Deze pagina is automatisch vertaald en de nauwkeurigheid van de vertaling kan niet worden gegarandeerd. Raadpleeg de Engelse versie voor een brontekst.

Multifamily Healing Spaces for Family Resilience in Rwanda (MFHS-CRT)

29 mei 2026 bijgewerkt door: Alexandros Lordos, PhD

The Effectiveness of Multi-Family Healing Spaces on Family Resilience and Mental Health Outcomes: A Multi-Site Cluster-Randomized Waitlist-Control Trial in Rwanda

This cluster-randomized waitlist-control trial evaluated Multifamily Healing Spaces (MFHS), a culturally adapted behavioral family intervention for genocide-affected communities in Rwanda. Community members across five districts were screened through a staged triage process. Individuals with acute or severe clinical concerns were routed to clinical referral, those with individual mental-health needs were prioritized for Resilience-Oriented Therapy, and families were invited to MFHS when at least one screened family member met criteria for family communication difficulties. Twenty eligible clusters were randomly selected and then allocated to MFHS or waitlist control. The baseline cohort included 319 family members aged 12 years or older. The trial tested whether MFHS improved family resilience, parenting, couple and youth family-system outcomes, and secondary mental health, psychosocial, community, and livelihood outcomes from baseline to immediate post-intervention endline.

Studie Overzicht

Gedetailleerde beschrijving

MFHS is a group-based, trauma-informed, family-systems intervention developed for post-genocide Rwanda. It combines psychoeducation, structured dialogue, family communication and problem-solving exercises, parenting and couple-relational work, and youth voice and identity activities. The intervention was delivered in intergenerational, whole-family, parent-only, and youth-only formats. MFHS comprised 18 core 3-hour meeting occasions, with parent-only and youth-only sessions delivered in parallel, plus four planned follow-up sessions where relevant.

Participants were identified through a broader Rwanda societal-healing screening process. Screening was conducted at the individual level, but MFHS invitation occurred at the family level: if any screened individual met the MFHS family-communication criterion, that person's family was invited. The audited screening workbook contained 4,214 adult/community screening records. After referral/triage for severe clinical flags and other staged interventions, 839 screened individuals were staged to MFHS. At the cell level, 56 eligible cells had enough staged MFHS-screened individuals to form a group; those cells contained 794 staged MFHS-screened individuals. Twenty trial clusters were randomly selected from the eligible cells and then allocated to MFHS or waitlist control. The final baseline cohort included 319 family members in 20 clusters: 167 in MFHS clusters and 152 in waitlist-control clusters.

The primary manuscript analysis is a baseline-cohort intention-to-treat analysis. All baseline-assessed participants were retained in their final fielded cluster allocation. Missing endline outcomes for 36 participants were handled through multiple imputation. Effects were estimated with baseline-adjusted cluster-level Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) weighted by baseline cluster size, with complete-case and unweighted analyses retained as sensitivity checks.

Studietype

Ingrijpend

Inschrijving (Werkelijk)

319

Fase

  • Niet toepasbaar

Contacten en locaties

In dit gedeelte vindt u de contactgegevens van degenen die het onderzoek uitvoeren en informatie over waar dit onderzoek wordt uitgevoerd.

Studie Locaties

    • Eastern Province
      • Ngoma, Eastern Province, Rwanda
        • Community and Health-Centre Settings, Ngoma District
      • Nyagatare, Eastern Province, Rwanda
        • Community and Health-Centre Settings, Nyagatare District
    • Northern Province
      • Ruhengeri, Northern Province, Rwanda
        • Community and Health-Centre Settings, Musanze District
    • Southern Province
      • Nyamagabe, Southern Province, Rwanda
        • Community and Health-Centre Settings, Nyamagabe District
    • Western Province
      • Nyabihu, Western Province, Rwanda
        • Community and Health-Centre Settings, Nyabihu District

Deelname Criteria

Onderzoekers zoeken naar mensen die aan een bepaalde beschrijving voldoen, de zogenaamde geschiktheidscriteria. Enkele voorbeelden van deze criteria zijn iemands algemene gezondheidstoestand of eerdere behandelingen.

Geschiktheidscriteria

Leeftijden die in aanmerking komen voor studie

  • Kind
  • Volwassen
  • Oudere volwassene

Accepteert gezonde vrijwilligers

Nee

Beschrijving

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Member of a family living in or connected to a selected MFHS-eligible cluster/cell in one of the five study districts in Rwanda.
  • Aged 12 years or older.
  • Family invited because at least one screened family member met the staged MFHS criterion for family communication difficulties after higher-priority clinical and individual mental-health triage.
  • Able and willing to participate in baseline assessment and, if allocated to MFHS, family/group sessions.
  • Written informed consent, assent, and/or caregiver permission obtained according to age and local ethics requirements.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals with suicidality, psychosis, or severe substance-use flags were routed for clinical interview or hospital referral rather than MFHS as first-line allocation.
  • Individuals meeting higher-priority individual mental-health criteria were routed to Resilience-Oriented Therapy before the MFHS screening stage.
  • Individuals or families unable to provide consent/assent or safely participate in group family sessions were not enrolled.
  • Remaining individuals with social-conflict indicators after earlier stages were routed to sociotherapy rather than MFHS.

Studie plan

Dit gedeelte bevat details van het studieplan, inclusief hoe de studie is opgezet en wat de studie meet.

Hoe is de studie opgezet?

Ontwerpdetails

  • Primair doel: Ondersteunende zorg
  • Toewijzing: Gerandomiseerd
  • Interventioneel model: Parallelle opdracht
  • Masker: Geen (open label)

Wapens en interventies

Deelnemersgroep / Arm
Interventie / Behandeling
Experimenteel: Multifamily Healing Spaces
Clusters allocated to Multifamily Healing Spaces (MFHS) received the behavioral family intervention during the trial evaluation period. MFHS was delivered to families in group formats using intergenerational, whole-family, parent-only, and youth-only sessions.
MFHS is a culturally adapted, group-based family intervention for genocide-affected communities in Rwanda. It includes 18 core 3-hour meeting occasions in intergenerational, whole-family, parent-only, and youth-only formats. Sessions focus on trauma-informed psychoeducation, family communication and problem solving, shared meaning-making, parenting, couple relationships, youth voice, and family and community resilience. Groups were facilitated by trained facilitators, including a therapist and community volunteer, with facilitator training and supervision.
Geen tussenkomst: Waitlist Control
Clusters allocated to waitlist control did not receive MFHS during the baseline-to-endline evaluation period. Families were invited to receive MFHS after the evaluation period.

Wat meet het onderzoek?

Primaire uitkomstmaten

Uitkomstmaat
Maatregel Beschrijving
Tijdsspanne
Change in Family Resilience
Tijdsspanne: Baseline to immediate post-intervention endline, up to 5 months
Family resilience was measured with the Walsh Family Resilience Questionnaire. The local version included 32 items forming belief systems, organization patterns, and communication/problem solving subscales. Subscale scores range from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating stronger family resilience processes.
Baseline to immediate post-intervention endline, up to 5 months
Change in Parenting Practices
Tijdsspanne: Baseline to immediate post-intervention endline, up to 5 months
Parenting practices were measured with the Parenting Practices Questionnaire. The local version included 20 items forming authoritative warmth/involvement, authoritative democratic participation, and authoritarian verbal hostility subscales. Subscale scores range from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating more of the named parenting behavior.
Baseline to immediate post-intervention endline, up to 5 months
Change in Parent Couple Functioning
Tijdsspanne: Baseline to immediate post-intervention endline, up to 5 months
Parent couple functioning was measured with parent-only measures of dyadic adjustment, dyadic happiness, sexual relationship decision-making power, and preference for boys over girls. Dyadic adjustment domains range from 0 to 3 and dyadic happiness ranges from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating better couple functioning. Sexual relationship decision-making power ranges from 1 to 3, with higher scores indicating more respondent decision-making authority. Preference for boys over girls ranges from 1 to 4, with higher scores indicating stronger preference for boys over girls.
Baseline to immediate post-intervention endline, up to 5 months
Change in Youth Family-System Functioning
Tijdsspanne: Baseline to immediate post-intervention endline, up to 5 months
Youth family-system functioning was measured with youth-only family enmeshment and personal accountability scores. Family enmeshment was measured with seven items ranging from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating greater over-involvement or lower differentiation. Personal accountability was measured with eight items ranging from 1 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater youth responsibility and accountability.
Baseline to immediate post-intervention endline, up to 5 months

Secundaire uitkomstmaten

Uitkomstmaat
Maatregel Beschrijving
Tijdsspanne
Change in Post-Traumatic Stress Symptoms
Tijdsspanne: Baseline to immediate post-intervention endline, up to 5 months.
Post-traumatic stress symptoms were measured with four genocide-adapted items from the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition. Items were rated from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater post-traumatic stress symptoms.
Baseline to immediate post-intervention endline, up to 5 months.
Change in Borderline Traits
Tijdsspanne: Baseline to immediate post-intervention endline, up to 5 months.
Borderline traits were measured with the McLean Screening Instrument for Borderline Personality Disorder. The 10 yes/no items are summed to a total score ranging from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more borderline-personality features.
Baseline to immediate post-intervention endline, up to 5 months.
Change in Aggression
Tijdsspanne: Baseline to immediate post-intervention endline, up to 5 months.
Aggression was measured with physical and verbal aggression items from the Aggression Questionnaire. Items were averaged to scores ranging from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating greater aggression.
Baseline to immediate post-intervention endline, up to 5 months.
Change in Forgiveness and Community Relations
Tijdsspanne: Baseline to immediate post-intervention endline, up to 5 months.
Forgiveness and community relations were measured with forgiveness of others, social cohesion, perceived community threat, and intergenerational harmony scores. Forgiveness of others used retained items derived from the Heartland Forgiveness Scale and ranges from 1 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater forgiveness. Social cohesion ranges from 1 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater social cohesion. Perceived community threat ranges from 1 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater perceived threat. Intergenerational harmony ranges from 1 to 4, with higher scores indicating stronger intergenerational harmony.
Baseline to immediate post-intervention endline, up to 5 months.
Change in Socioemotional Skills
Tijdsspanne: Baseline to immediate post-intervention endline, up to 5 months.
Socioemotional skills were measured with locally developed emotional wellbeing, collaboration, and self-management subscales. Subscale scores range from 1 to 4. In the scoring, higher scores indicate greater socioemotional difficulty, so lower scores indicate improvement.
Baseline to immediate post-intervention endline, up to 5 months.
Change in Livelihood and Household Economic Functioning
Tijdsspanne: Baseline to immediate post-intervention endline, up to 5 months.
Livelihood and household economic functioning were measured with parent-only economic security, partner economic support, and food-insecurity indicators. Economic security and partner economic support scores range from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating greater economic security or partner support. Short-term Food Security Consumption Coping Strategy Index scores range from 0 to 84 and long-term scores range from 0 to 12, with higher scores indicating worse food insecurity.
Baseline to immediate post-intervention endline, up to 5 months.

Medewerkers en onderzoekers

Hier vindt u mensen en organisaties die betrokken zijn bij dit onderzoek.

Onderzoekers

  • Hoofdonderzoeker: Alexandros Lordos, PhD, University of Cyprus

Publicaties en nuttige links

De persoon die verantwoordelijk is voor het invoeren van informatie over het onderzoek stelt deze publicaties vrijwillig ter beschikking. Dit kan gaan over alles wat met het onderzoek te maken heeft.

Algemene publicaties

  • Lordos, A., Interayamahanga, R., Kayitare, F., Dukuzumuremyi, E., Mahoro, M., Mwiza, J., & Mbanda, J. (2026). Establishing multi-stakeholder alliances to promote societal healing and resilience in post-genocide Rwanda. In S. Clarke-Habibi & C. Reimann (Eds.), The Routledge International Handbook of Trauma-Responsive Peacebuilding (pp. 411-424). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003536970-33
  • Nikolaou, K., Lordos, A., Rutembesa, E., Ioannou, M., Dukuzumuremyi, E., Christou, G., Meade, A., Karayianni, E., Anastasiou, E., Guest, A., Sezibera, V., Panayiotou, O., Throstur, B., & Kayitare, F. (2025). Multifamily Healing Spaces: Development of a family-based intervention for recovery and resilience in Rwanda. Intervention, 23(1), 52-62. https://doi.org/10.4103/intv.intv_16_24

Studie record data

Deze datums volgen de voortgang van het onderzoeksdossier en de samenvatting van de ingediende resultaten bij ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieverslagen en gerapporteerde resultaten worden beoordeeld door de National Library of Medicine (NLM) om er zeker van te zijn dat ze voldoen aan specifieke kwaliteitscontrolenormen voordat ze op de openbare website worden geplaatst.

Bestudeer belangrijke data

Studie start (Werkelijk)

28 april 2023

Primaire voltooiing (Werkelijk)

15 september 2023

Studie voltooiing (Werkelijk)

15 september 2023

Studieregistratiedata

Eerst ingediend

20 mei 2026

Eerst ingediend dat voldeed aan de QC-criteria

29 mei 2026

Eerst geplaatst (Werkelijk)

2 juni 2026

Updates van studierecords

Laatste update geplaatst (Werkelijk)

2 juni 2026

Laatste update ingediend die voldeed aan QC-criteria

29 mei 2026

Laatst geverifieerd

1 mei 2026

Meer informatie

Termen gerelateerd aan deze studie

Andere studie-ID-nummers

  • MFHS-CRT-RWA-2023
  • 122/RNEC/2023 (Andere identificatie: Rwanda National Research Ethics Committee approval/reference number)

Plan Individuele Deelnemersgegevens (IPD)

Bent u van plan om gegevens van individuele deelnemers (IPD) te delen?

JA

Beschrijving IPD-plan

De-identified participant-level data underlying the manuscript analyses may be shared with qualified researchers on reasonable request to the first author, subject to ethics, data-protection, and partner-organization approvals.

IPD-tijdsbestek voor delen

Available after publication, with no predetermined end date.

IPD-toegangscriteria voor delen

Researchers must submit a methodologically sound proposal to the first author. Access will be subject to approval by the study team and any applicable ethics, data-protection, and partner-organization requirements. Shared data will be de-identified.

IPD delen Ondersteunend informatietype

  • LEERPROTOCOOL
  • SAP
  • ANALYTIC_CODE

Informatie over medicijnen en apparaten, studiedocumenten

Bestudeert een door de Amerikaanse FDA gereguleerd geneesmiddel

Nee

Bestudeert een door de Amerikaanse FDA gereguleerd apparaatproduct

Nee

Deze informatie is zonder wijzigingen rechtstreeks van de website clinicaltrials.gov gehaald. Als u verzoeken heeft om uw onderzoeksgegevens te wijzigen, te verwijderen of bij te werken, neem dan contact op met register@clinicaltrials.gov. Zodra er een wijziging wordt doorgevoerd op clinicaltrials.gov, wordt deze ook automatisch bijgewerkt op onze website .

Abonneren