このページは自動翻訳されたものであり、翻訳の正確性は保証されていません。を参照してください。 英語版 ソーステキスト用。

45 V vs 60 V Pulsed Radiofrequency of the Cervical Dorsal Root Ganglion for Cervical Radicular Pain

2026年7月29日 更新者:Gökhan Yıldız、Ankara Etlik City Hospital

Does Higher Voltage Improve Outcomes in Cervical Radicular Pain? A Comparison of 45 V and 60 V Pulsed Radiofrequency of the Cervical Dorsal Root Ganglion

This study aims to compare the clinical outcomes of 45 V and 60 V pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) applied to the cervical dorsal root ganglion (DRG) in patients with cervical radicular pain. Treatment efficacy will be evaluated using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for pain intensity and the Neck Disability Index (NDI) for functional disability. Procedure-related adverse events will also be compared to assess the safety of both voltage settings.

調査の概要

詳細な説明

Pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) applied to the dorsal root ganglion (DRG) is a well-established minimally invasive treatment for patients with cervical radicular pain who do not respond adequately to conservative management. Although PRF has demonstrated favorable efficacy and safety, the optimal procedural parameters, particularly the applied voltage, remain uncertain. Previous studies have reported conflicting findings regarding the influence of voltage on treatment outcomes, with some suggesting improved long-term pain relief with higher voltages, while others have associated lower voltage settings with better clinical results. More recent evidence has shown favorable outcomes with higher-voltage PRF in cervical radicular pain; however, direct comparisons between commonly used voltage settings, such as 45 V and 60 V, are lacking.

The primary aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of 45 V and 60 V PRF applied to the cervical DRG in patients with cervical radicular pain using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). Secondary aims include comparing functional outcomes using the Neck Disability Index (NDI) and evaluating the safety of both treatment protocols by comparing the incidence of procedure-related adverse events.

Patients who have undergone cervical DRG PRF for cervical radicular pain and completed their treatment will be evaluated according to the voltage applied during the procedure (45 V or 60 V). Pain intensity will be assessed using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), and functional disability will be evaluated using the Neck Disability Index (NDI) before treatment and at 3 and 6 months after the procedure. In addition to between-group comparisons, changes from baseline within each group will also be analyzed. Procedure-related adverse events will be recorded throughout the follow-up period.

研究の種類

介入

入学 (推定)

58

段階

  • 適用できない

連絡先と場所

このセクションには、調査を実施する担当者の連絡先の詳細と、この調査が実施されている場所に関する情報が記載されています。

研究連絡先

研究場所

参加基準

研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。

適格基準

就学可能な年齢

  • 大人
  • 高齢者

健康ボランティアの受け入れ

いいえ

説明

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Unilateral cervical radicular pain consistent with cervical disc herniation.
  • Pain intensity of ≥6 on the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS).
  • Radicular pain persisting for at least 3 months.
  • MRI evidence of lower cervical nerve root compression consistent with clinical findings.
  • Inadequate response to conservative treatment, including analgesic medications and physical therapy.
  • Completion of cervical dorsal root ganglion pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) treatment.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Bilateral upper extremity pain or predominant axial neck pain.
  • Cervical spinal stenosis, spondylolisthesis, cervical myelopathy, or other structural spinal disorders causing radicular pain.
  • Previous cervical spine surgery at the target level.
  • Cognitive impairment preventing reliable outcome assessment.
  • Active local or systemic infection.
  • Coagulopathy or inability to discontinue anticoagulant/antiplatelet therapy for the procedure.
  • Severe hepatic or renal failure.
  • Pregnancy.
  • Unstable psychiatric disorders.
  • Any condition that could interfere with completion of follow-up evaluations.

研究計画

このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。

研究はどのように設計されていますか?

デザインの詳細

  • 主な目的:処理
  • 割り当て:ランダム化
  • 介入モデル:並列代入
  • マスキング:独身

武器と介入

参加者グループ / アーム
介入・治療
アクティブコンパレータ:45 V cervical DRG pulsed radiofrequency group
45 V pulsed radiofrequency applied to the cervical dorsal root ganglion for the treatment of cervical radicular pain.
After standard hemodynamic monitoring, the patient was placed in the supine position, and the cervical region was prepared using sterile technique. Under fluoroscopic guidance, the target cervical neural foramen was identified in anteroposterior and lateral views. Following local infiltration with 2 mL of 1% lidocaine, a radiofrequency cannula was advanced to the target cervical dorsal root ganglion. Correct needle placement was confirmed fluoroscopically and by sensory stimulation, which elicited concordant paresthesia in the corresponding dermatome. Pulsed radiofrequency was then applied for 240 seconds at a maximum temperature of 42°C using a voltage of 45 V. After completion of the procedure, the cannula was removed, a sterile dressing was applied, and patients were observed for 60 minutes before discharge.
アクティブコンパレータ:60 V cervical DRG pulsed radiofrequency group
60 V pulsed radiofrequency applied to the cervical dorsal root ganglion for the treatment of cervical radicular pain.
After standard hemodynamic monitoring, the patient was placed in the supine position, and the cervical region was prepared using sterile technique. Under fluoroscopic guidance, the target cervical neural foramen was identified in anteroposterior and lateral views. Following local infiltration with 2 mL of 1% lidocaine, a radiofrequency cannula was advanced to the target cervical dorsal root ganglion. Correct needle placement was confirmed fluoroscopically and by sensory stimulation, which elicited concordant paresthesia in the corresponding dermatome. Pulsed radiofrequency was then applied for 240 seconds at a maximum temperature of 42°C using a voltage of 60 V. After completion of the procedure, the cannula was removed, a sterile dressing was applied, and patients were observed for 60 minutes before discharge.

この研究は何を測定していますか?

主要な結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Numerical rating scale (NRS)
時間枠:Change from baseline to post-treatment at 3 and 6 months.
NRS is a scale that can be used measuring pain. Scores range from 0 (no pain) to 10 (the worst pain)
Change from baseline to post-treatment at 3 and 6 months.

二次結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Neck Disability Index (NDI)
時間枠:Change from baseline to post-treatment at 3 and 6 months.
NDI is a validated questionnaire used to assess functional disability associated with neck pain. Scores range from 0 to 50, with higher scores indicating greater disability.
Change from baseline to post-treatment at 3 and 6 months.

協力者と研究者

ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。

スポンサー

捜査官

  • 主任研究者:Gokhan Yildiz、Ankara Etlik City Hospital

研究記録日

これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。

主要日程の研究

研究開始 (実際)

2026年7月29日

一次修了 (推定)

2027年2月26日

研究の完了 (推定)

2027年3月1日

試験登録日

最初に提出

2026年7月29日

QC基準を満たした最初の提出物

2026年7月29日

最初の投稿 (実際)

2026年8月4日

学習記録の更新

投稿された最後の更新 (実際)

2026年8月4日

QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました

2026年7月29日

最終確認日

2026年7月1日

詳しくは

本研究に関する用語

その他の研究ID番号

  • Cervical DRG PRF 45V vs 60V

医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書

米国FDA規制医薬品の研究

いいえ

米国FDA規制機器製品の研究

いいえ

この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。

購読する