このページは自動翻訳されたものであり、翻訳の正確性は保証されていません。を参照してください。 英語版 ソーステキスト用。

Clinical Study on Using Laparoscopic Sentinel Lymph Node Navigation Combined With Dual Endoscopy Surgery for Early Gastric Cancer

2026年7月13日 更新者:wangdongsheng

Safety and Effectiveness of Laparoscopic Sentinel Lymph Node Navigation Combined With Dual-endoscope Surgery for Early Stomach Cancer: a Prospective, Single-centre, Single-arm Clinical Study

Gastric cancer is a common malignant tumour worldwide, and in China, the incidence and mortality rates of gastric cancer remain high. Standardised surgical treatment is effective, but the normal structure of the stomach undergoes irreversible changes, leading to a series of adverse reactions. At the same time, some early-stage gastric cancer patients cannot have the lesions completely removed endoscopically, and conventional surgery can affect postoperative normal life. Therefore, laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery has become a focus for precise stomach-preserving surgery. Participants meeting the surgical criteria are selected, and after discussing the treatment plan with their families and signing informed consent forms, relevant examinations are completed. During surgery, lesions are explored together using laparoscopy and endoscopy, then a fluorescent tracer is injected around the lesion and the lesion boundary is marked. Fifteen minutes after injecting the fluorescent tracer, the illuminated perigastric lymph nodes are the sentinel lymph node region (SLNB), and all fluorescent lymph nodes (sentinel lymph nodes) are removed and sent for intraoperative frozen pathology. If the SLNB is negative: a dual-endoscope combined local gastric resection (endoscope combined with laparoscopic local gastric resection or a modified procedure) is performed to completely remove the lesion, ensuring a negative margin. If the SLNB is positive: immediate conversion to laparoscopic-assisted radical gastrectomy (D2 lymph node dissection) is carried out. For SLNB-negative cases, the dual-endoscope combined local gastric resection specimen is placed in a retrieval bag for full removal and examination, with the stomach wall incision then closed by suturing or using a stapler. Postoperative follow-up includes monitoring tumour outcomes and quality of life.

調査の概要

詳細な説明

Stomach cancer is one of the common malignant tumours worldwide, and in China, the incidence and mortality rates of stomach cancer remain high, posing a major public health burden. With the widespread implementation of stomach cancer screening in China, the detection rate of early-stage stomach cancer has significantly increased, now accounting for 19.5% of all stomach cancer cases. Early-stage stomach cancer (T1 stage) has a much better prognosis than advanced-stage cancer, with a 5-year survival rate exceeding 90% after standard treatment. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), due to its minimally invasive nature and ability to preserve stomach function, has become the standard treatment for certain cT1a-stage stomach cancers. However, for early-stage stomach cancer patients with a higher risk of lymph node metastasis, the lymph node metastasis rate can be close to 20%. In this context, if these patients only undergo endoscopic removal, they may face a higher risk of tumour residue. The traditional standard treatment is radical gastrectomy, usually combined with regional lymph node dissection (D1 or D2). Although this surgery is effective for cancer control, it can cause significant trauma, leading to irreversible changes to the patient's post-operative physiology and function, as well as long-term complications such as malnutrition, reflux oesophagitis and reduced quality of life, which have become key issues affecting the recovery of early-stage stomach cancer patients.

With the development of endoscopic technology (gastroscopy) and laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery, the concept of "function-preserving" surgery for early gastric cancer has been gaining increasing attention. This concept aims to minimise surgical trauma and preserve the anatomical structure and physiological function of the stomach while ensuring oncological safety. Achieving this goal relies heavily on the development and integration of two key techniques. First is Laparoscopic Sentinel Node Navigation Surgery (LSNNS). Sentinel lymph nodes are the first or group of lymph nodes along the primary tumour's lymphatic drainage pathway, and their pathological state is considered to highly predict metastasis in all lymph nodes in that region. In gastric cancer surgery, by injecting tracers (such as the fluorescent dye indocyanine green) under the mucosa around the tumour, and using the magnified view and fluorescence imaging system of laparoscopy, these sentinel lymph nodes can be located and removed in real time for intraoperative rapid pathological examination. The National Cancer Center in South Korea conducted a multicentre phase III randomised controlled clinical trial (SENORITA) on laparoscopic sentinel node navigation surgery for function-preserving surgery in early gastric cancer. In the LSNNS group, 210 patients (81%) underwent stomach-preserving surgery, and the results showed no significant difference in postoperative complication rates, 5-year local recurrence, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) compared to conventional laparoscopic radical gastrectomy. However, the LSNNS group had significantly better postoperative quality of life. These study results suggest that due to the complexity of gastric cancer lymphatic drainage and the skip and uncertain nature of metastasis, detecting the sentinel lymphatic basin (SLB) can provide a more comprehensive understanding of sentinel nodes, offering precise guidance for individualised lymph node dissection and avoiding unnecessary extended lymph node removal, reducing surgical trauma and related complications without compromising oncological outcomes.

Laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS) combines the advantages of laparoscopic internal view and operation with the precise localisation and removal capabilities of endoscopy. It's become a hot research topic in stomach-function-preserving surgery in recent years. Endoscopy provides a high-definition view of the mucosal surface from inside the cavity, allowing precise marking of tumour boundaries and submucosal dissection, while laparoscopy offers an external view of the serosal surface, enabling reliable full-thickness gastric wall resection, accurate suturing and regional lymph node inspection and management. Main LECS procedures include laparoscopic-assisted endoscopic full-thickness resection (LAEFR), endoscope-assisted wedge resection (EAWR), classic LECS and modified LECS. Several studies both domestic and international have shown LECS has advantages in treating various gastrointestinal tumours, but standardised procedures for early gastric cancer are not yet established, and current data is largely from retrospective studies, lacking high-quality prospective evidence.

研究の種類

介入

入学 (推定)

30

段階

  • 適用できない

連絡先と場所

このセクションには、調査を実施する担当者の連絡先の詳細と、この調査が実施されている場所に関する情報が記載されています。

研究場所

    • Shandong
      • Qingdao、Shandong、中国、266000
        • Qingdao University Affiliated Hospital West Coast Campus

参加基準

研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。

適格基準

就学可能な年齢

  • 大人
  • 高齢者

健康ボランティアの受け入れ

いいえ

説明

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age 18-80, any gender;
  2. Gastric adenocarcinoma confirmed by gastroscopic biopsy, with a single lesion;
  3. Clinical staging cT1N0M0 based on enhanced CT, endoscopic ultrasound and other imaging evaluations (tumour limited to the mucosa or submucosa with no evidence of lymph node or distant metastasis);
  4. Absolute indications for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), with lesions no larger than 5cm, or cases where endoscopic removal is difficult. Absolute indications for ESD (differentiated carcinoma, mucosal T1a stage, without ulcer ≤2 cm or with ulcer ≤3 cm; undifferentiated carcinoma without ulcer ≤2 cm. Difficult cases for endoscopic removal: negative "lifting sign", laterally spreading tumours and scar ulcers etc.);
  5. Meets eCURA score criteria for non-curative ESD requiring additional surgery;
  6. ECOG performance status 0-1;
  7. Patient fully informed and consents, signing the consent form. Note: For inclusion, meeting either criterion ④ or ⑤ is sufficient.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Pregnant or breastfeeding women;
  2. Those with a history of major upper abdominal surgery where severe abdominal adhesions are expected;
  3. Patients with recurrent gastric cancer, multiple primary tumours, or those who have undergone preoperative chemoradiotherapy;
  4. Those meeting ESD indications and having completed curative endoscopic resection according to eCURA standards [12,13];
  5. Patients with other unresectable malignant tumours;
  6. Those with severe heart, lung, liver, or kidney dysfunction who cannot tolerate general anaesthesia and surgery;
  7. Those allergic to indocyanine green (ICG) or nano carbon tracers;
  8. Those with mental illness who cannot cooperate with the study and follow-up.

研究計画

このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。

研究はどのように設計されていますか?

デザインの詳細

  • 主な目的:処理
  • 割り当て:なし
  • 介入モデル:単一グループの割り当て
  • マスキング:なし(オープンラベル)

武器と介入

参加者グループ / アーム
介入・治療
実験的:Perform a combined surgery using both microscopes
  1. Inject the fluorescent dye under the endoscope to mark the lesion.
  2. Remove the sentinel lymph node area highlighted by fluorescence after 15 minutes.
  3. If no lymph node metastasis is found in the sentinel lymph node area (SLNB negative), perform a combined double-scope local gastrectomy (endoscopic combined with laparoscopic local gastrectomy or a modified procedure), completely remove the primary lesion, and ensure negative margins.
  4. The local excision specimen should be fully spread and fixed within 20-30 minutes after removal, and sliced continuously at 2 mm intervals. The pathological report needs to include key information such as tissue type, depth of infiltration, margins and vascular invasion.
  5. Postoperative patients are managed according to the standard postoperative pathway. Follow-ups are done at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months after surgery, and then annually, including physical exams, tumour marker tests, imaging checks, and quality of life questionnaires.

この研究は何を測定していますか?

主要な結果の測定

結果測定
時間枠
Postoperative complications within 30 days after surgery
時間枠:Within 30 days after surgery
Within 30 days after surgery
Overall survival (OS)
時間枠:1 year and 3 years after surgery
1 year and 3 years after surgery
disease-free survival (DFS)
時間枠:1 year and 3 years after surgery
1 year and 3 years after surgery
Local recurrence rate (LR)
時間枠:1 year and 3 years after surgery
1 year and 3 years after surgery

二次結果の測定

結果測定
時間枠
Sentinel lymph node prediction accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, etc.)
時間枠:Up to two weeks after surgery (confirmed by paraffin pathology)
Up to two weeks after surgery (confirmed by paraffin pathology)
Sentinel lymph node tracing success rate
時間枠:At most, no more than 2 hours after receiving the specimen for frozen biopsy (intraoperative sentinel lymph node frozen pathology)
At most, no more than 2 hours after receiving the specimen for frozen biopsy (intraoperative sentinel lymph node frozen pathology)
R0 resection rate
時間枠:Up to two weeks after surgery(confirmed by paraffin pathology)
Up to two weeks after surgery(confirmed by paraffin pathology)
EORTC QLQ-C30/STO22 scale scores(European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30)
時間枠:Before the surgery, and at 3, 6, 12 months after, and 2, 3 years post-surgery
Before the surgery, and at 3, 6, 12 months after, and 2, 3 years post-surgery
Weight and Body Mass Index
時間枠:Before the surgery, and then 1, 3, 6, 12 months and 2, 3 years after
Before the surgery, and then 1, 3, 6, 12 months and 2, 3 years after
Albumin and haemoglobin(g/L)
時間枠:Before the surgery, and then 1, 3, 6, 12 months and 2, 3 years after
Before the surgery, and then 1, 3, 6, 12 months and 2, 3 years after
NRS2002 Nutrition Risk Screening
時間枠:Before the surgery, and then 1, 3, 6, 12 months and 2, 3 years after
Before the surgery, and then 1, 3, 6, 12 months and 2, 3 years after

協力者と研究者

ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。

スポンサー

研究記録日

これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。

主要日程の研究

研究開始 (実際)

2026年1月1日

一次修了 (推定)

2028年1月1日

研究の完了 (推定)

2028年1月1日

試験登録日

最初に提出

2026年6月28日

QC基準を満たした最初の提出物

2026年7月13日

最初の投稿 (実際)

2026年7月16日

学習記録の更新

投稿された最後の更新 (実際)

2026年7月16日

QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました

2026年7月13日

最終確認日

2026年6月1日

詳しくは

本研究に関する用語

医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書

米国FDA規制医薬品の研究

いいえ

米国FDA規制機器製品の研究

いいえ

この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。

購読する