Standardized Study Protocol of Percutaneous Vertebroplasty Based on Pedicle Nine-Grid Zoning Method
2026年5月27日 更新者:Qi Fei、Beijing Friendship Hospital
The goal of this clinical trial is to verify the safety and efficacy of the pedicle "Nine-grid Zoning Method" in assisting percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) for the treatment of lumbar osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF) in adults. It also aims to standardize the puncture path of PVP and optimize the intraoperative operation process. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Does the "Nine-grid Zoning Method" significantly increase the rate of achieving ideal intraoperative puncture endpoints and reduce operative time compared with the traditional pedicle puncture method?
- Does the novel puncture method reduce intraoperative fluoroscopy times, radiation exposure, and the incidence of postoperative bone cement leakage without increasing surgical risks? Researchers will compare the modified PVP assisted by the "Nine-grid Zoning Method" (experimental group) with conventional PVP adopting the traditional "10 o'clock/2 o'clock" pedicle puncture point (control group) to confirm the clinical superiority and safety of the new standardized puncture path.
Participants will:
- Receive unilateral transpedicular PVP surgery via either the nine-grid zoning puncture path or the traditional puncture path for single-segment acute lumbar OVCF
- Complete preoperative baseline examinations including bone density detection, VAS pain score, ODI functional score and SF-36 quality of life score assessment
- Receive standardized intraoperative data recording covering operative time, fluoroscopy frequency, radiation dose, bone cement filling and leakage conditions
- Undergo postoperative follow-up at 1 day after surgery, discharge, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year after operation, with regular imaging re-examination and scale evaluation to monitor fracture recovery and postoperative complications
調査の概要
状態
募集
研究の種類
介入
入学 (推定)
68
段階
- 適用できない
連絡先と場所
このセクションには、調査を実施する担当者の連絡先の詳細と、この調査が実施されている場所に関する情報が記載されています。
研究連絡先
- 名前:Qi Fei
- 電話番号:+86 13641225060
- メール:spinefei@126.com
研究場所
-
-
Beijing Municipality
-
Beijing、Beijing Municipality、中国、100050
- 募集
- Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University
-
コンタクト:
- Qi Fei
- 電話番号:13641225060
- メール:spinefei@126.com
-
-
参加基準
研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。
適格基準
就学可能な年齢
- 大人
- 高齢者
健康ボランティアの受け入れ
いいえ
説明
Inclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosed with single-segment acute osteoporotic lumbar vertebral compression fracture (L1-L5), confirmed by typical MRI manifestations: low signal on T1-weighted imaging and high signal on T2-weighted and STIR sequences.
- First-time reception of percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) surgery.
- Complete preoperative imaging data including X-ray, CT, and MRI/bone scan.
- Aged patients who voluntarily participate in the study and sign written informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with old vertebral compression fractures or congenital pedicle dysplasia and lesions.
- With a history of bone tumors or other systematic bone metabolic diseases.
- CT examination shows incomplete or ruptured posterior wall of the fractured vertebral body.
- Failure to obtain signed informed consent.
研究計画
このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。
研究はどのように設計されていますか?
デザインの詳細
- 主な目的:処理
- 割り当て:ランダム化
- 介入モデル:並列代入
- マスキング:ダブル
武器と介入
参加者グループ / アーム |
介入・治療 |
|---|---|
|
実験的:Nine-grid Area Division Method Assisted PVP
Participants in this group undergo unilateral transpedicular percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) for single-segment acute lumbar osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.
Based on the newly proposed pedicle nine-grid zoning theory, surgeons identify the optimal puncture surface and puncture site under C-arm fluoroscopy guidance.
Except for the standardized nine-grid puncture positioning method, all other intraoperative operations, perioperative management, and postoperative treatment are completely consistent with the control group.
All subjects receive unified preoperative baseline evaluation, standardized intraoperative data collection, and regular postoperative follow-up up to 1 year after surgery.
|
This intervention applies a novel pedicle nine-grid zoning technique for puncture positioning during unilateral transpedicular PVP.
Under intraoperative C-arm fluoroscopy, the vertebral pedicle projection is divided into a nine-grid area to determine the optimal bony puncture surface and accurate puncture entry point, replacing the traditional fixed puncture site.
The standardized zoning positioning reduces repeated needle adjustment.
All other surgical procedures including routine disinfection, anesthesia, needle insertion depth adjustment, bone cement mixing and injection, and incision suture follow standard PVP protocols.
Perioperative management and 1-year systematic postoperative follow-up are performed uniformly.
|
|
アクティブコンパレータ:Traditional PVP
Participants in this group receive conventional unilateral transpedicular PVP for single-segment acute lumbar osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.
The traditional classic puncture positioning standard is adopted, with the ideal pedicle puncture point located at the "10 o'clock (left) and 2 o'clock (right)" projection position.
Surgeons adjust the puncture needle position repeatedly under intraoperative C-arm fluoroscopy to reach the ideal puncture endpoint.
Perioperative nursing, surgical operation specifications, postoperative rehabilitation guidance and follow-up schedule are identical to those of the experimental group to ensure consistent baseline conditions of the two groups.
|
This intervention adopts conventional unilateral transpedicular PVP with classic empirical puncture positioning.
The standard puncture entry point is defined as the left 10 o'clock and right 2 o'clock position of the pedicle projection.
Surgeons adjust the puncture needle repeatedly via real-time C-arm fluoroscopy to reach the ideal intraoperative puncture endpoint.
All surgical procedures, perioperative care, postoperative rehabilitation guidance, and long-term follow-up regimen are identical to the experimental group, ensuring consistent intervention conditions except for the puncture positioning method.
|
この研究は何を測定していますか?
主要な結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Proportion of cases reaching ideal intraoperative puncture endpoint
時間枠:Intraoperatively
|
The number and proportion of patients who achieve the standardized ideal puncture endpoint during operation.
Ideal endpoint is defined as the puncture needle reaches the anterior 1/3 of the vertebral body on lateral fluoroscopy and locates at the vertebral midline on anteroposterior fluoroscopy, with qualified pedicle channel positioning.
|
Intraoperatively
|
|
Operative time
時間枠:Intraoperatively
|
Total intraoperative operation time, defined as the time from surgical positioning start to complete incision suture, used to evaluate intraoperative operation efficiency.
|
Intraoperatively
|
二次結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Incidence of bone cement leakage
時間枠:Intraoperatively and within 24 hours after surgery
|
The number and proportion of patients with intraoperative or immediate postoperative bone cement leakage detected by C-arm fluoroscopy, and the classification of leakage types, to evaluate surgical safety.
|
Intraoperatively and within 24 hours after surgery
|
|
Intraoperative fluoroscopy times and radiation dose
時間枠:Intraoperatively
|
Record the total number of intraoperative C-arm fluoroscopy and cumulative radiation dose (mSv) to compare intraoperative radiation exposure between two groups.
|
Intraoperatively
|
|
VAS
時間枠:Postoperative day 1, discharge, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after surgery
|
Evaluate postoperative pain degree via Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) to assess long-term clinical efficacy.The VAS is a 10-point continuous scale used to evaluate subjective pain intensity.
The minimum score is 0 points, representing no pain at all.
The maximum score is 10 points, representing the most severe and unbearable pain.
A lower VAS score indicates milder pain and better clinical recovery, while a higher score indicates worse pain status and poorer symptomatic improvement.
|
Postoperative day 1, discharge, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after surgery
|
|
ODI
時間枠:Postoperative day 1, discharge, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after surgery
|
Evaluate postoperative pain degree via lumbar function via Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) to assess long-term clinical efficacy.The ODI is a validated questionnaire for assessing lumbar spine-related functional disability.
The total score ranges from 0 points to 100 points.
The minimum score (0 points) means no functional disability and completely normal lumbar activity.
The maximum score (100 points) means severe lumbar dysfunction and complete inability to perform daily activities.
Lower ODI scores reflect better lumbar function and improved living ability, whereas higher scores represent more serious functional impairment and worse surgical efficacy.
|
Postoperative day 1, discharge, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after surgery
|
|
SF-36 scores
時間枠:Postoperative day 1, discharge, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after surgery
|
Evaluate postoperative quality of life via SF-36 scale to assess long-term clinical efficacy.The SF-36 is a comprehensive scale for evaluating overall quality of life and general health status.
Each dimension and the aggregated total score range from 0 points to 100 points.
The minimum score (0 points) indicates the worst health status and extremely poor quality of life.
The maximum score (100 points) indicates perfect physical and mental health with excellent daily living quality.
Unlike VAS and ODI, a higher SF-36 score represents better health condition and superior postoperative quality of life, while a lower score indicates poorer recovery and worse health outcomes.
|
Postoperative day 1, discharge, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after surgery
|
|
Incidence of postoperative vertebral re-fracture
時間枠:Up to 1 year after surgery
|
Record the number of patients with adjacent or injured vertebral re-fracture during follow-up to evaluate long-term surgical prognosis.
|
Up to 1 year after surgery
|
協力者と研究者
ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。
研究記録日
これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。
主要日程の研究
研究開始 (実際)
2024年1月1日
一次修了 (推定)
2026年10月31日
研究の完了 (推定)
2026年12月31日
試験登録日
最初に提出
2026年5月21日
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
2026年5月27日
最初の投稿 (実際)
2026年6月1日
学習記録の更新
投稿された最後の更新 (実際)
2026年6月1日
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
2026年5月27日
最終確認日
2026年5月1日
詳しくは
本研究に関する用語
その他の研究ID番号
- 2024-P2-145
個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画
個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?
未定
医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書
米国FDA規制医薬品の研究
いいえ
米国FDA規制機器製品の研究
いいえ
この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。