Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Mesenteric Vein Access for OPVT-Related Recurrent Variceal Bleeding: An Ambispective Cohort

18 juin 2026 mis à jour par: Tie Jun, Air Force Military Medical University, China

Percutaneous Mesenteric Vein Access for Interventional Management of Recurrent Variceal Bleeding in Occlusive Portal Vein Thrombosis: An Ambispective Cohort Study

Occlusive portal vein thrombosis (OPVT) is defined as complete thrombosis of the main portal vein trunk, resulting in total interruption of portal venous inflow and representing the most severe form of portal vein thrombosis. A small proportion of patients may remain asymptomatic for prolonged periods because of sufficient collateral compensation; however, most develop complications of portal hypertension when collateral flow is inadequate, including gastroesophageal variceal bleeding and ascites. Among these, gastroesophageal variceal bleeding is the most life-threatening, and its management is more challenging-with a higher risk of rebleeding-than in patients without portal vein thrombosis.

Occlusive portal vein thrombosis (OPVT) is defined as complete thrombosis of the main portal vein trunk, resulting in total interruption of portal venous inflow and representing the most severe form of portal vein thrombosis. A small proportion of patients may remain asymptomatic for prolonged periods because of sufficient collateral compensation; however, most develop complications of portal hypertension when collateral flow is inadequate, including gastroesophageal variceal bleeding and ascites. Among these, gastroesophageal variceal bleeding is the most life-threatening, and its management is more challenging-with a higher risk of rebleeding-than in patients without portal vein thrombosis.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is an effective minimally invasive therapy for portal hypertension-related complications; however, in OPVT, technical feasibility largely depends on successful portal vein recanalization. To improve TIPS success in OPVT, our group-together with domestic and international investigators-has explored several adjunctive access routes and technical modifications, including percutaneous transhepatic or transsplenic portal vein recanalization TIPS (PVR-TIPS); transjugular portal cavernous collateral-caval shunt (TCCS); transjugular mesenteric-caval shunt (TMCS); transjugular spleno-caval shunt (TSCS); and surgically assisted hybrid procedures. Although these strategies have improved technical success rates to some extent, their applicability remains limited. In patients with extensive thrombosis involving intrahepatic portal vein branches, in those without a feasible splenic venous puncture route, or in patients with prior splenectomy, percutaneous transhepatic and transsplenic approaches are often not possible. Moreover, in patients with poor hepatic reserve and/or ascites, laparotomy-assisted hybrid procedures substantially increase invasiveness and perioperative risk.

In this context, the present project aims to systematically investigate and evaluate ultrasound-guided percutaneous mesenteric vein (MV) puncture as an adjunctive access strategy for interventional treatment of OPVT. This technique uses ultrasound-guided percutaneous puncture of the MV to establish antegrade portal venous access, thereby facilitating subsequent portal vein recanalization and/or shunt creation.

Aperçu de l'étude

Description détaillée

Occlusive portal vein thrombosis (OPVT) is defined as complete thrombosis of the main portal vein trunk, resulting in interruption of portal venous inflow and representing a severe form of portal vein thrombosis. Although some patients may remain asymptomatic for prolonged periods because of collateral compensation, many develop clinically significant portal hypertension when collateral flow is inadequate-most notably gastroesophageal variceal bleeding and ascites. Gastroesophageal variceal bleeding is a major cause of morbidity and mortality and is often more difficult to control, with a higher risk of rebleeding, than variceal bleeding in patients without portal vein thrombosis.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is an established minimally invasive therapy for complications of portal hypertension. In OPVT, however, technical feasibility often hinges on successful portal vein recanalization. Multiple adjunctive techniques have been developed to improve feasibility in selected patients, including percutaneous transhepatic or transsplenic portal vein recanalization TIPS (PVR-TIPS), portal cavernous collateral-caval shunt procedures, mesenteric-caval or spleno-caval shunts, and surgically assisted hybrid approaches. Despite these advances, a meaningful subset of patients remain poor candidates because of extensive intrahepatic portal branch thrombosis, absence of a feasible splenic puncture route, prior splenectomy, or prohibitive risk for laparotomy-assisted hybrid procedures (e.g., in patients with limited hepatic reserve and/or ascites).

This study will evaluate ultrasound-guided percutaneous mesenteric vein (MV) puncture as an adjunctive access strategy to enable interventional decompression of the portal venous system in OPVT. Using real-time ultrasound, percutaneous MV access is obtained to establish an antegrade working channel. This channel is then used to facilitate portal vein recanalization and/or shunt creation when standard access routes are not feasible or have failed.

Study design and setting: Ambispective, exploratory, single-center clinical study.

Population: Patients with imaging-confirmed OPVT and recurrent gastroesophageal variceal bleeding, particularly those in whom conventional interventional access routes (e.g., transjugular-only approaches, percutaneous transhepatic access, or transsplenic access) are limited, infeasible, or have been unsuccessful.

Intervention (Stepwise Intra-procedural Strategy)

After establishing MV access under ultrasound guidance, operators will follow a predefined escalation algorithm based on intra-procedural anatomy and technical feasibility:

MV-assisted PVR-TIPS (preferred): Antegrade catheter/guidewire manipulation via MV access to attempt recanalization of the occluded main portal vein trunk. A catheter or balloon may be positioned as a target to facilitate completion of a standard TIPS via the transjugular route.

MV-assisted collateral-to-caval shunt (secondary): If main portal vein recanalization is not achievable, selective catheterization of an eligible collateral (e.g., diameter ≥6 mm) may be performed, with target-marker assistance to create a collateral-to-inferior vena cava shunt via the transjugular route.

Extrahepatic MV-to-caval shunt (backup): If neither main portal vein recanalization nor a suitable collateral is available, an extrahepatic MV-to-inferior vena cava shunt tract may be created through the established MV access as an alternative portal decompression strategy.

Outcomes (Overview) The study will assess: (1) technical feasibility (e.g., successful MV access; successful creation of a functioning shunt via any pathway), (2) procedural safety (peri-procedural and follow-up complications), and (3) clinical effectiveness, including control of portal hypertension-related bleeding (e.g., rebleeding during follow-up) and other manifestations of portal hypertension, as applicable.

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Estimé)

15

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Coordonnées de l'étude

Lieux d'étude

    • Shaanxi
      • Xi'an, Shaanxi, Chine, 710032
        • Air Force Medical University
        • Contact:

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

  • Adulte
  • Adulte plus âgé

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

La description

Inclusion Criteria

  1. Confirmed OPVT, as demonstrated by contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
  2. History of at least two episodes of esophagogastric variceal bleeding.
  3. Ineligible for, or have previously failed, conventional transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) or percutaneous transhepatic/transsplenic access approaches, including but not limited to extensive thrombosis of intrahepatic portal vein branches, prior splenectomy, or previous unsuccessful attempts.
  4. Child-Pugh score ≤12, with anticipated tolerance of the interventional procedure.

Exclusion Criteria

  1. Thrombosis or severe stenosis of the superior mesenteric vein (SMV), precluding its use as a percutaneous access route.
  2. Severe cardiac, pulmonary, or renal insufficiency that precludes tolerance of the procedure.
  3. Uncorrectable coagulopathy.
  4. Life expectancy <3 months, or inability to comply with scheduled follow-up visits.

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Traitement
  • Répartition: N / A
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation à un seul groupe
  • Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Expérimental: Percutaneous mesenteric vein-assisted interventional treatment
Eligible patients include those with imaging-confirmed OPVT and recurrent gastroesophageal variceal bleeding, particularly when conventional interventional access routes (e.g., transjugular-only approaches, percutaneous transhepatic access, or transsplenic access) are limited, infeasible, or have failed. Under real-time ultrasound guidance, percutaneous mesenteric vein (MV) access is obtained to establish an antegrade working channel, which is then used to facilitate portal vein recanalization and/or shunt creation.

Intervention (stepwise intra-procedural strategy). After MV access is established under ultrasound guidance, operators will follow a predefined escalation algorithm based on anatomy and feasibility:

MV-assisted PVR-TIPS (preferred): Using antegrade catheter/guidewire manipulation via MV access, attempt recanalization of the occluded main portal vein trunk. A catheter or balloon may be positioned as a target to complete standard TIPS via the transjugular route.

MV-assisted collateral-to-caval shunt (secondary): If main portal vein recanalization is not achievable, catheterize an eligible collateral (e.g., ≥6 mm) and, with target-marker assistance, create a collateral-to-inferior vena cava shunt via the transjugular route.

Extrahepatic MV-to-caval shunt (backup): If neither main portal vein recanalization nor a suitable collateral is available, create an extrahepatic MV-to-inferior vena cava shunt tract through MV access as an alternative portal decompression strategy.

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Technical success of the index procedure (overall)
Délai: During the procedure (index hospitalization)
Successful creation of a functioning portosystemic shunt using the study strategy (MV-assisted PVR-TIPS, MV-assisted collateral-to-caval shunt, or extrahepatic MV-to-caval shunt), confirmed by completion angiography demonstrating shunt patency/flow and effective portal decompression as assessed intra-procedurally per operator judgment and standard imaging criteria.
During the procedure (index hospitalization)
Safety-major procedure-related adverse events
Délai: From procedure through 30 days post-procedure.
Incidence of major adverse events related to MV puncture and/or shunt creation (e.g., clinically significant intraperitoneal hemorrhage, bowel/mesenteric injury, sepsis, procedure-related death, or other events meeting predefined serious adverse event criteria).
From procedure through 30 days post-procedure.

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Variceal rebleeding
Délai: 6 months post-procedure.
Incidence of recurrent gastroesophageal variceal bleeding after the index procedure, defined clinically (e.g., hematemesis/melena with endoscopic and/or imaging confirmation when available) and requiring hospital presentation, transfusion, endoscopic therapy, radiologic intervention, or resulting in death.
6 months post-procedure.
Shunt patency (primary patency)
Délai: 6 months post-procedure.
Proportion of patients with a patent shunt without need for re-intervention, assessed by Doppler ultrasound and/or contrast-enhanced CT/MR venography per the follow-up schedule.
6 months post-procedure.
Hepatic encephalopathy (new onset or worsening)
Délai: From procedure through 6 months post-procedure.
Incidence and severity of hepatic encephalopathy after the procedure, graded using a standardized clinical scale per institutional practice (e.g., West Haven criteria) and requiring initiation/escalation of therapy and/or hospitalization.
From procedure through 6 months post-procedure.
Overall survival
Délai: 6 months post-procedure
All-cause mortality following the index procedure.
6 months post-procedure

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Estimé)

1 juillet 2026

Achèvement primaire (Estimé)

30 juin 2028

Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)

30 juin 2028

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

18 juin 2026

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

18 juin 2026

Première publication (Réel)

24 juin 2026

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

24 juin 2026

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

18 juin 2026

Dernière vérification

1 juin 2026

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

OUI

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner