Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

45 V vs 60 V Pulsed Radiofrequency of the Cervical Dorsal Root Ganglion for Cervical Radicular Pain

29 juillet 2026 mis à jour par: Gökhan Yıldız, Ankara Etlik City Hospital

Does Higher Voltage Improve Outcomes in Cervical Radicular Pain? A Comparison of 45 V and 60 V Pulsed Radiofrequency of the Cervical Dorsal Root Ganglion

This study aims to compare the clinical outcomes of 45 V and 60 V pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) applied to the cervical dorsal root ganglion (DRG) in patients with cervical radicular pain. Treatment efficacy will be evaluated using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for pain intensity and the Neck Disability Index (NDI) for functional disability. Procedure-related adverse events will also be compared to assess the safety of both voltage settings.

Aperçu de l'étude

Description détaillée

Pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) applied to the dorsal root ganglion (DRG) is a well-established minimally invasive treatment for patients with cervical radicular pain who do not respond adequately to conservative management. Although PRF has demonstrated favorable efficacy and safety, the optimal procedural parameters, particularly the applied voltage, remain uncertain. Previous studies have reported conflicting findings regarding the influence of voltage on treatment outcomes, with some suggesting improved long-term pain relief with higher voltages, while others have associated lower voltage settings with better clinical results. More recent evidence has shown favorable outcomes with higher-voltage PRF in cervical radicular pain; however, direct comparisons between commonly used voltage settings, such as 45 V and 60 V, are lacking.

The primary aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of 45 V and 60 V PRF applied to the cervical DRG in patients with cervical radicular pain using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). Secondary aims include comparing functional outcomes using the Neck Disability Index (NDI) and evaluating the safety of both treatment protocols by comparing the incidence of procedure-related adverse events.

Patients who have undergone cervical DRG PRF for cervical radicular pain and completed their treatment will be evaluated according to the voltage applied during the procedure (45 V or 60 V). Pain intensity will be assessed using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), and functional disability will be evaluated using the Neck Disability Index (NDI) before treatment and at 3 and 6 months after the procedure. In addition to between-group comparisons, changes from baseline within each group will also be analyzed. Procedure-related adverse events will be recorded throughout the follow-up period.

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Estimé)

58

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Coordonnées de l'étude

Lieux d'étude

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

  • Adulte
  • Adulte plus âgé

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Unilateral cervical radicular pain consistent with cervical disc herniation.
  • Pain intensity of ≥6 on the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS).
  • Radicular pain persisting for at least 3 months.
  • MRI evidence of lower cervical nerve root compression consistent with clinical findings.
  • Inadequate response to conservative treatment, including analgesic medications and physical therapy.
  • Completion of cervical dorsal root ganglion pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) treatment.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Bilateral upper extremity pain or predominant axial neck pain.
  • Cervical spinal stenosis, spondylolisthesis, cervical myelopathy, or other structural spinal disorders causing radicular pain.
  • Previous cervical spine surgery at the target level.
  • Cognitive impairment preventing reliable outcome assessment.
  • Active local or systemic infection.
  • Coagulopathy or inability to discontinue anticoagulant/antiplatelet therapy for the procedure.
  • Severe hepatic or renal failure.
  • Pregnancy.
  • Unstable psychiatric disorders.
  • Any condition that could interfere with completion of follow-up evaluations.

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Traitement
  • Répartition: Randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
  • Masquage: Seul

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Comparateur actif: 45 V cervical DRG pulsed radiofrequency group
45 V pulsed radiofrequency applied to the cervical dorsal root ganglion for the treatment of cervical radicular pain.
After standard hemodynamic monitoring, the patient was placed in the supine position, and the cervical region was prepared using sterile technique. Under fluoroscopic guidance, the target cervical neural foramen was identified in anteroposterior and lateral views. Following local infiltration with 2 mL of 1% lidocaine, a radiofrequency cannula was advanced to the target cervical dorsal root ganglion. Correct needle placement was confirmed fluoroscopically and by sensory stimulation, which elicited concordant paresthesia in the corresponding dermatome. Pulsed radiofrequency was then applied for 240 seconds at a maximum temperature of 42°C using a voltage of 45 V. After completion of the procedure, the cannula was removed, a sterile dressing was applied, and patients were observed for 60 minutes before discharge.
Comparateur actif: 60 V cervical DRG pulsed radiofrequency group
60 V pulsed radiofrequency applied to the cervical dorsal root ganglion for the treatment of cervical radicular pain.
After standard hemodynamic monitoring, the patient was placed in the supine position, and the cervical region was prepared using sterile technique. Under fluoroscopic guidance, the target cervical neural foramen was identified in anteroposterior and lateral views. Following local infiltration with 2 mL of 1% lidocaine, a radiofrequency cannula was advanced to the target cervical dorsal root ganglion. Correct needle placement was confirmed fluoroscopically and by sensory stimulation, which elicited concordant paresthesia in the corresponding dermatome. Pulsed radiofrequency was then applied for 240 seconds at a maximum temperature of 42°C using a voltage of 60 V. After completion of the procedure, the cannula was removed, a sterile dressing was applied, and patients were observed for 60 minutes before discharge.

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Numerical rating scale (NRS)
Délai: Change from baseline to post-treatment at 3 and 6 months.
NRS is a scale that can be used measuring pain. Scores range from 0 (no pain) to 10 (the worst pain)
Change from baseline to post-treatment at 3 and 6 months.

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Neck Disability Index (NDI)
Délai: Change from baseline to post-treatment at 3 and 6 months.
NDI is a validated questionnaire used to assess functional disability associated with neck pain. Scores range from 0 to 50, with higher scores indicating greater disability.
Change from baseline to post-treatment at 3 and 6 months.

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Les enquêteurs

  • Chercheur principal: Gokhan Yildiz, Ankara Etlik City Hospital

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Réel)

29 juillet 2026

Achèvement primaire (Estimé)

26 février 2027

Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)

1 mars 2027

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

29 juillet 2026

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

29 juillet 2026

Première publication (Réel)

4 août 2026

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

4 août 2026

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

29 juillet 2026

Dernière vérification

1 juillet 2026

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Autres numéros d'identification d'étude

  • Cervical DRG PRF 45V vs 60V

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner