このページは自動翻訳されたものであり、翻訳の正確性は保証されていません。を参照してください。 英語版 ソーステキスト用。

Mesenteric Vein Access for OPVT-Related Recurrent Variceal Bleeding: An Ambispective Cohort

2026年6月18日 更新者:Tie Jun、Air Force Military Medical University, China

Percutaneous Mesenteric Vein Access for Interventional Management of Recurrent Variceal Bleeding in Occlusive Portal Vein Thrombosis: An Ambispective Cohort Study

Occlusive portal vein thrombosis (OPVT) is defined as complete thrombosis of the main portal vein trunk, resulting in total interruption of portal venous inflow and representing the most severe form of portal vein thrombosis. A small proportion of patients may remain asymptomatic for prolonged periods because of sufficient collateral compensation; however, most develop complications of portal hypertension when collateral flow is inadequate, including gastroesophageal variceal bleeding and ascites. Among these, gastroesophageal variceal bleeding is the most life-threatening, and its management is more challenging-with a higher risk of rebleeding-than in patients without portal vein thrombosis.

Occlusive portal vein thrombosis (OPVT) is defined as complete thrombosis of the main portal vein trunk, resulting in total interruption of portal venous inflow and representing the most severe form of portal vein thrombosis. A small proportion of patients may remain asymptomatic for prolonged periods because of sufficient collateral compensation; however, most develop complications of portal hypertension when collateral flow is inadequate, including gastroesophageal variceal bleeding and ascites. Among these, gastroesophageal variceal bleeding is the most life-threatening, and its management is more challenging-with a higher risk of rebleeding-than in patients without portal vein thrombosis.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is an effective minimally invasive therapy for portal hypertension-related complications; however, in OPVT, technical feasibility largely depends on successful portal vein recanalization. To improve TIPS success in OPVT, our group-together with domestic and international investigators-has explored several adjunctive access routes and technical modifications, including percutaneous transhepatic or transsplenic portal vein recanalization TIPS (PVR-TIPS); transjugular portal cavernous collateral-caval shunt (TCCS); transjugular mesenteric-caval shunt (TMCS); transjugular spleno-caval shunt (TSCS); and surgically assisted hybrid procedures. Although these strategies have improved technical success rates to some extent, their applicability remains limited. In patients with extensive thrombosis involving intrahepatic portal vein branches, in those without a feasible splenic venous puncture route, or in patients with prior splenectomy, percutaneous transhepatic and transsplenic approaches are often not possible. Moreover, in patients with poor hepatic reserve and/or ascites, laparotomy-assisted hybrid procedures substantially increase invasiveness and perioperative risk.

In this context, the present project aims to systematically investigate and evaluate ultrasound-guided percutaneous mesenteric vein (MV) puncture as an adjunctive access strategy for interventional treatment of OPVT. This technique uses ultrasound-guided percutaneous puncture of the MV to establish antegrade portal venous access, thereby facilitating subsequent portal vein recanalization and/or shunt creation.

調査の概要

詳細な説明

Occlusive portal vein thrombosis (OPVT) is defined as complete thrombosis of the main portal vein trunk, resulting in interruption of portal venous inflow and representing a severe form of portal vein thrombosis. Although some patients may remain asymptomatic for prolonged periods because of collateral compensation, many develop clinically significant portal hypertension when collateral flow is inadequate-most notably gastroesophageal variceal bleeding and ascites. Gastroesophageal variceal bleeding is a major cause of morbidity and mortality and is often more difficult to control, with a higher risk of rebleeding, than variceal bleeding in patients without portal vein thrombosis.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is an established minimally invasive therapy for complications of portal hypertension. In OPVT, however, technical feasibility often hinges on successful portal vein recanalization. Multiple adjunctive techniques have been developed to improve feasibility in selected patients, including percutaneous transhepatic or transsplenic portal vein recanalization TIPS (PVR-TIPS), portal cavernous collateral-caval shunt procedures, mesenteric-caval or spleno-caval shunts, and surgically assisted hybrid approaches. Despite these advances, a meaningful subset of patients remain poor candidates because of extensive intrahepatic portal branch thrombosis, absence of a feasible splenic puncture route, prior splenectomy, or prohibitive risk for laparotomy-assisted hybrid procedures (e.g., in patients with limited hepatic reserve and/or ascites).

This study will evaluate ultrasound-guided percutaneous mesenteric vein (MV) puncture as an adjunctive access strategy to enable interventional decompression of the portal venous system in OPVT. Using real-time ultrasound, percutaneous MV access is obtained to establish an antegrade working channel. This channel is then used to facilitate portal vein recanalization and/or shunt creation when standard access routes are not feasible or have failed.

Study design and setting: Ambispective, exploratory, single-center clinical study.

Population: Patients with imaging-confirmed OPVT and recurrent gastroesophageal variceal bleeding, particularly those in whom conventional interventional access routes (e.g., transjugular-only approaches, percutaneous transhepatic access, or transsplenic access) are limited, infeasible, or have been unsuccessful.

Intervention (Stepwise Intra-procedural Strategy)

After establishing MV access under ultrasound guidance, operators will follow a predefined escalation algorithm based on intra-procedural anatomy and technical feasibility:

MV-assisted PVR-TIPS (preferred): Antegrade catheter/guidewire manipulation via MV access to attempt recanalization of the occluded main portal vein trunk. A catheter or balloon may be positioned as a target to facilitate completion of a standard TIPS via the transjugular route.

MV-assisted collateral-to-caval shunt (secondary): If main portal vein recanalization is not achievable, selective catheterization of an eligible collateral (e.g., diameter ≥6 mm) may be performed, with target-marker assistance to create a collateral-to-inferior vena cava shunt via the transjugular route.

Extrahepatic MV-to-caval shunt (backup): If neither main portal vein recanalization nor a suitable collateral is available, an extrahepatic MV-to-inferior vena cava shunt tract may be created through the established MV access as an alternative portal decompression strategy.

Outcomes (Overview) The study will assess: (1) technical feasibility (e.g., successful MV access; successful creation of a functioning shunt via any pathway), (2) procedural safety (peri-procedural and follow-up complications), and (3) clinical effectiveness, including control of portal hypertension-related bleeding (e.g., rebleeding during follow-up) and other manifestations of portal hypertension, as applicable.

研究の種類

介入

入学 (推定)

15

段階

  • 適用できない

連絡先と場所

このセクションには、調査を実施する担当者の連絡先の詳細と、この調査が実施されている場所に関する情報が記載されています。

研究連絡先

研究場所

    • Shaanxi
      • Xi'an、Shaanxi、中国、710032
        • Air Force Medical University
        • コンタクト:

参加基準

研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。

適格基準

就学可能な年齢

  • 大人
  • 高齢者

健康ボランティアの受け入れ

いいえ

説明

Inclusion Criteria

  1. Confirmed OPVT, as demonstrated by contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
  2. History of at least two episodes of esophagogastric variceal bleeding.
  3. Ineligible for, or have previously failed, conventional transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) or percutaneous transhepatic/transsplenic access approaches, including but not limited to extensive thrombosis of intrahepatic portal vein branches, prior splenectomy, or previous unsuccessful attempts.
  4. Child-Pugh score ≤12, with anticipated tolerance of the interventional procedure.

Exclusion Criteria

  1. Thrombosis or severe stenosis of the superior mesenteric vein (SMV), precluding its use as a percutaneous access route.
  2. Severe cardiac, pulmonary, or renal insufficiency that precludes tolerance of the procedure.
  3. Uncorrectable coagulopathy.
  4. Life expectancy <3 months, or inability to comply with scheduled follow-up visits.

研究計画

このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。

研究はどのように設計されていますか?

デザインの詳細

  • 主な目的:処理
  • 割り当て:なし
  • 介入モデル:単一グループの割り当て
  • マスキング:なし(オープンラベル)

武器と介入

参加者グループ / アーム
介入・治療
実験的:Percutaneous mesenteric vein-assisted interventional treatment
Eligible patients include those with imaging-confirmed OPVT and recurrent gastroesophageal variceal bleeding, particularly when conventional interventional access routes (e.g., transjugular-only approaches, percutaneous transhepatic access, or transsplenic access) are limited, infeasible, or have failed. Under real-time ultrasound guidance, percutaneous mesenteric vein (MV) access is obtained to establish an antegrade working channel, which is then used to facilitate portal vein recanalization and/or shunt creation.

Intervention (stepwise intra-procedural strategy). After MV access is established under ultrasound guidance, operators will follow a predefined escalation algorithm based on anatomy and feasibility:

MV-assisted PVR-TIPS (preferred): Using antegrade catheter/guidewire manipulation via MV access, attempt recanalization of the occluded main portal vein trunk. A catheter or balloon may be positioned as a target to complete standard TIPS via the transjugular route.

MV-assisted collateral-to-caval shunt (secondary): If main portal vein recanalization is not achievable, catheterize an eligible collateral (e.g., ≥6 mm) and, with target-marker assistance, create a collateral-to-inferior vena cava shunt via the transjugular route.

Extrahepatic MV-to-caval shunt (backup): If neither main portal vein recanalization nor a suitable collateral is available, create an extrahepatic MV-to-inferior vena cava shunt tract through MV access as an alternative portal decompression strategy.

この研究は何を測定していますか?

主要な結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Technical success of the index procedure (overall)
時間枠:During the procedure (index hospitalization)
Successful creation of a functioning portosystemic shunt using the study strategy (MV-assisted PVR-TIPS, MV-assisted collateral-to-caval shunt, or extrahepatic MV-to-caval shunt), confirmed by completion angiography demonstrating shunt patency/flow and effective portal decompression as assessed intra-procedurally per operator judgment and standard imaging criteria.
During the procedure (index hospitalization)
Safety-major procedure-related adverse events
時間枠:From procedure through 30 days post-procedure.
Incidence of major adverse events related to MV puncture and/or shunt creation (e.g., clinically significant intraperitoneal hemorrhage, bowel/mesenteric injury, sepsis, procedure-related death, or other events meeting predefined serious adverse event criteria).
From procedure through 30 days post-procedure.

二次結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Variceal rebleeding
時間枠:6 months post-procedure.
Incidence of recurrent gastroesophageal variceal bleeding after the index procedure, defined clinically (e.g., hematemesis/melena with endoscopic and/or imaging confirmation when available) and requiring hospital presentation, transfusion, endoscopic therapy, radiologic intervention, or resulting in death.
6 months post-procedure.
Shunt patency (primary patency)
時間枠:6 months post-procedure.
Proportion of patients with a patent shunt without need for re-intervention, assessed by Doppler ultrasound and/or contrast-enhanced CT/MR venography per the follow-up schedule.
6 months post-procedure.
Hepatic encephalopathy (new onset or worsening)
時間枠:From procedure through 6 months post-procedure.
Incidence and severity of hepatic encephalopathy after the procedure, graded using a standardized clinical scale per institutional practice (e.g., West Haven criteria) and requiring initiation/escalation of therapy and/or hospitalization.
From procedure through 6 months post-procedure.
Overall survival
時間枠:6 months post-procedure
All-cause mortality following the index procedure.
6 months post-procedure

協力者と研究者

ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。

研究記録日

これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。

主要日程の研究

研究開始 (推定)

2026年7月1日

一次修了 (推定)

2028年6月30日

研究の完了 (推定)

2028年6月30日

試験登録日

最初に提出

2026年6月18日

QC基準を満たした最初の提出物

2026年6月18日

最初の投稿 (実際)

2026年6月24日

学習記録の更新

投稿された最後の更新 (実際)

2026年6月24日

QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました

2026年6月18日

最終確認日

2026年6月1日

詳しくは

本研究に関する用語

個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画

個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?

はい

医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書

米国FDA規制医薬品の研究

いいえ

米国FDA規制機器製品の研究

いいえ

この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。

購読する