此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Hyperangulated vs. Macintosh Style Blades for Intubation in Obstetric Patients (ANGLED)

HyperANGulated Versus Macintosh styLE blaDes for INtubation in OBstetric Patients: a Cluster Randomized Feasibility Study

Cesarean section under general anesthesia requires intubation (insertion of a tube through the mouth into the breathing pipe to support breathing during the surgery). A device called a video laryngoscope is used, which has a smooth, curved, or less curved component called 'a blade' that helps the doctor gently see the voice box and guide the breathing tube safely into place during anesthesia; it is not a sharp tool blade.

There are two types of video laryngoscopes blades: a Macintosh- style blade with a gentle curve, approximately 90 degrees) and a hyperangulated blade (with a more pronounced curve).

Although video laryngoscopes are safe and both types have been used for around 20 years, it is not known whether one type works better that the other in patients undergoing cesarean delivery under general anesthesia. Because general anesthesia is used in only a small proportion (about 5%) of all cesarean deliveries, research in this area is limited.

The main purpose of the study is to assess if a study comparing these two types of blades in the obstetric population is feasible. This is also known as a feasibility study, which aims to test the study plan and determine whether enough participants will join a larger study and accept the study procedures. The results will be used as a guide for a larger study.

研究概览

详细说明

Study design and setting.

This will be a single-site, prospective feasibility study conducted within the Department of Anesthesia and Pain management, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, a high-volume tertiary obstetric centre with established expertise in obstetric anesthesia and airway research.

Intervention and Cluster Assignment

Because individual randomization immediately before induction is often impractical in obstetric emergencies, blade assignment will occur by randomized time-based clusters. Randomization will occur in 4 clusters of 4 months each, separated by one-month washout periods. Four consecutive four-month periods will be randomly assigned to use either a hyperangulated or Macintosh-style blade as the default for the first intubation attempt. Clinicians may deviate from the assigned blade for patient safety. The time-block design minimizes contamination associated with rapid decision-making in obstetric emergencies and aligns with real-world workflow on labour and delivery units.

Randomization

Time-block cluster allocation will be generated by a study statistician who is not involved in clinical care, participant enrollment, or study implementation. The allocation schedule will be finalized prior to study initiation and maintained without modification.

Data Collection

A trained research assistant will extract patient demographic and perioperative data from the electronic medical record and confirm key airway variables with the attending anesthesiologist within 72 hours of Cesarean delivery (CD). Patients will be contacted by telephone on postoperative day 3 to assess airway-related morbidity, including minor oral or dental injuries (lacerations of the lips, teeth, tongue, or oral mucosa) and postoperative sore throat.

Outcomes

The primary feasibility outcomes are patient enrollment, intervention adherence, and data completeness .

Each feasibility outcome will be assessed against its predefined threshold to determine whether to proceed to a full-scale randomized controlled trial (RCT), proceed with protocol modifications, or discontinue the study if feasibility cannot be achieved despite modifications. Recruitment strategies will be adapted if enrollment falls below two patients per week for several consecutive weeks. Feasibility will be interpreted using a green/yellow/red framework. Outcomes meeting green thresholds will be considered feasible (>80%); outcomes meeting yellow thresholds will prompt protocol modification (60-79%); and outcomes meeting red thresholds will be considered not feasible (<60%). Secondary exploratory outcomes include first-attempt intubation success, number of intubation attempts, need for rescue airway techniques, and airway-related complications.

Potential risks associated:

This study poses minimal risk to participants, as it compares two standard-of-care video-laryngoscope blades used by experienced clinicians, with no restriction on clinical judgment or rescue airway management. Both hyperangulated and Macintosh-style video-laryngoscope blades are widely used, approved devices and are part of standard clinical practice at Mount Sinai Hospital. No experimental devices or techniques are being introduced. The choice of blade does not expose participants to risks beyond those already inherent to general anesthesia (GA) and tracheal intubation for cesarean delivery.

Sample Size

A pragmatic sample of 100 participants will be enrolled over 19 months. This sample is sufficient to estimate feasibility parameters with acceptable precision but is not powered to detect clinical superiority.

Statistical Analysis

Feasibility outcomes will be summarized descriptively using proportions and 95% confidence intervals and evaluated using the pre-specified green/yellow/red framework to guide progression to a multicentre RCT. Descriptive statistics will be used to summarize patient characteristics and secondary outcomes. Categorical variables will be summarized as frequencies and percentages; continuous variables as means with standard deviation.

Significance/Importance

By establishing feasibility for a definitive multicentre RCT, this study represents a critical step toward optimizing airway management during CD under general anesthesia. Ultimately, this work has the potential to improve first-attempt intubation success, reduce airway-related complications, and enhance maternal and fetal safety nationwide.

研究类型

介入性

注册 (估计的)

100

阶段

  • 不适用

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习联系方式

学习地点

    • Ontario
      • Toronto、Ontario、加拿大、M5G 1X5
        • Mount Sinai Hospital
        • 接触:
        • 首席研究员:
          • Fabricio Zasso, MD

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

  • 孩子
  • 成人
  • 年长者

接受健康志愿者

不

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Pregnant patients undergoing emergency or urgent cesarean delivery under general anesthesia requiring tracheal intubation.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. No tracheal intubation performed and (ii) patient refusal of consent.
  2. Patients not receiving general anesthesia.
  3. Patients that previously participated in the study.

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

  • 主要用途:支持治疗
  • 分配:随机化
  • 介入模型:并行分配
  • 屏蔽:单身的

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
有源比较器:Macintosh style blade
Study patients in this arm will be intubated using a Macintosh style blade
Macintosh- style blade with a gentle curve, approximately 90 degrees
有源比较器:Hyperangulated blade
Study patients in this arm will be intubated using a Hyperangulated style blade
hyperangulated blade (with a more pronounced curve

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Patient Enrollment
大体时间:3 days
Percentage of eligible cesarean deliveries under general anesthesia in which patients are recruited and consented
3 days
Intervention Adherence
大体时间:3 days
Percentage of cases in which the assigned time-block blade was used for the first intubation attempt, with documentation of crossovers and reasons
3 days
Data Completeness
大体时间:3 days
Percentage of patients with complete data on key airway and perioperative outcomes including postoperatively 3-day follow-up data.
3 days

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (估计的)

2026年6月15日

初级完成 (估计的)

2028年1月31日

研究完成 (估计的)

2028年6月30日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2026年6月15日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2026年6月19日

首次发布 (实际的)

2026年6月24日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2026年6月24日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2026年6月19日

最后验证

2026年6月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)

计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)?

不

IPD 计划说明

This is a feasibility study

药物和器械信息、研究文件

研究美国 FDA 监管的药品

不

研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品

不

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅