A Single-Arm Trial of a Web-Based Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Mental Health Promotion Intervention for University Students (YOLO UQ)
University students experience high rates of psychological distress and frequently encounter barriers to accessing professional mental health support. Web-based interventions may provide a scalable and accessible approach for promoting mental health and well-being in university settings. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) is a transdiagnostic behavioural intervention that aims to increase psychological flexibility and has demonstrated beneficial effects on a range of psychological and academic outcomes among university students.
YOLO (You Only Live Once) is a four-week, self-guided, web-based ACT mental health promotion program developed for university students. Previous pilot and randomized controlled evaluations of YOLO demonstrated significant improvements in psychological well-being, distress, and academic functioning. Following these encouraging findings, YOLO was integrated into the University of Queensland's suite of digital well-being resources for students, and the present study was designed to evaluate its university-wide implementation using a prospective single-arm interventional approach.
The study aims to evaluate the preliminary effectiveness of the YOLO program in improving psychological distress, well-being, life satisfaction, academic performance, and psychological flexibility/inflexibility processes. In addition, the study will examine the feasibility, acceptability, usability, and engagement associated with participation in the intervention and investigate whether changes in psychological flexibility/inflexibility processes are associated with improvements in mental health and well-being outcomes. Findings from this study are expected to inform the future implementation and dissemination of web-based ACT interventions within university settings.
Visão geral do estudo
Status
Condições
Intervenção / Tratamento
Descrição detalhada
Mental health concerns among university students represent an important public health issue. International epidemiological studies indicate that approximately 19.2% to 50% of university students meet the diagnostic criteria for at least one mental health disorder. Despite the high prevalence of psychological difficulties, a substantial proportion of affected students do not seek professional support, with estimates ranging from 65% to 85%. At the same time, university counselling and health services have reported increasing demand, increasing clinical complexity, and insufficient resources to adequately address student needs.
The widespread use of online resources by university students for obtaining health-related information and support suggests that web-based delivery may provide a feasible and acceptable approach to mental health promotion. In addition to increasing accessibility, web-based interventions may overcome common barriers to seeking support, such as perceived stigma, time constraints, and competing academic responsibilities. Previous research has further demonstrated that highly distressed university students often report a preference for web-based psychological interventions.
The wide range of psychological difficulties experienced by university students suggests that interventions targeting common underlying processes across symptoms may be particularly appropriate. Although digital mental health interventions have demonstrated effectiveness across various conditions, many existing programs are designed for specific disorders and may therefore have limited utility in universal student populations. In addition, interventions that focus primarily on symptom reduction do not necessarily promote the development of positive psychological resources and skills associated with flourishing and optimal functioning. Consequently, transdiagnostic interventions that target shared risk and protective processes may offer a more comprehensive framework for promoting mental health and well-being among university students.
Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) is an empirically supported transdiagnostic intervention that aims to enhance psychological flexibility. A substantial body of evidence supports the effectiveness of ACT in improving mental health and well-being outcomes across adult populations. Evidence from university settings has also demonstrated promising outcomes for ACT-based interventions. Among university students, participation in ACT programs has been associated with improvements in psychological flexibility, self-compassion, educational values, and academic outcomes, including academic performance and grade point average. ACT-based interventions have also been linked to reductions in anxiety, depression, stress, and broader psychological distress.
The present study uses a prospective single-arm interventional design to evaluate the university-wide implementation of the program. All participants will receive immediate access to the same four-week web-based intervention and no control condition will be included. To support both implementation and evaluation objectives, participants may enrol in one of two assessment pathways. The Full research Arm includes assessments at T1 (baseline/pre-intervention), T2 (post-intervention, 4 weeks), and T3 (3-month follow-up). Data obtained from this pathway will be used to evaluate preliminary effectiveness, feasibility, acceptability, usability, and potential mechanisms of change associated with participation in the program. Participants enrolled in the Minimal research Arm will complete a brief baseline assessment prior to accessing the intervention. Data collected through this pathway will be used exclusively for descriptive and implementation purposes, including the evaluation of program reach, uptake, and engagement. The two pathways differ only in the extent of assessment and follow-up procedures and do not represent different intervention conditions. Only participants enrolled in the Full research Arm will contribute data to the effectiveness analyses and the examination of potential mechanisms of change.
Participant email addresses will be used solely for study administration purposes, including sending automated reminders and invitations to complete follow-up assessments. Personally identifiable information will not be linked to survey responses or disclosed to individuals outside the research team. All data will be stored securely in de-identified and aggregated formats in accordance with institutional data management procedures.
The study hypothesises that participation in YOLO will be associated with improvements in psychological distress, well-being, life satisfaction, academic outcomes, and psychological flexibility/inflexibility processes, including experiential Avoidance, cognitive defusion, valued living, education values, and present-moment awareness. Changes in outcomes will be examined using repeated-measures analyses across assessment time points. Potential mechanisms of change will be investigated by examining whether changes in psychological flexibility/inflexibility processes mediate changes in primary outcomes. Findings from both assessment pathways will be used to inform future implementation and dissemination of the YOLO program within university settings, and the results will be disseminated through scientific publications and reports.
Tipo de estudo
Inscrição (Real)
Estágio
- Não aplicável
Contactos e Locais
Locais de estudo
-
-
Queensland
-
Saint Lucia, Queensland, Austrália, 4072
- School of Psychology, University of Qeensland
-
-
Critérios de participação
Critérios de elegibilidade
Idades elegíveis para estudo
- Adulto
- Adulto mais velho
Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis
Descrição
Inclusion Criteria:
- Currently enrolled student at the University of Queensland.
- Aged 18 years or older.
- Sufficient computer and internet literacy;
- Fluent knowledge of the English language.
- Able to access the web-based platform.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Current high risk of suicide or self-harm;
- Severe cognitive impairment or neurocognitive difficulties that would prevent informed consent, completion of self-report assessments, or meaningful engagement with the self-guided online intervention.
- Current severe psychiatric or medical condition that would make participation inappropriate or unsafe, or that would require more intensive clinical care than can be provided by a self-guided mental health promotion program.
Plano de estudo
Como o estudo é projetado?
Detalhes do projeto
- Finalidade Principal: Prevenção
- Alocação: N / D
- Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição de grupo único
- Mascaramento: Nenhum (rótulo aberto)
Armas e Intervenções
Grupo de Participantes / Braço |
Intervenção / Tratamento |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: YOLO intervention
The study includes two assessment pathways (Full research Arm and Minimal research Arm), but these do not constitute separate intervention arms because all participants will receive immediate access to the web-based YOLO program after providing informed consent. The intervention consists of four online modules, each based on the core principles of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), and participants will be encouraged to complete one module per week. The program is designed to promote psychological flexibility through the following topics:
Each module includes animated presentations, YouTube videos, audio recordings, and experiential exercises grounded in ACT principles. To support engagement, participants will receive automated reminders, one supplementary learning activity per module, module summaries upon completion, and invitations to complete |
The study includes two assessment pathways (Full research Arm and Minimal research Arm), but these do not constitute separate intervention arms because all participants will receive immediate access to the web-based YOLO program after providing informed consent. The intervention consists of four online modules, each based on the core principles of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), and participants will be encouraged to complete one module per week. The program is designed to promote psychological flexibility through the following topics:
Each module includes animated presentations, YouTube videos, audio recordings, and experiential exercises grounded in ACT principles. To support engagement, participants will receive automated reminders, one supplementary learning activity per module, module summaries upon completion, and invitations to complete. |
O que o estudo está medindo?
Medidas de resultados primários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Distress
Prazo: T1 (baseline); T2 (post-intervention, 4 weeks); T3 (follow-ups, 3 months)
|
The Depression Anxiety and Stress Scales 21 (DASS-21) is a 21-item self-report measure assessing three core symptom dimensions of negative emotional states: depression, anxiety, and stress. Each item is rated on a 4-point scale from 0 ("Did not apply to me at all") to 3 ("Applied to me very much, or most of the time"), referring to the past week. Subscale and total scores are calculated by summing the relevant items. Higher scores indicate greater severity of depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms. |
T1 (baseline); T2 (post-intervention, 4 weeks); T3 (follow-ups, 3 months)
|
|
Well-being
Prazo: T1 (baseline); T2 (post-intervention, 4 weeks); T3 (follow-ups, 3 months)
|
The Mental Health Continuum Short Form (MHC-SF) is a 14-item measure assessing positive mental health across three dimensions: emotional, social, and psychological well-being. Each item is rated on a 6-point frequency scale from 0 ("Never") to 5 ("Every day"), referring to the past month. Total and subscale scores are calculated by summing or averaging the relevant items. Higher scores indicate greater well-being. |
T1 (baseline); T2 (post-intervention, 4 weeks); T3 (follow-ups, 3 months)
|
|
Academic performance
Prazo: T1 (baseline); T2 (post-intervention, 4 weeks); T3 (follow-ups, 3 months)
|
This self-report questionnaire assesses students perceived academic functioning. Items are rated on a 10-point scale from 1 ("Performing at your worst") to 10 ("Performing at your best"), with an additional "Not applicable" option where relevant. Scores are calculated by averaging the valid items. Higher scores indicate better perceived academic performance and academic functioning. The total score reflects the mean level of perceived academic performance across the retained academic functioning items. |
T1 (baseline); T2 (post-intervention, 4 weeks); T3 (follow-ups, 3 months)
|
|
Life satisfaction
Prazo: T1 (baseline); T2 (post-intervention, 4 weeks); T3 (follow-ups, 3 months)
|
The Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS) is a 5-item measure assessing global cognitive judgements of satisfaction with one's life. Each item is rated on a 7-point scale from 1 ("Strongly disagree") to 7 ("Strongly agree"). Total scores are calculated by summing the 5 items, with higher scores indicating greater life satisfaction. |
T1 (baseline); T2 (post-intervention, 4 weeks); T3 (follow-ups, 3 months)
|
Medidas de resultados secundários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Experiential Avoidance
Prazo: T1 (baseline); T2 (post-intervention, 4 weeks); T3 (follow-ups, 3 months)
|
The Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II (AAQ-II) is a 7-item self-report measure assessing psychological inflexibility and experiential avoidance, reflecting the extent to which individuals are unwilling to experience unwanted thoughts and feelings while pursuing valued actions. Each item is rated on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 ("Never true") to 7 ("Always true"). Total scores are calculated by summing the 7 items, with higher scores indicating greater psychological inflexibility and experiential avoidance. |
T1 (baseline); T2 (post-intervention, 4 weeks); T3 (follow-ups, 3 months)
|
|
Cognitive fusion
Prazo: T1 (baseline); T2 (post-intervention, 4 weeks); T3 (follow-ups, 3 months)
|
The Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire (CFQ; Gillanders et al., 2014) is a 7-item self-report measure assessing the extent to which individuals become entangled with, or dominated by, their thoughts and treat them as literal truths. Each item is rated on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 ("Never true") to 7 ("Always true"). Total scores are calculated by summing the 7 items, with higher scores indicating greater cognitive fusion. |
T1 (baseline); T2 (post-intervention, 4 weeks); T3 (follow-ups, 3 months)
|
|
Valued living
Prazo: T1 (baseline); T2 (post-intervention, 4 weeks); T3 (follow-ups, 3 months)
|
The Engaged Living Scale-Short Form (ELS-SF) is a 9-item self-report measure assessing the extent to which individuals live in accordance with their personal values and experience a sense of fulfilment in daily life. The scale includes dimensions of value-consistent action and life fulfilment. Total scores are calculated by summing or averaging the relevant items, with higher scores indicating greater engaged, value-consistent living. |
T1 (baseline); T2 (post-intervention, 4 weeks); T3 (follow-ups, 3 months)
|
|
Education values
Prazo: T1 (baseline); T2 (post-intervention, 4 weeks); T3 (follow-ups, 3 months)
|
The Personal Values Questionnaire-II (PVQ-II) is a 9-item adapted version of the Personal Values Questionnaire designed to assess the extent to which individuals' behaviours within the educational domain are consistent with their personally held values and academic goals.
The measure captures value-consistent action in academic contexts, reflecting the degree of alignment between what individuals consider important and how they behave in their studies.
Scores are calculated by averaging the relevant items, with higher scores indicating greater value-consistent behaviour in education.
|
T1 (baseline); T2 (post-intervention, 4 weeks); T3 (follow-ups, 3 months)
|
|
Present moment awareness
Prazo: T1 (baseline); T2 (post-intervention, 4 weeks); T3 (follow-ups, 3 months)
|
The Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS) is a 15-item self-report measure assessing an individual's tendency to attend to and be aware of present-moment experiences in everyday life. Each item is rated on a 6-point Likert scale ranging from 1 ("Almost always") to 6 ("Almost never"). Total scores are calculated by averaging the 15 items, with higher scores indicating greater present-moment awareness and mindfulness. |
T1 (baseline); T2 (post-intervention, 4 weeks); T3 (follow-ups, 3 months)
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Patrocinador
Colaboradores
Datas de registro do estudo
Datas Principais do Estudo
Início do estudo (Real)
Conclusão Primária (Real)
Conclusão do estudo (Real)
Datas de inscrição no estudo
Enviado pela primeira vez
Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ
Primeira postagem (Real)
Atualizações de registro de estudo
Última Atualização Postada (Real)
Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade
Última verificação
Mais Informações
Termos relacionados a este estudo
Palavras-chave
Outros números de identificação do estudo
- HE001551
Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)
Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?
Descrição do plano IPD
Prazo de Compartilhamento de IPD
Critérios de acesso de compartilhamento IPD
Tipo de informação de suporte de compartilhamento de IPD
- SEIVA
Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo
Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .