Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

Efficacy of Attention Bias Modification vs. Placebo for Social Anxiety Disorder

18. Juni 2026 aktualisiert von: Yair Bar-Haim, Tel Aviv University

Placebo Effects in Dot-Probe Attention Bias Modification (ABM) Among Adults With Social Anxiety Disorder.

This study examines whether a computerized attention-training intervention called attention bias modification (ABM) can reduce symptoms of social anxiety disorder (SAD) in adults, and whether symptom improvement is specifically related to changes in attentional processing or to nonspecific factors such as expectancy and placebo effects.

Studienübersicht

Detaillierte Beschreibung

This study examines whether a computerized attention-training intervention called attention bias modification (ABM) can reduce symptoms of social anxiety disorder (SAD) in adults, and whether symptom improvement is specifically related to changes in attentional processing or to nonspecific factors such as expectancy and placebo effects.

Social Anxiety Disorder is characterized by persistent fear of social situations and negative evaluation by others. Previous research suggests that individuals with SAD tend to direct their attention toward socially threatening information, such as angry facial expressions. ABM was developed to reduce these attentional biases by training individuals to shift attention away from threat-related stimuli. However, findings regarding the clinical efficacy of ABM have been mixed, and some studies suggest that symptom improvement may also result from placebo-related factors, including treatment expectancy and engagement with the intervention.

In this randomized controlled trial, 90 adults diagnosed with Social Anxiety Disorder will be assigned to one of three study conditions: (1) active dot-probe ABM training, (2) placebo computerized training, or (3) a wait-list control group. Participants in the active and placebo training groups will complete eight computerized training sessions over four weeks.

The study will assess changes in social anxiety symptoms before and after the intervention using clinical interviews, self-report questionnaires, and computerized attention tasks. In addition, the study will examine attention bias and attention bias variability (ABV), using both reaction-time-based and eye-tracking-based measures, to better understand changes in attentional processing over time. Treatment expectancy and perceived credibility of the intervention will also be evaluated.

The hypothesis is that participants receiving active ABM training and placebo training will show greater reductions in social anxiety symptoms compared to the wait-list control group, and that participants in the active condition will show greater reduction in symptoms than the placebo condition. The study further hypothesizes that only the active ABM condition will produce significant changes in attention bias and attentional bias variability. Overall, the study aims to clarify the specific and nonspecific mechanisms underlying symptom improvement following Attention Bias Modification interventions for Social Anxiety Disorder.

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Geschätzt)

90

Phase

  • Unzutreffend

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienkontakt

Studieren Sie die Kontaktsicherung

Studienorte

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

  • Erwachsene
  • Älterer Erwachsener

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Nein

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults aged 18-65 years
  • Primary diagnosis of generalized Social Anxiety Disorder based on clinical evaluation, the MINI International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI), and a Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS) score greater than 50
  • Normal or corrected-to-normal vision without color blindness
  • Sufficient Hebrew proficiency to complete clinical interviews, self-report questionnaires, and computerized cognitive tasks

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous participation in attention bias modification training using a dot-probe task
  • Previous participation in eye-tracking-based attention training
  • Current diagnosis of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder
  • Current or past diagnosis of psychotic disorder or bipolar disorder
  • Neurological disorder (e.g., epilepsy or traumatic brain injury)
  • Severe suicidal ideation
  • Current substance or alcohol use disorder
  • Concurrent pharmacological or psychosocial treatment, unless medication has been stable for at least 45 days
  • Pregnancy
  • Uncorrected visual impairment or use of multifocal glasses

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Behandlung
  • Zuteilung: Zufällig
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
  • Maskierung: Doppelt

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Aktiver Komparator: Active ABM Training
Mechanized Dot-Probe Attention Bias Modification (ABM) training attention away from threat faces. Participants identify the direction of an arrowehead presented at the location of neutral faces.
Participants complete a computerized dot-probe attention training task designed to train attention away from threat-related stimuli. During each trial, angry and neutral facial expressions are presented simultaneously, followed by a probe that consistently appears in the location of the neutral face. Participants complete eight training sessions over four weeks.
Andere Namen:
  • ABM
Placebo-Komparator: Placebo Training
Mechanized Intervention: Placebo Training, presenting a single, centered, non-face oval shape in each trial. Participants identify the direction of an arrowehead centrally presented.
Participants complete a computerized task matched to the active training condition in duration, structure, and task demands, but without exposure to emotional stimuli or attentional training contingencies. The task is designed to control for nonspecific factors such as expectancy and engagement. Participants complete eight sessions over four weeks.
Kein Eingriff: Wait-List Control
No Intervention / Wait-List, assessments at the same intervals as the active and placebo conditions without intervention in between.

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Change in social anxiety symptoms
Zeitfenster: a) Baseline one-week before treatment begins; b) an average of 2 weeks following treatment completion. Total time frame (baseline-post) an average of 6 weeks.
Change in social anxiety symptom severity from baseline to post-intervention as measured by the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS). Min-Max values 0-80, higher scores mean worse outcome.
a) Baseline one-week before treatment begins; b) an average of 2 weeks following treatment completion. Total time frame (baseline-post) an average of 6 weeks.

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Change in reaction-time-based attention bias measured in miliseconds
Zeitfenster: a) Baseline one-week before treatment begins; b) an average of 2 weeks following treatment completion. Total time frame (baseline-post) an average of 6 weeks.
Change in attention bias derived from reaction-time performance on the dot-probe task.
a) Baseline one-week before treatment begins; b) an average of 2 weeks following treatment completion. Total time frame (baseline-post) an average of 6 weeks.
Change in reaction-time-based attention bias variability
Zeitfenster: a) Baseline one-week before treatment begins; b) an average of 2 weeks following treatment completion. Total time frame (baseline-post) an average of 6 weeks.
Change in attention bias variability derived from reaction-time performance on the dot-probe task.
a) Baseline one-week before treatment begins; b) an average of 2 weeks following treatment completion. Total time frame (baseline-post) an average of 6 weeks.
Change in eye-tracking-based attention bias
Zeitfenster: a) Baseline one-week before treatment begins; b) an average of 2 weeks following treatment completion. Total time frame (baseline-post) an average of 6 weeks.
Change in attention bias measured using eye-tracking during a free-viewing task with threat-related and neutral facial stimuli.
a) Baseline one-week before treatment begins; b) an average of 2 weeks following treatment completion. Total time frame (baseline-post) an average of 6 weeks.
Change in eye-tracking-based attention bias variability
Zeitfenster: a) Baseline one-week before treatment begins; b) an average of 2 weeks following treatment completion. Total time frame (baseline-post) an average of 6 weeks.
Change in attention bias variability measured using eye-tracking during a free-viewing task with threat-related and neutral facial stimuli.
a) Baseline one-week before treatment begins; b) an average of 2 weeks following treatment completion. Total time frame (baseline-post) an average of 6 weeks.
Treatment Expectancy and Credibility
Zeitfenster: Baseline one-week before treatment begins
Participant-rated treatment expectancy and perceived credibility assessed using the Credibility/Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ). 0-9 scale and 0% - 100%. Higher scores indicate greater treatment credibility and greater expectation of improvement.
Baseline one-week before treatment begins
Change in depressive symptoms
Zeitfenster: a) Baseline one-week before treatment begins; b) an average of 2 weeks following treatment completion. Total time frame (baseline-post) an average of 6 weeks.
Change in depressive symptom severity measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). Scale range 0-20, higher scores mean worse outcome.
a) Baseline one-week before treatment begins; b) an average of 2 weeks following treatment completion. Total time frame (baseline-post) an average of 6 weeks.
Change in Generalized Anxiety Symptoms
Zeitfenster: a) Baseline one-week before treatment begins; b) an average of 2 weeks following treatment completion. Total time frame (baseline-post) an average of 6 weeks.
Change in generalized anxiety symptoms measured using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 scale (GAD-7). Scores range 0-21, higher scores mean worse outcome.
a) Baseline one-week before treatment begins; b) an average of 2 weeks following treatment completion. Total time frame (baseline-post) an average of 6 weeks.
Self report change in social anxiety symptoms
Zeitfenster: a) Baseline one-week before treatment begins; b) an average of 2 weeks following treatment completion. Total time frame (baseline-post) an average of 6 weeks.
Change insocial anxiety symptom severity measured using the Social Phobia Inventory (SPIN). Scores range 0-68, higher scores mean worse outcome.
a) Baseline one-week before treatment begins; b) an average of 2 weeks following treatment completion. Total time frame (baseline-post) an average of 6 weeks.

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Ermittler

  • Hauptermittler: Yair Bar-Haim, PhD, Tel Aviv University

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn (Tatsächlich)

15. Juni 2026

Primärer Abschluss (Geschätzt)

30. Oktober 2026

Studienabschluss (Geschätzt)

30. Juni 2027

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

15. Juni 2026

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

18. Juni 2026

Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)

24. Juni 2026

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

24. Juni 2026

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

18. Juni 2026

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. Juni 2026

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Andere Studien-ID-Nummern

  • ABM_P

Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)

Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?

NEIN

Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt

Nein

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt

Nein

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Klinische Studien zur Placebo-Effekt

Klinische Studien zur Dot-Probe Attention Bias Modification (ABM)

Abonnieren