このページは自動翻訳されたものであり、翻訳の正確性は保証されていません。を参照してください。 英語版 ソーステキスト用。

Efficacy of Attention Bias Modification vs. Placebo for Social Anxiety Disorder

2026年6月18日 更新者:Yair Bar-Haim、Tel Aviv University

Placebo Effects in Dot-Probe Attention Bias Modification (ABM) Among Adults With Social Anxiety Disorder.

This study examines whether a computerized attention-training intervention called attention bias modification (ABM) can reduce symptoms of social anxiety disorder (SAD) in adults, and whether symptom improvement is specifically related to changes in attentional processing or to nonspecific factors such as expectancy and placebo effects.

調査の概要

詳細な説明

This study examines whether a computerized attention-training intervention called attention bias modification (ABM) can reduce symptoms of social anxiety disorder (SAD) in adults, and whether symptom improvement is specifically related to changes in attentional processing or to nonspecific factors such as expectancy and placebo effects.

Social Anxiety Disorder is characterized by persistent fear of social situations and negative evaluation by others. Previous research suggests that individuals with SAD tend to direct their attention toward socially threatening information, such as angry facial expressions. ABM was developed to reduce these attentional biases by training individuals to shift attention away from threat-related stimuli. However, findings regarding the clinical efficacy of ABM have been mixed, and some studies suggest that symptom improvement may also result from placebo-related factors, including treatment expectancy and engagement with the intervention.

In this randomized controlled trial, 90 adults diagnosed with Social Anxiety Disorder will be assigned to one of three study conditions: (1) active dot-probe ABM training, (2) placebo computerized training, or (3) a wait-list control group. Participants in the active and placebo training groups will complete eight computerized training sessions over four weeks.

The study will assess changes in social anxiety symptoms before and after the intervention using clinical interviews, self-report questionnaires, and computerized attention tasks. In addition, the study will examine attention bias and attention bias variability (ABV), using both reaction-time-based and eye-tracking-based measures, to better understand changes in attentional processing over time. Treatment expectancy and perceived credibility of the intervention will also be evaluated.

The hypothesis is that participants receiving active ABM training and placebo training will show greater reductions in social anxiety symptoms compared to the wait-list control group, and that participants in the active condition will show greater reduction in symptoms than the placebo condition. The study further hypothesizes that only the active ABM condition will produce significant changes in attention bias and attentional bias variability. Overall, the study aims to clarify the specific and nonspecific mechanisms underlying symptom improvement following Attention Bias Modification interventions for Social Anxiety Disorder.

研究の種類

介入

入学 (推定)

90

段階

  • 適用できない

連絡先と場所

このセクションには、調査を実施する担当者の連絡先の詳細と、この調査が実施されている場所に関する情報が記載されています。

研究連絡先

研究連絡先のバックアップ

研究場所

参加基準

研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。

適格基準

就学可能な年齢

  • 大人
  • 高齢者

健康ボランティアの受け入れ

いいえ

説明

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults aged 18-65 years
  • Primary diagnosis of generalized Social Anxiety Disorder based on clinical evaluation, the MINI International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI), and a Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS) score greater than 50
  • Normal or corrected-to-normal vision without color blindness
  • Sufficient Hebrew proficiency to complete clinical interviews, self-report questionnaires, and computerized cognitive tasks

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous participation in attention bias modification training using a dot-probe task
  • Previous participation in eye-tracking-based attention training
  • Current diagnosis of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder
  • Current or past diagnosis of psychotic disorder or bipolar disorder
  • Neurological disorder (e.g., epilepsy or traumatic brain injury)
  • Severe suicidal ideation
  • Current substance or alcohol use disorder
  • Concurrent pharmacological or psychosocial treatment, unless medication has been stable for at least 45 days
  • Pregnancy
  • Uncorrected visual impairment or use of multifocal glasses

研究計画

このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。

研究はどのように設計されていますか?

デザインの詳細

  • 主な目的:処理
  • 割り当て:ランダム化
  • 介入モデル:並列代入
  • マスキング:ダブル

武器と介入

参加者グループ / アーム
介入・治療
アクティブコンパレータ:Active ABM Training
Mechanized Dot-Probe Attention Bias Modification (ABM) training attention away from threat faces. Participants identify the direction of an arrowehead presented at the location of neutral faces.
Participants complete a computerized dot-probe attention training task designed to train attention away from threat-related stimuli. During each trial, angry and neutral facial expressions are presented simultaneously, followed by a probe that consistently appears in the location of the neutral face. Participants complete eight training sessions over four weeks.
他の名前:
  • ABM
プラセボコンパレーター:Placebo Training
Mechanized Intervention: Placebo Training, presenting a single, centered, non-face oval shape in each trial. Participants identify the direction of an arrowehead centrally presented.
Participants complete a computerized task matched to the active training condition in duration, structure, and task demands, but without exposure to emotional stimuli or attentional training contingencies. The task is designed to control for nonspecific factors such as expectancy and engagement. Participants complete eight sessions over four weeks.
介入なし:Wait-List Control
No Intervention / Wait-List, assessments at the same intervals as the active and placebo conditions without intervention in between.

この研究は何を測定していますか?

主要な結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Change in social anxiety symptoms
時間枠:a) Baseline one-week before treatment begins; b) an average of 2 weeks following treatment completion. Total time frame (baseline-post) an average of 6 weeks.
Change in social anxiety symptom severity from baseline to post-intervention as measured by the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS). Min-Max values 0-80, higher scores mean worse outcome.
a) Baseline one-week before treatment begins; b) an average of 2 weeks following treatment completion. Total time frame (baseline-post) an average of 6 weeks.

二次結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Change in reaction-time-based attention bias measured in miliseconds
時間枠:a) Baseline one-week before treatment begins; b) an average of 2 weeks following treatment completion. Total time frame (baseline-post) an average of 6 weeks.
Change in attention bias derived from reaction-time performance on the dot-probe task.
a) Baseline one-week before treatment begins; b) an average of 2 weeks following treatment completion. Total time frame (baseline-post) an average of 6 weeks.
Change in reaction-time-based attention bias variability
時間枠:a) Baseline one-week before treatment begins; b) an average of 2 weeks following treatment completion. Total time frame (baseline-post) an average of 6 weeks.
Change in attention bias variability derived from reaction-time performance on the dot-probe task.
a) Baseline one-week before treatment begins; b) an average of 2 weeks following treatment completion. Total time frame (baseline-post) an average of 6 weeks.
Change in eye-tracking-based attention bias
時間枠:a) Baseline one-week before treatment begins; b) an average of 2 weeks following treatment completion. Total time frame (baseline-post) an average of 6 weeks.
Change in attention bias measured using eye-tracking during a free-viewing task with threat-related and neutral facial stimuli.
a) Baseline one-week before treatment begins; b) an average of 2 weeks following treatment completion. Total time frame (baseline-post) an average of 6 weeks.
Change in eye-tracking-based attention bias variability
時間枠:a) Baseline one-week before treatment begins; b) an average of 2 weeks following treatment completion. Total time frame (baseline-post) an average of 6 weeks.
Change in attention bias variability measured using eye-tracking during a free-viewing task with threat-related and neutral facial stimuli.
a) Baseline one-week before treatment begins; b) an average of 2 weeks following treatment completion. Total time frame (baseline-post) an average of 6 weeks.
Treatment Expectancy and Credibility
時間枠:Baseline one-week before treatment begins
Participant-rated treatment expectancy and perceived credibility assessed using the Credibility/Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ). 0-9 scale and 0% - 100%. Higher scores indicate greater treatment credibility and greater expectation of improvement.
Baseline one-week before treatment begins
Change in depressive symptoms
時間枠:a) Baseline one-week before treatment begins; b) an average of 2 weeks following treatment completion. Total time frame (baseline-post) an average of 6 weeks.
Change in depressive symptom severity measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). Scale range 0-20, higher scores mean worse outcome.
a) Baseline one-week before treatment begins; b) an average of 2 weeks following treatment completion. Total time frame (baseline-post) an average of 6 weeks.
Change in Generalized Anxiety Symptoms
時間枠:a) Baseline one-week before treatment begins; b) an average of 2 weeks following treatment completion. Total time frame (baseline-post) an average of 6 weeks.
Change in generalized anxiety symptoms measured using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 scale (GAD-7). Scores range 0-21, higher scores mean worse outcome.
a) Baseline one-week before treatment begins; b) an average of 2 weeks following treatment completion. Total time frame (baseline-post) an average of 6 weeks.
Self report change in social anxiety symptoms
時間枠:a) Baseline one-week before treatment begins; b) an average of 2 weeks following treatment completion. Total time frame (baseline-post) an average of 6 weeks.
Change insocial anxiety symptom severity measured using the Social Phobia Inventory (SPIN). Scores range 0-68, higher scores mean worse outcome.
a) Baseline one-week before treatment begins; b) an average of 2 weeks following treatment completion. Total time frame (baseline-post) an average of 6 weeks.

協力者と研究者

ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。

スポンサー

捜査官

  • 主任研究者:Yair Bar-Haim, PhD、Tel Aviv University

研究記録日

これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。

主要日程の研究

研究開始 (実際)

2026年6月15日

一次修了 (推定)

2026年10月30日

研究の完了 (推定)

2027年6月30日

試験登録日

最初に提出

2026年6月15日

QC基準を満たした最初の提出物

2026年6月18日

最初の投稿 (実際)

2026年6月24日

学習記録の更新

投稿された最後の更新 (実際)

2026年6月24日

QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました

2026年6月18日

最終確認日

2026年6月1日

詳しくは

本研究に関する用語

その他の研究ID番号

  • ABM_P

個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画

個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?

いいえ

医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書

米国FDA規制医薬品の研究

いいえ

米国FDA規制機器製品の研究

いいえ

この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。

購読する