的にこれらの出版物を提供します。これらは、研究に関連するあらゆるものに関するものである可能性があります。
一般刊行物
- Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988 Jun;54(6):1063-70. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.54.6.1063.
- Meyer TJ, Miller ML, Metzger RL, Borkovec TD. Development and validation of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire. Behav Res Ther. 1990;28(6):487-95. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(90)90135-6.
- Clark LA, Watson D. Tripartite model of anxiety and depression: psychometric evidence and taxonomic implications. J Abnorm Psychol. 1991 Aug;100(3):316-36. doi: 10.1037//0021-843x.100.3.316.
- Flores Jr, L. E., & Berenbaum, H. (2014). Desired emotional closeness moderates the prospective relations between levels of perceived emotional closeness and psychological distress. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 33(8), 673-700. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2014.33.8.673
- Flores Jr, L. E., & Berenbaum, H. (2012). Desire for emotional closeness moderates the effectiveness of the social regulation of emotion. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(8), 952-957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.07.009
- Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.) Guilford publications.
- Hayes, A. F. (2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling [White paper]. Retrieved from http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf
- Trautwein FM, Naranjo JR, Schmidt S. Decentering the Self? Reduced Bias in Self- vs. Other-Related Processing in Long-Term Practitioners of Loving-Kindness Meditation. Front Psychol. 2016 Nov 21;7:1785. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01785. eCollection 2016.
- Bierhoff, H. W., Grau, I., & Ludwig, A. (1993). Marburger Einstellungsinventar zu Liebesstilen (MEIL). Hogrefe.
- Wheeler, L., & Reis, H. T., (1991). Self-recording of everyday life events: Origins, types, and uses. Journal of Personality, 59, 339-354. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1991.tb00252.x
- Aron, A., Aron, E. N., & Smollan, D. (1992). Inclusion of the other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(4), 596-612. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.596
- Seppala, E.M., Hutcherson, C.A., Nguyen, D.T., Hutcheson, C. A., & Gross, J. J. (2014). Loving-kindness meditation: A tool to improve healthcare provider compassion, resilience, and patient care. Journal of Compassionate Health Care, 1(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40639-014-0005-9
- Gachter S, Starmer C, Tufano F. Measuring the Closeness of Relationships: A Comprehensive Evaluation of the 'Inclusion of the Other in the Self' Scale. PLoS One. 2015 Jun 12;10(6):e0129478. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129478. eCollection 2015.
研究記録日
これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。
主要日程の研究
研究開始 (実際)
2021年1月13日
一次修了 (実際)
2021年4月11日
研究の完了 (実際)
2021年4月11日
試験登録日
最初に提出
2026年5月1日
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
2026年5月20日
最初の投稿 (実際)
2026年5月28日
学習記録の更新
投稿された最後の更新 (実際)
2026年5月28日
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
2026年5月20日
最終確認日
2026年5月1日
詳しくは
本研究に関する用語
キーワード
その他の研究ID番号
- rf#1025416
個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画
個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?
はい
IPD プランの説明
Deidentified participant data will be shared on Open Science Framework.
Only IPD used in the results publication will be shared.
IPD 共有時間枠
Beginning within at publication with no end date.
IPD 共有アクセス基準
The data will be publically available.
A link to the Open Science Framework page will be included when the results are published.
IPD 共有サポート情報タイプ
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- ANALYTIC_CODE
医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書
米国FDA規制医薬品の研究
いいえ
米国FDA規制機器製品の研究
いいえ
この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。
Loving-Kindness Meditationの臨床試験
-
The University of Texas Health Science Center at...Arizona State University引きこもった
-
Arizona State UniversityThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio完了
-
Calm.com, Inc.The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio; Arizona State University完了