このページは自動翻訳されたものであり、翻訳の正確性は保証されていません。を参照してください。 英語版 ソーステキスト用。

Hyperangulated vs. Macintosh Style Blades for Intubation in Obstetric Patients (ANGLED)

HyperANGulated Versus Macintosh styLE blaDes for INtubation in OBstetric Patients: a Cluster Randomized Feasibility Study

Cesarean section under general anesthesia requires intubation (insertion of a tube through the mouth into the breathing pipe to support breathing during the surgery). A device called a video laryngoscope is used, which has a smooth, curved, or less curved component called 'a blade' that helps the doctor gently see the voice box and guide the breathing tube safely into place during anesthesia; it is not a sharp tool blade.

There are two types of video laryngoscopes blades: a Macintosh- style blade with a gentle curve, approximately 90 degrees) and a hyperangulated blade (with a more pronounced curve).

Although video laryngoscopes are safe and both types have been used for around 20 years, it is not known whether one type works better that the other in patients undergoing cesarean delivery under general anesthesia. Because general anesthesia is used in only a small proportion (about 5%) of all cesarean deliveries, research in this area is limited.

The main purpose of the study is to assess if a study comparing these two types of blades in the obstetric population is feasible. This is also known as a feasibility study, which aims to test the study plan and determine whether enough participants will join a larger study and accept the study procedures. The results will be used as a guide for a larger study.

調査の概要

詳細な説明

Study design and setting.

This will be a single-site, prospective feasibility study conducted within the Department of Anesthesia and Pain management, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, a high-volume tertiary obstetric centre with established expertise in obstetric anesthesia and airway research.

Intervention and Cluster Assignment

Because individual randomization immediately before induction is often impractical in obstetric emergencies, blade assignment will occur by randomized time-based clusters. Randomization will occur in 4 clusters of 4 months each, separated by one-month washout periods. Four consecutive four-month periods will be randomly assigned to use either a hyperangulated or Macintosh-style blade as the default for the first intubation attempt. Clinicians may deviate from the assigned blade for patient safety. The time-block design minimizes contamination associated with rapid decision-making in obstetric emergencies and aligns with real-world workflow on labour and delivery units.

Randomization

Time-block cluster allocation will be generated by a study statistician who is not involved in clinical care, participant enrollment, or study implementation. The allocation schedule will be finalized prior to study initiation and maintained without modification.

Data Collection

A trained research assistant will extract patient demographic and perioperative data from the electronic medical record and confirm key airway variables with the attending anesthesiologist within 72 hours of Cesarean delivery (CD). Patients will be contacted by telephone on postoperative day 3 to assess airway-related morbidity, including minor oral or dental injuries (lacerations of the lips, teeth, tongue, or oral mucosa) and postoperative sore throat.

Outcomes

The primary feasibility outcomes are patient enrollment, intervention adherence, and data completeness .

Each feasibility outcome will be assessed against its predefined threshold to determine whether to proceed to a full-scale randomized controlled trial (RCT), proceed with protocol modifications, or discontinue the study if feasibility cannot be achieved despite modifications. Recruitment strategies will be adapted if enrollment falls below two patients per week for several consecutive weeks. Feasibility will be interpreted using a green/yellow/red framework. Outcomes meeting green thresholds will be considered feasible (>80%); outcomes meeting yellow thresholds will prompt protocol modification (60-79%); and outcomes meeting red thresholds will be considered not feasible (<60%). Secondary exploratory outcomes include first-attempt intubation success, number of intubation attempts, need for rescue airway techniques, and airway-related complications.

Potential risks associated:

This study poses minimal risk to participants, as it compares two standard-of-care video-laryngoscope blades used by experienced clinicians, with no restriction on clinical judgment or rescue airway management. Both hyperangulated and Macintosh-style video-laryngoscope blades are widely used, approved devices and are part of standard clinical practice at Mount Sinai Hospital. No experimental devices or techniques are being introduced. The choice of blade does not expose participants to risks beyond those already inherent to general anesthesia (GA) and tracheal intubation for cesarean delivery.

Sample Size

A pragmatic sample of 100 participants will be enrolled over 19 months. This sample is sufficient to estimate feasibility parameters with acceptable precision but is not powered to detect clinical superiority.

Statistical Analysis

Feasibility outcomes will be summarized descriptively using proportions and 95% confidence intervals and evaluated using the pre-specified green/yellow/red framework to guide progression to a multicentre RCT. Descriptive statistics will be used to summarize patient characteristics and secondary outcomes. Categorical variables will be summarized as frequencies and percentages; continuous variables as means with standard deviation.

Significance/Importance

By establishing feasibility for a definitive multicentre RCT, this study represents a critical step toward optimizing airway management during CD under general anesthesia. Ultimately, this work has the potential to improve first-attempt intubation success, reduce airway-related complications, and enhance maternal and fetal safety nationwide.

研究の種類

介入

入学 (推定)

100

段階

  • 適用できない

連絡先と場所

このセクションには、調査を実施する担当者の連絡先の詳細と、この調査が実施されている場所に関する情報が記載されています。

研究連絡先

研究場所

    • Ontario
      • Toronto、Ontario、カナダ、M5G 1X5
        • Mount Sinai Hospital
        • コンタクト:
        • 主任研究者:
          • Fabricio Zasso, MD

参加基準

研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。

適格基準

就学可能な年齢

  • 子
  • 大人
  • 高齢者

健康ボランティアの受け入れ

いいえ

説明

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Pregnant patients undergoing emergency or urgent cesarean delivery under general anesthesia requiring tracheal intubation.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. No tracheal intubation performed and (ii) patient refusal of consent.
  2. Patients not receiving general anesthesia.
  3. Patients that previously participated in the study.

研究計画

このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。

研究はどのように設計されていますか?

デザインの詳細

  • 主な目的:支持療法
  • 割り当て:ランダム化
  • 介入モデル:並列代入
  • マスキング:独身

武器と介入

参加者グループ / アーム
介入・治療
アクティブコンパレータ:Macintosh style blade
Study patients in this arm will be intubated using a Macintosh style blade
Macintosh- style blade with a gentle curve, approximately 90 degrees
アクティブコンパレータ:Hyperangulated blade
Study patients in this arm will be intubated using a Hyperangulated style blade
hyperangulated blade (with a more pronounced curve

この研究は何を測定していますか?

主要な結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Patient Enrollment
時間枠:3 days
Percentage of eligible cesarean deliveries under general anesthesia in which patients are recruited and consented
3 days
Intervention Adherence
時間枠:3 days
Percentage of cases in which the assigned time-block blade was used for the first intubation attempt, with documentation of crossovers and reasons
3 days
Data Completeness
時間枠:3 days
Percentage of patients with complete data on key airway and perioperative outcomes including postoperatively 3-day follow-up data.
3 days

協力者と研究者

ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。

研究記録日

これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。

主要日程の研究

研究開始 (推定)

2026年6月15日

一次修了 (推定)

2028年1月31日

研究の完了 (推定)

2028年6月30日

試験登録日

最初に提出

2026年6月15日

QC基準を満たした最初の提出物

2026年6月19日

最初の投稿 (実際)

2026年6月24日

学習記録の更新

投稿された最後の更新 (実際)

2026年6月24日

QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました

2026年6月19日

最終確認日

2026年6月1日

詳しくは

本研究に関する用語

個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画

個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?

いいえ

IPD プランの説明

This is a feasibility study

医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書

米国FDA規制医薬品の研究

いいえ

米国FDA規制機器製品の研究

いいえ

この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。

購読する