このページは自動翻訳されたものであり、翻訳の正確性は保証されていません。を参照してください。 英語版 ソーステキスト用。

Multifamily Healing Spaces for Family Resilience in Rwanda (MFHS-CRT)

2026年5月29日 更新者:Alexandros Lordos, PhD

The Effectiveness of Multi-Family Healing Spaces on Family Resilience and Mental Health Outcomes: A Multi-Site Cluster-Randomized Waitlist-Control Trial in Rwanda

This cluster-randomized waitlist-control trial evaluated Multifamily Healing Spaces (MFHS), a culturally adapted behavioral family intervention for genocide-affected communities in Rwanda. Community members across five districts were screened through a staged triage process. Individuals with acute or severe clinical concerns were routed to clinical referral, those with individual mental-health needs were prioritized for Resilience-Oriented Therapy, and families were invited to MFHS when at least one screened family member met criteria for family communication difficulties. Twenty eligible clusters were randomly selected and then allocated to MFHS or waitlist control. The baseline cohort included 319 family members aged 12 years or older. The trial tested whether MFHS improved family resilience, parenting, couple and youth family-system outcomes, and secondary mental health, psychosocial, community, and livelihood outcomes from baseline to immediate post-intervention endline.

調査の概要

詳細な説明

MFHS is a group-based, trauma-informed, family-systems intervention developed for post-genocide Rwanda. It combines psychoeducation, structured dialogue, family communication and problem-solving exercises, parenting and couple-relational work, and youth voice and identity activities. The intervention was delivered in intergenerational, whole-family, parent-only, and youth-only formats. MFHS comprised 18 core 3-hour meeting occasions, with parent-only and youth-only sessions delivered in parallel, plus four planned follow-up sessions where relevant.

Participants were identified through a broader Rwanda societal-healing screening process. Screening was conducted at the individual level, but MFHS invitation occurred at the family level: if any screened individual met the MFHS family-communication criterion, that person's family was invited. The audited screening workbook contained 4,214 adult/community screening records. After referral/triage for severe clinical flags and other staged interventions, 839 screened individuals were staged to MFHS. At the cell level, 56 eligible cells had enough staged MFHS-screened individuals to form a group; those cells contained 794 staged MFHS-screened individuals. Twenty trial clusters were randomly selected from the eligible cells and then allocated to MFHS or waitlist control. The final baseline cohort included 319 family members in 20 clusters: 167 in MFHS clusters and 152 in waitlist-control clusters.

The primary manuscript analysis is a baseline-cohort intention-to-treat analysis. All baseline-assessed participants were retained in their final fielded cluster allocation. Missing endline outcomes for 36 participants were handled through multiple imputation. Effects were estimated with baseline-adjusted cluster-level Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) weighted by baseline cluster size, with complete-case and unweighted analyses retained as sensitivity checks.

研究の種類

介入

入学 (実際)

319

段階

  • 適用できない

連絡先と場所

このセクションには、調査を実施する担当者の連絡先の詳細と、この調査が実施されている場所に関する情報が記載されています。

研究場所

    • Eastern Province
      • Ngoma、Eastern Province、ルワンダ
        • Community and Health-Centre Settings, Ngoma District
      • Nyagatare、Eastern Province、ルワンダ
        • Community and Health-Centre Settings, Nyagatare District
    • Northern Province
      • Ruhengeri、Northern Province、ルワンダ
        • Community and Health-Centre Settings, Musanze District
    • Southern Province
      • Nyamagabe、Southern Province、ルワンダ
        • Community and Health-Centre Settings, Nyamagabe District
    • Western Province
      • Nyabihu、Western Province、ルワンダ
        • Community and Health-Centre Settings, Nyabihu District

参加基準

研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。

適格基準

就学可能な年齢

  • 子
  • 大人
  • 高齢者

健康ボランティアの受け入れ

いいえ

説明

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Member of a family living in or connected to a selected MFHS-eligible cluster/cell in one of the five study districts in Rwanda.
  • Aged 12 years or older.
  • Family invited because at least one screened family member met the staged MFHS criterion for family communication difficulties after higher-priority clinical and individual mental-health triage.
  • Able and willing to participate in baseline assessment and, if allocated to MFHS, family/group sessions.
  • Written informed consent, assent, and/or caregiver permission obtained according to age and local ethics requirements.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals with suicidality, psychosis, or severe substance-use flags were routed for clinical interview or hospital referral rather than MFHS as first-line allocation.
  • Individuals meeting higher-priority individual mental-health criteria were routed to Resilience-Oriented Therapy before the MFHS screening stage.
  • Individuals or families unable to provide consent/assent or safely participate in group family sessions were not enrolled.
  • Remaining individuals with social-conflict indicators after earlier stages were routed to sociotherapy rather than MFHS.

研究計画

このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。

研究はどのように設計されていますか?

デザインの詳細

  • 主な目的:支持療法
  • 割り当て:ランダム化
  • 介入モデル:並列代入
  • マスキング:なし(オープンラベル)

武器と介入

参加者グループ / アーム
介入・治療
実験的:Multifamily Healing Spaces
Clusters allocated to Multifamily Healing Spaces (MFHS) received the behavioral family intervention during the trial evaluation period. MFHS was delivered to families in group formats using intergenerational, whole-family, parent-only, and youth-only sessions.
MFHS is a culturally adapted, group-based family intervention for genocide-affected communities in Rwanda. It includes 18 core 3-hour meeting occasions in intergenerational, whole-family, parent-only, and youth-only formats. Sessions focus on trauma-informed psychoeducation, family communication and problem solving, shared meaning-making, parenting, couple relationships, youth voice, and family and community resilience. Groups were facilitated by trained facilitators, including a therapist and community volunteer, with facilitator training and supervision.
介入なし:Waitlist Control
Clusters allocated to waitlist control did not receive MFHS during the baseline-to-endline evaluation period. Families were invited to receive MFHS after the evaluation period.

この研究は何を測定していますか?

主要な結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Change in Family Resilience
時間枠:Baseline to immediate post-intervention endline, up to 5 months
Family resilience was measured with the Walsh Family Resilience Questionnaire. The local version included 32 items forming belief systems, organization patterns, and communication/problem solving subscales. Subscale scores range from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating stronger family resilience processes.
Baseline to immediate post-intervention endline, up to 5 months
Change in Parenting Practices
時間枠:Baseline to immediate post-intervention endline, up to 5 months
Parenting practices were measured with the Parenting Practices Questionnaire. The local version included 20 items forming authoritative warmth/involvement, authoritative democratic participation, and authoritarian verbal hostility subscales. Subscale scores range from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating more of the named parenting behavior.
Baseline to immediate post-intervention endline, up to 5 months
Change in Parent Couple Functioning
時間枠:Baseline to immediate post-intervention endline, up to 5 months
Parent couple functioning was measured with parent-only measures of dyadic adjustment, dyadic happiness, sexual relationship decision-making power, and preference for boys over girls. Dyadic adjustment domains range from 0 to 3 and dyadic happiness ranges from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating better couple functioning. Sexual relationship decision-making power ranges from 1 to 3, with higher scores indicating more respondent decision-making authority. Preference for boys over girls ranges from 1 to 4, with higher scores indicating stronger preference for boys over girls.
Baseline to immediate post-intervention endline, up to 5 months
Change in Youth Family-System Functioning
時間枠:Baseline to immediate post-intervention endline, up to 5 months
Youth family-system functioning was measured with youth-only family enmeshment and personal accountability scores. Family enmeshment was measured with seven items ranging from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating greater over-involvement or lower differentiation. Personal accountability was measured with eight items ranging from 1 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater youth responsibility and accountability.
Baseline to immediate post-intervention endline, up to 5 months

二次結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Change in Post-Traumatic Stress Symptoms
時間枠:Baseline to immediate post-intervention endline, up to 5 months.
Post-traumatic stress symptoms were measured with four genocide-adapted items from the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition. Items were rated from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater post-traumatic stress symptoms.
Baseline to immediate post-intervention endline, up to 5 months.
Change in Borderline Traits
時間枠:Baseline to immediate post-intervention endline, up to 5 months.
Borderline traits were measured with the McLean Screening Instrument for Borderline Personality Disorder. The 10 yes/no items are summed to a total score ranging from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more borderline-personality features.
Baseline to immediate post-intervention endline, up to 5 months.
Change in Aggression
時間枠:Baseline to immediate post-intervention endline, up to 5 months.
Aggression was measured with physical and verbal aggression items from the Aggression Questionnaire. Items were averaged to scores ranging from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating greater aggression.
Baseline to immediate post-intervention endline, up to 5 months.
Change in Forgiveness and Community Relations
時間枠:Baseline to immediate post-intervention endline, up to 5 months.
Forgiveness and community relations were measured with forgiveness of others, social cohesion, perceived community threat, and intergenerational harmony scores. Forgiveness of others used retained items derived from the Heartland Forgiveness Scale and ranges from 1 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater forgiveness. Social cohesion ranges from 1 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater social cohesion. Perceived community threat ranges from 1 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater perceived threat. Intergenerational harmony ranges from 1 to 4, with higher scores indicating stronger intergenerational harmony.
Baseline to immediate post-intervention endline, up to 5 months.
Change in Socioemotional Skills
時間枠:Baseline to immediate post-intervention endline, up to 5 months.
Socioemotional skills were measured with locally developed emotional wellbeing, collaboration, and self-management subscales. Subscale scores range from 1 to 4. In the scoring, higher scores indicate greater socioemotional difficulty, so lower scores indicate improvement.
Baseline to immediate post-intervention endline, up to 5 months.
Change in Livelihood and Household Economic Functioning
時間枠:Baseline to immediate post-intervention endline, up to 5 months.
Livelihood and household economic functioning were measured with parent-only economic security, partner economic support, and food-insecurity indicators. Economic security and partner economic support scores range from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating greater economic security or partner support. Short-term Food Security Consumption Coping Strategy Index scores range from 0 to 84 and long-term scores range from 0 to 12, with higher scores indicating worse food insecurity.
Baseline to immediate post-intervention endline, up to 5 months.

協力者と研究者

ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。

スポンサー

捜査官

  • 主任研究者:Alexandros Lordos, PhD、University of Cyprus

出版物と役立つリンク

研究に関する情報を入力する責任者は、自発的にこれらの出版物を提供します。これらは、研究に関連するあらゆるものに関するものである可能性があります。

一般刊行物

  • Lordos, A., Interayamahanga, R., Kayitare, F., Dukuzumuremyi, E., Mahoro, M., Mwiza, J., & Mbanda, J. (2026). Establishing multi-stakeholder alliances to promote societal healing and resilience in post-genocide Rwanda. In S. Clarke-Habibi & C. Reimann (Eds.), The Routledge International Handbook of Trauma-Responsive Peacebuilding (pp. 411-424). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003536970-33
  • Nikolaou, K., Lordos, A., Rutembesa, E., Ioannou, M., Dukuzumuremyi, E., Christou, G., Meade, A., Karayianni, E., Anastasiou, E., Guest, A., Sezibera, V., Panayiotou, O., Throstur, B., & Kayitare, F. (2025). Multifamily Healing Spaces: Development of a family-based intervention for recovery and resilience in Rwanda. Intervention, 23(1), 52-62. https://doi.org/10.4103/intv.intv_16_24

研究記録日

これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。

主要日程の研究

研究開始 (実際)

2023年4月28日

一次修了 (実際)

2023年9月15日

研究の完了 (実際)

2023年9月15日

試験登録日

最初に提出

2026年5月20日

QC基準を満たした最初の提出物

2026年5月29日

最初の投稿 (実際)

2026年6月2日

学習記録の更新

投稿された最後の更新 (実際)

2026年6月2日

QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました

2026年5月29日

最終確認日

2026年5月1日

詳しくは

本研究に関する用語

その他の研究ID番号

  • MFHS-CRT-RWA-2023
  • 122/RNEC/2023 (その他の識別子:Rwanda National Research Ethics Committee approval/reference number)

個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画

個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?

はい

IPD プランの説明

De-identified participant-level data underlying the manuscript analyses may be shared with qualified researchers on reasonable request to the first author, subject to ethics, data-protection, and partner-organization approvals.

IPD 共有時間枠

Available after publication, with no predetermined end date.

IPD 共有アクセス基準

Researchers must submit a methodologically sound proposal to the first author. Access will be subject to approval by the study team and any applicable ethics, data-protection, and partner-organization requirements. Shared data will be de-identified.

IPD 共有サポート情報タイプ

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ANALYTIC_CODE

医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書

米国FDA規制医薬品の研究

いいえ

米国FDA規制機器製品の研究

いいえ

この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。

購読する