このページは自動翻訳されたものであり、翻訳の正確性は保証されていません。を参照してください。 英語版 ソーステキスト用。

Optimizing Combined Physical and Cognitive Activity in Community-Dwelling Older Adults. (CONSCIOUS)

2026年6月1日 更新者:University Ghent

Determining the Optimal Combination of Physical and Cognitive Activity for Acute Cognitive Benefits in Community-Dwelling Older Adults.

This laboratory-based interventional study aims to determine which combination of physical activity intensity and cognitive activity difficulty yields the greatest acute cognitive benefits in community-dwelling older adults.

The main question it aims to answer is:

- Which combination of physical and cognitive activity results in the greatest short-term improvement in cognitive functioning?

Researchers will compare four different combinations of physical intensity and cognitive task difficulty to determine whether one combination stands out. In addition, the study examines whether these effects differ depending on baseline cardiorespiratory fitness.

Participants will:

  • undergo a preparatory phase in which their cardiorespiratory fitness, individualized physical activity intensity levels, and cognitive activity difficulty levels are established
  • visit the laboratory four times, with one week between visits, to complete each combination of physical and cognitive activity (light vs. moderate physical activity × easy vs. challenging cognitive activity)
  • complete cognitive tests immediately before and after each condition

調査の概要

詳細な説明

Recognizing the escalating dementia rates, its profound social and economic consequences and the lack of curative treatments, the World Health Organization (WHO) emphasizes the importance of reducing modifiable risk factors for dementia, as outlined in Action Area 3 of the WHO Global action plan on the public health response to dementia 2017-2025. Previous research suggests that combining physical activity and cognitive activity may produce greater cognitive benefits than either activity alone, but it remains unclear which specific combinations are most effective in older adults. In particular, little is known about how physical activity intensity and cognitive activity difficulty interact, and whether cardiorespiratory fitness influences these effects. The present study addresses this knowledge gap in community-dwelling older adults.

The study is conducted in two consecutive parts. In the preparatory phase, participants attend one laboratory visit. During this phase, baseline screening and descriptive assessments will be performed, cardiorespiratory fitness will beestimated using the 6-Minute Walk Test, individualized physical activity intensity zones will be determined using heart-rate reserve, and cognitive activities will be classified as easy or challenging based on subjective ratings. Participants will also be familiarized with treadmill walking and simultaneous physical and cognitive task performance.

In the fundamental phase, eligible participants will complete four laboratory sessions in randomized order, each involving one combination of physical and cognitive activity: light physical activity with easy cognitive activity, light physical activity with challenging cognitive activity, moderate physical activity with easy cognitive activity, and moderate physical activity with challenging cognitive activity. During each session, participants walk on a treadmill at a prescribed heart-rate-based intensity while simultaneously performing cognitive tasks. Cognitive functioning is assessed immediately before and after each session using three tasks from the CANTAB neuropsychological test battery: a) Multitasking test (MTT), (b) Delayed Matching to Sample (DMS), and (c) Match to Sample Visual Search (MTS), allowing the study to examine the short-term cognitive effects of each physical activity × cognitive activity combination. The overall aim is to identify the optimal combination of simultaneous physical and cognitive activity for acute cognitive benefits in older adults.

研究の種類

介入

入学 (実際)

53

段階

  • 適用できない

連絡先と場所

このセクションには、調査を実施する担当者の連絡先の詳細と、この調査が実施されている場所に関する情報が記載されています。

研究場所

参加基準

研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。

適格基準

就学可能な年齢

  • 高齢者

健康ボランティアの受け入れ

いいえ

説明

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged 65 years or older
  • Community-dwelling
  • Able to safely walk on a treadmill and complete the 6-Minute Walk Test
  • Sufficient Dutch proficiency to understand study instructions and complete study procedures

Exclusion Criteria:

  • MoCA score < 23
  • Severe cognitive or physical impairment that would hinder participation or understanding of study procedures
  • Use of medication affecting heart rate
  • Any medical condition contraindicating engagement in physical or cognitive activity
  • Severe visual or hearing impairment that would prevent valid participation in the study procedures

研究計画

このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。

研究はどのように設計されていますか?

デザインの詳細

  • 主な目的:基礎科学
  • 割り当て:ランダム化
  • 介入モデル:クロスオーバー割り当て
  • マスキング:なし(オープンラベル)

武器と介入

参加者グループ / アーム
介入・治療
実験的:Sequence 1
Participants complete the four experimental conditions in the following order across four separate laboratory visits: C1, C2, C3, and C4. C1 = light physical activity + easy cognitive activity; C2 = light physical activity + challenging cognitive activity; C3 = moderate physical activity + easy cognitive activity; C4 = moderate physical activity + challenging cognitive activity.
Participants walk on a treadmill at an individualized light physical activity intensity (30-39% of heart rate reserve) while performing cognitive tasks individually classified as easy.
Participants walk on a treadmill at an individualized light physical activity intensity (30-39% of heart rate reserve) while performing cognitive tasks individually classified as challenging.
Participants walk on a treadmill at an individualized moderate physical activity intensity (40-59% of heart rate reserve) while performing cognitive tasks individually classified as easy.
Participants walk on a treadmill at an individualized moderate physical activity intensity (40-59% of heart rate reserve) while performing cognitive tasks individually classified as challenging.
実験的:Sequence 2

Participants complete the four experimental conditions in the following order across four separate laboratory visits: C2, C4, C1, and C3.

C1 = light physical activity + easy cognitive activity; C2 = light physical activity + challenging cognitive activity; C3 = moderate physical activity + easy cognitive activity; C4 = moderate physical activity + challenging cognitive activity.

Participants walk on a treadmill at an individualized light physical activity intensity (30-39% of heart rate reserve) while performing cognitive tasks individually classified as easy.
Participants walk on a treadmill at an individualized light physical activity intensity (30-39% of heart rate reserve) while performing cognitive tasks individually classified as challenging.
Participants walk on a treadmill at an individualized moderate physical activity intensity (40-59% of heart rate reserve) while performing cognitive tasks individually classified as easy.
Participants walk on a treadmill at an individualized moderate physical activity intensity (40-59% of heart rate reserve) while performing cognitive tasks individually classified as challenging.
実験的:Sequence 3

Participants complete the four experimental conditions in the following order across four separate laboratory visits: C3, C1, C4, and C2.

C1 = light physical activity + easy cognitive activity; C2 = light physical activity + challenging cognitive activity; C3 = moderate physical activity + easy cognitive activity; C4 = moderate physical activity + challenging cognitive activity.

Participants walk on a treadmill at an individualized light physical activity intensity (30-39% of heart rate reserve) while performing cognitive tasks individually classified as easy.
Participants walk on a treadmill at an individualized light physical activity intensity (30-39% of heart rate reserve) while performing cognitive tasks individually classified as challenging.
Participants walk on a treadmill at an individualized moderate physical activity intensity (40-59% of heart rate reserve) while performing cognitive tasks individually classified as easy.
Participants walk on a treadmill at an individualized moderate physical activity intensity (40-59% of heart rate reserve) while performing cognitive tasks individually classified as challenging.
実験的:Sequence 4

Participants complete the four experimental conditions in the following order across four separate laboratory visits: C4, C3, C2, and C1.

C1 = light physical activity + easy cognitive activity; C2 = light physical activity + challenging cognitive activity; C3 = moderate physical activity + easy cognitive activity; C4 = moderate physical activity + challenging cognitive activity.

Participants walk on a treadmill at an individualized light physical activity intensity (30-39% of heart rate reserve) while performing cognitive tasks individually classified as easy.
Participants walk on a treadmill at an individualized light physical activity intensity (30-39% of heart rate reserve) while performing cognitive tasks individually classified as challenging.
Participants walk on a treadmill at an individualized moderate physical activity intensity (40-59% of heart rate reserve) while performing cognitive tasks individually classified as easy.
Participants walk on a treadmill at an individualized moderate physical activity intensity (40-59% of heart rate reserve) while performing cognitive tasks individually classified as challenging.

この研究は何を測定していますか?

主要な結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Change in Multitasking Test (MTT) performance from pre- to post-condition
時間枠:Immediately before and 10 minutes after each experimental condition
Change in accuracy and response latency from pre- to post-condition on the Multitasking Test (MTT), assessing executive functioning, cognitive flexibility, and processing speed.
Immediately before and 10 minutes after each experimental condition
Change in Delayed Matching to Sample (DMS) performance from pre- to post-condition
時間枠:Immediately before and 10 minutes after each experimental condition
Change in accuracy and response latency from pre- to post-condition on the Delayed Matching to Sample (DMS), assessing short-term visual recognition memory.
Immediately before and 10 minutes after each experimental condition
Change in Match to Sample Visual Search (MTS) performance from pre- to post-condition
時間枠:Immediately before and 10 minutes after each experimental condition
Change in accuracy and response latency from pre- to post-condition on the Match to Sample Visual Search (MTS), assessing visual attention and psychomotor speed.
Immediately before and 10 minutes after each experimental condition

二次結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
General impression of each experimental condition
時間枠:Immediately after each experimental condition, during the 10-minute post-condition interval.
Self-reported general impression of each experimental condition, rated on a 0-10 scale, where 0 indicates "not good at all" and 10 indicates "very good."
Immediately after each experimental condition, during the 10-minute post-condition interval.
Perceived feasibility of each experimental condition
時間枠:Immediately after each experimental condition, during the 10-minute post-condition interval.
Self-reported feasibility of each experimental condition, rated on a 0-10 scale in response to the statement "I feel capable of doing this session," where higher scores indicate greater perceived feasibility.
Immediately after each experimental condition, during the 10-minute post-condition interval.
Enjoyment of each experimental condition
時間枠:Immediately after each experimental condition, during the 10-minute post-condition interval.
Self-reported enjoyment of each experimental condition, rated on a 0-10 scale in response to the statement "I enjoyed this session," where higher scores indicate greater enjoyment.
Immediately after each experimental condition, during the 10-minute post-condition interval.

協力者と研究者

ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。

スポンサー

捜査官

  • 主任研究者:Greet Cardon, Prof. Dr.、University Ghent

研究記録日

これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。

主要日程の研究

研究開始 (実際)

2026年2月2日

一次修了 (実際)

2026年5月13日

研究の完了 (実際)

2026年5月13日

試験登録日

最初に提出

2026年6月1日

QC基準を満たした最初の提出物

2026年6月1日

最初の投稿 (実際)

2026年6月5日

学習記録の更新

投稿された最後の更新 (実際)

2026年6月5日

QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました

2026年6月1日

最終確認日

2026年6月1日

詳しくは

本研究に関する用語

追加の関連 MeSH 用語

その他の研究ID番号

  • CONSCIOUS - ONZ-2025-0282

個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画

個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?

はい

IPD プランの説明

De-identified individual participant data collected during the study will be made available to other researchers. The exact dataset(s), supporting documents, timing, and access procedures will be specified after completion of the main analyses and publication of the primary study results.

IPD 共有時間枠

De-identified individual participant data will become available after publication of the primary study results and are expected to remain available indefinitely in an institutional or open research repository.

IPD 共有サポート情報タイプ

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • ICF

医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書

米国FDA規制医薬品の研究

いいえ

米国FDA規制機器製品の研究

いいえ

この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。

購読する