The Effect of Loving-Kindness Meditation on Mood and Anxiety Symptoms, Interpersonal Relationships, and Emotions: An Initial Randomized Controlled Trial With a Non-Clinical Sample of Undergraduate Women
20 maj 2026 uppdaterad av: Luis Flores
The Effect of Loving-Kindness Meditation on Anhedonic Depressivity, Interpersonal Relationships, and Emotions.
The goal of this clinical trial was to examine the effects of Loving-Kindness Meditation (LKM) on anhedonic depressivity, interpersonal relationships (other inclusive self-concept, willingness to sacrifice, interaction quality) and emotions (positive affect, negative affect).
The second aim was to conduct exploratory analyses investigating potential mediators that help explain changes in anhedonic depressivity over the course of short-term targeted LKM.
Participants were randomly assigned to receive one week of ~5-minute daily audio recordings of Loving-Kindness Meditation or a visualization meditation, both of which were focused on a same-gender close friend. Participants completed baseline and follow-up questionnaires measuring psychological, social, and emotional variables; participants also completed daily questionnaires.
Studieöversikt
Status
Avslutad
Betingelser
Intervention / Behandling
Detaljerad beskrivning
Undergraduate women were recruited via the Queen's University psychology department's subject pool (n = 222) and online advertisements (i.e., Facebook; n = 18) in 2021; written informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to any data collection.
We randomly assigned participants-via Microsoft Excel random number generation-to engage in one-week of either a targeted form of Loving-Kindness Meditation or a visualization meditation. Participants identified a specific close friend at the beginning of the study to be the target of their meditation practice. They completed baseline and one-week follow-up measures.
Audio instructions for the LKM and visualization meditation conditions were developed for this study based on those used by Seppala et al. (2014). Recordings were delivered via email. Descriptions of the conditions can be found in the Arms and Interventions sections.
Studietyp
Interventionell
Inskrivning (Faktisk)
240
Fas
- Inte tillämpbar
Kontakter och platser
Det här avsnittet innehåller kontaktuppgifter för dem som genomför studien och information om var denna studie genomförs.
Studieorter
-
-
Ontario
-
Kingston, Ontario, Kanada
- Queen's University
-
-
Deltagandekriterier
Forskare letar efter personer som passar en viss beskrivning, så kallade behörighetskriterier. Några exempel på dessa kriterier är en persons allmänna hälsotillstånd eller tidigare behandlingar.
Urvalskriterier
Åldrar som är berättigade till studier
- Vuxen
- Äldre vuxen
Tar emot friska volontärer
Ja
Beskrivning
Inclusion Criteria:
- Participants must be enrolled as an undergraduate student
- Each Participant had to self-identify as a woman.
- Participants had to be age 18 or older.
- Participants had to have at least one close female platonic friend.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Participants did not complete at least three of seven daily meditations.
Studieplan
Det här avsnittet ger detaljer om studieplanen, inklusive hur studien är utformad och vad studien mäter.
Hur är studien utformad?
Designdetaljer
- Primärt syfte: Grundläggande vetenskap
- Tilldelning: Randomiserad
- Interventionsmodell: Parallellt uppdrag
- Maskning: Dubbel
Vapen och interventioner
Deltagargrupp / Arm |
Intervention / Behandling |
|---|---|
|
Experimentell: Loving-Kindness Meditation
Participants randomly assigned (via Microsoft Excel) to receive the Loving-Kindness Meditation intervention.
|
Participants received a ~5 minute audio recording of Loving-Kindness Meditation Instructions everday for one week.
Recordings were delivered via email.
Meditators in both conditions were instructed to find a comfortable position, either sitting or lying down, and were then guided through some initial deep breathing.
Once relaxed, meditators in the LKM condition were asked to imagine receiving love and wishes of well-being from a close other; they were then asked to direct feelings of love and wishes of wellness to their target close friend.
After approximately 5 minutes, meditators were guided back to relaxation.
|
|
Aktiv komparator: Visualization Meditation
Participants randomly assigned (via Microsoft Excel) to receive the Visualization Meditation active comparator condition.
|
Participants received a ~5 minute audio recording of visualization Instructions everday for one week.
Recordings were delivered via email.
Meditators in both conditions were instructed to find a comfortable position, either sitting or lying down, and were then guided through some initial deep breathing.
Meditators in the visualization condition were asked to visualize specific details of their target close friend's appearance.
After approximately 5 minutes, meditators were guided back to relaxation.
|
Vad mäter studien?
Primära resultatmått
Resultatmått |
Åtgärdsbeskrivning |
Tidsram |
|---|---|---|
|
Anhedonic Depressivity
Tidsram: Assessed once at baseline (Day 0) and once at follow-up after the intervention (follow up sent on Day 8).
|
The anhedonic depression scale of the Mood and Anxiety Symptom Questionnaire (MASQ; Clark & Watson, 1991) was used to measure anhedonic depressivity.
Participants rated items of the MASQ (Clark & Watson, 1991) on a scale from 1-5 (1 = Not at All; 5 = Extremely) based on how they felt over the past week.
The anhedonic depression subscale includes 22 items (e.g., "Felt like there wasn't anything interesting or fun to do").
A mean score was calculated, with higher scores indicating more anhedonic depressivity.
|
Assessed once at baseline (Day 0) and once at follow-up after the intervention (follow up sent on Day 8).
|
Sekundära resultatmått
Resultatmått |
Åtgärdsbeskrivning |
Tidsram |
|---|---|---|
|
Positive Affect
Tidsram: Assessed once at baseline (Day 0) and once at follow-up after the intervention (follow up sent on Day 8).
|
The Positive Affect Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS; Watson et al., 1988) was used to measure positive affect.
The PANAS consists of 20 emotion words divided into two subscales (10 positive words and 10 negative words).
Participants rate each emotion word on a scale from 1-5 (1 = Very Slightly or Not at All; 5 = Extremely) corresponding to how they have been feeling over the past week.
The positive affect subscale contains emotion words such as: "Interested," "Excited," and "Inspired."
A mean score was calculated for use in data analyses, with higher scores indicating greater positive affect.
|
Assessed once at baseline (Day 0) and once at follow-up after the intervention (follow up sent on Day 8).
|
|
Willingness to Sacrifice
Tidsram: Assessed once at baseline (Day 0) and once at follow-up after the intervention (follow up sent on Day 8).
|
The willingness to sacrifice scale is a two-item measure adapted from the Marburg Attitude Inventory for Styles of Loving (Bierhoff et al., 1993).
Participants are asked to respond to the following questions on a scale from 1-10 (1 = Not at all; 10 = Entirely): "To what extent would you be willing to sacrifice your own desires for your close friend's desires?"; and "To what extent would you leave everything else aside for your close friend?".
At baseline and follow-up, participants responded to these questions based on the previous week.
For each administration, a mean score was calculated for use in data analyses.
|
Assessed once at baseline (Day 0) and once at follow-up after the intervention (follow up sent on Day 8).
|
|
Other-Inclusive Self Concept
Tidsram: Assessed once at baseline (Day 0) and once at follow-up after the intervention (follow up sent on Day 8).
|
The Inclusion of the Other in the Self Scale (IOS; Aron et al., 1992) is a one item measure composed of seven images of two increasingly overlapping circles labeled "self" and "other".
Other-inclusive self-concept was measured with a modified IOS by asking participants to think about their relationship with their chosen close friend over the past week and to indicate the diagram that best matched their perceived connection.
The IOS has convergent validity (Aron et al., 1992; Gächter et al., 2015) and discriminant validity (Aron et al., 1992) in relation to other established interpersonal closeness measures.
|
Assessed once at baseline (Day 0) and once at follow-up after the intervention (follow up sent on Day 8).
|
|
Interaction Quality
Tidsram: Assessed once at baseline (Day 0) and once at follow-up after the intervention (follow up sent on Day 8).
|
A modified version of the Rochester Interaction Record (M-RIR; based on Wheeler & Reis, 1991) was used to measure interaction quality.
The M-RIR asks participants to rate, from 1-7, the degree to which their interactions with their close other: 1) were intimate (1 = superficial; 7 = meaningful); 2) included self/other disclosure (1 = very little; 7 = a great deal); 3) were satisfying (1 = very unsatisfying; 7 = very satisfying); 4) were loving (1 = not at all loving; 7 = very loving); 5) were supportive (1 = not at all supportive; 7 = very supportive); and 6) were stressful (1 = not at all stressful; 7 = very stressful; reverse coded).
At baseline and follow-up, participants completed the M-RIR for the past week.
A mean score was calculated for use in data analyses, with higher scores indicating greater interaction quality.
|
Assessed once at baseline (Day 0) and once at follow-up after the intervention (follow up sent on Day 8).
|
|
Anxious Arousal
Tidsram: Assessed once at baseline (Day 0) and once at follow-up after the intervention (follow up sent on Day 8).
|
The anxious arousal subscale of the Mood and Anxiety Symptom Questionnaire (MASQ; Clark & Watson, 1991) was used to measure anxious arousal. Participants rated items of the MASQ (Clark & Watson, 1991) on a scale from 1-5 (1 = Not at All; 5 = Extremely) based on how they felt over the past week. The anxious arousal subscale includes 17 items (e.g., "Was trembling or shaking"). For each subscale, a mean score was calculated, with higher scores indicating more anxious arousal. |
Assessed once at baseline (Day 0) and once at follow-up after the intervention (follow up sent on Day 8).
|
|
Negative Affect
Tidsram: Assessed once at baseline (Day 0) and once at follow-up after the intervention (follow up sent on Day 8).
|
The Positive Affect Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS; Watson et al., 1988) was used to measure negative affect.
The PANAS consists of 20 emotion words divided into two subscales (10 positive words and 10 negative words).
Participants rate each emotion word on a scale from 1-5 (1 = Very Slightly or Not at All; 5 = Extremely) corresponding to how they have been feeling over the past week.
The negative affect subscale contains emotion words such as "Hostile", "Irritable", and "Ashamed'".
A mean score was calculated for use in data analyses, with higher scores indicating greater negative affect.
|
Assessed once at baseline (Day 0) and once at follow-up after the intervention (follow up sent on Day 8).
|
|
Emotional Closeness
Tidsram: Assessed once at baseline (Day 0) and once at follow-up after the intervention (follow up sent on Day 8).
|
Emotional closeness was measured using a modified 10-item version of the Emotional Closeness Questionnaire (ECQ; Flores & Berenbaum, 2012, 2014).
The ECQ presents participants with 10 statements that reflect aspects of emotional closeness (e.g., "my friend gave me emotional support", "I shared my personal thoughts or feelings with my friend").
Respondents rate the degree each of these statements happened over the past week on a scale of 1 (not at all) to 5 (extremely).
Scores from each question are averaged to create an overall score with higher scores indicating higher levels of emotional closeness (Flores & Berenbaum, 2012, 2014).
This questionnaire was modified to ask respondents to specifically consider the close other they chose at the beginning of the study.
|
Assessed once at baseline (Day 0) and once at follow-up after the intervention (follow up sent on Day 8).
|
|
Desired Emotional Closeness
Tidsram: Assessed once at baseline (Day 0) and once at follow-up after the intervention (follow up sent on Day 8).
|
Desired emotional closeness was measured using a modified 10-item version of the Emotional Closeness Questionnaire (ECQ; Flores & Berenbaum, 2012, 2014).
The D-ECQ presents participants with 5 statements that reflect aspects of emotional closeness (e.g., "my friend gives me emotional support", "I share my personal thoughts or feelings with my friend").
Respondents rate the degree to which they would have liked each of these statements to have happened over the past week on a scale of 1 (not at all) to 5 (extremely).
Scores from each question are averaged to create an overall score with higher scores indicating a higher desire for emotional closeness (Flores & Berenbaum, 2012, 2014).
This questionnaire was modified to ask respondents to specifically consider the close other they chose at the beginning of the study.
|
Assessed once at baseline (Day 0) and once at follow-up after the intervention (follow up sent on Day 8).
|
|
Worry
Tidsram: Assessed once at baseline (Day 0) and once at follow-up after the intervention (follow up sent on Day 8).
|
The Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ; Meyer et al., 1990) was used to measure worry.
The PSWQ asks participants to rate the degree to which 16 statements related to worry are typical or characteristic of them (e.g., "My worries overwhelm me", "Once I start worrying, I can't stop").
Respondents rate each item on a scale from 1 (not at all typical) to 5 (very typical; Meyer et al., 1990).
A mean score was generated for each participant with higher scores indicating higher levels of worry.
|
Assessed once at baseline (Day 0) and once at follow-up after the intervention (follow up sent on Day 8).
|
Andra resultatmått
Resultatmått |
Åtgärdsbeskrivning |
Tidsram |
|---|---|---|
|
Daily Engagement with the Meditation
Tidsram: Questionnaires with an embedded meditation were sent each day (Day 1 - Day 7). Engagement was measured after listening to the audio recording.
|
After completing the meditation, participants were asked: "On a scale from one to ten, how engaged did you feel with the meditation today?" (higher numbers indicating more engagement in the meditation).
|
Questionnaires with an embedded meditation were sent each day (Day 1 - Day 7). Engagement was measured after listening to the audio recording.
|
|
Daily Negative Affect
Tidsram: Questionnaires with an embedded meditation were sent each day (Day 1 - Day 7). Negative affect was measured before and after listening to the audio recording.
|
Prior to the meditation, participants were asked to rate on a scale from 1-10: "how much negative emotion are you feeling right now?" (higher numbers indicating more negative emotion).
After completing the meditation, this question was repeated.
|
Questionnaires with an embedded meditation were sent each day (Day 1 - Day 7). Negative affect was measured before and after listening to the audio recording.
|
|
Daily Positive Affect
Tidsram: Questionnaires with an embedded meditation were sent each day (Day 1 - Day 7). Positive affect was measured before and after listening to the audio recording.
|
Prior to the meditation, participants were asked to rate on a scale from 1-10 "how much positive emotion are you feeling right now?" (higher numbers indicating more positive emotion).
After completing the meditation, this question was repeated.
|
Questionnaires with an embedded meditation were sent each day (Day 1 - Day 7). Positive affect was measured before and after listening to the audio recording.
|
|
Daily Social Connection
Tidsram: Questionnaires with an embedded meditation were sent each day (Day 1 - Day 7). Social connection was measured before and after listening to the audio recording.
|
Prior to the meditation, participants were asked to rate on a scale from 1-10 "how socially connected to your friend are you feeling right now?" (higher numbers indicating more feelings of social connection).
After completing the meditation, this question was repeated.
|
Questionnaires with an embedded meditation were sent each day (Day 1 - Day 7). Social connection was measured before and after listening to the audio recording.
|
Samarbetspartners och utredare
Det är här du hittar personer och organisationer som är involverade i denna studie.
Sponsor
Samarbetspartners
Utredare
- Huvudutredare: Luis Flores, Ph.D., Queen's University and Rutgers University
Publikationer och användbara länkar
Den som ansvarar för att lägga in information om studien tillhandahåller frivilligt dessa publikationer. Dessa kan handla om allt som har med studien att göra.
Allmänna publikationer
- Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988 Jun;54(6):1063-70. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.54.6.1063.
- Meyer TJ, Miller ML, Metzger RL, Borkovec TD. Development and validation of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire. Behav Res Ther. 1990;28(6):487-95. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(90)90135-6.
- Clark LA, Watson D. Tripartite model of anxiety and depression: psychometric evidence and taxonomic implications. J Abnorm Psychol. 1991 Aug;100(3):316-36. doi: 10.1037//0021-843x.100.3.316.
- Flores Jr, L. E., & Berenbaum, H. (2014). Desired emotional closeness moderates the prospective relations between levels of perceived emotional closeness and psychological distress. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 33(8), 673-700. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2014.33.8.673
- Flores Jr, L. E., & Berenbaum, H. (2012). Desire for emotional closeness moderates the effectiveness of the social regulation of emotion. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(8), 952-957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.07.009
- Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.) Guilford publications.
- Hayes, A. F. (2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling [White paper]. Retrieved from http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf
- Trautwein FM, Naranjo JR, Schmidt S. Decentering the Self? Reduced Bias in Self- vs. Other-Related Processing in Long-Term Practitioners of Loving-Kindness Meditation. Front Psychol. 2016 Nov 21;7:1785. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01785. eCollection 2016.
- Bierhoff, H. W., Grau, I., & Ludwig, A. (1993). Marburger Einstellungsinventar zu Liebesstilen (MEIL). Hogrefe.
- Wheeler, L., & Reis, H. T., (1991). Self-recording of everyday life events: Origins, types, and uses. Journal of Personality, 59, 339-354. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1991.tb00252.x
- Aron, A., Aron, E. N., & Smollan, D. (1992). Inclusion of the other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(4), 596-612. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.596
- Seppala, E.M., Hutcherson, C.A., Nguyen, D.T., Hutcheson, C. A., & Gross, J. J. (2014). Loving-kindness meditation: A tool to improve healthcare provider compassion, resilience, and patient care. Journal of Compassionate Health Care, 1(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40639-014-0005-9
- Gachter S, Starmer C, Tufano F. Measuring the Closeness of Relationships: A Comprehensive Evaluation of the 'Inclusion of the Other in the Self' Scale. PLoS One. 2015 Jun 12;10(6):e0129478. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129478. eCollection 2015.
Studieavstämningsdatum
Dessa datum spårar framstegen för inlämningar av studieposter och sammanfattande resultat till ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieposter och rapporterade resultat granskas av National Library of Medicine (NLM) för att säkerställa att de uppfyller specifika kvalitetskontrollstandarder innan de publiceras på den offentliga webbplatsen.
Studera stora datum
Studiestart (Faktisk)
13 januari 2021
Primärt slutförande (Faktisk)
11 april 2021
Avslutad studie (Faktisk)
11 april 2021
Studieregistreringsdatum
Först inskickad
1 maj 2026
Först inskickad som uppfyllde QC-kriterierna
20 maj 2026
Första postat (Faktisk)
28 maj 2026
Uppdateringar av studier
Senaste uppdatering publicerad (Faktisk)
28 maj 2026
Senaste inskickade uppdateringen som uppfyllde QC-kriterierna
20 maj 2026
Senast verifierad
1 maj 2026
Mer information
Termer relaterade till denna studie
Nyckelord
Ytterligare relevanta MeSH-villkor
Andra studie-ID-nummer
- rf#1025416
Plan för individuella deltagardata (IPD)
Planerar du att dela individuella deltagardata (IPD)?
JA
IPD-planbeskrivning
Deidentified participant data will be shared on Open Science Framework.
Only IPD used in the results publication will be shared.
Tidsram för IPD-delning
Beginning within at publication with no end date.
Kriterier för IPD Sharing Access
The data will be publically available.
A link to the Open Science Framework page will be included when the results are published.
IPD-delning som stöder informationstyp
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAV
- ANALYTIC_CODE
Läkemedels- och apparatinformation, studiedokument
Studerar en amerikansk FDA-reglerad läkemedelsprodukt
Nej
Studerar en amerikansk FDA-reglerad produktprodukt
Nej
Denna information hämtades direkt från webbplatsen clinicaltrials.gov utan några ändringar. Om du har några önskemål om att ändra, ta bort eller uppdatera dina studieuppgifter, vänligen kontakta register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ändring har implementerats på clinicaltrials.gov, kommer denna att uppdateras automatiskt även på vår webbplats .