このページは自動翻訳されたものであり、翻訳の正確性は保証されていません。を参照してください。 英語版 ソーステキスト用。

A Single-Arm Trial of a Web-Based Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Mental Health Promotion Intervention for University Students (YOLO UQ)

2026年7月7日 更新者:Kenneth Ian Pakenham、The University of Queensland

University students experience high rates of psychological distress and frequently encounter barriers to accessing professional mental health support. Web-based interventions may provide a scalable and accessible approach for promoting mental health and well-being in university settings. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) is a transdiagnostic behavioural intervention that aims to increase psychological flexibility and has demonstrated beneficial effects on a range of psychological and academic outcomes among university students.

YOLO (You Only Live Once) is a four-week, self-guided, web-based ACT mental health promotion program developed for university students. Previous pilot and randomized controlled evaluations of YOLO demonstrated significant improvements in psychological well-being, distress, and academic functioning. Following these encouraging findings, YOLO was integrated into the University of Queensland's suite of digital well-being resources for students, and the present study was designed to evaluate its university-wide implementation using a prospective single-arm interventional approach.

The study aims to evaluate the preliminary effectiveness of the YOLO program in improving psychological distress, well-being, life satisfaction, academic performance, and psychological flexibility/inflexibility processes. In addition, the study will examine the feasibility, acceptability, usability, and engagement associated with participation in the intervention and investigate whether changes in psychological flexibility/inflexibility processes are associated with improvements in mental health and well-being outcomes. Findings from this study are expected to inform the future implementation and dissemination of web-based ACT interventions within university settings.

調査の概要

詳細な説明

Mental health concerns among university students represent an important public health issue. International epidemiological studies indicate that approximately 19.2% to 50% of university students meet the diagnostic criteria for at least one mental health disorder. Despite the high prevalence of psychological difficulties, a substantial proportion of affected students do not seek professional support, with estimates ranging from 65% to 85%. At the same time, university counselling and health services have reported increasing demand, increasing clinical complexity, and insufficient resources to adequately address student needs.

The widespread use of online resources by university students for obtaining health-related information and support suggests that web-based delivery may provide a feasible and acceptable approach to mental health promotion. In addition to increasing accessibility, web-based interventions may overcome common barriers to seeking support, such as perceived stigma, time constraints, and competing academic responsibilities. Previous research has further demonstrated that highly distressed university students often report a preference for web-based psychological interventions.

The wide range of psychological difficulties experienced by university students suggests that interventions targeting common underlying processes across symptoms may be particularly appropriate. Although digital mental health interventions have demonstrated effectiveness across various conditions, many existing programs are designed for specific disorders and may therefore have limited utility in universal student populations. In addition, interventions that focus primarily on symptom reduction do not necessarily promote the development of positive psychological resources and skills associated with flourishing and optimal functioning. Consequently, transdiagnostic interventions that target shared risk and protective processes may offer a more comprehensive framework for promoting mental health and well-being among university students.

Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) is an empirically supported transdiagnostic intervention that aims to enhance psychological flexibility. A substantial body of evidence supports the effectiveness of ACT in improving mental health and well-being outcomes across adult populations. Evidence from university settings has also demonstrated promising outcomes for ACT-based interventions. Among university students, participation in ACT programs has been associated with improvements in psychological flexibility, self-compassion, educational values, and academic outcomes, including academic performance and grade point average. ACT-based interventions have also been linked to reductions in anxiety, depression, stress, and broader psychological distress.

The present study uses a prospective single-arm interventional design to evaluate the university-wide implementation of the program. All participants will receive immediate access to the same four-week web-based intervention and no control condition will be included. To support both implementation and evaluation objectives, participants may enrol in one of two assessment pathways. The Full research Arm includes assessments at T1 (baseline/pre-intervention), T2 (post-intervention, 4 weeks), and T3 (3-month follow-up). Data obtained from this pathway will be used to evaluate preliminary effectiveness, feasibility, acceptability, usability, and potential mechanisms of change associated with participation in the program. Participants enrolled in the Minimal research Arm will complete a brief baseline assessment prior to accessing the intervention. Data collected through this pathway will be used exclusively for descriptive and implementation purposes, including the evaluation of program reach, uptake, and engagement. The two pathways differ only in the extent of assessment and follow-up procedures and do not represent different intervention conditions. Only participants enrolled in the Full research Arm will contribute data to the effectiveness analyses and the examination of potential mechanisms of change.

Participant email addresses will be used solely for study administration purposes, including sending automated reminders and invitations to complete follow-up assessments. Personally identifiable information will not be linked to survey responses or disclosed to individuals outside the research team. All data will be stored securely in de-identified and aggregated formats in accordance with institutional data management procedures.

The study hypothesises that participation in YOLO will be associated with improvements in psychological distress, well-being, life satisfaction, academic outcomes, and psychological flexibility/inflexibility processes, including experiential Avoidance, cognitive defusion, valued living, education values, and present-moment awareness. Changes in outcomes will be examined using repeated-measures analyses across assessment time points. Potential mechanisms of change will be investigated by examining whether changes in psychological flexibility/inflexibility processes mediate changes in primary outcomes. Findings from both assessment pathways will be used to inform future implementation and dissemination of the YOLO program within university settings, and the results will be disseminated through scientific publications and reports.

研究の種類

介入

入学 (実際)

626

段階

  • 適用できない

連絡先と場所

このセクションには、調査を実施する担当者の連絡先の詳細と、この調査が実施されている場所に関する情報が記載されています。

研究場所

    • Queensland
      • Saint Lucia、Queensland、オーストラリア、4072
        • School of Psychology, University of Qeensland

参加基準

研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。

適格基準

就学可能な年齢

  • 大人
  • 高齢者

健康ボランティアの受け入れ

はい

説明

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Currently enrolled student at the University of Queensland.
  2. Aged 18 years or older.
  3. Sufficient computer and internet literacy;
  4. Fluent knowledge of the English language.
  5. Able to access the web-based platform.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Current high risk of suicide or self-harm;
  2. Severe cognitive impairment or neurocognitive difficulties that would prevent informed consent, completion of self-report assessments, or meaningful engagement with the self-guided online intervention.
  3. Current severe psychiatric or medical condition that would make participation inappropriate or unsafe, or that would require more intensive clinical care than can be provided by a self-guided mental health promotion program.

研究計画

このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。

研究はどのように設計されていますか?

デザインの詳細

  • 主な目的:防止
  • 割り当て:なし
  • 介入モデル:単一グループの割り当て
  • マスキング:なし(オープンラベル)

武器と介入

参加者グループ / アーム
介入・治療
実験的:YOLO intervention

The study includes two assessment pathways (Full research Arm and Minimal research Arm), but these do not constitute separate intervention arms because all participants will receive immediate access to the web-based YOLO program after providing informed consent. The intervention consists of four online modules, each based on the core principles of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), and participants will be encouraged to complete one module per week. The program is designed to promote psychological flexibility through the following topics:

  1. values and committed action;
  2. cognitive defusion;
  3. acceptance and willingness;
  4. mindfulness and the observing self.

Each module includes animated presentations, YouTube videos, audio recordings, and experiential exercises grounded in ACT principles. To support engagement, participants will receive automated reminders, one supplementary learning activity per module, module summaries upon completion, and invitations to complete

The study includes two assessment pathways (Full research Arm and Minimal research Arm), but these do not constitute separate intervention arms because all participants will receive immediate access to the web-based YOLO program after providing informed consent. The intervention consists of four online modules, each based on the core principles of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), and participants will be encouraged to complete one module per week. The program is designed to promote psychological flexibility through the following topics:

  1. values and committed action;
  2. cognitive defusion;
  3. acceptance and willingness;
  4. mindfulness and the observing self.

Each module includes animated presentations, YouTube videos, audio recordings, and experiential exercises grounded in ACT principles. To support engagement, participants will receive automated reminders, one supplementary learning activity per module, module summaries upon completion, and invitations to complete.

この研究は何を測定していますか?

主要な結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Distress
時間枠:T1 (baseline); T2 (post-intervention, 4 weeks); T3 (follow-ups, 3 months)

The Depression Anxiety and Stress Scales 21 (DASS-21) is a 21-item self-report measure assessing three core symptom dimensions of negative emotional states: depression, anxiety, and stress. Each item is rated on a 4-point scale from 0 ("Did not apply to me at all") to 3 ("Applied to me very much, or most of the time"), referring to the past week.

Subscale and total scores are calculated by summing the relevant items. Higher scores indicate greater severity of depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms.

T1 (baseline); T2 (post-intervention, 4 weeks); T3 (follow-ups, 3 months)
Well-being
時間枠:T1 (baseline); T2 (post-intervention, 4 weeks); T3 (follow-ups, 3 months)

The Mental Health Continuum Short Form (MHC-SF) is a 14-item measure assessing positive mental health across three dimensions: emotional, social, and psychological well-being. Each item is rated on a 6-point frequency scale from 0 ("Never") to 5 ("Every day"), referring to the past month.

Total and subscale scores are calculated by summing or averaging the relevant items. Higher scores indicate greater well-being.

T1 (baseline); T2 (post-intervention, 4 weeks); T3 (follow-ups, 3 months)
Academic performance
時間枠:T1 (baseline); T2 (post-intervention, 4 weeks); T3 (follow-ups, 3 months)

This self-report questionnaire assesses students perceived academic functioning. Items are rated on a 10-point scale from 1 ("Performing at your worst") to 10 ("Performing at your best"), with an additional "Not applicable" option where relevant.

Scores are calculated by averaging the valid items. Higher scores indicate better perceived academic performance and academic functioning. The total score reflects the mean level of perceived academic performance across the retained academic functioning items.

T1 (baseline); T2 (post-intervention, 4 weeks); T3 (follow-ups, 3 months)
Life satisfaction
時間枠:T1 (baseline); T2 (post-intervention, 4 weeks); T3 (follow-ups, 3 months)

The Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS) is a 5-item measure assessing global cognitive judgements of satisfaction with one's life. Each item is rated on a 7-point scale from 1 ("Strongly disagree") to 7 ("Strongly agree").

Total scores are calculated by summing the 5 items, with higher scores indicating greater life satisfaction.

T1 (baseline); T2 (post-intervention, 4 weeks); T3 (follow-ups, 3 months)

二次結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Experiential Avoidance
時間枠:T1 (baseline); T2 (post-intervention, 4 weeks); T3 (follow-ups, 3 months)

The Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II (AAQ-II) is a 7-item self-report measure assessing psychological inflexibility and experiential avoidance, reflecting the extent to which individuals are unwilling to experience unwanted thoughts and feelings while pursuing valued actions. Each item is rated on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 ("Never true") to 7 ("Always true").

Total scores are calculated by summing the 7 items, with higher scores indicating greater psychological inflexibility and experiential avoidance.

T1 (baseline); T2 (post-intervention, 4 weeks); T3 (follow-ups, 3 months)
Cognitive fusion
時間枠:T1 (baseline); T2 (post-intervention, 4 weeks); T3 (follow-ups, 3 months)

The Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire (CFQ; Gillanders et al., 2014) is a 7-item self-report measure assessing the extent to which individuals become entangled with, or dominated by, their thoughts and treat them as literal truths. Each item is rated on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 ("Never true") to 7 ("Always true").

Total scores are calculated by summing the 7 items, with higher scores indicating greater cognitive fusion.

T1 (baseline); T2 (post-intervention, 4 weeks); T3 (follow-ups, 3 months)
Valued living
時間枠:T1 (baseline); T2 (post-intervention, 4 weeks); T3 (follow-ups, 3 months)

The Engaged Living Scale-Short Form (ELS-SF) is a 9-item self-report measure assessing the extent to which individuals live in accordance with their personal values and experience a sense of fulfilment in daily life. The scale includes dimensions of value-consistent action and life fulfilment.

Total scores are calculated by summing or averaging the relevant items, with higher scores indicating greater engaged, value-consistent living.

T1 (baseline); T2 (post-intervention, 4 weeks); T3 (follow-ups, 3 months)
Education values
時間枠:T1 (baseline); T2 (post-intervention, 4 weeks); T3 (follow-ups, 3 months)
The Personal Values Questionnaire-II (PVQ-II) is a 9-item adapted version of the Personal Values Questionnaire designed to assess the extent to which individuals' behaviours within the educational domain are consistent with their personally held values and academic goals. The measure captures value-consistent action in academic contexts, reflecting the degree of alignment between what individuals consider important and how they behave in their studies. Scores are calculated by averaging the relevant items, with higher scores indicating greater value-consistent behaviour in education.
T1 (baseline); T2 (post-intervention, 4 weeks); T3 (follow-ups, 3 months)
Present moment awareness
時間枠:T1 (baseline); T2 (post-intervention, 4 weeks); T3 (follow-ups, 3 months)

The Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS) is a 15-item self-report measure assessing an individual's tendency to attend to and be aware of present-moment experiences in everyday life. Each item is rated on a 6-point Likert scale ranging from 1 ("Almost always") to 6 ("Almost never").

Total scores are calculated by averaging the 15 items, with higher scores indicating greater present-moment awareness and mindfulness.

T1 (baseline); T2 (post-intervention, 4 weeks); T3 (follow-ups, 3 months)

協力者と研究者

ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。

研究記録日

これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。

主要日程の研究

研究開始 (実際)

2019年6月25日

一次修了 (実際)

2025年8月31日

研究の完了 (実際)

2025年8月31日

試験登録日

最初に提出

2026年7月7日

QC基準を満たした最初の提出物

2026年7月7日

最初の投稿 (実際)

2026年7月14日

学習記録の更新

投稿された最後の更新 (実際)

2026年7月14日

QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました

2026年7月7日

最終確認日

2026年7月1日

詳しくは

本研究に関する用語

個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画

個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?

はい

IPD プランの説明

De-identified individual participant data underlying the results reported in the published article may be made available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author, subject to approval by the study investigators.

IPD 共有時間枠

Beginning after publication of the main study results.

IPD 共有アクセス基準

Data will be made available to researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal and whose proposed use of the data has been approved by the study investigators.

IPD 共有サポート情報タイプ

  • SAP

医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書

米国FDA規制医薬品の研究

いいえ

米国FDA規制機器製品の研究

いいえ

この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。

購読する