このページは自動翻訳されたものであり、翻訳の正確性は保証されていません。を参照してください。 英語版 ソーステキスト用。

Neurocomputational Dynamics of Cooperation (COBRA)

2026年8月6日 更新者：Timothy Allen、University of Pittsburgh
The purpose of this study is to understand brain function, how people make decisions when they interact with others, and how brain function and behavior relate to personality traits.

調査の概要

状態

まだ募集していません

条件

介入・治療

詳細な説明

Problems in cooperating with others define antagonism, a transdiagnostic dimension of psychopathology expressed in personality and externalizing disorders. People high on antagonism are prone to aggressive, callous, and exploitative behaviors that damage relationships and incur substantial costs in the form of productivity loss, substance misuse, and criminality. While clinical theories link antagonism to deficits in social cognition, it is hard to deny that exploiting others requires an understanding of their mind. This apparent contradiction can be resolved by distinguishing between two facets of antagonism: callousness and exploitativeness. Prior work by the investigators and preliminary data inform the hypothesis that exploitativeness reflects an enhanced capacity to learn about the mental states and behaviors of others coupled with an increased sensitivity to personal, rather than shared, rewards. In contrast, callousness reflects a broader insensitivity to social feedback. The investigators hypothesize that these dissociable social learning processes are instantiated in canonical circuits that expanded during anthropogenesis to support mentalizing and self-directed thought. These learning signals, which track behaviorally salient features of the social environment, are integrated in the posterior hub of the default network (DN) where they drive adaptive cooperation. This study proposes to test these hypotheses in two samples elevated on antagonism. At the behavioral level, participants are characterized using a battery of personality and psychopathology measures, social and reward-based decision-making tasks, and corresponding hierarchically estimated reinforcement learning (RL) models (Aim 1). In a model-based functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study, model-derived learning signals and facets of antagonism are linked to underlying neural activity during cooperative decision-making (Aim 2). Leveraging the multi-timescale design of our study, the investigators plan to relate neurocomputational signatures of callousness and exploitativeness to mentalizing abilities, multi-informant reports of momentary interpersonal behavior, and prospective stress generation. Certain elements of study design are withheld from this record to protect the scientific integrity of the study design.

研究の種類

介入

入学 (推定)

1612

段階

  • 適用できない

連絡先と場所

このセクションには、調査を実施する担当者の連絡先の詳細と、この調査が実施されている場所に関する情報が記載されています。

研究連絡先

  • 名前：Michelle M Berry, MPS
  • 電話番号：424-380-1194
  • メール：berrymic@pitt.edu

研究連絡先のバックアップ

研究場所

  • アメリカ
    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh、Pennsylvania、アメリカ、15213
        • University of Pittsburgh, Bellefield Towers
        • コンタクト：
        • コンタクト：
        • 主任研究者：
          • Timothy A Allen, PhD
        • 副調査官：
          • Alexandre Dombrovski, MD

参加基準

研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。

適格基準

就学可能な年齢

  • 大人
  • 高齢者

健康ボランティアの受け入れ

はい

説明

Online cohort inclusion criteria:

  • English fluency
  • US residency
  • Owner of a desktop or laptop computer
  • Adult aged 18-100

Online cohort exclusion criteria:

  • Participants who have participated in an earlier version of the study
  • Inability to consent
  • Self-reported history of neurological disorder or brain damage
  • Self-endorsed history of psychosis or mania

Clinical cohort inclusion criteria:

  • Adult aged 20-60 years old
  • English fluency
  • Owner of a smartphone with celluar data

Clinical cohort exclusion criteria:

  • Inability to consent
  • Self-reported history of neurological disorder or brain damage
  • Clinician-rated psychosis or mania in the last 6 months
  • Current intoxication or withdrawal
  • Estimated IQ < 70
  • fMRI safety concerns
  • Pregnancy
  • Lack of stable psychiatric treatment (e.g., medication dosage, therapy modality) for the previous two months

Informant inclusion criteria:

  • Adult aged 18+ years old
  • English fluency
  • Owner of a smartphone with celluar data
  • Must have 4+ interactions/week with the participant for at least 6 months prior to study baseline

Informant exclusion criteria:

- Lack of a smartphone with cellular data at study baseline

研究計画

このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。

研究はどのように設計されていますか？

デザインの詳細

  • 主な目的：基礎科学
  • 割り当て：非ランダム化
  • 介入モデル：並列代入
  • マスキング：なし（オープンラベル）

武器と介入

参加者グループ / アーム
介入・治療
実験的：Online Cohort
The online cohort will include 718 adults ages 18-100 who will complete 1) a battery of behavioral tasks designed to assess social learning and mentalizing abilities, and 2) self-report measures assessing personality, externalizing symptoms, interpersonal functioning, and psychopathology.
行動：Social Learning Task Battery, Online Cohort
In the primary study task, participants engage in a modified iterative trust game. Participant choices earn feedback in the form of monetary gains or losses. All participants are debriefed on the motivation behind study task at the end of their visit.
実験的：Clinical Cohort
The study will enroll up to 416 clinical-cohort participants, with an anticipated final eligible sample of 239 adults ages 20-60 who will complete 1) a structured clinical interview and neuropsychological assessments, 2) self-report measures assessing personality, externalizing symptoms, interpersonal functioning, and psychopathology, 3) lab-based tasks designed to assess social learning and mentalizing abilities while monitoring physiological responding with Biopac, 4) task-based fMRI, 5) 21-day ecological momentary assessment (EMA) protocol, and 6) additional self-report questionnaires at three yearly follow-ups. The investigators expect to enroll 416 participants for the start of the protocol to yield 239 final eligible participants to complete fMRI and EMA.
行動：Social Learning Task Battery, Clinical Cohort
In the primary study task, participants engage in a modified iterative trust game. The task is completed in the fMRI scanner and takes about 35 minutes. Participant choices earn feedback in the form of monetary gains or losses. All participants are debriefed on the motivation behind the task at the end of their visit.
介入なし：Informants
Additionally, 2 informants (ages 18+) for each participant will be recruited to complete self-report measures, one of whom will also enroll in EMA.

この研究は何を測定していますか？

主要な結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Participant-level Coaxing Score
時間枠：During behavioral task visit at study baseline (clinical cohort) or during single online study session (online cohort)
Participant coaxing behavior will be measured during the primary social learning task. Coaxing will be operationalized as the difference in the participant's return rate between exchange and secrecy modes on trials in which the coplayer decides not to share. In exchange mode, the participant knows whether the coplayer chose to share or keep the monetary incentive before indicating whether they would return it. In secrecy mode, the participant must make the return decision before learning the coplayer's choice. The coaxing score is calculated as the exchange-mode return rate minus the secrecy-mode return rate. Scores range from -1 to 1, with positive values indicating greater strategic coaxing and 0 indicating no difference between modes.
During behavioral task visit at study baseline (clinical cohort) or during single online study session (online cohort)

二次結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Mean Informant-rated Momentary Manipulativeness
時間枠：Post-baseline 21-day EMA period within year 1 of the study
Manipulativeness will be assessed using the study-specific Interpersonal Dynamics EMA Battery. The informant-rated manipulativeness scale contains 3 items, each rated from 1 ("strongly disagree") to 5 ("strongly agree"). At each assessment, responses to the 3 items will be averaged to produce a momentary manipulativeness score that ranges from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicate greater informant-rated manipulativeness.
Post-baseline 21-day EMA period within year 1 of the study
Latent Mentalizing Factor
時間枠：Baseline
A latent mentalizing factor will be derived using CFA, with participants' scores on three social cognition tasks serving as indicators. The latent factor will be standardized to a mean of 0 and standard deviation of 1 in the study sample and therefore has no fixed theoretical minimum or maximum. Higher factor scores indicate greater mentalizing ability.
Baseline
Interpersonal Stress
時間枠：At 12, 24, and 36 months after baseline
Interpersonal stress will be assessed using the marital- or partner-relationship and other-relationship life domains of the Stress and Adversity Inventory for Adults. At each follow-up, the frequency scores for stressors in these two domains will be averaged to produce an interpersonal stress score. The score ranges from a minimum of 0 stressors, with no limit on reported stressor maximums. Higher scores indicate more frequent exposure to interpersonal relationship stressors.
At 12, 24, and 36 months after baseline

協力者と研究者

ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。

スポンサー

University of Pittsburgh

協力者

National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
Emory University
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center

捜査官

  • 主任研究者：Timothy A Allen, PhD、University of Pittsburgh

研究記録日

これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。

主要日程の研究

研究開始 (推定)

2026年9月1日

一次修了 (推定)

2031年6月30日

研究の完了 (推定)

2031年6月30日

試験登録日

最初に提出

2026年8月6日

QC基準を満たした最初の提出物

2026年8月6日

最初の投稿 (実際)

2026年8月12日

学習記録の更新

投稿された最後の更新 (実際)

2026年8月12日

QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました

2026年8月6日

最終確認日

2026年8月1日

詳しくは

本研究に関する用語

キーワード

追加の関連 MeSH 用語

その他の研究ID番号

  • STUDY25050217
  • R01MH140901 (米国 NIH グラント/契約)

個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画

個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?

はい

IPD プランの説明

Individual participant data (IPD) will be shared via the National Institute of Mental Health Data Archive (NDA) in accordance with National Institutes of Health (NIH) Data Management and Sharing Policy. Data will be de-identified and made available to qualified researchers upon request after publication of primary results or completion of the study, as outlined in the NIH-approved Data Sharing Plan.

Task code will be posted on GitHub and/or OSF.

IPD 共有時間枠

All data will be deposited to NDA starting 12 months after the award begins and will be deposited every six months thereafter following the usual NDA data submission dates.

IPD and supporting information will be available when the award ends (anticipated 06/30/2031). NDA will make decisions about how long to preserve the data, but that data archive has not deleted any deposited data up to now.

IPD 共有アクセス基準

Deidentified data will be findable for the research community through the NDA Collection that will be established when this application is funded. For all publications, an NDA study will be created. Each of those studies is assigned a digital object identifier (DOI). This data DOI will be referenced in the publication to allow the research community easy access to the exact data used in the publication.

To request access to the data, qualified researchers will use the standard processes at NDA, and the NDA Data Access Committee will decide which requests to grant. The standard NDA data access process allows access for one year and is renewable.

IPD 共有サポート情報タイプ

  • ANALYTIC_CODE

医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書

米国FDA規制医薬品の研究

いいえ

米国FDA規制機器製品の研究

いいえ

この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。

購読する