Эта страница была переведена автоматически, точность перевода не гарантируется. Пожалуйста, обратитесь к английской версии для исходного текста.

Optimizing Combined Physical and Cognitive Activity in Community-Dwelling Older Adults. (CONSCIOUS)

1 июня 2026 г. обновлено: University Ghent

Determining the Optimal Combination of Physical and Cognitive Activity for Acute Cognitive Benefits in Community-Dwelling Older Adults.

This laboratory-based interventional study aims to determine which combination of physical activity intensity and cognitive activity difficulty yields the greatest acute cognitive benefits in community-dwelling older adults.

The main question it aims to answer is:

- Which combination of physical and cognitive activity results in the greatest short-term improvement in cognitive functioning?

Researchers will compare four different combinations of physical intensity and cognitive task difficulty to determine whether one combination stands out. In addition, the study examines whether these effects differ depending on baseline cardiorespiratory fitness.

Participants will:

  • undergo a preparatory phase in which their cardiorespiratory fitness, individualized physical activity intensity levels, and cognitive activity difficulty levels are established
  • visit the laboratory four times, with one week between visits, to complete each combination of physical and cognitive activity (light vs. moderate physical activity × easy vs. challenging cognitive activity)
  • complete cognitive tests immediately before and after each condition

Обзор исследования

Подробное описание

Recognizing the escalating dementia rates, its profound social and economic consequences and the lack of curative treatments, the World Health Organization (WHO) emphasizes the importance of reducing modifiable risk factors for dementia, as outlined in Action Area 3 of the WHO Global action plan on the public health response to dementia 2017-2025. Previous research suggests that combining physical activity and cognitive activity may produce greater cognitive benefits than either activity alone, but it remains unclear which specific combinations are most effective in older adults. In particular, little is known about how physical activity intensity and cognitive activity difficulty interact, and whether cardiorespiratory fitness influences these effects. The present study addresses this knowledge gap in community-dwelling older adults.

The study is conducted in two consecutive parts. In the preparatory phase, participants attend one laboratory visit. During this phase, baseline screening and descriptive assessments will be performed, cardiorespiratory fitness will beestimated using the 6-Minute Walk Test, individualized physical activity intensity zones will be determined using heart-rate reserve, and cognitive activities will be classified as easy or challenging based on subjective ratings. Participants will also be familiarized with treadmill walking and simultaneous physical and cognitive task performance.

In the fundamental phase, eligible participants will complete four laboratory sessions in randomized order, each involving one combination of physical and cognitive activity: light physical activity with easy cognitive activity, light physical activity with challenging cognitive activity, moderate physical activity with easy cognitive activity, and moderate physical activity with challenging cognitive activity. During each session, participants walk on a treadmill at a prescribed heart-rate-based intensity while simultaneously performing cognitive tasks. Cognitive functioning is assessed immediately before and after each session using three tasks from the CANTAB neuropsychological test battery: a) Multitasking test (MTT), (b) Delayed Matching to Sample (DMS), and (c) Match to Sample Visual Search (MTS), allowing the study to examine the short-term cognitive effects of each physical activity × cognitive activity combination. The overall aim is to identify the optimal combination of simultaneous physical and cognitive activity for acute cognitive benefits in older adults.

Тип исследования

Интервенционный

Регистрация (Действительный)

53

Фаза

  • Непригодный

Контакты и местонахождение

В этом разделе приведены контактные данные лиц, проводящих исследование, и информация о том, где проводится это исследование.

Места учебы

Критерии участия

Исследователи ищут людей, которые соответствуют определенному описанию, называемому критериям приемлемости. Некоторыми примерами этих критериев являются общее состояние здоровья человека или предшествующее лечение.

Критерии приемлемости

Возраст, подходящий для обучения

  • Пожилой взрослый

Принимает здоровых добровольцев

Нет

Описание

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged 65 years or older
  • Community-dwelling
  • Able to safely walk on a treadmill and complete the 6-Minute Walk Test
  • Sufficient Dutch proficiency to understand study instructions and complete study procedures

Exclusion Criteria:

  • MoCA score < 23
  • Severe cognitive or physical impairment that would hinder participation or understanding of study procedures
  • Use of medication affecting heart rate
  • Any medical condition contraindicating engagement in physical or cognitive activity
  • Severe visual or hearing impairment that would prevent valid participation in the study procedures

Учебный план

В этом разделе представлена ​​подробная информация о плане исследования, в том числе о том, как планируется исследование и что оно измеряет.

Как устроено исследование?

Детали дизайна

  • Основная цель: Фундаментальная наука
  • Распределение: Рандомизированный
  • Интервенционная модель: Назначение кроссовера
  • Маскировка: Нет (открытая этикетка)

Оружие и интервенции

Группа участников / Армия
Вмешательство/лечение
Экспериментальный: Sequence 1
Participants complete the four experimental conditions in the following order across four separate laboratory visits: C1, C2, C3, and C4. C1 = light physical activity + easy cognitive activity; C2 = light physical activity + challenging cognitive activity; C3 = moderate physical activity + easy cognitive activity; C4 = moderate physical activity + challenging cognitive activity.
Participants walk on a treadmill at an individualized light physical activity intensity (30-39% of heart rate reserve) while performing cognitive tasks individually classified as easy.
Participants walk on a treadmill at an individualized light physical activity intensity (30-39% of heart rate reserve) while performing cognitive tasks individually classified as challenging.
Participants walk on a treadmill at an individualized moderate physical activity intensity (40-59% of heart rate reserve) while performing cognitive tasks individually classified as easy.
Participants walk on a treadmill at an individualized moderate physical activity intensity (40-59% of heart rate reserve) while performing cognitive tasks individually classified as challenging.
Экспериментальный: Sequence 2

Participants complete the four experimental conditions in the following order across four separate laboratory visits: C2, C4, C1, and C3.

C1 = light physical activity + easy cognitive activity; C2 = light physical activity + challenging cognitive activity; C3 = moderate physical activity + easy cognitive activity; C4 = moderate physical activity + challenging cognitive activity.

Participants walk on a treadmill at an individualized light physical activity intensity (30-39% of heart rate reserve) while performing cognitive tasks individually classified as easy.
Participants walk on a treadmill at an individualized light physical activity intensity (30-39% of heart rate reserve) while performing cognitive tasks individually classified as challenging.
Participants walk on a treadmill at an individualized moderate physical activity intensity (40-59% of heart rate reserve) while performing cognitive tasks individually classified as easy.
Participants walk on a treadmill at an individualized moderate physical activity intensity (40-59% of heart rate reserve) while performing cognitive tasks individually classified as challenging.
Экспериментальный: Sequence 3

Participants complete the four experimental conditions in the following order across four separate laboratory visits: C3, C1, C4, and C2.

C1 = light physical activity + easy cognitive activity; C2 = light physical activity + challenging cognitive activity; C3 = moderate physical activity + easy cognitive activity; C4 = moderate physical activity + challenging cognitive activity.

Participants walk on a treadmill at an individualized light physical activity intensity (30-39% of heart rate reserve) while performing cognitive tasks individually classified as easy.
Participants walk on a treadmill at an individualized light physical activity intensity (30-39% of heart rate reserve) while performing cognitive tasks individually classified as challenging.
Participants walk on a treadmill at an individualized moderate physical activity intensity (40-59% of heart rate reserve) while performing cognitive tasks individually classified as easy.
Participants walk on a treadmill at an individualized moderate physical activity intensity (40-59% of heart rate reserve) while performing cognitive tasks individually classified as challenging.
Экспериментальный: Sequence 4

Participants complete the four experimental conditions in the following order across four separate laboratory visits: C4, C3, C2, and C1.

C1 = light physical activity + easy cognitive activity; C2 = light physical activity + challenging cognitive activity; C3 = moderate physical activity + easy cognitive activity; C4 = moderate physical activity + challenging cognitive activity.

Participants walk on a treadmill at an individualized light physical activity intensity (30-39% of heart rate reserve) while performing cognitive tasks individually classified as easy.
Participants walk on a treadmill at an individualized light physical activity intensity (30-39% of heart rate reserve) while performing cognitive tasks individually classified as challenging.
Participants walk on a treadmill at an individualized moderate physical activity intensity (40-59% of heart rate reserve) while performing cognitive tasks individually classified as easy.
Participants walk on a treadmill at an individualized moderate physical activity intensity (40-59% of heart rate reserve) while performing cognitive tasks individually classified as challenging.

Что измеряет исследование?

Первичные показатели результатов

Мера результата
Мера Описание
Временное ограничение
Change in Multitasking Test (MTT) performance from pre- to post-condition
Временное ограничение: Immediately before and 10 minutes after each experimental condition
Change in accuracy and response latency from pre- to post-condition on the Multitasking Test (MTT), assessing executive functioning, cognitive flexibility, and processing speed.
Immediately before and 10 minutes after each experimental condition
Change in Delayed Matching to Sample (DMS) performance from pre- to post-condition
Временное ограничение: Immediately before and 10 minutes after each experimental condition
Change in accuracy and response latency from pre- to post-condition on the Delayed Matching to Sample (DMS), assessing short-term visual recognition memory.
Immediately before and 10 minutes after each experimental condition
Change in Match to Sample Visual Search (MTS) performance from pre- to post-condition
Временное ограничение: Immediately before and 10 minutes after each experimental condition
Change in accuracy and response latency from pre- to post-condition on the Match to Sample Visual Search (MTS), assessing visual attention and psychomotor speed.
Immediately before and 10 minutes after each experimental condition

Вторичные показатели результатов

Мера результата
Мера Описание
Временное ограничение
General impression of each experimental condition
Временное ограничение: Immediately after each experimental condition, during the 10-minute post-condition interval.
Self-reported general impression of each experimental condition, rated on a 0-10 scale, where 0 indicates "not good at all" and 10 indicates "very good."
Immediately after each experimental condition, during the 10-minute post-condition interval.
Perceived feasibility of each experimental condition
Временное ограничение: Immediately after each experimental condition, during the 10-minute post-condition interval.
Self-reported feasibility of each experimental condition, rated on a 0-10 scale in response to the statement "I feel capable of doing this session," where higher scores indicate greater perceived feasibility.
Immediately after each experimental condition, during the 10-minute post-condition interval.
Enjoyment of each experimental condition
Временное ограничение: Immediately after each experimental condition, during the 10-minute post-condition interval.
Self-reported enjoyment of each experimental condition, rated on a 0-10 scale in response to the statement "I enjoyed this session," where higher scores indicate greater enjoyment.
Immediately after each experimental condition, during the 10-minute post-condition interval.

Соавторы и исследователи

Здесь вы найдете людей и организации, участвующие в этом исследовании.

Спонсор

Следователи

  • Главный следователь: Greet Cardon, Prof. Dr., University Ghent

Даты записи исследования

Эти даты отслеживают ход отправки отчетов об исследованиях и сводных результатов на сайт ClinicalTrials.gov. Записи исследований и сообщаемые результаты проверяются Национальной медицинской библиотекой (NLM), чтобы убедиться, что они соответствуют определенным стандартам контроля качества, прежде чем публиковать их на общедоступном веб-сайте.

Изучение основных дат

Начало исследования (Действительный)

2 февраля 2026 г.

Первичное завершение (Действительный)

13 мая 2026 г.

Завершение исследования (Действительный)

13 мая 2026 г.

Даты регистрации исследования

Первый отправленный

1 июня 2026 г.

Впервые представлено, что соответствует критериям контроля качества

1 июня 2026 г.

Первый опубликованный (Действительный)

5 июня 2026 г.

Обновления учебных записей

Последнее опубликованное обновление (Действительный)

5 июня 2026 г.

Последнее отправленное обновление, отвечающее критериям контроля качества

1 июня 2026 г.

Последняя проверка

1 июня 2026 г.

Дополнительная информация

Термины, связанные с этим исследованием

Дополнительные соответствующие термины MeSH

Другие идентификационные номера исследования

  • CONSCIOUS - ONZ-2025-0282

Планирование данных отдельных участников (IPD)

Планируете делиться данными об отдельных участниках (IPD)?

ДА

Описание плана IPD

De-identified individual participant data collected during the study will be made available to other researchers. The exact dataset(s), supporting documents, timing, and access procedures will be specified after completion of the main analyses and publication of the primary study results.

Сроки обмена IPD

De-identified individual participant data will become available after publication of the primary study results and are expected to remain available indefinitely in an institutional or open research repository.

Совместное использование IPD Поддерживающий тип информации

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • МКФ

Информация о лекарствах и устройствах, исследовательские документы

Изучает лекарственный продукт, регулируемый FDA США.

Нет

Изучает продукт устройства, регулируемый Управлением по санитарному надзору за качеством пищевых продуктов и медикаментов США.

Нет

Эта информация была получена непосредственно с веб-сайта clinicaltrials.gov без каких-либо изменений. Если у вас есть запросы на изменение, удаление или обновление сведений об исследовании, обращайтесь по адресу register@clinicaltrials.gov. Как только изменение будет реализовано на clinicaltrials.gov, оно будет автоматически обновлено и на нашем веб-сайте. .

Подписаться