- ICH GCP
- US-Register für klinische Studien
- Klinische Studie NCT07708012
Clinical Study on Using Laparoscopic Sentinel Lymph Node Navigation Combined With Dual Endoscopy Surgery for Early Gastric Cancer
Safety and Effectiveness of Laparoscopic Sentinel Lymph Node Navigation Combined With Dual-endoscope Surgery for Early Stomach Cancer: a Prospective, Single-centre, Single-arm Clinical Study
Studienübersicht
Status
Bedingungen
Intervention / Behandlung
Detaillierte Beschreibung
Stomach cancer is one of the common malignant tumours worldwide, and in China, the incidence and mortality rates of stomach cancer remain high, posing a major public health burden. With the widespread implementation of stomach cancer screening in China, the detection rate of early-stage stomach cancer has significantly increased, now accounting for 19.5% of all stomach cancer cases. Early-stage stomach cancer (T1 stage) has a much better prognosis than advanced-stage cancer, with a 5-year survival rate exceeding 90% after standard treatment. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), due to its minimally invasive nature and ability to preserve stomach function, has become the standard treatment for certain cT1a-stage stomach cancers. However, for early-stage stomach cancer patients with a higher risk of lymph node metastasis, the lymph node metastasis rate can be close to 20%. In this context, if these patients only undergo endoscopic removal, they may face a higher risk of tumour residue. The traditional standard treatment is radical gastrectomy, usually combined with regional lymph node dissection (D1 or D2). Although this surgery is effective for cancer control, it can cause significant trauma, leading to irreversible changes to the patient's post-operative physiology and function, as well as long-term complications such as malnutrition, reflux oesophagitis and reduced quality of life, which have become key issues affecting the recovery of early-stage stomach cancer patients.
With the development of endoscopic technology (gastroscopy) and laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery, the concept of "function-preserving" surgery for early gastric cancer has been gaining increasing attention. This concept aims to minimise surgical trauma and preserve the anatomical structure and physiological function of the stomach while ensuring oncological safety. Achieving this goal relies heavily on the development and integration of two key techniques. First is Laparoscopic Sentinel Node Navigation Surgery (LSNNS). Sentinel lymph nodes are the first or group of lymph nodes along the primary tumour's lymphatic drainage pathway, and their pathological state is considered to highly predict metastasis in all lymph nodes in that region. In gastric cancer surgery, by injecting tracers (such as the fluorescent dye indocyanine green) under the mucosa around the tumour, and using the magnified view and fluorescence imaging system of laparoscopy, these sentinel lymph nodes can be located and removed in real time for intraoperative rapid pathological examination. The National Cancer Center in South Korea conducted a multicentre phase III randomised controlled clinical trial (SENORITA) on laparoscopic sentinel node navigation surgery for function-preserving surgery in early gastric cancer. In the LSNNS group, 210 patients (81%) underwent stomach-preserving surgery, and the results showed no significant difference in postoperative complication rates, 5-year local recurrence, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) compared to conventional laparoscopic radical gastrectomy. However, the LSNNS group had significantly better postoperative quality of life. These study results suggest that due to the complexity of gastric cancer lymphatic drainage and the skip and uncertain nature of metastasis, detecting the sentinel lymphatic basin (SLB) can provide a more comprehensive understanding of sentinel nodes, offering precise guidance for individualised lymph node dissection and avoiding unnecessary extended lymph node removal, reducing surgical trauma and related complications without compromising oncological outcomes.
Laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS) combines the advantages of laparoscopic internal view and operation with the precise localisation and removal capabilities of endoscopy. It's become a hot research topic in stomach-function-preserving surgery in recent years. Endoscopy provides a high-definition view of the mucosal surface from inside the cavity, allowing precise marking of tumour boundaries and submucosal dissection, while laparoscopy offers an external view of the serosal surface, enabling reliable full-thickness gastric wall resection, accurate suturing and regional lymph node inspection and management. Main LECS procedures include laparoscopic-assisted endoscopic full-thickness resection (LAEFR), endoscope-assisted wedge resection (EAWR), classic LECS and modified LECS. Several studies both domestic and international have shown LECS has advantages in treating various gastrointestinal tumours, but standardised procedures for early gastric cancer are not yet established, and current data is largely from retrospective studies, lacking high-quality prospective evidence.
Studientyp
Einschreibung (Geschätzt)
Phase
- Unzutreffend
Kontakte und Standorte
Studienorte
-
-
Shandong
-
Qingdao, Shandong, China, 266000
- Qingdao University Affiliated Hospital West Coast Campus
-
-
Teilnahmekriterien
Zulassungskriterien
Studienberechtigtes Alter
- Erwachsene
- Älterer Erwachsener
Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige
Beschreibung
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 18-80, any gender;
- Gastric adenocarcinoma confirmed by gastroscopic biopsy, with a single lesion;
- Clinical staging cT1N0M0 based on enhanced CT, endoscopic ultrasound and other imaging evaluations (tumour limited to the mucosa or submucosa with no evidence of lymph node or distant metastasis);
- Absolute indications for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), with lesions no larger than 5cm, or cases where endoscopic removal is difficult. Absolute indications for ESD (differentiated carcinoma, mucosal T1a stage, without ulcer ≤2 cm or with ulcer ≤3 cm; undifferentiated carcinoma without ulcer ≤2 cm. Difficult cases for endoscopic removal: negative "lifting sign", laterally spreading tumours and scar ulcers etc.);
- Meets eCURA score criteria for non-curative ESD requiring additional surgery;
- ECOG performance status 0-1;
- Patient fully informed and consents, signing the consent form. Note: For inclusion, meeting either criterion ④ or ⑤ is sufficient.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pregnant or breastfeeding women;
- Those with a history of major upper abdominal surgery where severe abdominal adhesions are expected;
- Patients with recurrent gastric cancer, multiple primary tumours, or those who have undergone preoperative chemoradiotherapy;
- Those meeting ESD indications and having completed curative endoscopic resection according to eCURA standards [12,13];
- Patients with other unresectable malignant tumours;
- Those with severe heart, lung, liver, or kidney dysfunction who cannot tolerate general anaesthesia and surgery;
- Those allergic to indocyanine green (ICG) or nano carbon tracers;
- Those with mental illness who cannot cooperate with the study and follow-up.
Studienplan
Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?
Designdetails
- Hauptzweck: Behandlung
- Zuteilung: N / A
- Interventionsmodell: Einzelgruppenzuweisung
- Maskierung: Keine (Offenes Etikett)
Waffen und Interventionen
Teilnehmergruppe / Arm |
Intervention / Behandlung |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Perform a combined surgery using both microscopes
|
|
Was misst die Studie?
Primäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|
|
Postoperative complications within 30 days after surgery
Zeitfenster: Within 30 days after surgery
|
Within 30 days after surgery
|
|
Overall survival (OS)
Zeitfenster: 1 year and 3 years after surgery
|
1 year and 3 years after surgery
|
|
disease-free survival (DFS)
Zeitfenster: 1 year and 3 years after surgery
|
1 year and 3 years after surgery
|
|
Local recurrence rate (LR)
Zeitfenster: 1 year and 3 years after surgery
|
1 year and 3 years after surgery
|
Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|
|
Sentinel lymph node prediction accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, etc.)
Zeitfenster: Up to two weeks after surgery (confirmed by paraffin pathology)
|
Up to two weeks after surgery (confirmed by paraffin pathology)
|
|
Sentinel lymph node tracing success rate
Zeitfenster: At most, no more than 2 hours after receiving the specimen for frozen biopsy (intraoperative sentinel lymph node frozen pathology)
|
At most, no more than 2 hours after receiving the specimen for frozen biopsy (intraoperative sentinel lymph node frozen pathology)
|
|
R0 resection rate
Zeitfenster: Up to two weeks after surgery(confirmed by paraffin pathology)
|
Up to two weeks after surgery(confirmed by paraffin pathology)
|
|
EORTC QLQ-C30/STO22 scale scores(European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30)
Zeitfenster: Before the surgery, and at 3, 6, 12 months after, and 2, 3 years post-surgery
|
Before the surgery, and at 3, 6, 12 months after, and 2, 3 years post-surgery
|
|
Weight and Body Mass Index
Zeitfenster: Before the surgery, and then 1, 3, 6, 12 months and 2, 3 years after
|
Before the surgery, and then 1, 3, 6, 12 months and 2, 3 years after
|
|
Albumin and haemoglobin(g/L)
Zeitfenster: Before the surgery, and then 1, 3, 6, 12 months and 2, 3 years after
|
Before the surgery, and then 1, 3, 6, 12 months and 2, 3 years after
|
|
NRS2002 Nutrition Risk Screening
Zeitfenster: Before the surgery, and then 1, 3, 6, 12 months and 2, 3 years after
|
Before the surgery, and then 1, 3, 6, 12 months and 2, 3 years after
|
Mitarbeiter und Ermittler
Sponsor
Studienaufzeichnungsdaten
Haupttermine studieren
Studienbeginn (Tatsächlich)
Primärer Abschluss (Geschätzt)
Studienabschluss (Geschätzt)
Studienanmeldedaten
Zuerst eingereicht
Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat
Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)
Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen
Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)
Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt
Zuletzt verifiziert
Mehr Informationen
Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie
Zusätzliche relevante MeSH-Bedingungen
Andere Studien-ID-Nummern
- QYFYEC2026-37
Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen
Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt
Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt
Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .
Klinische Studien zur Combined binocular surgery
-
Columbia UniversityAbbott NutritionRekrutierungHerzfehler | Darm-Mikrobiom | ErnährungsmangelVereinigte Staaten
-
Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation TrustUnbekanntEierstockkrebs | Eileiterkrebs | Bauchfellkrebs | Eierstock-Neoplasma | Eierstock-Neoplasma EpithelialVereinigtes Königreich
-
Sahmyook UniversityAbgeschlossenSchmerzen im unteren RückenKorea, Republik von
-
Bournemouth UniversityStryker Orthopaedics; Nuffield Health Bournemouth; Orthopaedic Research InstituteAbgeschlossenArthrose, HüfteVereinigtes Königreich
-
NYU Langone HealthRekrutierungEntzündliche DarmerkrankungenVereinigte Staaten
-
University of Colorado, DenverRekrutierungVerbesserte Erholung nach der Operation | Gynäkologische ErkrankungVereinigte Staaten
-
Rong WenchaoAbgeschlossenKörperliche AbhängigkeitChina
-
Uludag UniversityAnmeldung auf EinladungMagen-Darm-ErkrankungenTruthahn
-
Mayo ClinicBeendetGastroösophagealer Reflux | Hernie, Hiatal | Umfragen und Fragebögen | FundoplikatioVereinigte Staaten
-
NYU Langone Health7D Surgical Inc.ZurückgezogenSkoliose | Spinale Stenose | Spondylolisthese